Jennifer Ruth Fosket
University of California, San Francisco
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jennifer Ruth Fosket.
American Sociological Review | 2003
Adele E. Clarke; Janet K. Shim; Laura Mamo; Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Jennifer R. Fishman
The first social transformation of American medicine institutionally established medicine by the end of World War II. In the next decades, medicalization-the expansion of medical jurisdiction, authority, and practices into new realms-became widespread. Since about 1985, dramatic changes in both the organization and practices of contemporary biomedicine, implemented largely through the integration of technoscientific innovations, have been coalescing into what the authors call biomedicalization, a second transformation of American medicine. Biomedicalization describes the increasingly complex, multisited, multidirectional processes of medicalization, both extended and reconstituted through the new social forms of highly technoscientific biomedicine. The historical shift from medicalization to biomedicalization is one from control over biomedical phenomena to transformations of them. Five key interactive processes both engender biomedicalization and are produced through it: (1) the political economic reconstitution of the vast sector of biomedicine; (2) the focus on health itself and the elaboration of risk and surveillance biomedicines; (3) the increasingly technological and scientific nature of biomedicine; (4) transformations in how biomedical knowledges are produced, distributed, and consumed, and in medical information management; and (5) transformations of bodies to include new properties and the production of new individual and collective technoscientific identities.
Maturitas | 2000
Shelley R. Adler; Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Sarah A McGraw; Evaon Wong-Kim; Ellen B. Gold; Barbara Sternfeld
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this qualitative project was to describe and examine expectations and experiences of menopause and midlife in pre- and postmenopausal Chinese American and Chinese women in the United States. METHODS Four focus groups were formed from a total of 44 women: two groups of premenopausal Chinese/Chinese American women (one conducted in English and one in Cantonese) and two groups of postmenopausal Chinese/Chinese American women (one conducted in English and one in Cantonese). Qualitative data, in the form of transcripts, were interpreted using text-based content analysis. RESULTS The major thematic findings were: meanings of menopause are inextricably bound with meanings of midlife; the borders and timing of the menopausal transition are ambiguous; the menopausal transition represents a natural progression through the life cycle; the expectations of the premenopausal women did not match the experiences of the postmenopausal women; menopause is viewed as a marker for aging; and the menopausal transition must be prepared for and managed. CONCLUSIONS Study findings indicate that the participants did not share the strictly medicalized view of menopause as a discrete, biological entity. Menopause was typically described as a natural transition that was virtually interchangeable with midlife. While most of the participants characterized menopause as signaling the end of fertility and virtually synonymous with old age, some women described it as a new opportunity and a second chance at life. Participants felt a sense of their own agency in addressing what they viewed as a complex life stage, the experience of which could be manipulated.
Journal of Family Practice | 1999
Shelley R. Adler; Jennifer Ruth Fosket
Archive | 2009
Adele E. Clarke; Laura Mamo; Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Jennifer R. Fishman; Janet K. Shim; Elianne Riska
Signs | 2009
Laura Mamo; Jennifer Ruth Fosket
Archive | 2009
Adele E. Clarke; Janet K. Shim; Laura Mamo; Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Jennifer R. Fishman
Sciences Sociales Et Sante | 2000
Adele E. Clarke; Jennifer R. Fishman; Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Laura Mamo; Janet K. Shim
Archive | 2009
Adele E. Clarke; Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Laura Mamo; Jennifer R. Fishman; Janet K. Shim
Women’s Studies Quarterly | 2016
Adele E. Clarke; Jennifer Ruth Fosket
Ctheory | 2015
Jennifer Ruth Fosket; Jennifer R. Fishman