Zuzana Šomlóová

Randomized Comparison of Renal Denervation Versus Intensified Pharmacotherapy Including Spironolactone in True-Resistant Hypertension Six-Month Results From the Prague-15 Study

This prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation (Symplicity, Medtronic) versus intensified pharmacological treatment including spironolactone (if tolerated) in patients with true-resistant hypertension. This was confirmed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after excluding secondary hypertension and confirmation of adherence to therapy by measurement of plasma antihypertensive drug levels before enrollment. One-hundred six patients were randomized to renal denervation (n=52), or intensified pharmacological treatment (n=54) with baseline systolic blood pressure of 159±17 and 155±17 mm Hg and average number of drugs 5.1 and 5.4, respectively. A significant reduction in 24-hour average systolic blood pressure after 6 months (−8.6 [95% cofidence interval: −11.8, −5.3] mm Hg; P<0.001 in renal denervation versus −8.1 [95% cofidence interval: −12.7, −3.4] mm Hg; P=0.001 in pharmacological group) was observed, which was comparable in both groups. Similarly, a significant reduction in systolic office blood pressure (−12.4 [95% cofidence interval: −17.0, −7.8] mm Hg; P<0.001 in renal denervation versus −14.3 [95% cofidence interval: −19.7, −8.9] mm Hg; P<0.001 in pharmacological group) was present. Between-group differences in change were not significant. The average number of antihypertensive drugs used after 6 months was significantly higher in the pharmacological group (+0.3 drugs; P<0.001). A significant increase in serum creatinine and a parallel decrease of creatinine clearance were observed in the pharmacological group; between-group difference were borderline significant. The 6-month results of this study confirmed the safety of renal denervation. In conclusion, renal denervation achieved reduction of blood pressure comparable with intensified pharmacotherapy.

Precise assessment of noncompliance with the antihypertensive therapy in patients with resistant hypertension using toxicological serum analysis

Background: The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of pseudo-resistance caused by noncompliance with treatment among patients with severe resistant hypertension and to analyze the contributing factors. Method: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients (195 men) with resistant essential hypertension were studied. The first group consisted of 176 patients admitted for hospitalization for exclusion of a secondary cause to our hypertension centre (103 men); the second one consisted of 163 out-patients (92 men) investigated for the first time in an out-patient hypertension clinic. Unplanned blood sampling for assessment of serum antihypertensive drug concentrations by means of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry was performed in all patients. Results: Our main finding is a surprisingly low compliance with drug treatment in out-patients with resistant hypertension (23% partially noncompliant and 24% totally noncompliant – in total, 47% prevalence of noncompliance). Eighty-one percent of hospitalized patients were positive, in 10% the results were partially positive and in 9% of the patients, the drugs were all negative. The compliance among hospitalized patients was probably better due to lower numbers of prescribed drugs and expected thorough investigation. More frequently, noncompliance was found in nonworking (potential purpose-built behaviour), younger and less well educated patients. The most frequent noncompliance was to doxazosine, spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide. We have observed a surprisingly low compliance with treatment among out-patients with severe hypertension. Conclusion: We conclude that the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs concentrations is a useful and precise method for assessment of noncompliance in patients with resistant hypertension. This evaluation is useful before starting the diagnostic work-up of secondary forms of hypertension and before assignment patients into protocols with new therapy modalities such as renal denervation.

Pulse wave velocity in primary hyperparathyroidism and effect of surgical therapy

The study was aimed at investigating the arterial stiffness assessed by aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the presence of primary hyperparathyroidism (PH), with and without concomitant hypertension. Subsequently, we examined the effect of parathyroidectomy (PTX) on arterial stiffness. A total of 28 patients with PH and concomitant hypertension, and 16 with PH without hypertension were investigated in comparison with 28 essential hypertensive patients and 18 healthy controls, respectively. Patients were matched for age, blood pressure (BP), body mass index, lipid profile and fasting glucose. Six months after PTX, 15 patients were examined again (hypertensive as well as normotensive). PWV was obtained using the SphygmoCor applanation tonometer (AtCor Medical, West Ryde, Australia). PWV was significantly higher in patients with PH and hypertension when compared with patients with essential hypertension (10.1 vs. 8.5 m s−1, P=0.013). PWV remained significant even after adjustment for age and BP (P=0.02). Similarly, PWV was significantly higher in PH patients without hypertension in comparison with healthy controls (7.6 vs. 5.8 m s−1, P<0.001). Six months after surgery, in addition to a normalization of calcium metabolism, a significant decrease in systolic BP (131 vs. 123 mm Hg, P=0.004) and PWV (9.1 vs. 8.5 m s−1, P=0.024) was observed. After adjusting for BP reduction, the decrease in PWV appeared non-significant. Our data indicate that PH increases PWV as a marker of arterial stiffness, in both hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. However, neither the calcium serum level nor the parathyroid hormone level has been associated with PWV. Specific treatment by PTX significantly decreases PWV, which may be determined primarily by improved BP control after surgery.

Importance of thorough investigation of resistant hypertension before renal denervation: should compliance to treatment be evaluated systematically?

Catheter-based renal denervation (RD) has been introduced recently as a potentially effective invasive treatment of refractory hypertension. The proportion of patients with severe hypertension suitable for RD is not clear. The aim of this study was to identify what percentage of patients has truly resistant essential hypertension and are thus potentially eligible for RD. We investigated 205 consecutive patients referred to a university hypertension center for severe hypertension within 12 months. Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure (BP) monitoring (24 h ABPM), secondary hypertension screening and compliance to treatment testing (by use of plasma drug level measurements) were performed in all patients. Fifty-seven patients (27.8%) did not have truly resistant hypertension (RH) based on clinical BP. Among the remaining 122 patients (59.5%) with RH confirmed by 24 h ABPM, 50 patients (24.4% of the original cohort) had a secondary cause of hypertension and in 27 (13.2%) non-compliance to treatment was confirmed. Thus, only 45 patients (22%) had truly resistant essential hypertension and were considered for RD. Only one-third (n=15, 7.3% of the original cohort) was, however, finally referred for RD (14 were excluded due to contraindications for RD and 16 refused the invasive treatment). In conclusion, thorough examination of severe hypertension including 24 h ABPM, secondary hypertension exclusion and drug compliance testing before considering RD reveals that majority of these patients are not suitable for RD. Specifically, compliance to treatment testing should be mandatory in order to identify eligible candidates for RD.

Long-term effect of specific treatment of primary aldosteronism on carotid intima-media thickness.

Background: Aldosterone has been shown to substantially contribute to the accumulation of different types of collagen fibres and growth factors in the arterial wall, thus increasing wall thickness. A previous study showed reduction of increased common carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) in patients with primary aldosteronism 1 year after adrenalectomy. Our study in patients with primary aldosteronism was aimed at comparing the long-term effect of adrenalectomy vs. spironolactone therapy on common carotid IMT regression. Method: Forty-two patients with confirmed primary aldosteronism (21 with aldosterone-producing adenoma treated by unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy, 21 treated with spironolactone) were investigated by carotid ultrasound at baseline and 1 and 6 years after the specific treatment. Results: There was a decrease in common carotid IMT from 0.956 ± 0.140 to 0.900 ± 0.127 mm (−5.9%; P < 0.05) at 1 year and to 0.866 ± 0.130 mm (−9.4%; P < 0.01) at 6 years after adrenalectomy; in the spironolactone group, common carotid IMT decreased from 0.917 ± 0.151 to 0.900 ± 0.165 mm (−1.8%; NS) at 1 year and to 0.854 ± 0.176 mm (−6.8%; P < 0.01) at 6 years of treatment. The magnitude of improvement at 1 year was significantly higher (by 70%; P < 0.05) in the adrenalectomy group; however, the difference (by 27%) became nonsignificant at 6 years. Comparing the adrenalectomy and spironolactone groups, there was no significant difference in blood pressure decrease after treatment. Conclusion: In the long term, spironolactone therapy in patients with primary aldosteronism had significant effect on regression of IMT, which was comparable to surgical treatment in patients with unilateral forms of primary aldosteronism.

Vascular Disturbances in Primary Aldosteronism: Clinical Evidence

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common form of arterial hypertension with a high prevalence of cardiovascular complications. In patients with PA, complex mechanisms may lead to functional and/or structural abnormalities of the blood vessel wall. Clinical evidence indicates that patients with PA may have immune cell activation, increased oxidative stress, impaired endothelial function and vascular remodeling. Activation of fibroproliferation has been found in resistant arteries of patients with PA. Subjects with PA compared to essential hypertensives with similar blood pressure levels have increased intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness as measured by pulse wave velocity. These functional and morphological changes can be modified by an increased sodium intake. Vascular remodeling in PA may indicate a poor response to specific therapy with lower probability of cure and/or normalization of blood pressure. Early diagnosis of PA before blood vessel wall disturbances develop is of utmost importance.

Combination antihypertensive therapy in clinical practice. The analysis of 1254 consecutive patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical use of different types of combination therapy in a large sample of consecutive patients with uncontrolled hypertension referred to Hypertension Centre. We performed a retrospective analysis of combination antihypertensive therapy in 1254 consecutive patients with uncontrolled hypertension receiving at least triple-combination antihypertensive therapy. Among the most prescribed antihypertensive classes were renin-angiotensin blockers (96.8%), calcium channel blockers (82.5%), diuretics (82.0%), beta-blockers (73.0%), centrally acting drugs (56.0%) and urapidil (24.1%). Least prescribed were spironolactone (22.2%) and alpha-1-blockers (17.1%). Thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics were underdosed in more than two-thirds of patients. Furosemide was prescribed in 14.3% of patients treated with diuretics, while only indicated in 3.9%. Inappropriate combination therapy was found in 40.4% of patients. Controversial dual and higher blockade of renin-angiotensin system occurred in 25.2%. Incorrect use of a combination of two antihypertensive drugs with the similar mechanism of action was found in 28.1%, most commonly a combination of two drugs with central mechanism (13.5%). In conclusion, use of controversial or incorrect combinations of drugs in uncontrolled hypertension is common. Diuretics are frequently underdosed and spironolactone remains neglected in general practice. The improper combination of antihypertensive drugs may contribute to uncontrolled hypertension.

Long-term effects of adrenalectomy or spironolactone on blood pressure control and regression of left ventricle hypertrophy in patients with primary aldosteronism

Introduction: Primary aldosteronism (PA) represents the most common cause of secondary hypertension. Beyond increased blood pressure, additional harmful effects of aldosterone excess including inappropriate left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy were found. We evaluated the effect of adrenalectomy and spironolactone on blood pressure and myocardial remodelling in a long-term follow-up study. Methods: Thirty-one patients with PA were recruited. Fifteen patients with confirmed aldosterone-producing adenoma underwent adrenalectomy; in the remaining 16 patients, treatment with spironolactone was initiated. Laboratory data, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and echocardiography parameters were evaluated at baseline and at a median follow-up of 64 months. Results: Both approaches reduced blood pressure (p = 0.001 vs. baseline). In both groups we observed a decrease in end-diastolic (p = 0.04, p = 0.01) and end-systolic LV cavity diameters (p = 0.03, p = 0.01). Interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness reduction was significant only after adrenalectomy (p = 0.01, p = 0.03) as was reduction of LV mass index (p = 0.004). A trend to lower LV mass on spironolactone was caused predominantly by diminution of the LV cavity, which was reflected in increased relative wall thickness (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Although both surgical and conservative treatment can induce a long-term decrease of blood pressure, adrenalectomy seems to be more effective in reduction of LV mass, as it reverses both wall thickening and enlargement of the LV cavity.

Randomized Comparison of Renal Denervation Versus Intensified Pharmacotherapy Including Spironolactone in True-Resistant Hypertension

This prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation (Symplicity, Medtronic) versus intensified pharmacological treatment including spironolactone (if tolerated) in patients with true-resistant hypertension. This was confirmed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after excluding secondary hypertension and confirmation of adherence to therapy by measurement of plasma antihypertensive drug levels before enrollment. One-hundred six patients were randomized to renal denervation (n=52), or intensified pharmacological treatment (n=54) with baseline systolic blood pressure of 159±17 and 155±17 mm Hg and average number of drugs 5.1 and 5.4, respectively. A significant reduction in 24-hour average systolic blood pressure after 6 months (−8.6 [95% cofidence interval: −11.8, −5.3] mm Hg; P<0.001 in renal denervation versus −8.1 [95% cofidence interval: −12.7, −3.4] mm Hg; P=0.001 in pharmacological group) was observed, which was comparable in both groups. Similarly, a significant reduction in systolic office blood pressure (−12.4 [95% cofidence interval: −17.0, −7.8] mm Hg; P<0.001 in renal denervation versus −14.3 [95% cofidence interval: −19.7, −8.9] mm Hg; P<0.001 in pharmacological group) was present. Between-group differences in change were not significant. The average number of antihypertensive drugs used after 6 months was significantly higher in the pharmacological group (+0.3 drugs; P<0.001). A significant increase in serum creatinine and a parallel decrease of creatinine clearance were observed in the pharmacological group; between-group difference were borderline significant. The 6-month results of this study confirmed the safety of renal denervation. In conclusion, renal denervation achieved reduction of blood pressure comparable with intensified pharmacotherapy.

Left ventricle remodeling in men with moderate to severe volume-dependent hypertension

We evaluated the influence of increased intravascular volume on the heart anatomy in salt-sensitive types of hypertension, represented by primary aldosteronism (PA) and low-renin essential hypertension (LREH). Echocardiography was performed in 128 males with moderate to severe or resistant hypertension: 44 patients had PA, 40 patients had LREH and 44 patients had normal-renin essential hypertension (NREH). Groups were comparable in demographic characteristics, blood pressure, duration of hypertension and previous antihypertensive treatment. Patients with PA and LREH, in comparison with NREH patients, showed both greater end-systolic (37.6±5.4 and 35.6±4.5 vs 32.6±4.4 mm, p<0.001 and p<0.05) and end-diastolic (56.1±4.5 and 54.0±4.8 vs 50.4±5.1 mm; p<0.001 and p<0.01) left ventricle (LV) diameter. There were no significant differences either in LV wall thicknesses or LV mass, although a higher percentage of patients with PA and LREH met the criteria of eccentric hypertrophy (p<0.001 and p<0.05 respectively). Aldosterone concentration was positively related to LV cavity dimensions, whether wall thicknesses were rather associated with blood pressure levels. In conclusion, plasma volume overload was identified as an important factor influencing LV remodeling in PA and LREH, whether due to excessive aldosterone levels in PA or other pathophysiological mechanisms.