Jeannine D. Rinderknecht
University of Zurich
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jeannine D. Rinderknecht.
European Journal of Cancer | 2014
Reinhard Dummer; Simone M. Goldinger; Christian P. Turtschi; Nina Eggmann; Olivier Michielin; Lada Mitchell; Luisa Veronese; Paul René Hilfiker; Lea Felderer; Jeannine D. Rinderknecht
BACKGROUND & AIM Brain metastases are frequent in patients with metastatic melanoma, indicating poor prognosis. We investigated the BRAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib in patients with advanced melanoma with symptomatic brain metastases. METHODS This open-label trial assessed vemurafenib (960mg twice a day) in patients with BRAF(V600) mutation-positive metastatic melanoma with non-resectable, previously treated brain metastases. The primary end-point was safety. Secondary end-points included best overall response rate, and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS Twenty-four patients received vemurafenib for a median treatment duration of 3.8 (0.1-11.3) months. The majority of discontinuations were due to disease progression (n=22). Twenty-three of 24 patients reported at least one adverse event (AE). Grade 3 AEs were reported in four (17%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-37.4%) patients and included cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in four patients. Median progression-free survival was 3.9 (95% CI, 3.0-5.5) months, and median survival was 5.3 (95% CI, 3.9-6.6) months. An overall partial response (PR) at both intracranial and extracranial sites was achieved in 10 of 24 (42%; 95% CI, 22.1-63.4) evaluable patients, with stable disease in nine (38%; 95% CI, 18.8-59.4) patients. Of 19 patients with measurable intracranial disease, seven (37%) achieved >30% intracranial tumour regression, and three (16%; 95% CI, 3.4-39.6%) achieved a confirmed PR. Other signs of improvement included reduced need for corticosteroids and enhanced performance status. CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib can be safely used in patients with advanced symptomatic melanoma that has metastasised to the brain and can result in meaningful tumour regression.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012
Reinhard Dummer; Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger
The BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, is associated with photosensitivity. This small study identifies ultraviolet A (UVA) as the active agent. UVA blockers may be effective in preventing photosensitivity among patients taking vemurafenib.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger; Sima Rozati; Jivko Kamarashev; Katrin Kerl; Lars E. French; Reinhard Dummer; Benedetta Belloni
Purpose Vemurafenib is a potent inhibitor of V600 mutant BRAF with significant impact on progression-free and overall survival in advanced melanoma. Cutaneous side effects are frequent. This single-center observational study investigates clinical and histological features of these class-specific cutaneous adverse reactions. Patients and Methods Patients were all treated with Vemurafenib 960 mg b.i.d. within local ethic committees approved clinical trials. All skin reactions were collected and documented prospectively. Cutaneous reactions were classified by reaction pattern as phototoxic and inflammatory, hair and nail changes, keratinocytic proliferations and melanocytic disorders. Results Vemurafenib was well tolerated, only in two patients the dose had to be reduced to 720 mg due to arthralgia. 26/28 patients (93%) experienced cutaneous side effects. Observed side effects included UVA dependent photosensitivity (n = 16), maculopapular exanthema (n = 14), pruritus (n = 8), folliculitis (n = 5), burning feet (n = 3), hair thinning (mild alopecia) (n = 8), curly hair (n = 2) and nail changes (n = 2). Keratosis pilaris and acanthopapilloma were common skin reactions (n = 12/n = 13), as well as plantar hyperkeratosis (n = 4), keratoacanthoma (n = 5) and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (n = 4). One patient developed a second primary melanoma after more than 4 months of therapy (BRAF and RAS wild type). Conclusion Vemurafenib has a broad and peculiar cutaneous side effect profile involving epidermis and adnexa overlapping with the cutaneous manifestations of genetic diseases characterized by activating germ line mutations of RAS (RASopathy). They must be distinguished from allergic drug reaction. Regular skin examination and management by experienced dermatologists as well as continuous prophylactic photo protection including an UVA optimized sun screen is mandatory.
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives | 2015
Simone M. Goldinger; Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Reinhard Dummer; Felix P. Kuhn; Kuo-Hsiung Yang; Lucy Lee; Jagdish Kumar Racha; Wanping Geng; David Moore; Mei Liu; Andrew K. Joe; Selby Patricia Gil Bazan; Joseph F. Grippo
Vemurafenib, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic BRAF kinase carrying the V600 mutation, is approved for treatment of advanced BRAF mutation–positive melanoma. This study characterized mass balance, metabolism, rates/routes of elimination, and disposition of 14C‐labeled vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. Seven patients with metastatic BRAF‐mutated melanoma received unlabeled vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily for 14 days. On the morning of day 15, patients received 14C‐labeled vemurafenib 960 mg (maximum 2.56 MBq [69.2 μCi]). Thereafter, patients resumed unlabeled vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily). Blood, urine, and feces were collected for metabolism, pharmacokinetic, and dose recovery analysis. Within 18 days after dose, ~95% of 14C‐vemurafenib–related material was recovered from feces (94.1%) and urine (<1%). The parent compound was the predominant component (95%) in plasma. The mean plasma elimination half‐life of 14C‐vemurafenib–related material was 71.1 h. Each metabolite accounted for <0.5% and ≤6% of the total administered dose in urine and feces, respectively (0–96 h postdose). No new metabolites were detected. Vemurafenib was well‐tolerated. Excretion of vemurafenib via bile into feces is considered the predominant elimination route from plasma with minor renal elimination (<1%).
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011
Reinhard Dummer; Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger; I. Wagner; Lada Mitchell; M. L. Veronese; S. Nick; P. Hilfiker; S. Gobbi
Annals of Oncology | 2012
Reinhard Dummer; Sima Rozati; Nina Eggmann; Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012
Simone M. Goldinger; Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Benedetta Belloni; Nina Eggmann; Reinhard Dummer
PLOS ONE | 2013
Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger; Sima Rozati; Jivko Kamarashev; Katrin Kerl; Lars E. French; Reinhard Dummer; Benedetta Belloni
PLOS ONE | 2013
Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger; Sima Rozati; Jivko Kamarashev; Katrin Kerl; Lars E. French; Reinhard Dummer; Benedetta Belloni
PLOS ONE | 2013
Jeannine D. Rinderknecht; Simone M. Goldinger; Sima Rozati; Jivko Kamarashev; Katrin Kerl; Lars E. French; Reinhard Dummer; Benedetta Belloni