Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jennifer Hanratty is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jennifer Hanratty.


IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing | 2012

The Belfast Induced Natural Emotion Database

Ian Sneddon; Margaret McRorie; Jennifer Hanratty

For many years psychological research on facial expression of emotion has relied heavily on a recognition paradigm based on posed static photographs. There is growing evidence that there may be fundamental differences between the expressions depicted in such stimuli and the emotional expressions present in everyday life. Affective computing, with its pragmatic emphasis on realism, needs examples of natural emotion. This paper describes a unique database containing recordings of mild to moderate emotionally colored responses to a series of laboratory-based emotion induction tasks. The recordings are accompanied by information on self-report of emotion and intensity, continuous trace-style ratings of valence and intensity, the sex of the participant, the sex of the experimenter, the active or passive nature of the induction task, and it gives researchers the opportunity to compare expressions from people from more than one culture.


Health Technology Assessment | 2016

The effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for maltreated children and adolescents: an evidence synthesis

Geraldine Macdonald; Nuala Livingstone; Jennifer Hanratty; Claire McCartan; Richard Cotmore; Maria Cary; Danya Glaser; Sarah Byford; Nicky J Welton; Tania Bosqui; Lucy Bowes; Suzanne Audrey; Gill Mezey; Helen L. Fisher; Wendy Riches; Rachel Churchill

BACKGROUND Child maltreatment is a substantial social problem that affects large numbers of children and young people in the UK, resulting in a range of significant short- and long-term psychosocial problems. OBJECTIVES To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of interventions addressing the adverse consequences of child maltreatment. STUDY DESIGN For effectiveness, we included any controlled study. Other study designs were considered for economic decision modelling. For acceptability, we included any study that asked participants for their views. PARTICIPANTS Children and young people up to 24 years 11 months, who had experienced maltreatment before the age of 17 years 11 months. INTERVENTIONS Any psychosocial intervention provided in any setting aiming to address the consequences of maltreatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Psychological distress [particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety, and self-harm], behaviour, social functioning, quality of life and acceptability. METHODS Young Persons and Professional Advisory Groups guided the project, which was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration and NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance. Departures from the published protocol were recorded and explained. Meta-analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses of available data were undertaken where possible. RESULTS We identified 198 effectiveness studies (including 62 randomised trials); six economic evaluations (five using trial data and one decision-analytic model); and 73 studies investigating treatment acceptability. Pooled data on cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for sexual abuse suggested post-treatment reductions in PTSD [standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.44 (95% CI -4.43 to -1.53)], depression [mean difference -2.83 (95% CI -4.53 to -1.13)] and anxiety [SMD -0.23 (95% CI -0.03 to -0.42)]. No differences were observed for post-treatment sexualised behaviour, externalising behaviour, behaviour management skills of parents, or parental support to the child. Findings from attachment-focused interventions suggested improvements in secure attachment [odds ratio 0.14 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.70)] and reductions in disorganised behaviour [SMD 0.23 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.42)], but no differences in avoidant attachment or externalising behaviour. Few studies addressed the role of caregivers, or the impact of the therapist-child relationship. Economic evaluations suffered methodological limitations and provided conflicting results. As a result, decision-analytic modelling was not possible, but cost-effectiveness analysis using effectiveness data from meta-analyses was undertaken for the most promising intervention: CBT for sexual abuse. Analyses of the cost-effectiveness of CBT were limited by the lack of cost data beyond the cost of CBT itself. CONCLUSIONS It is not possible to draw firm conclusions about which interventions are effective for children with different maltreatment profiles, which are of no benefit or are harmful, and which factors encourage people to seek therapy, accept the offer of therapy and actively engage with therapy. Little is known about the cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions. LIMITATIONS Studies were largely conducted outside the UK. The heterogeneity of outcomes and measures seriously impacted on the ability to conduct meta-analyses. FUTURE WORK Studies are needed that assess the effectiveness of interventions within a UK context, which address the wider effects of maltreatment, as well as specific clinical outcomes. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003889. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Tools Used to Measure Behaviour Problems in Young Children with Autism

Jennifer Hanratty; Nuala Livingstone; Shannon Robalino; Caroline B. Terwee; Magdalena Glod; Inalegwu P Oono; Jacqui Rodgers; Geraldine Macdonald; Helen McConachie

Background Behaviour problems are common in young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There are many different tools used to measure behavior problems but little is known about their validity for the population. Objectives To evaluate the measurement properties of behaviour problems tools used in evaluation of intervention or observational research studies with children with ASD up to the age of six years. Methods Behaviour measurement tools were identified as part of a larger, two stage, systematic review. First, sixteen major electronic databases, as well as grey literature and research registers were searched, and tools used listed and categorized. Second, using methodological filters, we searched for articles examining the measurement properties of the tools in use with young children with ASD in ERIC, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The quality of these papers was then evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Results We identified twelve tools which had been used to measure behaviour problems in young children with ASD, and fifteen studies which investigated the measurement properties of six of these tools. There was no evidence available for the remaining six tools. Two questionnaires were found to be the most robust in their measurement properties, the Child Behavior Checklist and the Home Situations Questionnaire—Pervasive Developmental Disorders version. Conclusions We found patchy evidence on reliability and validity, for only a few of the tools used to measure behaviour problems in young children with ASD. More systematic research is required on measurement properties of tools for use in this population, in particular to establish responsiveness to change which is essential in measurement of outcomes of intervention. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42012002223


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2015

Child‐focused psychosocial interventions for anger and aggression in children under 12 years of age

Jennifer Hanratty; Geraldine Macdonald; Nuala Livingstone

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the effectiveness of child-focused psychosocial interventions for anger and aggression in children under 12 years of age.


Health Technology Assessment | 2015

Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder

Helen McConachie; Jeremy R. Parr; Magdalena Glod; Jennifer Hanratty; Nuala Livingstone; Inalegwu P Oono; Shannon Robalino; Gillian Baird; Bryony Beresford; Tony Charman; Deborah Garland; Jonathan Green; Paul Gringras; Glenys Jones; James Law; Ann Le Couteur; Geraldine Macdonald; Elaine McColl; Christopher Morris; Jacqueline Rodgers; Emily Simonoff; Caroline B. Terwee; Katrina Williams


Archive | 2016

The relationship between poverty, child abuse and neglect: an evidence review

Paul Bywaters; Lisa Bunting; Gavin Davidson; Jennifer Hanratty; Will Mason; Claire McCartan; Nicole Steils


Landscape and Urban Planning | 2015

Emotional response to images of wind turbines: A psychophysiological study of their visual impact on the landscape

Anna M. Maehr; Greg Watts; Jennifer Hanratty; Deborah Talmi


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2015

Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome

Nuala Livingstone; Jennifer Hanratty; Rupert McShane; Geraldine Macdonald


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2015

Pharmacological interventions for dementia in people with Down Syndrome (Protocol).

Nuala Livingstone; Jennifer Hanratty; Rupert McShane; Geraldine Macdonald


Archive | 2010

Induction techniques developed to illuminate relationships between signs of emotion and their context, physical and social

Roddy Cowie; Ellen Douglas-Cowie; Ian Sneddon; Margaret McRorie; Jennifer Hanratty; Edelle McMahon

Collaboration


Dive into the Jennifer Hanratty's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claire McCartan

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Danya Glaser

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Cotmore

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge