Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joachim Schofer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joachim Schofer.


European Heart Journal | 2008

Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

Alec Vahanian; Ottavio Alfieri; Nawwar Al-Attar; Manuel J. Antunes; Jeroen J. Bax; Bertrand Cormier; Alain Cribier; Peter de Jaegere; Gerard Fournial; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Jan Kovac; Susanne Ludgate; Francesco Maisano; Neil Moat; Fw Mohr; Patrick Nataf; Luc Pierard; José L. Pomar; Joachim Schofer; Pilar Tornos; Murat Tuzcu; Ben van Hout; Ludwig K. von Segesser; Thomas Walther

AIMS To critically review the available transcatheter aortic valve implantation techniques and their results, as well as propose recommendations for their use and development. METHODS AND RESULTS A committee of experts including European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and European Society of Cardiology representatives met to reach a consensus based on the analysis of the available data obtained with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and their own experience. The evidence suggests that this technique is feasible and provides haemodynamic and clinical improvement for up to 2 years in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery. Questions remain mainly concerning safety and long-term durability, which have to be assessed. Surgeons and cardiologists working as a team should select candidates, perform the procedure, and assess the results. Today, the use of this technique should be restricted to high-risk patients or those with contraindications for surgery. However, this may be extended to lower risk patients if the initial promise holds to be true after careful evaluation. CONCLUSION Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising technique, which may offer an alternative to conventional surgery for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Today, careful evaluation is needed to avoid the risk of uncontrolled diffusion.


The Lancet | 2003

Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS)

Joachim Schofer; Michael Schlüter; Anthony H. Gershlick; William Wijns; Eulogio García; Erick Schampaert; Günter Breithardt

BACKGROUND Sirolimus-eluting stents have been developed to prevent restenosis in the treatment of coronary artery disease. We investigated the risk of restenosis with use of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents to assess possible differences. METHODS We enrolled 352 patients in whom one coronary artery required treatment, with diameter 2.5-3.0 mm and lesion length 15-32 mm. We randomly assigned patients sirolimus-eluting stents (n=175) or bare-metal stents (control, n=177). At 8 months we assessed differences in minimum lumen diameter and binary restenosis within the lesion (restenosis of > or =50% diameter, including 5 mm vessel segments proximal and distal to stented segment). Patients were also followed up for 9 months for major adverse cardiac events. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS Stent implantation was successful in 100% of sirolimus-stent patients and 99.4% of controls. The mean diameter of treated coronary arteries was 2.55 mm (SD 0.37) and mean lesion length was 15.0 mm (6.0). Multiple stents were implanted in 170 (48%) patients. At 8 months, minimum lumen diameter was significantly higher with sirolimus-eluting stents than with control stents (2.22 vs 1.33 mm, p<0.0001). The rate of binary restenosis was significantly reduced with sirolimus-eluting stents compared with control stents (5.9 vs 42.3%, p=0.0001). Significantly fewer patients with sirolimus-eluting stents had major adverse cardiac events at 9 months than did controls (8.0 vs 22.6%, p=0.0002), due mainly to a lower need for target-lesion revascularisations (4.0 vs 20.9%, p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION Sirolimus-eluting stents are better than bare-metal stents for treatment of single long atherosclerotic lesions in a coronary vessel smaller than 3 mm in diameter.


Circulation | 2009

Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study

Antonio Colombo; Ezio Bramucci; S. Saccà; Roberto Violini; Corrado Lettieri; Roberto Zanini; Imad Sheiban; Leonardo Paloscia; Eberhard Grube; Joachim Schofer; Leonardo Bolognese; Mario Orlandi; Giampaolo Niccoli; Azeem Latib; Flavio Airoldi

Background— Sirolimus-eluting stents have been reported to be effective in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Still, it has not been fully clarified which strategy would provide the best results with true bifurcation lesions. Methods and Results— The CACTUS trial (Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing 2 different techniques of stenting, with mandatory final kissing-balloon inflation, in true bifurcations: (1) elective “crush” stenting and (2) stenting of only the main branch, with provisional side-branch T-stenting. From August 2004 to June 2007, 350 patients were enrolled in 12 European centers. The primary angiographic end point was the in-segment restenosis rate, and the primary clinical end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization) at 6 months. At 6 months, angiographic restenosis rates were not different between the crush group (4.6% and 13.2% in the main branch and side branch, respectively) and the provisional stenting group (6.7% and 14.7% in the main branch and side branch, respectively; P=NS). Additional stenting on the side branch in the provisional stenting group was required in 31% of lesions. Rates of major adverse cardiac events were also similar in the 2 groups (15.8% in the crush group versus 15% in the provisional stenting group, P=NS). Conclusions— In most bifurcations with a significant stenosis in both branches, a provisional strategy of stenting the main branch only is effective, with the need to implant a second stent on the side branch occurring in approximately one third of cases. The implantation of 2 stents does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 6 months.


Circulation | 2006

Safety of Coronary Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Daily Clinical Practice One-Year Follow-Up of the e-Cypher Registry

Philip Urban; Anthony H. Gershlick; Giulio Guagliumi; Philippe Guyon; Chaim Lotan; Joachim Schofer; Ashok Seth; J. Eduardo Sousa; William Wijns; Claude Berge; Monika Deme; Hans-Peter Stoll

Background— The expanding indications for sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) include increasingly complex coronary lesions and populations with clinical profiles markedly different from those of early pivotal controlled studies. The e-Cypher registry monitored the safety and efficacy of SES currently implanted worldwide in daily practice. Methods and Results— Between April 2002 and September 2005, data were collected on 15 157 patients who underwent implantation of ≥1 SES at 279 medical centers from 41 countries. An independent endpoint review committee adjudicated all reported major adverse cardiovascular events, stent thromboses, and target-vessel revascularizations. Data were managed and analyzed by independent organizations. Predictors of adverse clinical events were identified by regression analysis. The mean age of the sample was 61.7±11.4 years; 77.7% were men, and 28.6% were diabetics. A total of 18 295 lesions were treated (20 503 SES) during the index procedure. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were 1.36% at 30 days, 3.38% at 6 months, and 5.80% at 1 year. The rates of acute, subacute, and late stent thrombosis were 0.13%, 0.56%, and 0.19% of patients, respectively, representing a 12-month actuarial incidence of 0.87%. Insulin-dependent diabetes, acute coronary syndrome at presentation, and advanced age were clinical predictors, whereas TIMI flow grade <3 after the index procedure, treatment of multiple lesions, a prominently calcified or totally occluded target lesion, and multivessel disease were the angiographic or procedural predictors of stent thrombosis at 12 months. Conclusions— This analysis of 1-year data collected by the e-Cypher registry suggests a high degree of safety of SES, with a rate of stent thrombosis similar to that observed in randomized trials.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 1988

Iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy: A noninvasive method to demonstrate myocardial adrenergic nervous system disintegrity in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy☆

Joachim Schofer; Rolf P. Spielmann; Andreas Schuchert; Kirsten Weber; Michael Schlüter

Iodine-123 (I-123) meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging was performed in 31 patients. Three patients were without cardiac disease and 28 had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with various degrees of left ventricular dysfunction. The qualitatively assessed myocardial I-123 MIBG scintigrams and the myocardial versus mediastinal I-123 MIBG uptake ratio were related to I-123 MIBG activity and norepinephrine concentration determined from endomyocardial biopsy samples taken from the right side of the interventricular septum. Scintigrams and the MIBG uptake ratio were also related to plasma catecholamine concentrations, left ventricular ejection fraction and New York Heart Association functional class. Patients with distinct myocardial I-123 MIBG uptake (score 1) had a normal ejection fraction (58 +/- 16%). Patients with diffusely reduced uptake or scintigraphic defects (score 2) had a significantly lower ejection fraction (38 +/- 9%, p less than 0.05), whereas patients with shadowy or no visible myocardial uptake (score 3) had the lowest ejection fraction (23 +/- 6%, p less than 0.002 versus patients with score 2). The scintigraphically determined I-123 MIBG activity in the septal region correlated significantly with I-123 MIBG activity from the endomyocardial biopsy samples (r = 0.78, p less than 0.001, n = 9). The myocardial versus mediastinal I-123 MIBG activity ratio was significantly related to myocardial norepinephrine concentration (r = 0.63, n = 28) and to left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.74, n = 31). These data suggest that myocardial I-123 MIBG scintigraphy is a useful noninvasive method for the assessment of myocardial adrenergic nervous system disintegrity in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.


European Heart Journal | 2010

Acute outcomes of MitraClip therapy for mitral regurgitation in high-surgical-risk patients: emphasis on adverse valve morphology and severe left ventricular dysfunction

Olaf Franzen; Stephan Baldus; Volker Rudolph; Sven Meyer; Malgorzata Knap; Dietmar Koschyk; Hendrik Treede; Achim Barmeyer; Joachim Schofer; Angelika Costard-Jäckle; Michael Schlüter; Hermann Reichenspurner; Thomas Meinertz

AIMS We sought to assess the feasibility of catheter-based mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system in high-surgical-risk patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > or =grade 3+. METHODS AND RESULTS MitraClip therapy was performed in 51 consecutive patients [73 +/- 10 years; 34 (67%) men] with symptomatic functional [n = 35 (69%)] or organic MR [n = 16 (31%)]. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 29 +/- 22%; Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 15 +/- 11. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 36 +/- 17%. In 35 patients (69%), adverse mitral valve morphology and/or severe LV dysfunction were present. MitraClip implantation was successful in 49 patients (96%). Most patients [n = 34/49 (69%)] were treated with a single clip, whereas 14 patients (29%) received two clips and one patient received three clips. Mean device and fluoroscopy times were 105 +/- 65 min and 44 +/- 28 min, respectively. Procedure-related reduction in MR severity was one grade in 16 patients (31%), two grades in 24 patients (47%), and three grades in 9 patients (18%). Forty-four of the 49 successfully treated patients (90%) showed clinical improvement at discharge [NYHA functional class > or =III in 48 patients (98%) before and 16 patients (33%) after the procedure (P < 0.0001)]. There were no procedure-related major adverse events and no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION Mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system was shown to be feasible in patients at high surgical risk primarily determined by an adverse mitral valve morphology and/or severe LV dysfunction.


Circulation | 2009

Percutaneous Mitral Annuloplasty for Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study

Joachim Schofer; Tomasz Siminiak; Michael Haude; Jean Paul R Herrman; Jindra Vainer; Justina C. Wu; Wayne C. Levy; Laura Mauri; Ted Feldman; Raymond Y. Kwong; David M. Kaye; S. Duffy; Thilo Tübler; Hubertus Degen; Mathias C. Brandt; Rich Van Bibber; Steve Goldberg; David G. Reuter; Uta C. Hoppe

Background— Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), a well-recognized component of left ventricular remodeling, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty has the potential to serve as a therapeutic adjunct to standard medical care. Methods and Results— Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, moderate to severe FMR, an ejection fraction <40%, and a 6-minute walk distance between 150 and 450 m were enrolled in the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study (AMADEUS). Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty was achieved through the coronary sinus with the CARILLON Mitral Contour System. Echocardiographic FMR grade, exercise tolerance, New York Heart Association class, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and 1 and 6 months. Of the 48 patients enrolled in the trial, 30 received the CARILLON device. Eighteen patients did not receive a device because of access issues, insufficient acute FMR reduction, or coronary artery compromise. The major adverse event rate was 13% at 30 days. At 6 months, the degree of FMR reduction among 5 different quantitative echocardiographic measures ranged from 22% to 32%. Six-minute walk distance improved from 307±87 m at baseline to 403±137 m at 6 months (P<0.001). Quality of life, measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, improved from 47±16 points at baseline to 69±15 points at 6 months (P<0.001). Conclusions— Percutaneous reduction in FMR with a novel coronary sinus-based mitral annuloplasty device is feasible in patients with heart failure, is associated with a low rate of major adverse events, and is associated with improvement in quality of life and exercise tolerance.


The Lancet | 1985

DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS TISSUE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR VERSUS PLACEBO IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

M. Verstraete; R. W. Brower; D. Collen; Aj Dunning; Jacobus Lubsen; P.L. Michel; Joachim Schofer; J. Vanhaecke; F. Van de Werf; W. Bleifeld; B. Charbonnier; D.P. de Bono; R.J. Lennane; Detlef G. Mathey; Ph. Raynaud; A. Vahanian; G.A.vande Kley; R.Von Essen

In a double-blind randomised trial 129 patients with first myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration were allocated to treatment with human recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) given intravenously over 90 min, or to placebo infusion. Coronary angiography at the end of this infusion showed that the infarct-related vessel was patent in 61% of 62 assessable coronary angiograms in the rt-PA-treated group compared with 21% in the control group. Treatment with rt-PA was not accompanied by any major complications. In the rt-PA group the circulating fibrinogen level at the end of the catheterisation was 52 +/- 29% (mean +/- SD) of the starting value.


European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 2008

Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Alec Vahanian; Ottavio Alfieri; Nawwar Al-Attar; Manuel J. Antunes; Jeroen J. Bax; Bertrand Cormier; Alain Cribier; Peter de Jaegere; Gerard Fournial; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Jan Kovac; Susanne Ludgate; Francesco Maisano; Neil Moat; Friedrich W. Mohr; Patrick Nataf; Luc Pierard; José L. Pomar; Joachim Schofer; Pilar Tornos; Murat Tuzcu; Ben van Hout; Ludwig K. von Segesser; Thomas Walther

AIMS To critically review the available transcatheter aortic valve implantation techniques and their results, as well as propose recommendations for their use and development. METHODS AND RESULTS A committee of experts including European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and European Society of Cardiology representatives met to reach a consensus based on the analysis of the available data obtained with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and their own experience. The evidence suggests that this technique is feasible and provides haemodynamic and clinical improvement for up to 2 years in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery. Questions remain mainly concerning safety and long-term durability, which have to be assessed. Surgeons and cardiologists working as a team should select candidates, perform the procedure, and assess the results. Today, the use of this technique should be restricted to high-risk patients or those with contraindications for surgery. However, this may be extended to lower risk patients if the initial promise holds to be true after careful evaluation. CONCLUSION Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising technique, which may offer an alternative to conventional surgery for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Today, careful evaluation is needed to avoid the risk of uncontrolled diffusion.


Circulation | 1989

Impact of compensatory enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary arteries on angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease.

Georg M. Stiel; Ludmilla S. G. Stiel; Joachim Schofer; Karl Donath; Detlef G. Mathey

To determine whether compensatory enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary arteries occurs and to what degree it affects the angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease, we performed postmortem coronary angiography of 30 human hearts with suspected coronary artery disease and studied 70 histologic cross sections of the proximal left anterior descending artery and proximal right coronary artery. Angiographic and morphometric analyses of 50 stenoses in proximal and middle sections of the left anterior descending artery, right coronary artery, and left circumflex artery were performed. The control group of 10 human hearts without suspected coronary artery disease was evaluated in the same way. For this purpose, coronary arteries were filled with a methylmethacrylic radiopaque resin at a pressure of 100 mm Hg and closely embedded in a methylmethacrylic resin by use of which shrinkage and mechanical artifacts could be avoided. The area circumscribed by the internal elastic lamina was taken as a measure of the area of the arterial lumen if no plaque had been present. The angiographic and corresponding morphometric degree of stenosis was assessed. A significant correlation (r = 0.85, p less than or equal to 0.0001) was found between the internal elastic lamina area and the area of the plaque (lesion area), suggesting that coronary arteries may enlarge as lesion area increases. With the morphometric degree of stenosis, the expected anatomic diminution of the coronary artery was abolished (r = 0.79, p less than or equal to 0.0001), indicating compensatory enlargement in atherosclerotic segments. Accordingly, the degree of stenosis assessed from in vitro angiograms was underestimated. Compensatory coronary enlargement of the stenotic segment was the main reason for angiographic underestimation. The underestimation factor of up to 3.50 for very mild stenoses decreased to 1.37 at an angiographic degree of 50% area stenosis and 30% diameter stenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Collaboration


Dive into the Joachim Schofer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Schlüter

Hamburg University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Verheye

Cardiovascular Institute of the South

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eberhard Grube

University Hospital Bonn

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexandre Abizaid

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Colombo

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Azeem Latib

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge