Jean T. Barbey

Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs. Sodium channel block and action potential prolongation.

Antiarrhythmic drugs have been reported to produce variable effects on defibrillation energy requirements. However, the relation between the in vitro electrophysiologic effects of these agents and the changes in defibrillation energy requirements have not been systematically examined. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of the sodium channel blocking drugs lidocaine and procainamide, the action potential prolonging drugs N-acetyl procainamide and clofilium, and the potassium current blocker cesium in acute canine models with the same internal spring and epicardial patch electrodes used in humans for ventricular defibrillation testing. Ten series of experiments were performed in 78 dogs. Nonlinear regression was used to derive curves of energy dose versus percent successful defibrillation attempts and the 50% and 90% effective energy dose for each experimental condition. Saline control experiments indicated that the preparation was stable throughout the 6-hour duration of the experiments. Lidocaine doubled the defibrillation energy requirement (p less than 0.001) at a mean plasma concentration of 8.2 micrograms/ml. The effect of lidocaine on defibrillation energy was reversible, present at therapeutic plasma concentrations, linearly related to plasma concentration (r = 0.69, p less than 0.002), and present even after only 5-second episodes of ventricular fibrillation. In contrast, procainamide had no effect on defibrillation energy at mean plasma concentrations of 8.5 and 13 micrograms/ml, even after prolonged (30-second) episodes of ventricular fibrillation, whereas N-acetyl procainamide, clofilium, and cesium all decreased the energy requirement for defibrillation by 13-27%. Moreover, with the addition of N-acetyl procainamide, there was a trend toward diminishing the increase in defibrillation energy requirement caused by lidocaine. All agents prolonged the mean ventricular fibrillation cycle length. Lidocaine shortened the QT interval, whereas all other agents increased the QT (p less than 0.05). The major electrophysiologic effect of lidocaine is of sodium channel blockade, whereas, N-acetyl procainamide, clofilium, and cesium predominantly increase the action potential duration, and procainamide exerts both effects. Thus, these data indicate that sodium channel block and action potential prolongation exert significant and antagonistic modulating effects on defibrillation energy requirements.

Influence of Ventricular Fibrillation Duration on Defibrillation Energy in Dogs Using Bidirectional Pulse Discharges

The automatic implantable defibrillator device typically discharges 5–30 seconds after detection of ventricular fibrillation. To investigate the importance of the duration of ventricular fibrillation on defibrillation, the effects of ventricular fibrillation durations of 5, 15, and 30 seconds on the energy requirements for successful internal defibrillation were compared in 15 dosed chest dogs with internal electrodes. The electrode configuration utilized a transvenous right heart catheter with two electrodes and a precordial subcutaneous patch electrode, with a single bidirectional pulse discharged between the distal catheter electrode and the proximal catheter and patch electrodes. Curves of energy vs. percentage of successful defibrillation were constructed and logistic regression was used to derive 90% and 50% successful energy doses (ED90 and ED50). The mean ventricular fibrillation activation interval just prior to defibrillation was determined from discrete RV endocardial electrograms. Four dogs died during testing, all because of inability to defibrillate after 30 s of ventricular fibrillation. In the remaining 11 dogs, the ED90 increased from (mean ± SD) 27 ± 13J at 5 s to 41 ± 14J at 30 s (p < .01). The mean ventricular fibrillation activation interval decreased from 107 ± 21 ms at 5 s to 95 ± 18 ms at 30 s (p < .01). In conclusion, the energy required for internal defibrillation in dogs using this electrode configuration increases with longer durations of ventricular fibrillation, and is associated with more rapid ventricular fibrillation activation intervals.

Antiarrhythmic activity, electrocardiographic effects and pharmacokinetics of the encainide metabolites O-desmethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide in man.

Although encainide is an effective antiarrhythmic agent, plasma concentrations and pharmacologic effects are not well correlated. One explanation is the generation of active metabolites: while in most patients (extensive metabolizers; EMs) concentrations of the metabolites O-desmethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (3MODE) are higher than those of encainide, a small subset (poor metabolizers; PMs) lack the ability to extensively biotransform encainide. Considerable data from studies in vitro and animal studies, as well as indirect evidence in patients, indicate that ODE and 3MODE produce the effects seen during long-term encainide therapy in EMs. We now report the initial direct evaluation of the pharmacologic actions of these metabolites of encainide in man. Nine patients with ventricular arrhythmias, seven of the EM phenotype and two of the PM phenotype, were studied. Chronic high-frequency ventricular arrhythmias were suppressed by encainide therapy in seven of nine; monitoring arrhythmia frequency during withdrawal of encainide allowed definition of plasma concentrations of encainide and metabolites associated with arrhythmia suppression. Intravenous infusions of both ODE and 3MODE suppressed chronic ventricular arrhythmias, while infusions of placebo had no effect. ODE clearance was a function of metabolizer phenotype, with higher clearance (mean 914 ml/min; range 554 to 1,314) in EMs than in PMs (434, 298 ml/min); moreover, 3MODE was detected during ODE infusions in all seven EMs but in neither PM. 3MODE clearance was more uniform (mean 289 ml/min in EMs [range 180-410] vs 300 and 78 ml/min in the two PMs) and ODE was not detected in any subject during 3MODE infusion. Encainide itself was not detected after any infusion of ODE or 3MODE. During withdrawal of encainide therapy, ODE plasma concentration at the time of arrhythmia recurrence was 55 +/- 40 ng/ml (mean +/- SD), while ODE by infusion was effective at a concentration of 37 +/- 15 ng/ml. Similarly, plasma concentration of 3MODE at the time of arrhythmia recurrence after withdrawal of chronic encainide was 116 +/- 35 ng/ml and that during 3MODE infusion was 105 +/- 50 ng/ml. While both compounds prolonged QRS duration, ODE was the more potent, increasing QRS by 9.2 +/- 1.6% per 100 ng/ml vs 1.2 +/- 0.5% per 100 ng/ml for 3MODE. On the other hand, 3MODE prolonged the corrected JT interval by 1.9 +/- 0.6% per 100 ng/ml, while ODE shortened it by 2.7 +/- 1.9% per 100 ng/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sotalol in a pediatric population with supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmia

This pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic study was designed to define the steady‐state relationship between pharmacologic response and dose or concentration of sotalol in children with cardiac arrhythmias, with an emphasis on neonates and infants.

Suppression of ventricular arrhythmias in man by d-propranolol independent of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade.

To investigate the mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia suppression by propranolol, we determined the antiarrhythmic efficacy of d-propranolol in 10 patients with frequent ventricular ectopic depolarizations (VEDs) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. After an initial placebo phase, 40 mg d-propranolol was administered orally every 6 h with dosage increased every 2 d until arrhythmia suppression (greater than or equal to 80% VED reduction), intolerable side effects, or a maximal dosage (1,280 mg/d) was reached. Response was verified by documenting return of arrhythmia during a final placebo phase. Arrhythmia suppression occurred in six patients while two more had partial responses. Effective dosages were 320-1,280 mg/d (mean 920 +/- 360, SD) of d-propranolol with corresponding plasma concentrations of 60-2,280 ng/ml (mean 858 +/- 681). For the entire group, the QTc interval shortened by 4 +/- 4% (P = 0.03). Arrhythmia suppression was accompanied by a reduction in peak heart rate during exercise of 0-29%. To determine whether arrhythmia suppression could be attributed to beta-blockade, racemic propranolol was then administered in dosages producing the same or greater depression of exercise heart rate. In 3/8 patients, arrhythmias were not suppressed by racemic propranolol indicating that d-propranolol was effective via a non-beta-mediated action. By contrast, in 5/8 patients racemic propranolol also suppressed VEDs. We conclude that propranolol suppresses ventricular arrhythmias by both beta- and non-beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated effects.

Mexiletine and tocainide: a comparison of antiarrhythmic efficacy, adverse effects, and predictive value of lidocaine testing.

Thirty patients received one of the lidocaine analogues—mexiletine or tocainide—orally for treatment of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Crossover to the other analogue was allowed if initial drug treatment was unsuccessful, and the controlled use of other marketed oral antiarrhythmic agents was permitted. After follow‐up of 7 ± 3 months (SD), mexiletine was successful in 5 of 13 patients initially and in 5 of 14 patients who failed to respond to tocainide. Tocainide was successful in 1 of 17 patients initially and in 2 of 7 who did not respond to mexiletine. Combination therapy was used in nearly half of all ultimately successful drug trials. A common cause of drug trial failure for both drugs was the occurrence of adverse effects that frequently appeared well after hospital discharge. Response to lidocaine was a sensitive but nonspecific predictor of clinical outcome with mexiletine or tocainide that helped to identify drug‐resistant patients. Finally, although mexiletine provided effective antiarrhythmic therapy more often than tocainide, response to one lidocaine analogue did not predict response to the other.

Tocainide plus quinidine for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

Tocainide and quinidine were administered both as single agents and in combination to 14 patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias. Therapy with tocainide was limited by the occurrence of dose-related adverse reactions in 8 patients, but could be titrated to a dose that was well-tolerated in 13 of 14 and effective in 2 of 13. The addition of quinidine gluconate to the tolerated dose of tocainide increased the number of patients with arrhythmia suppression from 2 to 6. After tocainide washout, quinidine alone suppressed arrhythmias in only 3 patients. Analysis of electrocardiogram intervals showed that the drugs had additive effects on the coupling interval of the sinus beat to the predominant ectopic beat, but exerted antagonistic effects on the corrected QT interval. These findings suggest that the combination may be clinically useful, exerting pharmacologic effects unlike either agent alone.