Jennifer Lees

Time Spent at Home Poststroke “Home-Time” a Meaningful and Robust Outcome Measure for Stroke Trials

Background and Purpose— Stroke outcome assessment requires some measure of functional recovery. Several instruments are in common use but all have recognized limitations. We examined duration of stay in the patient’s own home over the first 90 days since stroke—“home-time”—as an alternative outcome likely to show graded response with improved reliability. Methods— We examined prospectively collected data from the GAIN International trial using analysis of variance with Bonferroni contrasts of adjacent modified Rankin scale score categories. Results— We had full outcome data from 1717 of 1788 patients. Increasing home-time was associated with improved modified Rankin scale scores (P<0.0001). The relationship held across all modified Rankin scale grades except 4 to 5. Conclusions— Home-time offers a robust, useful, and easily validated outcome measure for stroke, particularly across better recovery levels.

Association Between Disability Measures and Healthcare Costs After Initial Treatment for Acute Stroke

Background and Purpose— The distribution of 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores has been used as an outcome measure in acute stroke trials. We hypothesized that hospitalization and institutional care home stays within the first 90 days after stroke should be closely related to 90-day mRS, that each higher mRS category will reflect incremental cost, and that resource use may be less clearly linked to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) or Barthel index. Methods— We examined resource use data from the GAIN International trial comparing 90-day mRS with total length of stay in hospital or other institutions during the first 90 days. We repeated analyses using NIHSS and Barthel index scores. Relationships were examined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni contrasts of adjacent score categories. Estimated costs were based on published Scottish figures. Results— We had full data from 1717 patients. Length of stay was strongly associated with final mRS (P<0.0001). Each mRS increment from 0 to 1–2 to 3–4 was significant (mean length of stay: 17, 25, 44, 58, 79 days; P<0.0005). Ninety-five percent confidence limits for estimated costs (£) rose incrementally: 2493 to 3412, 3369 to 4479, 5784 to 7008, 7300 to 8512, 10 095 to 11 141, 11 772 to 13 560, and 2623 to 3321 for mRS 0 to 5 and dead, respectively. Weaker relationships existed with Barthel and NIHSS. Conclusions— Each mRS category reflects different average length of hospital and institutional stay. Associated costs are meaningfully different across the full range of mRS outcomes. Analysis of the full distribution of mRS scores is appropriate for interpretation of treatment effects after acute stroke and more informative than Barthel or NIHSS end points.

Low Body Temperature Does Not Compromise the Treatment Effect of Alteplase

Background and Purpose— Hypothermia is neuroprotective in ischemic stroke models. The influence of baseline body temperature on outcomes after thrombolytic therapy is unclear. We examined outcomes after alteplase treatment across baseline body temperature for patients with ischemic stroke in data held within the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA; 1998 to 2007). Methods— We collated data on age, baseline severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score on patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke. We compared 90-day modified Rankin Scale score between thrombolyzed and nonthrombolyzed comparators across baseline body temperature. We report age and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-adjusted Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel probability value and proportional OR with 95% CI for improved modified Rankin Scale distribution. We report temperature profiles over 72 hours after stroke by treatment group. Results— Rankin data were available for 5586 patients with acute ischemic stroke in VISTA (1980 received alteplase). Age and baseline severity were similar (age 68.0±13.0 years versus 69.9±12.3 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 14.2±5.2 versus 13.0±5.6). Alteplase was associated with improved outcome (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.65, P<0.0001). Alteplase treatment effect was not associated with baseline temperature (P=0.14). Point estimates showed benefit of alteplase treatment across 35.5°C to 37.5°C but showed a negative trend >37.5°C. Alteplase did not influence temperature profiles over 72 hours after stroke. Conclusions— There is no evidence of influence of body temperature on alteplase treatment response. These results are reassuring that low temperatures across a physiological range do not compromise therapeutic effect of alteplase.

Risk factors for bleeding complications after nephrologist-performed native renal biopsy

Abstract Background Bleeding is a recognized complication of native percutaneous renal biopsy. This study aimed to describe the incidence of major bleeding after biopsy in a single centre over a 15-year period and examine factors associated with major bleeding. Methods We identified consecutive adult patients undergoing ultrasound-guided native renal biopsy in the Glasgow Renal and Transplant Unit from 2000 to 2014. From the electronic patient record, we collected data pertaining to biopsy indication, pre- and post-biopsy laboratory measurements, prescribed medication and diagnosis. Aspirin was routinely continued. We defined major bleeding post-biopsy as the need for blood transfusion, surgical or radiological intervention or death. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with increased risk of major bleeding. Results There were 2563 patients who underwent native renal biopsy (1499 elective, 1064 emergency). The average age of patients was 57 (SD 17) years and 57.4% were male. Overall, the rate of major bleeding was 2.2%. In all, 46 patients required transfusion (1.8%), 9 patients underwent embolization (0.4%), no patient required nephrectomy and 1 patient died as a result of a significant late retroperitoneal bleed. Major bleeding was more common in those undergoing emergency compared with elective renal biopsy (3.4 versus 1.1%; P < 0.001). Aspirin was being taken at the time of biopsy in 327 of 1509 patients, with no significant increase in the risk of major bleeding (P = 0.93). Body mass index (BMI) data were available for 546 patients, with no increased risk of major bleeding in 207 patients classified as obese (BMI >30). Conclusions The risk of major bleeding following native renal biopsy in the modern era is low. Complications are more common when biopsy is conducted as an emergency, which has implications for obtaining informed consent. Our data support the strategy of not stopping aspirin before renal biopsy.

Interaction between socioeconomic deprivation and likelihood of pre-emptive transplantation: influence of competing risks and referral characteristics - a retrospective study

Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) influences likelihood of pre‐emptive kidney transplantation (PET), but the mechanisms behind this are unclear. We explored the relationships between SED and patient characteristics at referral, which might explain this discrepancy. A retrospective cohort study was performed. SED was measured by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD). Logistic regression evaluated predictors of PET. A competing risks survival analysis evaluated the interaction between SED and progression to end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) and death. Of 7765 patients with follow‐up of 5.69 ± 6.52 years, 1298 developed ESKD requiring RRT; 113 received PET, 64 of which were from live donors. Patients receiving PET were “less deprived” with higher SIMD (5 ± 7 vs. 4 ± 5; P = 0.003). This appeared independent of overall comorbidity burden. SED was associated with a higher risk of death but not ESKD. Higher SIMD decile was associated with a higher likelihood of PET (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06, 1.23); the presence of diabetes and malignancy also reduced PET. SED was associated with reduced likelihood of PET after adjustment for baseline comorbidity, and this was not explained by risk of death or faster progression to ESKD. Education and outreach into transplantation should be augmented in areas with higher deprivation.

The impact of coronary angiography on renal transplant function

Introduction There may be reluctance to perform coronary angiography in kidney transplant patients due to perceived risk of iodinated contrast, despite an increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared with the general population. Aim We sought to determine if renal transplant function was adversely affected within 7, 30 and 180 days of coronary angiography. Design and methods Renal transplant recipients undergoing coronary angiography in a single centre (01/2006-02/2018) were identified retrospectively. Baseline and highest SCr within 7, 30 and 180 days of coronary angiography were extracted from the electronic patient record. Rise in creatinine >26 micromol/l was considered significant [equivalent to Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Network criteria stage 1 AKI] and case note review performed to determine circumstance of renal decline. Results There were 127 coronary angiographies conducted in 90 patients: 67.7% were male and mean age was 58.0 (±10.1) years. There was AKI within 7 days in 18.9% cases, but SCr returned to baseline within 7 days or there was an alternative explanation for AKI in 83.3% of these. In the remaining four cases, there was progressive decline in renal transplant function. In the absence of critical illness, no patient required dialysis or extended hospital stay for contrast-associated AKI. Conclusions In this cohort of renal transplant recipients undergoing coronary angiography, AKI occurred in a minority of cases, and in more than 95% of such cases this effect was transient, with progressive renal decline a rare and predictable event. Renal transplant should not be regarded as a contraindication to coronary angiography.

Renal biopsy: it is time for pragmatism and consensus

ABSTRACT To obtain truly informed consent, we must be able to advise our patients accurately about the relative risk and benefit of any treatment plan. Percutaneous renal biopsy remains the gold standard investigation in the evaluation of intrinsic renal disease. There have been significant improvements in practice over the past decades with regards to percutaneous renal biopsy. Across centres, we appear now to have reached agreement on many aspects of this procedure, such as the need for blood pressure control, avoidance of coagulopathy, use of spring-loaded needles under direct imaging guidance and a need to monitor for complications. The authors from Rush University Medical Centre provide reassurance that renal biopsy in the modern era remains a safe procedure with a low rate of significant bleeding. There remain areas of divergence in practice that may have unintended and deleterious consequences: administration of desmopressin and discontinuation of aspirin, for example, both carry a risk of thrombosis. It is our opinion that it is time to reach consensus on our interpretation of the available data and to draw up guidelines to standardize our biopsy practice internationally.

The utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women with chronic kidney disease, on haemodialysis and after kidney transplantation

Women with renal disease have menstrual and gonadal dysfunction manifesting as hormonal imbalance. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a potential measure of ovarian reserve. We examined circulating AMH concentrations in young women with renal failure, determined associations with clinical characteristics, and compared AMH with age-matched healthy individuals. AMH was measured in 77 women: 26 had chronic kidney disease (CKD), 26 were on haemodialysis (HD), and 25 had a kidney transplant. Random AMH levels were highest in women on HD [HD 2.9 (1.1-5.2), CKD 1.6 (0.7-2.2), transplant 1.5 (1.0-4.2) ng/ml]. On multiple linear regression, AMH was 53% higher [95% CI 0.20-0.98, P = 0.002] in women on HD and decreased by 20% per 5-year increase in age (P < 0.001). AMH was 43% lower in women with renal failure compared with 600 age-matched controls [1.7 (0.9-3.8) versus 3.0 (1.9-5.0) ng/ml, P < 0.001]; however, we found no difference in AMH between those on HD and healthy individuals [2.9 (1.1-5.2) versus 3.0 (1.9-5.0) ng/ml]. AMH may be a useful biomarker in female renal patients with non-dialysis dependent renal disease pursuing pregnancy. In contrast, AMH levels are higher in HD but unlikely to reflect ovarian reserve.