Jiri Widimsky

The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study (AVIS) for Identifying the Major Subtypes of Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT In patients who seek surgical cure of primary aldosteronism (PA), The Endocrine Society Guidelines recommend the use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), which is invasive, technically challenging, difficult to interpret, and commonly held to be risky. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AVS and the ways in which it is performed and interpreted at major referral centers. DESIGN AND SETTINGS The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study conducted at major referral centers for endocrine hypertension worldwide. PARTICIPANTS Eligible centers were identified from those that had published on PA and/or AVS in the last decade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The protocols, interpretation, and costs of AVS were measured, as well as the rate of adrenal vein rupture and the rate of use of AVS. RESULTS Twenty of 24 eligible centers from Asia, Australia, North America, and Europe participated and provided information on 2604 AVS studies over a 6-yr period. The percentage of PA patients systematically submitted to AVS was 77% (median; 19-100%, range). Thirteen of the 20 centers used sequential catheterization, and seven used bilaterally simultaneous catheterization; cosyntropin stimulation was used in 11 centers. The overall rate of adrenal vein rupture was 0.61%. It correlated directly with the number of AVS performed at a particular center (P = 0.002) and inversely with the number of AVS performed by each radiologist (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Despite carrying a minimal risk of adrenal vein rupture and at variance with the guidelines, AVS is not used systematically at major referral centers worldwide. These findings represent an argument for defining guidelines for this clinically important but technically demanding procedure.

Prevalence of primary hyperaldosteronism in moderate to severe hypertension in the Central Europe region.

Recently published studies from different parts of the world report significantly higher prevalence of primary hyperaldosteronism (PH) in hypertensives (ranging from 5 to 25%) than the previously accepted figures. There have been no data so far about the prevalence of PH in Central Europe. Therefore, we have undertaken this study to evaluate the prevalence of PH in patients with moderate to severe hypertension referred to a hypertension unit in the Czech Republic, together with the determination of the percentage of different subtypes of PH including familial forms. In addition to that, we have evaluated the prevalence of other types of secondary forms of hypertension.A total of 402 consecutive patients (230 females and 172 males) with hypertension, referred to our hypertension unit, were studied. Positive aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR, (ng/100 ml)/(ng/ml/h)) ⩾50 as a more strict marker of PH was found in 87 patients (21.6%), 30% of them were normokalaemic. The diagnosis of PH was later confirmed in 77 cases (89%); the total prevalence of PH was thus 19%. PH consisted of the following forms: idiopathic hyperaldosteronism 42%, unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma 36%, unilateral hyperplasia 7%, nonclassifiable PH (refused operation/adrenal venous sampling) 13%, familial hyperaldosteronism type 1.2%. The prevalence of other types of secondary hypertension was as follows: pheochromocytoma 5%, renovascular 4.5%, hypercortisolism 2%, renal 0.75%.In conclusion, we have noted that PH in the Central Europe region (Czech Republic) is the most frequent form of endocrine hypertension with a considerably high prevalence in moderate to severe hypertension. Application of more strict criteria raises the probability of correct diagnosis of PH including the early normokalaemic stages of PH.

Pulse wave velocity in primary hyperparathyroidism and effect of surgical therapy

The study was aimed at investigating the arterial stiffness assessed by aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the presence of primary hyperparathyroidism (PH), with and without concomitant hypertension. Subsequently, we examined the effect of parathyroidectomy (PTX) on arterial stiffness. A total of 28 patients with PH and concomitant hypertension, and 16 with PH without hypertension were investigated in comparison with 28 essential hypertensive patients and 18 healthy controls, respectively. Patients were matched for age, blood pressure (BP), body mass index, lipid profile and fasting glucose. Six months after PTX, 15 patients were examined again (hypertensive as well as normotensive). PWV was obtained using the SphygmoCor applanation tonometer (AtCor Medical, West Ryde, Australia). PWV was significantly higher in patients with PH and hypertension when compared with patients with essential hypertension (10.1 vs. 8.5 m s−1, P=0.013). PWV remained significant even after adjustment for age and BP (P=0.02). Similarly, PWV was significantly higher in PH patients without hypertension in comparison with healthy controls (7.6 vs. 5.8 m s−1, P<0.001). Six months after surgery, in addition to a normalization of calcium metabolism, a significant decrease in systolic BP (131 vs. 123 mm Hg, P=0.004) and PWV (9.1 vs. 8.5 m s−1, P=0.024) was observed. After adjusting for BP reduction, the decrease in PWV appeared non-significant. Our data indicate that PH increases PWV as a marker of arterial stiffness, in both hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. However, neither the calcium serum level nor the parathyroid hormone level has been associated with PWV. Specific treatment by PTX significantly decreases PWV, which may be determined primarily by improved BP control after surgery.

Impact of essential hypertension and primary aldosteronism on plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration

Introduction. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has important role in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. Data on the impact of blood pressure (BP) on BNP are controversial. In primary aldosteronism (PA), BNP production can be affected by both hypertension and specific endocrine mechanisms. This study was aimed at investigating the impact of hypertension and hyperaldosteronism on plasma BNP levels. Methods. Plasma BNP concentration, casual and 24‐h BP and echocardiographic indices were assessed in 40 patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension (EH), 40 BP‐matched patients with PA, and 40 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls. Results. BNP levels in PA and EH groups did not differ significantly and were higher compared with those in controls [median and interquartile range 26 (13–48) pg/ml, p = 0.01, and 23 (9–32) pg/ml, n.s., vs 14 (6–26) pg/ml in controls]. Remarkably elevated BNP was observed only in three PA and two EH patients, all having significant left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. BNP levels in PA and EH groups correlated weakly with casual and 24‐h BP, interventricular septal thickness and LV mass index (LVMI). Diastolic BP and LVMI were identified as the strongest independent determinants of BNP (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions. Both PA and EH patients had modest and mutually comparable elevation of BNP, which was independently determined by diastolic BP and LVMI. Both subtypes of PA (aldosterone‐producing adenoma and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia) had similar effect on BNP production. Specific impact of hyperaldosteronism on BNP was not confirmed.

Vascular Disturbances in Primary Aldosteronism: Clinical Evidence

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common form of arterial hypertension with a high prevalence of cardiovascular complications. In patients with PA, complex mechanisms may lead to functional and/or structural abnormalities of the blood vessel wall. Clinical evidence indicates that patients with PA may have immune cell activation, increased oxidative stress, impaired endothelial function and vascular remodeling. Activation of fibroproliferation has been found in resistant arteries of patients with PA. Subjects with PA compared to essential hypertensives with similar blood pressure levels have increased intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness as measured by pulse wave velocity. These functional and morphological changes can be modified by an increased sodium intake. Vascular remodeling in PA may indicate a poor response to specific therapy with lower probability of cure and/or normalization of blood pressure. Early diagnosis of PA before blood vessel wall disturbances develop is of utmost importance.

The efficacy and safety of valsartan and combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension - the VICTORY trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM The aim of the trial was to establish the efficacy and safety of Valsacor® (valsartan) and Valsacombi® (combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide) in a wide variety of patient populations with mild to moderate arterial hypertension. METHODS We performed an international, multicentre, open-label, prospective trial. After one week of washout in previously treated patients, the patients were treated for 16 weeks according to the protocol. Naïve patients entered the treatment period immediately. During the active treatment, four visits were planned for each patient to obtain the data for the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints analysis. The principal methods were blood pressure (BP) measurement, additionally in a subgroup of patients, assessment of erectile function. The initial dosage of valsartan 80 mg/day was titrated up to 320 mg/day to achieve the BP goal, with the addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in a fixed-dose combination (FDC), if needed. RESULTS Mean ± standard deviation changes from baseline at week 16 were -26.6 ± 10.4 mm Hg (systolic BP) and -14.8 ± 7.6 mm Hg (diastolic BP). A total of 91% of the patients treated with either valsartan or valsartan FDC achieved the BP goal. Adverse reactions were experienced by 7.1% of the patients, with the most common being headache (1.9%), palpitation (1.6%), dizziness (1.6%), and fatigue (1.6%), during the whole trial. CONCLUSIONS The results of the VICTORY trial show that valsartan and valsartan FDC effectively reduce the BP in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension and have a good tolerability profile.

The efficacy and safety of valsartan and a combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: a subgroup analysis of the effect of valsartan and its combination with…

BACKGROUND AND AIM The aim of the study was to establish the effect of valsartan and combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central blood pressure (CBP) in a large population of patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension. METHODS This was an international, multicentre, open-label, prospective trial. After one week of washout in previously treated patients, 74 subjects were treated with valsartan or valsartan combined with HCTZ for 16 weeks according to the protocol. Naïve patients received the treatment immediately. During the active treatment, four visits were planned for each patient to obtain data for the primary and secondary efficacy. At the beginning and at the end of the study PWV and CBP were determined with central arterial pressure waveform analysis (SphygmoCor®, Atcor Medical). This study is registered with clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT number 2012-005129-57. RESULTS The results of the present VICTORY trial showed that valsartan and combination of valsartan and HCTZ effectively reduced the brachial blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension as well as PWV, central systolic blood pressure and central diastolic blood pressure. The effects on the augmentation index were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Valsartan and valsartan/HCTZ improve arterial stiffness in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.