Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeff Cooper is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeff Cooper.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Testing an Emerging Paradigm in Migration Ecology Shows Surprising Differences in Efficiency between Flight Modes

Adam E. Duerr; Tricia A. Miller; Michael Lanzone; Dave Brandes; Jeff Cooper; Kieran O'Malley; Charles Maisonneuve; Junior A. Tremblay; Todd E. Katzner

To maximize fitness, flying animals should maximize flight speed while minimizing energetic expenditure. Soaring speeds of large-bodied birds are determined by flight routes and tradeoffs between minimizing time and energetic costs. Large raptors migrating in eastern North America predominantly glide between thermals that provide lift or soar along slopes or ridgelines using orographic lift (slope soaring). It is usually assumed that slope soaring is faster than thermal gliding because forward progress is constant compared to interrupted progress when birds pause to regain altitude in thermals. We tested this slope-soaring hypothesis using high-frequency GPS-GSM telemetry devices to track golden eagles during northbound migration. In contrast to expectations, flight speed was slower when slope soaring and eagles also were diverted from their migratory path, incurring possible energetic costs and reducing speed of progress towards a migratory endpoint. When gliding between thermals, eagles stayed on track and fast gliding speeds compensated for lack of progress during thermal soaring. When thermals were not available, eagles minimized migration time, not energy, by choosing energetically expensive slope soaring instead of waiting for thermals to develop. Sites suited to slope soaring include ridges preferred for wind-energy generation, thus avian risk of collision with wind turbines is associated with evolutionary trade-offs required to maximize fitness of time-minimizing migratory raptors.


Biology Letters | 2012

Flight responses by a migratory soaring raptor to changing meteorological conditions.

Michael Lanzone; Tricia A. Miller; Philip J. Turk; David Brandes; Casey Halverson; Charles Maisonneuve; Junior A. Tremblay; Jeff Cooper; Kieran O'Malley; Robert P. Brooks; Todd E. Katzner

Soaring birds that undertake long-distance migration should develop strategies to minimize the energetic costs of endurance flight. This is relevant because condition upon completion of migration has direct consequences for fecundity, fitness and thus, demography. Therefore, strong evolutionary pressures are expected for energy minimization tactics linked to weather and topography. Importantly, the minute-by-minute mechanisms birds use to subsidize migration in variable weather are largely unknown, in large part because of the technological limitations in studying detailed long-distance bird flight. Here, we show golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) migratory response to changing meteorological conditions as monitored by high-resolution telemetry. In contrast to expectations, responses to meteorological variability were stereotyped across the 10 individuals studied. Eagles reacted to increased wind speed by using more orographic lift and less thermal lift. Concomitantly, as use of thermals decreased, variation in flight speed and altitude also decreased. These results demonstrate how soaring migrant birds can minimize energetic expenditures, they show the context for avian decisions and choices of specific instantaneous flight mechanisms and they have important implications for design of bird-friendly wind energy.


Conservation Biology | 2014

Assessing risk to birds from industrial wind energy development via paired resource selection models.

Tricia A. Miller; Robert P. Brooks; Michael Lanzone; David Brandes; Jeff Cooper; Kieran O'Malley; Charles Maisonneuve; Junior A. Tremblay; Adam E. Duerr; Todd E. Katzner

When wildlife habitat overlaps with industrial development animals may be harmed. Because wildlife and people select resources to maximize biological fitness and economic return, respectively, we estimated risk, the probability of eagles encountering and being affected by turbines, by overlaying models of resource selection for each entity. This conceptual framework can be applied across multiple spatial scales to understand and mitigate impacts of industry on wildlife. We estimated risk to Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from wind energy development in 3 topographically distinct regions of the central Appalachian Mountains of Pennsylvania (United States) based on models of resource selection of wind facilities (n = 43) and of northbound migrating eagles (n = 30). Risk to eagles from wind energy was greatest in the Ridge and Valley region; all 24 eagles that passed through that region used the highest risk landscapes at least once during low altitude flight. In contrast, only half of the birds that entered the Allegheny Plateau region used highest risk landscapes and none did in the Allegheny Mountains. Likewise, in the Allegheny Mountains, the majority of wind turbines (56%) were situated in poor eagle habitat; thus, risk to eagles is lower there than in the Ridge and Valley, where only 1% of turbines are in poor eagle habitat. Risk within individual facilities was extremely variable; on average, facilities had 11% (SD 23; range = 0-100%) of turbines in highest risk landscapes and 26% (SD 30; range = 0-85%) of turbines in the lowest risk landscapes. Our results provide a mechanism for relocating high-risk turbines, and they show the feasibility of this novel and highly adaptable framework for managing risk of harm to wildlife from industrial development.


The Auk | 2012

Status, Biology, and Conservation Priorities for North America's Eastern Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Population

Todd E. Katzner; Brian W. Smith; Tricia A. Miller; David Brandes; Jeff Cooper; Michael Lanzone; Daniel W. Brauning; Christopher J. Farmer; Sergio R. Harding; David Kramar; Craig Koppie; Charles Maisonneuve; Mark Martell; Elizabeth K. Mojica; Charlie Todd; Junior A. Tremblay; Maria Wheeler; David F. Brinker; Tony E. Chubbs; Rolf Gubler; Kieran O'Malley; Scott Mehus; Brady A. Porter; Robert P. Brooks; Bryan D. Watts; Keith L. Bildstein

TODD KATZNER,1,2,26 BRIAN W. SMITH,3 TRICIA A. MILLER,4,5 DAVID BRANDES,6 JEFF COOPER,7 MICHAEL LANZONE,5,8 DANIEL BRAUNING,9 CHRISTOPHER FARMER,10 SERGIO HARDING,11 DAVID E. KRAMAR,12 CRAIG KOPPIE,13 CHARLES MAISONNEUVE,14 MARK MARTELL,15 ELIZABETH K. MOJICA,16 CHARLIE TODD,17 JUNIOR A. TREMBLAY,18 MARIA WHEELER,19 DAVID F. BRINKER,20 TONY E. CHUBBS,21 ROLF GUBLER,22 KIERAN O’MALLEY,23 SCOTT MEHUS,24 BRADY PORTER,19 ROBERT P. BROOKS,4 BRYAN D. WATTS,16 AND KEITH L. BILDSTEIN25


Functional Ecology | 2015

Flight response of slope-soaring birds to seasonal variation in thermal generation

Adam E. Duerr; Tricia A. Miller; Michael Lanzone; David Brandes; Jeff Cooper; Kieran O'Malley; Charles Maisonneuve; Junior A. Tremblay; Todd E. Katzner

Animals respond to a variety of environmental cues, including weather conditions, when migrating. Understanding the relationship between weather and migration behaviour is vital to assessing time- and energy limitations of soaring birds. Different soaring modes have different efficiencies, are dependent upon different types of subsidized lift and are weather dependent. We collected GPS locations from 47 known-age golden eagles that moved along 83 migration tracks. We paired each location with weather to determine meteorological correlates of migration during spring and fall as birds crossed three distinct ecoregions in north-east North America. Golden eagle migration was associated with weather conditions that promoted thermal development, regardless of season, ecoregion or age. Eagle migration showed age- and season-specific responses to weather conditions that promoted orographic lift.


Journal of the Royal Society Interface | 2015

Use of multiple modes of flight subsidy by a soaring terrestrial bird, the golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos, when on migration

Todd E. Katzner; Philip J. Turk; Adam E. Duerr; Tricia A. Miller; Michael Lanzone; Jeff Cooper; David Brandes; Junior A. Tremblay; Jérôme Lemaître

Large birds regularly use updrafts to subsidize flight. Although most research on soaring bird flight has focused on use of thermal updrafts, there is evidence suggesting that many species are likely to use multiple modes of subsidy. We tested the degree to which a large soaring species uses multiple modes of subsidy to provide insights into the decision-making that underlies flight behaviour. We statistically classified more than 22 000 global positioning satellite–global system for mobile communications telemetry points collected at 30-s intervals to identify the type of subsidized flight used by 32 migrating golden eagles during spring in eastern North America. Eagles used subsidized flight on 87% of their journey. They spent 41.9% ± 1.5 (, range: 18–56%) of their subsidized northbound migration using thermal soaring, 45.2% ± 2.1 (12–65%) of time gliding between thermals, and 12.9% ± 2.2 (1–55%) of time using orographic updrafts. Golden eagles responded to the variable local-scale meteorological events they encountered by switching flight behaviour to take advantage of multiple modes of subsidy. Orographic soaring occurred more frequently in morning and evening, earlier in the migration season, and when crosswinds and tail winds were greatest. Switching between flight modes allowed migration for relatively longer periods each day and frequent switching behaviour has implications for a better understanding of avian flight behaviour and of the evolution of use of subsidy in flight.


The Condor | 2015

Stable hydrogen isotopes identify leapfrog migration, degree of connectivity, and summer distribution of Golden Eagles in eastern North America

David M. Nelson; Melissa A. Braham; Tricia A. Miller; Adam E. Duerr; Jeff Cooper; Michael Lanzone; Jérôme Lemaître; Todd E. Katzner

ABSTRACT Knowledge of the distribution and movements of populations of migratory birds is useful for the effective conservation and management of biodiversity. However, such information is often unavailable because of the difficulty of tracking sufficient numbers of individuals. We used more easily obtained feather stable hydrogen isotope ratios (δ2H) to predict the summer grounds of the small, threatened, and migratory population of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in eastern North America. We then identified summer locations and the extent of migratory connectivity for this population. We collected δ2H (δ2Hf), stable carbon isotope (δ13C), and stable nitrogen isotope (δ15N) data from the body feathers of 47 juvenile, subadult, and adult Golden Eagles. Values of δ13C and δ15N suggested that all but 2 birds obtained food from terrestrial-based food webs and therefore that δ2H data were appropriate for inferring the geographic region of molt for the majority of birds. There was relatively large interfeather variation in the δ2H values of subadults vs. adults, suggesting that these groups molted at different times and places. The most negative δ2Hf values from birds with known summering grounds exhibited (1) a negative correlation with their summering latitude, and (2) a positive correlation with amount-weighted δ2H values of May–August precipitation at the summer location. These data validate the use of δ2Hf values for inferring the summer locations of Golden Eagles of unknown origin. Likelihood-of-origin maps derived from δ2Hf values revealed that (1) the majority of birds spent the breeding season in central Québec and Labrador, and (2) birds that wintered at southern latitudes, from approximately northern Alabama to southwestern Virginia, migrated about twice the distance of birds that wintered at northern latitudes, from Pennsylvania to New York. We observed a positive relationship between δ2Hf values and the latitude of the wintering location, which, along with the likelihood-of-origin maps, revealed moderate patterns of leapfrog migration and migratory connectivity.


The Condor | 2017

Summer and winter space use and home range characteristics of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in eastern North America

Tricia A. Miller; Robert P. Brooks; Michael Lanzone; Jeff Cooper; Kieran O'Malley; David Brandes; Adam E. Duerr; Todd E. Katzner

ABSTRACT Movement behavior and its relationship to habitat provide critical information toward understanding the effects of changing environments on birds. The eastern North American population of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) is a genetically distinct and small population of conservation concern. To evaluate the potential responses of this population to changing landscapes, we calculated the home range and core area sizes of 52 eagles of 6 age–sex classes during the summer and winter seasons. Variability in range size was related to variation in topography and open cover, and to age and sex. In summer, eagle ranges that were smaller had higher proportions of ridge tops and open cover and had greater topographic roughness than did larger ranges. In winter, smaller ranges had higher proportions of ridge tops, hillsides and cliffs, and open cover than did larger ranges. All age and sex classes responded similarly to topography and open cover in both seasons. Not surprisingly, adult eagles occupied the smallest ranges in both seasons. Young birds used larger ranges than adults, and subadults in summer used the largest ranges (>9,000 km2). Eastern adult home ranges in summer were 2–10 times larger than those reported for other populations in any season. Golden Eagles in eastern North America may need to compensate for generally lower-quality habitat in the region by using larger ranges that support access to adequate quantities of resources (prey, updrafts, and nesting, perching, and roosting sites) associated with open cover and diverse topography. Our results suggest that climate change–induced afforestation on the breeding grounds and ongoing land cover change from timber harvest and energy development on the wintering grounds may affect the amount of suitable habitat for Golden Eagles in eastern North America.


Journal of Raptor Research | 2018

Non-anthropogenic Diet-based Oiling of Predatory Birds

Todd E. Katzner; Daniel E. Driscoll; Ronald E. Jackman; Peter H. Bloom; Scott E. Thomas; Jeff Cooper; Stephen Living; Teryl G. Grubb; Jacqueline M. Doyle; Douglas A. Bell; Joseph E. Didonato; J. Andrew DeWoody

Resumen El empetrolado de las aves puede tener consecuencias importantes a nivel individual y poblacional. Aunque la mayoria de los ejemplos publicados sobre empetrolado se refieren a la exposicion a fuentes antropicas de hidrocarburos, el empetrolado puede ocurrir naturalmente. Describimos cuatro casos de empetrolado natural de siete pollos de Aquila chrysaetos asi como nuestra intervencion para mitigarlo. En todos los casos, el aceite en estas aves provino casi seguro de sus presas, en su mayoria ardillas terrestres (Otospermophilus beecheyi), aportadas por aguilas adultas en cantidades mayores de las que los polluelos podian consumir. Algunos pollos solo fueron empetrolados levemente. Otros fueron empetrolados tanto que la funcion de las plumas se vio comprometida a un nivel en el que, sin nuestra intervencion, la supervivencia de estos pollos de aguila seguramente hubiera sido afectada. Hasta donde sabemos, este es el primer informe publicado sobre empetrolado de rapaces como consecuencia de un sobre ...


Journal of Raptor Research | 2017

Patterns of Spatial Distribution of Golden Eagles Across North America: How Do They Fit into Existing Landscape-scale Mapping Systems?

Jessi L. Brown; Bryan Bedrosian; Douglas A. Bell; Melissa A. Braham; Jeff Cooper; Ross H. Crandall; Joe DiDonato; Robert Domenech; Adam E. Duerr; Todd E. Katzner; Michael Lanzone; David W. LaPlante; Carol L. McIntyre; Tricia A. Miller; Robert K. Murphy; Adam Shreading; Steven J. Slater; Jeff P. Smith; Brian W. Smith; James W. Watson; Brian Woodbridge

Abstract Conserving wide-ranging animals requires knowledge about their year-round movements and resource use. Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) exhibit a wide range of movement patterns across North America. We combined tracking data from 571 Golden Eagles from multiple independent satellite-telemetry projects from North America to provide a comprehensive look at the magnitude and extent of these movements on a continental scale. We compared patterns of use relative to four alternative administrative and ecological mapping systems, namely Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs), U.S. administrative migratory bird flyways, Migratory Bird Joint Ventures, and Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Our analyses suggested that eagles initially captured in eastern North America used space differently than those captured in western North America. Other groups of eagles that exhibited distinct patterns in space use included long-distance migrants from northern latitudes, and southwestern and Californian desert residents. There were also several groupings of eagles in the Intermountain West. Using this collaborative approach, we have identified large-scale movement patterns that may not have been possible with individual studies. These results will support landscape-scale conservation measures for Golden Eagles across North America.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeff Cooper's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Todd E. Katzner

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Lanzone

Carnegie Museum of Natural History

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam E. Duerr

West Virginia University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Junior A. Tremblay

Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kieran O'Malley

West Virginia Division of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert P. Brooks

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip J. Turk

West Virginia University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas A. Bell

California Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge