Jesse Leitner
Goddard Space Flight Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jesse Leitner.
Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2003
Keith C. Gendreau; Jesse Leitner; Landis Markley; Webster Cash; Ann F. Shipley
The MAXIM Pathfinder (MP) and Stellar Imager (SI) missions are under study to do 100 microarcsecond resolution imaging for a number of different targets using interferometers divided over formation flying spacecrafts. One of the most challenging technical hurdles for these missions is to have an independent directional reference in the sky to use for target acquisition and tracking. This directional reference will guide the placement of separate free flying elements of the interferometers to have ~<30 microarcseconds of alignment with the target. This paper will discuss some of the specific challenges as well as some possible options to explore for achieving this alignment.
Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2003
Alfred B. Schultz; Ian J. E. Jordan; M. C. Kochte; Dorothy A. Fraquelli; Fred C. Bruhweiler; J. M. Hollis; Kenneth G. Carpenter; Richard G. Lyon; Mike A. DiSanti; C. L. Miskey; Jesse Leitner; Richard D. Burns; Scott R. Starin; M. Rodrigue; M.S. Fadali; Dennis L. Skelton; H. M. Hart; F. C. Hamilton; Kwang-Ping Cheng
We describe a 1-meter space telescope plus free-flying occulter craft mission that would provide direct imaging and spectroscopic observations of Jovian and Uranus-sized planets about nearby stars not detectable by Doppler techniques. The Doppler technique is most sensitive for the detection of massive, close-in extrasolar planets while the use of a free-flying occulter would make it possible to image and study stellar systems with planets comparable to our own Solar System. Such a mission with a larger telescope has the potential to detect earth-like planets. Previous studies of free-flying occulters reported advantages in having the occulting spot outside the telescope compared to a classical coronagraph onboard a space telescope. Using an external occulter means light scatter within the telescope is reduced due to fewer internal obstructions and less light entering the telescope and the polishing tolerances of the primary mirror and the supporting optics can be less stringent, thereby providing higher contrast and fainter detection limits. In this concept, the occulting spot is positioned over the star by translating the occulter craft, at distances of 1,000 to 15,000 kms from the telescope, on the sky instead of by moving the telescope. Any source within the telescope field-of-view can be occulted without moving the telescope. In this paper, we present our current concept for a 1-m space telescope matched to a free-flying occulter, the Umbral Missions Blocking Radiating Astronomical Sources (UMBRAS) space mission. An UMBRAS space mission consists of a Solar Powered Ion Driven Eclipsing Rover (SPIDER) occulter craft and a matched (apodized) telescope. The occulter spacecraft would be semi-autonomous, with its own propulsion systems, internal power (solar cells), communications, and navigation capability. Spacecraft rendezvous and formation flying would be achieved with the aid of telescope imaging, RF or laser ranging, celestial navigation inputs, and formation control algorithms.
Proceedings of SPIE | 2004
David T. Leisawitz; Tom Abel; Ronald J. Allen; Dominic J. Benford; A. W. Blain; Claudio Bombardelli; Daniela Calzetti; Michael DiPirro; Pascale Ehrenfreund; Neal J. Evans; J. Fischer; Martin Harwit; Tristram T. Hyde; Marc J. Kuchner; Jesse Leitner; Enrico C. Lorenzini; John C. Mather; K. M. Menten; S. H. Moseley; Lee G. Mundy; Takao Nakagawa; David A. Neufeld; John C. Pearson; Stephen A. Rinehart; Juan Roman; Shobita Satyapal; R. F. Silverberg; H. Philip Stahl; Mark R. Swain; Theodore D. Swanson
Ultimately, after the Single Aperture Far-IR (SAFIR) telescope, astrophysicists will need a far-IR observatory that provides angular resolution comparable to that of the Hubble Space Telescope. At such resolution galaxies at high redshift, protostars, and nascent planetary systems will be resolved, and theoretical models for galaxy, star, and planet formation and evolution can be subjected to important observational tests. This paper updates information provided in a 2000 SPIE paper on the scientific motivation and design concepts for interferometric missions SPIRIT (the Space Infrared Interferometric Telescope) and SPECS (the Submillimeter Probe of the Evolution of Cosmic Structure). SPECS is a kilometer baseline far-IR/submillimeter imaging and spectral interferometer that depends on formation flying, and SPIRIT is a highly-capable pathfinder interferometer on a boom with a maximum baseline in the 30 - 50 m range. We describe recent community planning activities, remind readers of the scientific rationale for space-based far-infrared imaging interferometry, present updated design concepts for the SPIRIT and SPECS missions, and describe the main issues currently under study. The engineering and technology requirements for SPIRIT and SPECS, additional design details, recent technology developments, and technology roadmaps are given in a companion paper in the Proceedings of the conference on New Frontiers in Stellar Interferometry.
international frequency control symposium | 2003
Scott Francis; Samuel R. Stein; Thomas P. Celano; Jeremy Warriner; Jesse Leitner; Michael Moreau; Richard D. Burns; Robert A. Nelson; Al Gifford
This paper summarizes the development of mathematical simulators for precise time transfer and the underlying theoretical principles. Experimental tests with atomic clocks flown on aircraft and potential applications to future space missions are described.
Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2003
Jesse Leitner; Dave Quinn; Mark M. Matsumura
As part of The National Aeronautics and Space Administrations (NASAs) endeavor to push the envelope and go where we have never been before, the Space Science Enterprise has laid out a vision which includes several missions that revolutionize the collection of scientific data from space. Many of the missions designed to meet the objectives of these programs depend heavily on the ability to perform space-based interferometry, which has recently become a rapidly growing field of investigation for both the scientific and engineering communities. While scientists are faced with the challenges of designing high fidelity optical systems capable of making detailed observations, engineers wrestle with the problem of providing space-based platforms that can permit this data gathering to occur. Observational data gathering is desired at a variety of spectral wavelengths and resolutions, calling for interferometers with a range of baseline requirements. Approaches to configuration design are as varied as the missions themselves from large monolithic spacecraft to multiple free-flying small spacecraft and everything in between. As will be discussed, no one approach provides a ?panacea? of solutions rather each has its place in terms of the mission requirements. The purpose here is to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches, to discuss the driving factors in design selection and determine the relative range of applicability of each design approach.
Quality Engineering | 2018
Jesse Leitner; Bhanu Sood; Eric Isaac; Jack Shue; Nancy Lindsey; Jeannette Plante
Abstract In 2014, in response to a large volume of feedback from industry, the science community, and internal to Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), GSFC’s Safety and Mission Assurance (SMA) Directorate began a transition to a risk-based implementation of SMA, departing from its longstanding practice of being primarily driven by a mostly static set of Mission Assurance Requirements. The transition started out with a pilot project involving risk-based acceptance of bare-printed circuit boards that was enormously successful, continued through a complete organizational transformation in 2015, and culminated with the baselining of formal Risk-Based SMA policy in 2016. This article highlights five major examples of successful implementation of Risk-Based SMA that have demonstrated not only substantial savings in project resources, but also the ability to achieve the lowest level of risk in developing and operating inherently risky systems.
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit | 2003
J. Russell Carpenter; Jesse Leitner; David C. Folta; Richard D. Burns
Proceedings of the 2005 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation | 2005
Michael C. Moreau; Bo J. Naasz; Jesse Leitner; J. Russell Carpenter; Dave Gaylor
Proceedings of SPIE | 2004
David T. Leisawitz; Ronald J. Allen; Charles Baker; Dominic J. Benford; Claudio Bombardelli; Michael DiPirro; Pascale Ehrenfreund; Neal J. Evans; Martin Harwit; Tristram T. Hyde; Antoine Labeyrie; Jesse Leitner; Alice Liu; Enrico C. Lorenzini; Richard G. Lyon; Anthony J. Martino; John C. Mather; K. M. Menten; S. Harvey Moseley; Lee G. Mundy; Takao Nakagawa; Stanford Ollendorf; John C. Pearson; Dave Quinn; Stephen A. Rinehart; Juan Roman; Shobita Satyapal; R. F. Silverberg; H. Philip Stahl; Mark R. Swain
Archive | 2004
Richard J. Luquette; Jesse Leitner; Keith C. Gendreau; Robert M. Sanner