Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jennifer E. Prey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jennifer E. Prey.


Patient Education and Counseling | 2016

Reliability and validity of the patient activation measure in hospitalized patients

Jennifer E. Prey; Min Qian; S. Restaino; Judith H. Hibbard; Suzanne Bakken; Rebecca Schnall; Gloria Rothenberg; David K. Vawdrey; Ruth Masterson Creber

OBJECTIVE The purposes of this paper are to describe the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the PAM-13 for hospitalized cardiology and oncology patients and to examine the predictors of low patient activation in the same population. METHODS We evaluated the internal consistency reliability of the PAM-13 in the inpatient setting. Construct validity of the PAM-13 was then assessed using two approaches: expected known-groups differences between patients with planned and unplanned admissions PAM-13 levels and convergence of PAM-13 levels with other measures. RESULTS The PAM demonstrated adequate internal consistency overall (Cronbach α=0.81). Patients with unplanned admissions were more likely to have low activation than patients with planned admissions (adjusted OR=5.7, p=0.008). The PAM-13 was modestly correlated (p<0.001) with each of the PROMIS Global Health components used in this study (global, physical and mental health). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the PAM-13 is a reliable and valid measure for use in the inpatient hospital setting and that type of admission (planned versus unplanned) is an important predictor of patient activation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS By measuring patient activation with the PAM-13, clinicians and researchers can provide tailored communication and care strategies to meet patients needs.


Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 2018

An informatics research agenda to support patient and family empowerment and engagement in care and recovery during and after hospitalization

Sarah A. Collins; Patricia C. Dykes; David W. Bates; Brittany Couture; Ronen Rozenblum; Jennifer E. Prey; Kristin O’Reilly; Patricia Q Bourie; Cindy Dwyer; S. Ryan Greysen; Jeffery Smith; Michael A. Gropper; Anuj K. Dalal

As part of an interdisciplinary acute care patient portal task force with members from 10 academic medical centers and professional organizations, we held a national workshop with 71 attendees representing over 30 health systems, professional organizations, and technology companies. Our consensus approach identified 7 key sociotechnical and evaluation research focus areas related to the consumption and capture of information from patients, care partners (eg, family, friends), and clinicians through portals in the acute and post-acute care settings. The 7 research areas were: (1) standards, (2) privacy and security, (3) user-centered design, (4) implementation, (5) data and content, (6) clinical decision support, and (7) measurement. Patient portals are not yet in routine use in the acute and post-acute setting, and research focused on the identified domains should increase the likelihood that they will deliver benefit, especially as there are differences between needs in acute and post-acute care compared to the ambulatory setting.


International Journal of Medical Informatics | 2016

International perspectives on sharing clinical data with patients

Jennifer E. Prey; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Gilad J. Kuperman; Victoria Tiase; Sarah A. Collins; David K. Vawdrey

OBJECTIVE Engaging patients in their care has become a topic of increasing importance, and enabling patients to have access to their clinical data is a key aspect of such engagement. We investigated, on an international scale, the current state of approaches for providing patients with access to their own clinical information. METHODS Individuals from 28 countries were invited to participate in a cross-sectional semi-structured interview. Interview questions focused on social and cultural influences that affected patient engagement activities, government support for current and planned initiatives, data ownership models, and technical issues. RESULTS Interviews were conducted with individuals from 16 countries representing six continents. Respondents reported substantive initiatives for providing information to patients in the majority of countries interviewed. These initiatives were diverse in nature and stage of implementation. DISCUSSION Enabling patient access to data is occurring on an international scale. There is considerable variability in the level of maturity, the degree of government involvement, the technical infrastructure, and the plans for future development across the world. As informaticians, we are still in the early stages of deploying patient engagement technologies and have yet to identify optimal strategies in this arena. CONCLUSION Efforts to improve patient access to data are active on a global-scale. There are many open questions about best practices and much can be learned by adopting an international perspective to guide future implementation efforts.


Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 2018

Engaging hospital patients in the medication reconciliation process using tablet computers

Jennifer E. Prey; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Lisa V. Grossman; Ruth Masterson Creber; Demetra Tsapepas; Rimma Perotte; Min Qian; S. Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; Leigh Efird; Joseph Underwood; David K. Vawdrey

Abstract Objective Unintentional medication discrepancies contribute to preventable adverse drug events in patients. Patient engagement in medication safety beyond verbal participation in medication reconciliation is limited. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether patients’ use of an electronic home medication review tool could improve medication safety during hospitalization. Materials and Methods Patients were randomized to use a toolbefore orafter hospital admission medication reconciliation to review and modify their home medication list. We assessed the quantity, potential severity, and potential harm of patients’ and clinicians’ medication changes. We also surveyed clinicians to assess the tool’s usefulness. Results Of 76 patients approached, 65 (86%) participated. Forty-eight (74%) made changes to their home medication list [before: 29 (81%),after: 19 (66%),p = .170].Before group participants identified 57 changes that clinicians subsequently missed on admission medication reconciliation. Thirty-nine (74%) had a significant or greater potential severity, and 19 (36%) had a greater than 50-50 chance of harm.After group patients identified 68 additional changes to their reconciled medication lists. Fifty-one (75%) had a significant or greater potential severity, and 33 (49%) had a greater than 50-50 chance of harm. Clinicians reported believing that the tool would save time, and patients would supply useful information. Discussion The results demonstrate a high willingness of patients to engage in medication reconciliation, and show that patients were able to identify important medication discrepancies and often changes that clinicians missed. Conclusion Engaging patients in admission medication reconciliation using an electronic home medication review tool may improve medication safety during hospitalization.


Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 2014

Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review

Jennifer E. Prey; Janet Woollen; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander D. Sackeim; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; S. Restaino; Steven Feiner; David K. Vawdrey


Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 2016

Interactive tools for inpatient medication tracking: a multi-phase study with cardiothoracic surgery patients

Lauren Wilcox; Janet Woollen; Jennifer E. Prey; S. Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; Steven K. Feiner; Alexander D. Sackeim; David K. Vawdrey


Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2016

Engaging hospitalized patients in clinical care: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Ruth Masterson Creber; Jennifer E. Prey; Beatriz Ryan; Irma Alarcon; Min Qian; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; Fernanda Polubriaginof; S. Restaino; Rebecca Schnall; Philip Strong; David K. Vawdrey


Applied Clinical Informatics | 2016

Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record

Janet Woollen; Jennifer E. Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander D. Sackeim; S. Restaino; S. T. Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven K. Feiner; George Hripcsak; David K. Vawdrey


american medical informatics association annual symposium | 2013

Method for the Development of Data Visualizations for Community Members with Varying Levels of Health Literacy

Adriana Arcia; Michael E. Bales; William Brown; Manuel C. Co; Melinda Gilmore; Young Ji Lee; Chin S. Park; Jennifer E. Prey; Mark Velez; Janet Woollen; Sunmoo Yoon; Rita Kukafka; Jacqueline Merrill; Suzanne Bakken


american medical informatics association annual symposium | 2014

Providing hospital patients with access to their medical records.

Jennifer E. Prey; S. Restaino; David K. Vawdrey

Collaboration


Dive into the Jennifer E. Prey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander D. Sackeim

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lauren Wilcox

Georgia Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge