Joanna Wibig
University of Łódź
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joanna Wibig.
Climatic Change | 1999
Pavel Ya. Groisman; Thomas R. Karl; David R. Easterling; Richard W. Knight; Paul Jamason; Kevin Hennessy; Ramasamy Suppiah; Cher Page; Joanna Wibig; Krzysztof Fortuniak; Vyacheslav N. Razuvaev; Arthur V. Douglas; Eirik J. Førland; P. Zhai
A simple statistical model of daily precipitation based on the gamma distribution is applied to summer (JJA in Northern Hemisphere, DJF in Southern Hemisphere) data from eight countries: Canada, the United States, Mexico, the former Soviet Union, China, Australia, Norway, and Poland. These constitute more than 40% of the global land mass, and more than 80% of the extratropical land area. It is shown that the shape parameter of this distribution remains relatively stable, while the scale parameter is most variable spatially and temporally. This implies that the changes in mean monthly precipitation totals tend to have the most influence on the heavy precipitation rates in these countries. Observations show that in each country under consideration (except China), mean summer precipitation has increased by at least 5% in the past century. In the USA, Norway, and Australia the frequency of summer precipitation events has also increased, but there is little evidence of such increases in any of the countries considered during the past fifty years. A scenario is considered, whereby mean summer precipitation increases by 5% with no change in the number of days with precipitation or the shape parameter. When applied in the statistical model, the probability of daily precipitation exceeding 25.4 mm (1 inch) in northern countries (Canada, Norway, Russia, and Poland) or 50.8 mm (2 inches) in mid-latitude countries (the USA, Mexico, China, and Australia) increases by about 20% (nearly four times the increase in mean). The contribution of heavy rains (above these thresholds) to the total 5% increase of precipitation is disproportionally high (up to 50%), while heavy rain usually constitutes a significantly smaller fraction of the precipitation events and totals in extratropical regions (but up to 40% in the tropics, e.g., in southern Mexico). Scenarios with moderate changes in the number of days with precipitation coupled with changes in the scale parameter were also investigated and found to produce smaller increases in heavy rainfall but still support the above conclusions. These scenarios give changes in heavy rainfall which are comparable to those observed and are consistent with the greenhouse-gas-induced increases in heavy precipitation simulated by some climate models for the next century. In regions with adequate data coverage such as the eastern two-thirds of contiguous United States, Norway, eastern Australia, and the European part of the former USSR, the statistical model helps to explain the disproportionate high changes in heavy precipitation which have been observed.
Climatic Change | 1999
R. Heino; Rudolf Brázdil; Eirik J. Førland; Heikki Tuomenvirta; H. Alexandersson; Martin Beniston; C. Pfister; Martine Rebetez; G. Rosenhagen; S. Rösner; Joanna Wibig
A study of the long-term changes of various climatic extremes was made jointly by a number of European countries. It was found that the changes in maximum and minimum temperatures follow, in broad terms, the corresponding well-documented mean temperature changes. Minimum temperatures, however, have increased slightly more than maximum temperatures, although both have increased. As a result, the study confirms that the diurnal temperature range has mostly decreased during the present century in Northern and Central Europe. Frost has become less frequent. Two extreme-related precipitation characteristics, the annual maximum daily precipitation and the number of days with precipitation ≥ 10 mm, show no major trends or changes in their interannual variability. An analysis of return periods indicated that in the Nordic countries there were high frequencies of ‘extraordinary’ 1-day rainfalls both in the 1930s and since the 1980s. There have been no long-term changes in the number of high wind speeds in the German Bight. Occurrences of thunderstorms and hails show a decreasing tendency in the Czech Republic during the last 50 years. Finally, using proxy data sources, a 500-year temperature and precipitation event graph for the Swiss Mittelland is presented. It shows large interdecadal variations as well as the exceptionality of the latest decade 1986-1995.
International Journal of Climatology | 1999
Joanna Wibig
The relationships of circulation patterns defined as rotated principal components of the 500 hPa geopotential heights in the Euro-Atlantic sector to precipitation distribution in Europe during the winter months (from December to March) were investigated. In each month, four to five patterns are distinguished: the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Scandinavian, Central European, East European and East Atlantic. The first four are present each month, while the East Atlantic pattern is present only in December and March. Rotated principal components are used as indicators of circulation type intensity. The precipitation data consist of 321 series of monthly totals for the years 1951–1990. Maps of linear correlation coefficients between precipitation series and rotated principal components show the areas where precipitation is influenced by particular circulation types. The NAO has the greatest influence on precipitation in Western Europe; it enhances precipitation from France across the British Isles to Scandinavia and is a reason for low totals in Spain. The anticyclone over Scandinavia results in wet conditions in the Central Mediterranean and dry weather in northern Europe. The blocking phase of the Central European pattern combines with very low precipitation in Central Europe and higher-than-usual totals in the north. The East European pattern brings above-normal precipitation in north-eastern and south-western Europe, and below-normal precipitation in north-western and south-eastern areas in the phase when the geopotential level is low over the east Atlantic. Copyright
Earth’s Future | 2015
Douglas Maraun; Martin Widmann; José Manuel Gutiérrez; Sven Kotlarski; Richard E. Chandler; Elke Hertig; Joanna Wibig; Radan Huth; Renate A.I. Wilcke
VALUE is an open European network to validate and compare downscaling methods for climate change research. VALUE aims to foster collaboration and knowledge exchange between climatologists, impact modellers, statisticians, and stakeholders to establish an interdisciplinary downscaling community. A key deliverable of VALUE is the development of a systematic validation framework to enable the assessment and comparison of both dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. In this paper, we present the key ingredients of this framework. VALUEs main approach to validation is user- focused: starting from a specific user problem, a validation tree guides the selection of relevant validation indices and performance measures. Several experiments have been designed to isolate specific points in the downscaling procedure where problems may occur: what is the isolated downscaling skill? How do statistical and dynamical methods compare? How do methods perform at different spatial scales? Do methods fail in representing regional climate change? How is the overall representation of regional climate, including errors inherited from global climate models? The framework will be the basis for a comprehensive community-open downscaling intercomparison study, but is intended also to provide general guidance for other validation studies.
Archive | 2008
Raino Heino; Heikki Tuomenvirta; Valery Vuglinsky; Bo G. Gustafsson; Hans Alexandersson; Lars Bärring; Agrita Briede; John Cappelen; Deliang Chen; Małgorzata Falarz; Eirik J. Førland; Jari Haapala; Jaak Jaagus; Lev Kitaev; Are Kont; Esko Kuusisto; Göran Lindström; H. E. Markus Meier; Mirosław Miętus; Anders Moberg; Kai Myrberg; Tadeusz Niedźwiedź; Øyvind Nordli; Anders Omstedt; Kaarel Orviku; Zbigniew Pruszak; Egidijus Rimkus; Viivi Russak; Corinna Schrum; Ülo Suursaar
This section describes long-term observed climatic changes in atmospheric parameters. The focus is on surface climate conditions, but changes in atmospheric circulation are discussed as they often are behind climatic variability seen on regional and local scales. For a summary introduction on mean atmospheric states and conditions in the Baltic Sea Basin see Annex 1.2 with sections on the general atmospheric circulation (A.1.2.1), surface air temperature (A.1.2.2), precipitation (A.1.2.3), clouds (A.1.2.4), and global radiation (A.1.2.5).
Annals of Glaciology | 2008
Ewa Bednorz; Joanna Wibig
Abstract Rotated principal components of the 500 hPa geopotential heights in the Euro-Atlantic sector are used as indicators of circulation pattern intensity. Daily snow-cover depth data for the years 1951–95 from 71 eastern European stations are examined. Maps of linear correlation coefficient between monthly change in snow depth and rotated principal components are presented. The positive and negative extremes of each circulation pattern are analyzed, and positive and negative snow-depth signals indicated. A daily analysis of relationships between snow depth and circulation pattern is performed for three locations. The strongest impact of the atmospheric circulation on changes in snow depth is observed in the south and west of the study area, where the eastern European (EE) and central European circulation patterns are found to have the greatest impact. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) impact on the snow depth in eastern Europe is limited to the beginning and the end of winter. Snow cover has low variability in northeastern Europe (where the Scandinavian (SC) pattern is of greatest importance) and low sensitivity to change in the atmospheric circulation. The decrease in snow-cover depth observed in spring is related to the NAO, SC and EE patterns, the latter being important for snow-cover depth fluctuations over northeastern Europe in April.
Archive | 2015
Anna Rutgersson; Jaak Jaagus; Frederik Schenk; Martin Stendel; Lars Bärring; Agrita Briede; Björn Claremar; Inger Hanssen-Bauer; Jari Holopainen; Anders Moberg; Øyvind Nordli; Egidijus Rimkus; Joanna Wibig
This chapter examines past and present studies of variability and changes in atmospheric variables within the North Sea region over the instrumental period; roughly the past 200 years. The variables addressed are large-scale circulation, pressure and wind, surface air temperature, precipitation and radiative properties (clouds, solar radiation, and sunshine duration). Temperature has increased everywhere in the North Sea region, especially in spring and in the north. Precipitation has increased in the north and decreased in the south. There has been a north-eastward shift in storm tracks, which agrees with climate model projections. Due to large internal variability, it is not clear which aspects of the observed changes are due to anthropogenic activities and which are internally forced, and long-term trends are difficult to deduce. The number of deep cyclones seems to have increased (but not the total number of cyclones). The persistence of circulation types seems to have increased over the past century, with ‘more extreme’ extreme events. Changes in extreme weather events, however, are difficult to assess due to changes in instrumentation, station relocations, and problems with digitisation. Without thorough quality control digitised datasets may be useless or even counterproductive. Reanalyses are useful as long as biases introduced by inhomogeneities are properly addressed. It is unclear to what extent circulation over the North Sea region is controlled by distant factors, especially changes in Arctic sea ice.
Polar Research | 2016
Ewa Bednorz; Joanna Wibig
Snow accumulation and associated synoptic conditions in the Russian Arctic are analysed based on snow depth data from 1950 to 2013 from the All-Russian Research Institute of Hydrometeorological Information—World Data Centre data set. The mean duration of snow coverage in the Russian Arctic is approximately eight to nine months. While the period of snowmelt is usually very short (one or two months), snow accumulates during most of the cold season (October–May). Snow accumulation is associated with negative anomalies of sea level pressure and positive anomalies of air temperature, which means increased cyclonic activity over the analysed region. The cyclones differ in intensity and localization, depending on the area of snowfall. In the western part of the Russian Arctic the cyclones and air masses that bring snowfall may originate from the North Atlantic, while in the eastern part they originate from the Bering Sea, Okhotsk Sea or the North Pacific. The cyclones that bring snowfall may also form locally along the zonal border between two different air masses: the very cold, polar, continental air originating from the Siberian High and the Arctic air from the north, which is often warmer and always more humid than the continental air.
Quaestiones Geographicae | 2015
Ewa Bednorz; Joanna Wibig
Abstract The mean duration of snow coverage in the West Siberian Plain is approximately eight months in the north to about five months in the south. While the period of intense snow melting is short (one or two months between March and May), snow accumulation persists for most of the cold season. Snow accumulation is associated with negative anomalies of sea level pressure, which means increased cyclonal activity and weaker than normal Siberian High. Much lower anomalies of sea level pressure occur during snow ablation. This suggests smaller influence of air circulation on snow cover reduction in spring.
Archive | 2015
Joanna Wibig; Douglas Maraun; Rasmus E. Benestad; Erik Kjellström; Philip Lorenz; Ole Bøssing Christensen
General (global) circulation models (GCMs) are a useful tool for studying how climate may change in the future. Although GCMs have high temporal resolution , their spatial resolution is low. To simulate the future climate of the Baltic Sea region, it is necessary to downscale GCM data. This chapter describes the two conceptually different ways of downscaling : regional climate models (RCMs) nested in GCMs and using empirical and/or statistical relations between large-scale variables from GCMs and small-scale variables. There are many uncertainties in climate models, including uncertainty related to future land use and atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, limits on the amount of input data and their accuracy, and the chaotic nature of weather. The skill of methods for describing regional climate futures is also limited by natural climate variability. For the Baltic Sea area, the lack of an oceanic component in RCMs and poor representation of forcing by aerosols and changes in land use are major limitations.