Joachim Bürger

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection May Increase the Risk of Imprinting Defects

In germ cells and the early embryo, the mammalian genome undergoes widespread epigenetic reprogramming. Animal studies suggest that this process is vulnerable to external factors. We report two children who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and who developed Angelman syndrome. Molecular studies, including DNA methylation and microsatellite and quantitative Southern blot analysis, revealed a sporadic imprinting defect in both patients. We discuss the possibility that ICSI may interfere with the establishment of the maternal imprint in the oocyte or pre-embryo.

Sporadic Imprinting Defects in Prader-Willi Syndrome and Angelman Syndrome: Implications for Imprint-Switch Models, Genetic Counseling, and Prenatal Diagnosis

The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and the Angelman syndrome (AS) are caused by the loss of function of imprinted genes in proximal 15q. In approximately 2%-4% of patients, this loss of function is due to an imprinting defect. In some cases, the imprinting defect is the result of a parental imprint-switch failure caused by a microdeletion of the imprinting center (IC). Here we describe the molecular analysis of 13 PWS patients and 17 AS patients who have an imprinting defect but no IC deletion. Heteroduplex and partial sequence analysis did not reveal any point mutations of the known IC elements, either. Interestingly, all of these patients represent sporadic cases, and some share the paternal (PWS) or the maternal (AS) 15q11-q13 haplotype with an unaffected sib. In each of five PWS patients informative for the grandparental origin of the incorrectly imprinted chromosome region and four cases described elsewhere, the maternally imprinted paternal chromosome region was inherited from the paternal grandmother. This suggests that the grandmaternal imprint was not erased in the fathers germ line. In seven informative AS patients reported here and in three previously reported patients, the paternally imprinted maternal chromosome region was inherited from either the maternal grandfather or the maternal grandmother. The latter finding is not compatible with an imprint-switch failure, but it suggests that a paternal imprint developed either in the maternal germ line or postzygotically. We conclude (1) that the incorrect imprint in non-IC-deletion cases is the result of a spontaneous prezygotic or postzygotic error, (2) that these cases have a low recurrence risk, and (3) that the paternal imprint may be the default imprint.

Different mechanisms and recurrence risks of imprinting defects in Angelman syndrome

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurogenetic disorder that appears to be caused by the loss of function of an imprinted gene expressed from maternal chromosome 15 only. Approximately 6% of patients have a paternal imprint on the maternal chromosome. In the few cases, this is due to an inherited microdeletion, in the 15q11-q13 imprinting center (IC), that blocks the paternal-->maternal imprint switch in the maternal germ line. We have determined the segregation of 15q11-q13 haplotypes in nine families with AS and with an imprinting defect. One family, with two affected siblings, has a microdeletion affecting the IC transcript. In the other eight patients, no mutation was found at this locus. In two families, the patient and a healthy sibling share the same maternal alleles. In one of these families and in two others, grandparental DNA samples were available, and the chromosomes with the imprinting defect were found to be of grandmaternal origin. These findings suggest that germ-line mosaicism or de novo mutations account for a significant fraction of imprinting defects, among patients who have an as-yet-undetected mutation in a cis-acting element. Alternatively, these data may indicate that some imprinting defects are caused by a failure to maintain or to reestablish the maternal imprint in the maternal germ line or by a failure to replicate the imprint postzygotically. Depending on the underlying cause of the imprinting defect, different recurrence risks need to be considered.

Phenotypic differences in Angelman syndrome patients : Imprinting mutations show less frequently microcephaly and hypopigmentation than deletions

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a relatively frequent disorder of psychomotor development caused by loss of function of a gene from chromosome 15q11-q13, a region subject to genomic imprinting. The AS gene(s) is exclusively expressed from the maternal chromosome. Several kinds of mutations have been found to cause AS. More than half of the cases exhibit a deletion of the maternal 15q11-q13 region. Recently, we and others described a new mutation type, the imprinting mutation, characterised by normal, biparental inheritance but aberrant methylation patterns of the entire chromosomal region. In AS, a paternal imprint is found on the maternal chromosome probably leading to functional inactivation of the AS gene(s). We have now compared the phenotype of 9 AS patients with imprinting mutation to that of nine age-matched ones with a maternally derived deletion. Both groups were evaluated for 19 common AS symptoms. All patients, independently of their molecular findings, showed classical AS symptoms such s mental retardation, delayed motor development, and absent speech. In contrast, for two signs, hypopigmentation and microcephaly, a different distribution among both groups was observed. Only one of nine AS patients with an imprinting mutation, but seven of nine in the deletion control group showed either symptom. Our results suggest that imprinting mutations, in contrast to deletions, cause only incomplete loss of gene function or that maternally derived deletions affect also genes not subject to genomic imprinting. We conclude that AS is caused by loss of function of a major gene that is imprinted but that there are also other genes that contribute to the phenotype when in hemizygous condition.

Exceptionally mild Angelman syndrome phenotype associated with an incomplete imprinting defect

A ngelman syndrome (AS) is a relatively frequent disorder of mental and motor development. Affected subjects show severe mental retardation, delayed motor development, movement or balance disorders with ataxic gait and jerky limb movements, and absence of speech. In addition, distinct behavioural features, such as frequent laughter and hyperactivity, microcephaly, seizures, and EEG abnormalities are typically found.1 AS is caused by the loss of function of the maternal UBE3A gene. Structural mutations of the UBE3A gene are found in AS patients, suggesting that UBE3A is the major AS gene.2,3 More than two thirds of AS patients have a de novo deletion of approximately 4 Mb of the maternal chromosome region 15q11-q13, which affects several imprinted genes including UBE3A and SNRPN . Only about 1% of AS cases are the result of paternal disomy of chromosome 15. Finally, approximately 5% of AS patients have an imprinting defect (ID). Apparently normal chromosomes of biparental origin carry uniparental DNA methylation because of a maternal chromosome that erroneously carries a paternal methylation pattern.4 In some of these patients the incorrect epigenotype is caused by a deletion in the imprinting centre,5,6 but other mechanisms must exist as well.7 Several investigations with small numbers of AS patients suggested a genotype-phenotype correlation. Deletions appeared to correlate with a more severe phenotype than the other three mutation types. AS patients with imprinting defects showed microcephaly and hypopigmentation less frequently,8 those with UBE3A mutations were less severe affected than deletion patients,9 and AS patients with uniparental disomy showed better verbal development compared to deletion patients.10 Furthermore, an intermediate phenotype that more resembles Prader-Willi syndrome than AS was shown to be associated with AS imprinting defects.11 Recently, Lossie et al 12 reported a distinct genotype-phenotype correlation resulting from analysis …

Dystrophinopathy in a boy with Chediak–Higashi syndrome

Chediak-Higashi syndrome (CHS) is a hereditary, biphasic immunodeficiency syndrome which usually leads to early death, during the first decade. The second phase is characterized by a lymphoproliferative syndrome with histiocytic infiltrations in various tissues. Recently the gene has been identified on chromosome 1q43. In the patient presented here, a mutation within codon 3197 was found, resulting in a frame-shift. Additionally, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) was diagnosed by immunostaining of the muscle. Unusual for both CHS and DMD muscle weakness and hypotonia became evident during the first months of life. Compared to typical DMD cases we found an increased histiocytic infiltration in the muscle. The underlying muscular dystrophy probably predisposes to the affection of muscle in the second phase of CHS. This patient is presented as an example of modification of the phenotype by a second genetic disease.