Jeehoon Kang

Comparison Among Drug-Eluting Balloon, Drug-Eluting Stent, and Plain Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis : A Network Meta-Analysis of 11 Randomized, Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVESnA Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed comparing the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons (DEB), drug-eluting stents (DES), or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).nnnBACKGROUNDnOptimal treatment options for ISR have not been well established.nnnMETHODSnRandomized, controlled trials comparing DEB, DES, and POBA for the treatment of ISR after percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent or DES were included. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The pairwise posterior median odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was the effect measure.nnnRESULTSnThis analysis included 2,059 patients from 11 RCTs. The risk of TLR was markedly lower in patients treated with DEB (OR: 0.22, 95% CrI: 0.10 to 0.42) or DES (OR: 0.24, 95% CrI: 0.11 to 0.47) than in those treated with POBA in a random-effects model. In a comparison of DEB and DES, the risk of TLR (OR: 0.92, 95% CrI: 0.43 to 1.90) was similar. The risk of MI or all-cause mortality was lowest in the DEB group compared with the DES and POBA groups, which did not meet statistical significance. The risk of major adverse cardiac events, which was mainly driven by TLR, was also significantly lower in the DEB or and DES group (OR: 0.28, 95% CrI: 0.14 to 0.53) than in the POBA group, but it was similar between the DEB and DES groups (OR: 0.84, 95% CrI: 0.45 to 1.50). The probability of being ranked as the best treatment was 59.9% (DEB), 40.1% (DES), and 0.1% (POBA) in terms of TLR, whereas it was 63.0% (DEB), 35.3% (POBA), and 1.7% (DES) in terms of MI.nnnCONCLUSIONSnLocal drug delivery by DEB or DES for ISR lesions was markedly better than POBA in preventing TLR, but not for MI or mortality. Among the 2 different strategies of drug delivery for ISR lesions, treatment with DEB showed a trend of less development of MI than did treatment with DES.

CD82/KAI1 Maintains the Dormancy of Long-Term Hematopoietic Stem Cells through Interaction with DARC-Expressing Macrophages

Hematopoiesis is regulated by crosstalk between long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) and supporting niche cells in the bone marrow (BM). Here, we examine the role of CD82/KAI1 in niche-mediated LT-HSC maintenance. We found that CD82/KAI1 is expressed predominantly on LT-HSCs and rarely on other hematopoietic stem-progenitor cells (HSPCs). In Cd82(-/-) mice, LT-HSCs were selectively lost as they exited from quiescence and differentiated. Mechanistically, CD82-based TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling leads to induction of CDK inhibitors and cell-cycle inhibition. The CD82 binding partner DARC/CD234 is expressed on macrophages and stabilizes CD82 on LT-HSCs, promoting their quiescence. When DARC(+) BM macrophages were ablated, the level of surface CD82 on LT-HSCs decreased, leading to cell-cycle entry, proliferation, and differentiation. A similar interaction appears to be relevant for human HSPCs. Thus, CD82 is a functional surface marker of LT-HSCs that maintains quiescence through interaction with DARC-expressing macrophages in the BM stem cell niche.

Amlodipine, clopidogrel and CYP3A5 genetic variability: effects on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective To test the effect of a loss-of-function variation of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 on drug–drug interaction between amlodipine and clopidogrel. Amlodipine is a well-known inhibitor of CYP 3A4, an isoenzyme of CYP3A that activates clopidogrel. However, controversy exists regarding whether amlodipine adversely affects clopidogrel response and clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the presence of CYP3A4 inhibitors such as amlodipine, the genetic variation of CYP3A5, the isoenzyme responsible for the backup CYP3A activity, may play an important role in clopidogrel activation. Design Post hoc analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort. Patients Patients enrolled in the CROSS-VERIFY cohort from June 2006 to June 2010, with successful genotyping of CYP3A5. Main outcome measures The pharmacodynamic analysis end point was clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) and the clinical analysis end point was the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and stent thrombosis at 12u2005months post-PCI. Results 1258 patients had successful genotyping and were categorised as CYP3A5 non-expressers (749 patients) and expressers (509 patients) according to the CYP3A5 genotype. Amlodipine users showed higher OPR versus non-users only in CYP3A5 non-expressers (249±83 vs 228±84 P2Y12 reaction units, p=0.013). These findings was corroborated by clinical outcomes, in which amlodipine users had a higher incidence of events compared with non-users only in CYP3A5 non-expressers (4.6% vs 0.6%, HR 7.731, CI 2.042 to 29.264, p=0.004). Conclusions Treatment with amlodipine is associated with increased clopidogrel OPR and increased risk of thrombotic events after PCI, which is dependent on the CYP3A5 genetic status.

Paraoxonase 1 Gene Polymorphism Does Not Affect Clopidogrel Response Variability but Is Associated with Clinical Outcome after PCI

Background Paraoxonase (PON) is a high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) associated enzyme with antioxidative and anti-atherogenic property. Its function is associated with coronary artery disease and its activity genetically controlled. We evaluated whether genetic variation of PON-1 is associated with clinical outcome in a large cohort of Korean patients with drug-eluting stents implantation. Methods A total of 1676 patients with drug-eluting stent implantation were enrolled in the prospective CROSS-VERIFY cohort from June 2006 to June 2010. We genotyped the PON1-Q192R gene, measured clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR), and analyzed lipid profiles. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis at 12 months. Results PON-1 genotyping data were available in 1336 patients. Since the Q-allele is associated with decreased PON-activity, we analyzed the outcome between patients with QQ/QR (815 patients, 61%) and those with RR-genotype (521 patients, 39%). After adjustment for common cardiac risk factors, the QQ/QR-genotype was an independent predictor of the primary thrombotic endpoint with an 11-fold increased risk (HR 11.6, 95% CI: 1.55–87.0), but not repeat revascularization (HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.78–1.61). The QQ/QR-genotype was not associated with OPR (QQ/QR: 231±86 PRU vs. RR 236±82 PRU, pu200a=u200a0.342) but higher small-dense LDL levels (1.20±0.12 mg/dL vs. 0.76±0.15 mg/dL, pu200a=u200a0.027). The increased risk of thrombotic outcomes was more profound in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients compared with non-ACS patients. Conclusion PON1 Q-allele is an independent predictor of worse cardiovascular outcome independent of platelet function and is associated with significantly higher levels of small dense LDL-C.

The efficacy and safety of mechanical hemodynamic support in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with or without cardiogenic shock: Bayesian approach network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUNDnStudies have reported conflicting results regarding efficacy of mechanical hemodynamic support using intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous ventricular assisted device (pVAD) in patients undergoing high-risk PCI. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of mechanical hemodynamic support devices and medical therapy (MT).nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnRCTs comparing overall mortality of IABP versus MT or IABP versus pVAD in high-risk PCI populations were included. The primary endpoint was overall mortality, using the longest available follow-up in each study. This analysis included 2843 patients from 13 trials. In network meta-analysis, overall survival benefit was not significant with IABP (RR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.56-1.24) or pVAD (RR 0.95, 95% CrI 0.42-2.06), compared with MT. IABP or pVAD also did not show early survival benefit compared with MT. In terms of bleeding, pVAD was the worst (versus IABP: RR 29.4, 95% CrI 5.99-221.0; versus MT: RR 41.7, 95% CrI 8.19-330.0), which was mainly driven by the higher incidence of bleeding in the ECMO and TandemHeart, while IABP was worse than MT (RR 1.41, 95% CrI 1.01-2.08). The incidence of acute limb ischemia or vascular complication was not different between treatment groups.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this meta-analysis, routine elective use of IABP or pVAD did not reduce mortality, while it increased bleeding, compared with MT in high-risk PCI population or even in the patients with cardiogenic shock. Thoughtful selection of appropriate patients and balancing the risk and benefit should be the prerequisites to the use of mechanical hemodynamic support devices.

Genetic determinants of clopidogrel responsiveness in Koreans treated with drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUNDnVariations of genes encoding cytochrome enzymes, drug transporters, and paraoxonase have recently been reported to be associated with clopidogrel response variability besides the well-known CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles. We determined whether newly reported genetic variations are associated with clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) in Korean patients.nnnMETHODSnOPR was measured in 1264 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using the VerifyNowP2Y12 assay system and genotyping of PON-1 Q192R, ABCB1 C3435T, CYP1A2*1F, CYP2B6*6, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*17, CYP3A4 (IVS10+12G>A), and CYP3A5*3 was performed. We applied two different cutoffs, i.e. 240 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and 253 PRU, to define high OPR.nnnRESULTSnMean OPR of the entire population was 231±83 PRU. Genetic variations of ABCB1 and PON-1 genes as well as that of CYP1A2, 2B6, 3A4, and 3A5 were not associated with clopidogrel response variability. As for CYP2C19, patients were classified into 4 metabolism genotypes: 0.6% ultrarapid (UM), 40.3% extensive (EM), 48.8% intermediate (IM), and 10.3% poor metabolizers (PM). After adjustment for possible confounders, CYP2C19 metabolism genotype was associated with a significant increase in OPR: effect on OPR-difference: +27 PRU, p=0.015 for EM, +53 PRU, p<0.001 for IM, and +74 PRU, p=0.006 for PM compared with UM. In multivariable analysis, the CYP2C19 genotype was the only independent predictor of high-OPR among genetic variations using two different cutoffs.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAmong genes postulated to be involved in clopidogrel metabolism, only the CYP2C19 genotype is associated with response variability and emerged as an independent predictor of high-OPR using two different cutoffs. PON-1 and ABCB1 genetic variants do not affect clopidogrel OPR in Korean patients.

Differential Prognostic Effect Between First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts.

OBJECTIVESnThe purpose of this study was to investigate the differential clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions with 1- or 2-stenting techniques using first- or second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).nnnBACKGROUNDnThe 2-stenting technique has been regarded to have worse clinical outcomes than the 1-stenting technique after bifurcation PCI with first-generation DES. However, there has been a paucity of data comparing the 1- and 2-stenting techniques with the use of second-generation DES.nnnMETHODSnPatient-level pooled analysis was performed with 3,162 patients undergoing PCI using first- or second-generation DES for bifurcation lesions from the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts (COBIS [Coronary Bifurcation Stenting] II, EXCELLENT [Registry to Evaluate Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting], and RESOLUTE-Korea [Registry to Evaluate the Efficacy of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent]). The 3-year clinical outcomes were compared between 1- and 2-stenting techniques, stratified by the type of DES.nnnRESULTSnWith first-generation DES, rates of target lesion failure (TLF) or patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) (a composite of all death, any myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, and cerebrovascular accidents) at 3 years were significantly higher after the 2-stenting than the 1-stenting technique (TLF 8.6% vs. 17.5%; p < 0.001; POCO 18.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001). With second-generation DES, however, there was no difference between 1- and 2-stenting techniques (TLF 5.4% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.768; POCO 11.2% vs. 12.9%; p = 0.995). The differential effects of 2-stenting technique on the prognosis according to the type of DES were also corroborated with similar results by the inverse probability weighted model. The 2-stenting technique was a significant independent predictor of TLF in first-generation DES (hazard ratio: 2.046; 95% confidence interval: 1.114 to 3.759; p < 0.001), but not in second-generation DES (hazard ratio: 0.667; 95% confidence interval: 0.247 to 1.802; p = 0.425).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPatient-level pooled analysis of 3,162 patients in Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts demonstrated that the 2-stenting technique showed comparable outcomes to 1-stenting technique with second-generation DES, which is different from the results of first-generation DES favoring the 1-stenting technique.

Involvement of miR-34c in high glucose-insulted mesenchymal stem cells leads to inefficient therapeutic effect on myocardial infarction.

High glucose-insulted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMCs) showed impaired angiogenesis along with downregulation of stem cell factor (SCF). This study was designed to determine the involvement of microRNAs (miR), which are actively involved in the physiological function of stem cells. We observed that miR-34c was significantly induced by high glucose treatment and blunted tube formation of BMCs. Stem cell factor (SCF) was confirmed as a target of miR-34c by 3-UTR promoter analysis and Western blot. SCF knockdown by siRNA induced Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) and resulted in the blockade of angiogenesis of BMCs. Sequentially, KLF4 overexpression completely blocked tube formation through inducing PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1). To study the action of miR-34c in terms of the therapeutic potential of BMCs, myocardial infarction (MI) was induced by ligation of the coronary artery in nude mice, BMCs transfected with miR-control or miR-34c were injected into the infarcted myocardium 7 days later, and histological studies were performed 2 weeks later. Cardiac fibrosis was 18.24±4.7% in the miR-34c-BMC group and 10.01±0.2% in the miR-control-BMC group (p<0.05). Cardiac function and vessel density were decreased in the miR-34c-BMC group compared with the miR-con-BMC group. Particularly, miR-34c-BMCs failed to incorporate into vessels. Our results show that the angiogenic activity of BMCs is finely regulated by the miR-34c-SCF-KLF4 axis, which is a potent translational target for optimizing the therapeutic activity of autologous BMCs for cardiac repair.

Intravascular Ultrasound and Angiographic Predictors of In-Stent Restenosis of Chronic Total Occlusion Lesions

Despite the benefits of successful percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, PCIs of CTO lesions still carry a high rate of adverse events, including in-stent restenosis (ISR). Because previous reports have not specifically investigated the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of ISR in CTO lesions, we focused on these predictors. We included 126 patients who underwent successful PCIs, using drug-eluting stents, and post-PCI IVUS of CTO lesions. Patient and lesion characteristics were analyzed to elucidate the ISR predictors. In each lesion, an average of 1.7 ± 0.7 (mean length, 46.4 ± 20.3 mm) stents were used. At 9 months follow-up, 14 (11%) patients demonstrated ISR, and 8 (6.3%) underwent target lesion revascularization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent predictors of ISR were the post-PCI minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and the stent expansion ratio (SER; minimal stent cross-sectional area (CSA) over the nominal CSA of the implanted stent), measured using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the best post-PCI MLD and SER cut-off values for predicting ISR were 2.4 mm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.762; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.639–0.885) and 70% (AUC, 0.714; 95% CI, 0.577–0.852), respectively. Lesions with post-PCI MLD and SER values less than these threshold values were at a higher risk of ISR, with an odds ratio of 23.3 (95% CI, 2.74–198.08), compared with lesions having larger MLD and SER values. Thus, the potential predictors of ISR, after PCI of CTO lesions, are the post-PCI MLD and SER values. The ISR rate was highest in lesions with a post-PCI MLD ≤2.4 mm and an SER ≤70%.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds ― Are We Facing a Time of Crisis or One of Breakthrough? ―

Current 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have dramatically improved clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease. However, DES implantation has major long-term limitations related to the permanent presence of foreign material in the coronary artery. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to overcome this limitation of permanent metal-based DES. However, because of immature manufacturing technology, BVS have several drawbacks, such as the thicker strut, poor deliverability, poor radio-opacity, poor radial strength, and cumbersome procedure to meet the principle of PSP (Preparation, Sizing, and Post-dilatation). Initial studies indicated that BVS outcomes were non-inferior to those of current DES and recent follow-up data of trials have revealed an additional critical drawback, higher rate of scaffold thrombosis, on the top of the existing limitations of BVS. Thus attention must be paid to the appropriate BVS-specific implantation protocols (i.e., PSP), as well as adequate intensity and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. In any case, current BVS need further technical evolution to replace current metallic DES in routine clinical use.