Jinli Liao

Conversion to shockable rhythms is associated with better outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial asystole but not in those with pulseless electrical activity

BACKGROUND The prognostic implication of conversion from initially non-shockable to shockable rhythms in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. Our objective is to determine whether the conversion to shockable rhythms is a reliable predictor of short- and long-term outcomes both in patients who initially presented with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and in those with asystole. METHODS A secondary analysis was performed on non-traumatic OHCA cases ≥18 years old with PEA or asystole as initial rhythms, who were treated in the field and enrolled in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) PRIMED study (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00394706). We reported the characteristics and outcomes for those patients with or without shocks delivered in the field. Logistic regression analysis assessed the association of shock delivery with pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcome as well. RESULTS Of the 9902 included cases, 3415 (34.5%) were initially in PEA and 6487 (65.5%) were in asystole. 744 (21.8%) PEA and 1134 (17.5%) asystolic patients underwent rhythm conversions and received subsequent shocks. For asystolic patients, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of shock delivery for pre-hospital ROSC, survival to discharge and favorable neurological outcome were 1.862 (95%CI 1.590-2.180), 3.778 (95%CI 2.374-6.014) and 4.154 (95%CI 2.192-7.871) respectively, while for PEA patients they were 0.951 (95%CI 0.796-1.137), 1.115 (95%CI 0.720-1.726) and 1.373 (95%CI 0.790-2.385) respectively. CONCLUSIONS Conversion to shockable rhythms was associated with better outcomes in initially asystolic OHCA patients, whereas such associations were not observed in patients initially in PEA.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with Do-Not-Resuscitate orders signed in hospital: Who are the survivors?

BACKGROUND Signing Do-Not-Resuscitate orders is an important element contributing to a worse prognosis for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, our data showed that some of those OHCA patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate orders signed in hospital survived to hospital discharge, and even recovered with favorable neurological function. In this study, we described their clinical features and identified those factors that were associated with better outcomes. METHODS A retrospective, observational analysis was performed on all adult non-traumatic OHCA who were enrolled in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) PRIMED study but signed Do-Not-Resuscitate orders in hospital after admission. We reported their demographics, characteristics, interventions and outcomes of all enrolled cases. Patients surviving and not surviving to hospital discharge, as well as those who did and did not obtain favorable neurological recovery, were compared. Logistic regression models assessed those factors which might be prognostic to survival and favorable neurological outcomes at discharge. RESULTS Of 2289 admitted patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate order signed in hospital, 132(5.8%) survived to hospital discharge and 28(1.2%) achieved favorable neurological recovery. Those factors, including witnessed arrest, prehospital shock delivered, Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) obtained in the field, cardiovascular interventions or procedures applied, and no prehospital adrenaline administered, were independently associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that some factors should be taken into considerations before Do-Not-Resuscitate decisions are made in hospital for those admitted OHCA patients.

Downregulated GTCPH I/BH4 Pathway and Decreased Function of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Their Relationship with Endothelial Dysfunction in Overweight Postmenopausal Women

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have endogenous endothelium-reparative potential, but obesity impairs EPCs. Overweight premenopausal women have a normal number of circulating EPCs with functional activity, but whether EPCs in overweight postmenopausal women can repair obesity-related endothelial damage requires further investigation. For this purpose, we examined the function and number of circulating EPCs, evaluated vascular endothelial function, and explored the underlying mechanism. Compared with normal weight or overweight age-matched men, postmenopausal women (overweight or normal weight) had a diminished number of circulating EPCs and impaired vascular endothelial function, as detected by flow-mediated dilatation. Moreover, GTCPH I expression and the nitric oxide level in overweight postmenopausal women and men were significantly decreased. Together, our findings demonstrate that the number or function of circulating EPCs and endothelial function, which is partially regulated by the GTCPH I/BH4 signaling pathway, is not preserved in overweight postmenopausal women. The GTCPH I/BH4 pathway in circulating EPCs may be a potential therapeutic target for endothelial injury in overweight postmenopausal women.

GW28-e0150 The Value of Heart Risk Score to Predict 30-day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Presenting to Emergency Department with Acute Chest Pain

To explore the Heart risk score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for the patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department. There are 209 Patients presented to emergency department with acute chest pain included. Clinical data and Heart scores were collected