Lyle A. Siddoway

Polymorphism of propafenone metabolism and disposition in man: clinical and pharmacokinetic consequences.

The relationship between debrisoquine metabolic phenotype and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone was studied in 28 patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias (22 extensive metabolizers [EMs] and six poor metabolizers [PMs] of debrisoquine). EMs were characterized by a shorter propafenone elimination half-life (5.5 +/- 2.1 vs 17.2 +/- 8.0, p less than .001), lower average plasma concentration (Cp) (1.1 +/- 0.6 vs 2.5 +/- 0.5 ng/ml/mg daily dosage, p less than .001), and higher oral clearance (1115 +/- 1238 vs 264 +/- 48 ml/min, p less than .001). The active metabolite 5-hydroxypropafenone, assayed in 12 patients, was identified in nine of 10 EMs but in neither of the PMs. A lower incidence of central nervous system side effects was noted in EMs (14% vs 67%, p less than .01). The magnitude of QRS widening at any given propafenone Cp was greater in EMs than PMs. There was no significant difference between EMs and PMs in effective propafenone dose or frequency of antiarrhythmic response. Inhibition of debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation by propafenone was demonstrated both in vivo and in a human liver microsomal system in vitro. We conclude that propafenone is metabolized via the same cytochrome P-450 responsible for debrisoquines 4-hydroxylation, and that its pharmacokinetics and concentration-response relationships and the incidence of central nervous system side effects are different in patients of different debrisoquine metabolic phenotype.

Concentration-dependent pharmacologic properties of sotalol☆

Sotalol is a nonselective beta-receptor antagonist that prolongs action potential duration and refractoriness in vitro at higher concentrations than those associated with heart rate slowing. To determine if this additional action can be expressed in humans, 17 patients with chronic stable ventricular premature complexes were studied. Each patient was hospitalized and arrhythmia frequency was quantified during a 48-hour drug-free baseline and during every third day of therapy with increasing incremental sotalol dosages. The dosages were 160, 320, 640 and 960 mg/day, administered in 1 or 2 doses. An index of action potential duration, the rate-corrected QT (QTc), was measured using serial 12-lead electrocardiograms on the third day of each dosage at presumed steady state and the degree of beta-receptor blockade was assessed by the reduction of the maximal exercise-induced heart rate. Of the 17 patients, 11 had an antiarrhythmic response (70 to 100% reduction in VPCs), at a wide range of plasma concentrations (340 to 3,440 ng/ml). The responders to sotalol included 8 patients in whom therapy with conventional beta-receptor antagonists had failed. In the group as a whole, the concentration associated with significant QTc prolongation (2,550 ng/ml) was greater than that associated with 50% reduction of the maximal slowing in heart rate (804 ng/ml). Sotalol was generally well tolerated, but in 1 nonresponder torsades de pointes developed 3 hours after the first 640-mg dose at a plasma sotalol concentration well within the concentration range measured in other patients. Sotalols repolarization-prolonging actions are seen at higher concentrations than those associated with heart rate slowing and may contribute to its clinical effects.

Pharmacology, electrophysiology, and pharmacokinetics of mexiletine☆

Mexiletine is a class I antiarrhythmic agent that is active after both oral and intravenous administration and similar in structure and activity to lidocaine. It decreases phase O maximal rate of depolarization (Vmax) by fast sodium channel blockade. The marked rate dependence of Vmax depression may explain mexiletines lack of effect on normal conduction and its efficacy against ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Mexiletine significantly decreases the relative refractory period in His-Purkinje fibers without changing the sinus rate or atrioventricular and His-Purkinje conduction times. Action potential duration is usually shortened. Mexiletine may aggravate preexisting impairment of impulse generation and conduction. Uptake and distribution of mexiletine are rapid, systemic bioavailability is about 90%, and tissue distribution is extensive. Mexiletine is primarily metabolized in the liver; 10% to 15% is excreted unchanged in the urine. Elimination half-life is 9 to 11 hours after intravenous or oral administration. Microsomal enzyme induction shortens mexiletines elimination half-life, whereas hepatic disease and acute myocardial infarction prolong it. Renal disease has little effect, although hemodialysis increases mexiletine clearance. Plasma concentrations from 0.75 to 2.0 mg/L are usually associated with a desirable therapeutic response.

Clinical pharmacology of propafenone: Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and concentration-response relations*

Propafenone is a promising new antiarrhythmic agent marketed in Europe for the past 7 years. The drug is remarkable for great interindividual variability in its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Propafenone undergoes extensive presystemic clearance that appears to be saturable, with bioavailability increasing as dosage increases. The drug is highly protein bound. Elimination half-life is 5 to 8 hours in most patients, although a range of 2 to 32 hours has been reported. Propafenone slows intracardiac conduction in a concentration-dependent manner. It is a weak beta-adrenergic blocker, but this property is of uncertain clinical significance. The major metabolic pathway for propafenone begins with aromatic ring hydroxylation, a pathway that may be determined by genetic factors.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Disopyramide

SummaryDisopyramide is an antiarrhythmic agent with proven efficacy in the management of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The drug is well absorbed and undergoes virtually no first-pass metabolism. Peak concentrations are achieved approximately 0.5 to 3.0 hours after a dose. Absorption is reduced and slightly slowed in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Disopyramide is excreted as unchanged drug (two-thirds) or as the metabolite mono-N-desisopropyldisopyramide, with elimination via both renal and biliary routes. Elimination half-life is approximately 7 hours in normal subjects and patients, but is prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min).Disopyramide exhibits complex protein binding. It is bound to α1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), an acute phase reactant, and binds in a concentration-dependent (saturable) manner. The unbound fraction is reduced in the presence of elevated concentrations of AAG, as are found in acute myocardial infarction and in some chronic haemodialysis patients and renal transplant recipients. Free disopyramide concentrations are low relative to total concentration in these patients. Because the pharmacological effects of disopyramide are determined by unbound drug, changes in the unbound fraction could make total disopyramide concentrations misleading as a guide to therapy. Changes in protein binding do not, however, alter free disopyramide or metabolite concentrations, both of which are dependent only on dosage and intrinsic clearance. Free drug concentration measurement could potentially improve therapeutic monitoring, but is as yet of unproven clinical value.Disopyramide is cleared more rapidly in children than in adults, and therefore children require higher dosages to attain therapeutic concentrations.

Flecainide dose-response relations in stable ventricular arrhythmias

Flecainide acetate was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study performed in patients with stable, high-frequency ventricular arrhythmias. Three centers studied 35 patients in a 3-stage protocol. After a placebo baseline, increasing oral dosages from 100 to 300 mg twice daily were evaluated. Placebo was then reinstituted and after arrhythmia had recurred, the patients were discharged on the effective dosage to return to the clinic for evaluation 7 and 14 days later. Thirty of 35 patients had more than 80% suppression (mean 96%) of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and more than 95% reduction in complex VPCs. Arrhythmia suppression was seen at dosages of 100 to 200 mg twice daily in 73% of the patients. Twenty-three percent of patients required 500 to 600 mg/day. Mild side effects were seen in 46% of patients. These resolved or became tolerable at lower dosages in most patients. Effective therapy continued for 2 years in 24 of 29 patients, without any evidence of chronic toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that many patients require 5 to 7 days of constant dosing before reaching steady state. Flecainide acetate is an effective antiarrhythmic with a narrow range of effective dosages.

Suppression of ventricular arrhythmias in man by d-propranolol independent of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade.

To investigate the mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia suppression by propranolol, we determined the antiarrhythmic efficacy of d-propranolol in 10 patients with frequent ventricular ectopic depolarizations (VEDs) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. After an initial placebo phase, 40 mg d-propranolol was administered orally every 6 h with dosage increased every 2 d until arrhythmia suppression (greater than or equal to 80% VED reduction), intolerable side effects, or a maximal dosage (1,280 mg/d) was reached. Response was verified by documenting return of arrhythmia during a final placebo phase. Arrhythmia suppression occurred in six patients while two more had partial responses. Effective dosages were 320-1,280 mg/d (mean 920 +/- 360, SD) of d-propranolol with corresponding plasma concentrations of 60-2,280 ng/ml (mean 858 +/- 681). For the entire group, the QTc interval shortened by 4 +/- 4% (P = 0.03). Arrhythmia suppression was accompanied by a reduction in peak heart rate during exercise of 0-29%. To determine whether arrhythmia suppression could be attributed to beta-blockade, racemic propranolol was then administered in dosages producing the same or greater depression of exercise heart rate. In 3/8 patients, arrhythmias were not suppressed by racemic propranolol indicating that d-propranolol was effective via a non-beta-mediated action. By contrast, in 5/8 patients racemic propranolol also suppressed VEDs. We conclude that propranolol suppresses ventricular arrhythmias by both beta- and non-beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated effects.

Encainide disposition in patients with chronic cirrhosis

The antiarrhythmic agent encainide undergoes extensive first‐pass hepatic metabolism after oral dosing. The active metabolites O‐desmethylencainide and 3‐methoxy‐O‐desmethylencainide are formed in subjects who are extensive metabolizers (EMs), a phenotypic trait that cosegregates with that of debrisoquin. Because of the possibility that drug metabolism is altered by liver dysfunction, the disposition of encainide and its metabolites was studied in six such EMs with cirrhosis and compared with that in eight normal subjects of the same phenotype. Patients with cirrhosis had lower systemic and oral clearances of encainide, resulting in a threefold increase in oral bioavailability. The plasma concentration of encainide was significantly higher among the patients with cirrhosis, whereas the plasma levels of the respective metabolites were comparable with those in normal subjects, resulting in no change in the patients ECG intervals. Encainide is, therefore, an example of a drug in which cirrhosis causes a three‐ to fourfold increase in parent drug concentrations. However, because no change occurs in the levels of the pharmacologically active metabolites, dosage adjustment is probably not required in patients with cirrhosis.

Mexiletine and tocainide: a comparison of antiarrhythmic efficacy, adverse effects, and predictive value of lidocaine testing.

Thirty patients received one of the lidocaine analogues—mexiletine or tocainide—orally for treatment of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Crossover to the other analogue was allowed if initial drug treatment was unsuccessful, and the controlled use of other marketed oral antiarrhythmic agents was permitted. After follow‐up of 7 ± 3 months (SD), mexiletine was successful in 5 of 13 patients initially and in 5 of 14 patients who failed to respond to tocainide. Tocainide was successful in 1 of 17 patients initially and in 2 of 7 who did not respond to mexiletine. Combination therapy was used in nearly half of all ultimately successful drug trials. A common cause of drug trial failure for both drugs was the occurrence of adverse effects that frequently appeared well after hospital discharge. Response to lidocaine was a sensitive but nonspecific predictor of clinical outcome with mexiletine or tocainide that helped to identify drug‐resistant patients. Finally, although mexiletine provided effective antiarrhythmic therapy more often than tocainide, response to one lidocaine analogue did not predict response to the other.

Potential Applications of Free Drug Level Monitoring in Cardiovascular Therapy

SummaryCardiovascular drugs, as a class, have low therapeutic indices, but also have great therapeutic potential. Plasma concentration information is therefore often of value when using these drugs. Unfortunately, the total plasma concentration may not reflect the concentration of pharmacologically active free drug, since a number of factors including disease states, heparin anticoagulation, non-linear binding characteristics, and in vitro artefacts can affect the protein binding of these agents. This may also explain their poor dose-response relationships and great interindividual variability in plasma concentration data. Careful studies relating bound and free drug concentration to pharmacological response may provide the clinician with a better guide to therapy, and enhance the usefulness of these drugs.