Jm Eom
Hanyang University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jm Eom.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2018
Jm Eom; Joong Sub Choi; Jaeman Bae; Won Moo Lee; Eunhyun Lee; Jong-Won Lee; Ji Hyun Keum
BackgroundOvarian pregnancy is very rare, and contralateral tubal pregnancy coexisting with ovarian pregnancy must be even rarer.Case presentationA 33-year-old Korean nulliparous woman was referred to our hospital because she suffered lower abdominal pain and had missed her periods after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. We could not identify any normal gestational sac in the endometrium, or specific ectopic pregnancies, on an initial ultrasound scan. However, there was a large hematoma in the cul-de-sac and free fluid in the right paracolic gutter. We decided to perform emergent laparoscopic surgery. We found contralateral tubal and ovarian ectopic pregnancies.ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a case in which a patient underwent laparoscopic right salpingectomy and left ovarian ectopic mass excision due to contralateral tubal and ovarian ectopic pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology.
Obstetrics & gynecology science | 2017
Mi Rang Seo; Joong Sub Choi; Jaeman Bae; Won Moo Lee; Jm Eom; Eunhyun Lee; Jihyun Keum
Objective To analyze the preoperative diagnostic clues to ovarian pregnancy (OP). Methods This study conducted a retrospective chart review of 23 patients with OP and 46 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) from October 1, 2003 to September 31, 2016 in Hanyang University Hospital. Results There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. The presence of an ectopic gestational sac and hemoperitoneum was significantly higher in the TP group (13.0% vs. 95.7%, P=0.000; 13.0% vs. 54.3%, P=0.001, respectively) in preoperative ultrasonogram. The OP group had more ruptured ectopic gestational sacs than the TP group (73.9% vs. 45.7%, P=0.039) in surgical findings. Conclusion For the patients in whom a gestational sac is not detected in the uterus or the fallopian tubes, it is important to be aware of the possibility of OP and rupture of an ovarian gestational sac to promote early diagnosis and surgical intervention.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2018
Jm Eom; Junyeong Choi; J. Bae; W.M. Lee; U.S. Jung
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2018
Junyeong Choi; J. Bae; W.M. Lee; U.S. Jung; Jm Eom
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2018
Junyeong Choi; J. Bae; W.M. Lee; U.S. Jung; Jm Eom
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2018
Won Moo Lee; Joong Sub Choi; Jaeman Bae; Un Suk Jung; Jm Eom
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2017
W.M. Lee; Junyeong Choi; Jong Woon Bae; J. Bae; Jm Eom; U.S. Jung; J.H. Ko
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2017
Junyeong Choi; Jong Woon Bae; J. Bae; W.M. Lee; U.S. Jung; Jm Eom
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2017
Jm Eom; Junyeong Choi; Jong Woon Bae; J. Bae; W.M. Lee; U.S. Jung
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2016
Un Suk Jung; Junyeong Choi; J. Bae; W.M. Lee; Jm Eom; A.R. Koh; Jh Ko