Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeffrey J. Brown is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeffrey J. Brown.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2007

MR contrast agents: Physical and pharmacologic basics

Shao-Pow Lin; Jeffrey J. Brown

Since approval of the first magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent was granted in 1988, there has been remarkable growth in the utilization of intravenous gadolinium (Gd)‐based agents. Currently it is estimated that nearly half of all MR studies performed are contrast‐enhanced. Despite containing a toxic heavy metal, these agents have proven to be not only an effective diagnostic adjunct to non‐enhanced MRI, but also remarkably well tolerated and safe. As a result, conventional wisdom has been that MR contrast media are “biologically inert,” a notion that is clearly false. Ultimately, it is the radiologists responsibility to understand the potential adverse effects of Gd‐based agents and the special situations in which they are likely to occur; however, the basic pharmacology of contrast agents is generally not included in medical school curricula or formally taught in residency. The purpose of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action of MR contrast agents and relevant aspects of their clinical pharmacology, including effects on the cardiovascular and renal systems, potential laboratory errors, and special situations involving women and children. We also briefly discuss the issue of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;25:884–899.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Role of Imaging in Pretreatment Evaluation of Early Invasive Cervical Cancer: Results of the Intergroup Study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651–Gynecologic Oncology Group 183

Hedvig Hricak; Constantine Gatsonis; Dennis S. Chi; Marco A. Amendola; Kathy Brandt; Lawrence H. Schwartz; Susan Koelliker; Evan S. Siegelman; Jeffrey J. Brown; Robert B. McGhee; Revathy B. Iyer; Kenneth M. Vitellas; Bradley S. Snyder; Harry J. Long; James Fiorica; D. G. Mitchell

PURPOSE To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with each other and to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical staging in the pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer, using surgicopathologic findings as the reference standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network and the Gynecologic Oncology Group from March 2000 to November 2002; 25 United States health centers enrolled 208 consecutive patients with biopsy-confirmed cervical cancer of FIGO stage > or = IB who were scheduled for surgery based on clinical assessment. Patients underwent FIGO clinical staging, helical CT, and MRI. Surgicopathologic findings constituted the reference standard for statistical analysis. RESULTS Complete data were available for 172 patients; surgicopathologic findings were consistent with FIGO stages IA to IIA in 76% and stage > or = IIB in 21%. For the detection of advanced stage (> or = IIB), sensitivity was poor for FIGO clinical staging (29%), CT (42%), and MRI (53%); specificity was 99% for FIGO clinical staging, 82% for CT, and 74% for MRI; and negative predictive value was 84% for FIGO clinical staging, 84% for CT, and 85% for MRI. MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.88) was significantly better than CT (AUC, 0.73) for detecting cervical tumors (P = .014). For 85% of patients, FIGO clinical staging forms were submitted after MRI and/or CT was performed. CONCLUSION CT and MRI performed similarly; both had lower staging accuracy than in prior single-institution studies. Accuracy of FIGO clinical staging was higher than previously reported. The temporal data suggest that FIGO clinical staging was influenced by CT and MRI findings.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2000

Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA.

Y. Wang; Y. Yu; Debiao Li; Kyongtae T. Bae; Jeffrey J. Brown; Weili Lin; E.M. Haacke

In magnetic resonance angiography, contrast agents are frequently used to help highlight arteries over background tissue. Unfortunately, enhancing veins hamper the visualization of arteries when data are collected over a long period of time after the arterial phase of the contrast agent. To overcome this problem, we have developed a novel imaging and postprocessing method that is capable of eliminating veins by utilizing the susceptibility difference between veins and surrounding tissue. This method was applied in the peripheral vasculature where the vessels are predominantly parallel to the main field and where the blood oxygen level‐dependent effect is most pronounced. Results are presented for both long (15.8 msec) and short echo times (7.8 msec) and for sequential and centrally reordered acquisition schemes. The short echo scan approach appears to be the most promising, making it possible to obtain good suppression of the venous signal even when the timing is not perfect or when repeat scans are necessary. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:661–670.


Radiographics | 2008

MR imaging of the gallbladder: a pictorial essay.

O. Catalano; Dushyant V. Sahani; Sanjeeva P. Kalva; Matthew S. Cushing; Peter F. Hahn; Jeffrey J. Brown; Robert R. Edelman

The gallbladder serves as the repository for bile produced in the liver. However, bile within the gallbladder may become supersaturated with cholesterol, leading to crystal precipitation and subsequent gallstone formation. The most common disorders of the gallbladder are related to gallstones and include symptomatic cholelithiasis, acute and chronic cholecystitis, and carcinoma of the gallbladder. Other conditions that can affect the gallbladder include biliary dyskinesia (functional), adenomyomatosis (hyperplastic), and postoperative changes or complications (iatrogenic). Ultrasonography (US) has been the traditional modality for evaluating gallbladder disease, primarily owing to its high sensitivity and specificity for both stone disease and gallbladder inflammation. US performed before and after ingestion of a fatty meal may also be useful for functional evaluation of the gallbladder. However, US is limited by patient body habitus, with degradation of image quality and anatomic detail in obese individuals. With the advent of faster and more efficient imaging techniques, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has assumed an increasing role as an adjunct modality for gallbladder imaging, primarily in patients who are incompletely assessed with US. MR imaging allows simultaneous anatomic and physiologic assessment of the gallbladder and biliary tract in both initial evaluation of disease and examination of the postoperative patient. This assessment is accomplished chiefly through the use of MR imaging contrast agents excreted preferentially via the biliary system.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2012

Hepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents

Alex Frydrychowicz; Meghan G. Lubner; Jeffrey J. Brown; Elmar M. Merkle; Scott K. Nagle; Neil M. Rofsky; Scott B. Reeder

The advent of gadolinium‐based “hepatobiliary” contrast agents offers new opportunities for diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and has triggered great interest for innovative imaging approaches to the liver and bile ducts. In this review article we discuss the imaging properties of the two gadolinium‐based hepatobiliary contrast agents currently available in the U.S., gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid, as well as important pharmacokinetic differences that affect their diagnostic performance. We review potential applications, protocol optimization strategies, as well as diagnostic pitfalls. A variety of illustrative case examples will be used to demonstrate the role of these agents in detection and characterization of liver lesions as well as for imaging the biliary system. Changes in MR protocols geared toward optimizing workflow and imaging quality are also discussed. It is our aim that the information provided in this article will facilitate the optimal utilization of these agents and will stimulate the readers pursuit of new applications for future benefit. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:492‐511.


Hepatology | 2011

Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions: Approach to imaging diagnosis

Kathryn J. Fowler; Jeffrey J. Brown; Vamsi R. Narra

This article is a review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of incidental focal liver lesions. This review provides an overview of liver MRI protocol, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and contrast agents. Additionally, the most commonly encountered benign and malignant lesions are discussed with emphasis on imaging appearance and the diagnostic performance of MRI based on a review of the literature. (HEPATOLOGY 2011)


Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography | 1994

MR appearance of umbilical endometriosis.

Chin-Yin Yu; Maria Perez-Reyes; Jeffrey J. Brown; Joseph A. Borrello

Objective We describe the MR appearance of endometriosis involving the umbilicus in two patients. One patient had a history of laparoscopy performed through the umbilicus; the other had an umbilical hernia. Materials and Methods MR imaging was performed using both a body coil and a spine coil (with the patient lying prone on the spine coil). The lesions were surgically removed and their MR appearance was correlated with the results of histologic analysis. Results The lesions were well delineated on MRI and showed evidence of prior hemorrhage consistent with endometriosis. Both lesions were shown to be endometriosis at surgical pathology. Conclusion MR imaging was useful for delineating the size and location of the lesions and excluding intraabdominal extension.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1997

Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Findings in 311 lesions

Shawn P. Quillin; Serhan Atilla; Jeffrey J. Brown; Joseph A. Borrello; Chin-Yin Yu; Thomas K. Pilgram

This study aimed to determine the overall accuracy of known enhancement patterns for the characterization of a large series of focal hepatic masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images. Breath-hold T1-weighted images of the liver acquired before intravenous gadolinium administration and serially over 6-10 min after contrast injection were acquired in < 25 a using FLASH or rapid spin-echo pulse sequences. A total of 311 proven focal hepatic masses in 128 patients were analyzed, including 192 malignant lesions (166 metastases and 26 hepatomas) and 119 benign lesions (48 cavernous hemangiomas, 45 hepatic cysts, and 26 other abnormalities). The lesions were evaluated for a variety of characteristics independently by two reviewers who were blinded to results. Cavernous hemangiomas showed early peripheral nodular enhancement (80% sensitivity and 99% specificity) and hepatic cysts showed no enhancement (100% sensitivity and 95% specificity). Hepatic metastases showed variable, moderate enhancement (47% by one reviewer and 74% by the other). Metastatic lesions from hypervascular primary neoplasms displayed peak enhancement during the hepatic artery dominant (bolus) phase, while other malignant neoplasms showed later peak enhancement (72% sensitivity and 77% specificity). Five metastatic foci with early homogeneous enhancement showed a delayed peripheral washout of contrast (rim sign), while no nonmetastatic foci displayed this finding (3% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Characteristic enhancement patterns of focal hepatic lesions were described in a large series of patients. This study confirms results of previous investigators who have shown that early nodular peripheral enhancement was highly specific for hemangiomas and lack of enhancement was highly specific for hepatic cysts. Hypervascular metastatic foci show earlier peak enhancement than other malignant lesions. Some (2-3%) metastatic lesions display a peripheral washout of contrast on serial images, with 100% specificity.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2000

Safety and efficacy of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. multicenter phase III clinical trials (safety).

Michael P. Federle; Judith L. Chezmar; Daniel L. Rubin; Jeffrey C. Weinreb; Patrick C. Freeny; Richard C. Semelka; Jeffrey J. Brown; Joseph A. Borrello; Joseph K. T. Lee; Robert F. Mattrey; Abraham H. Dachman; Sanjay Saini; Marc J. Fenstermacher; Retta E. Pelsang; Steven E. Harms; D. G. Mitchell; Hollis H. Halford; Mark W. Anderson; C. Daniel Johnson; Isaac R. Francis; James G. Bova; Philip J. Kenney; Donald L. Klippenstein; Gregory S. Foster; David A. Turner; Arthur E. Stillman; Rendon C. Nelson; Stuart W. Young; Richard H. Patt; Matthew Rifkin

The short‐term1 safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection was studied in 546 adults with known or suspected focal liver lesions. An initial contrast‐enhanced computed tomography examination was followed by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), injection of MnDPDP (5 μmol/kg), and enhanced MRI. Adverse events were reported for 23% of the patients; most were mild to moderate in intensity, did not require treatment, and were not drug related. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (7%) and headache (4%). The incidence of serious adverse events was low (nine events in six patients) and not drug related. Injection‐associated discomfort was reported for 69% of the patients, and the most commonly reported discomforts included heat (49%) and flushing (33%). Changes in laboratory values and vital signs were generally transient, were not clinically significant, and did not require treatment. There were no clinically significant short‐term risks from exposure to MnDPDP. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:186–197.


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 1989

Magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses.

Jeffrey J. Brown; Jerome A. Barakos; Charles B. Higgins

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with ECG-gated acquisition displays the blood pool as a signal void and thereby provides high contrast differentiation between cardiovascular structures and soft-tissue masses. The role of MRI for the detection and definition of the extent of paracardiac and intracardiac masses is reviewed. The extension of mediastinal, lung, and upper abdominal tumors to the heart and pericardium is depicted favorably by MRI and this attribute is also demonstrated. It is anticipated that MRI will have an increasing role in the evaluation of primary and secondary masses of the heart and pericardium.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeffrey J. Brown's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vamsidhar R. Narra

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Khaled M. Elsayes

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph A. Borrello

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay P. Heiken

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph K. T. Lee

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard C. Semelka

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fernando R. Gutierrez

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. K.T. Lee

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge