Joe Caffrey
Queen's University Belfast
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joe Caffrey.
Biological Invasions | 2013
Jaimie T. A. Dick; Kevin Gallagher; Suncica Avlijas; Hazel C. Clarke; Susan E. Lewis; Sally Leung; Dan Minchin; Joe Caffrey; Mhairi E. Alexander; Cathy Maguire; Chris Harrod; Neil Reid; Neal R. Haddaway; Keith D. Farnsworth; Marcin R. Penk; Anthony Ricciardi
Forecasting the ecological impacts of invasive species is a major challenge that has seen little progress, yet the development of robust predictive approaches is essential as new invasion threats continue to emerge. A common feature of ecologically damaging invaders is their ability to rapidly exploit and deplete resources. We thus hypothesized that the ‘functional response’ (the relationship between resource density and consumption rate) of such invasive species might be of consistently greater magnitude than those of taxonomically and/or trophically similar native species. Here, we derived functional responses of the predatory Ponto-Caspian freshwater ‘bloody red’ shrimp, Hemimysis anomala, a recent and ecologically damaging invader in Europe and N. America, in comparison to the local native analogues Mysis salemaai and Mysis diluviana in Ireland and Canada, respectively. This was conducted in a novel set of experiments involving multiple prey species in each geographic location and a prey species that occurs in both regions. The predatory functional responses of the invader were generally higher than those of the comparator native species and this difference was consistent across invaded regions. Moreover, those prey species characterized by the strongest and potentially de-stabilizing Type II functional responses in our laboratory experiments were the same prey species found to be most impacted by H. anomala in the field. The impact potential of H. anomala was further indicated when it exhibited similar or higher attack rates, consistently lower prey handling times and higher maximum feeding rates compared to those of the two Mysis species, formerly known as ‘Mysis relicta’, which itself has an extensive history of foodweb disruption in lakes to which it has been introduced. Comparative functional responses thus merit further exploration as a methodology for predicting severe community-level impacts of current and future invasive species and could be entered into risk assessment protocols.
BMC Evolutionary Biology | 2010
Brian Hayden; Domitilla Pulcini; Mary Kelly-Quinn; Martin O'Grady; Joe Caffrey; Aisling McGrath; Stefano Mariani
BackgroundThe potential role hybridisation in adaptive radiation and the evolution of new lineages has received much recent attention. Hybridisation between roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) and bream (Abramis brama L.) is well documented throughout Europe, however hybrids in Ireland occur at an unprecedented frequency, often exceeding that of both parental species. Utilising an integrated approach, which incorporates geometric morphometrics, life history and molecular genetic analyses we identify the levels and processes of hybridisation present, while also determining the direction of hybridisation, through the analysis of mitochondrial DNA.ResultsThe presence of F2 hybrids was found to be unlikely from the studied populations, although significant levels of backcrossing, involving both parental taxa was observed in some lakes. Hybridisation represents a viable conduit for introgression of genes between roach and bream. The vast majority of hybrids in all populations studied exhibited bream mitochondrial DNA, indicating that bream are maternal in the majority of crosses.ConclusionsThe success of roach × bream hybrids in Ireland is not due to a successful self reproducing lineage. The potential causes of widespread hybridisation between both species, along with the considerations regarding the role of hybridisation in evolution and conservation, are also discussed.
Hydrobiologia | 2010
Jan-Robert Baars; Julie A. Coetzee; G.D. Martin; Martin P. Hill; Joe Caffrey
The non-native invasive plant, Lagarosiphon major (Hydrocharitaceae) is a submersed aquatic macrophyte that poses a significant threat to water bodies in Europe. Dense infestations prove difficult to manage using traditional methods. In order to initiate a biocontrol programme, a survey for natural enemies of Lagarosiphon was conducted in South Africa. Several phytophagous species were recorded for the first time, with at least three showing notable promise as candidate agents. Amongst these, a leaf-mining fly, Hydrellia sp. (Ephydridae) that occurred over a wide distribution causes significant leaf damage despite high levels of parasitism by braconid wasps. Another yet unidentified fly was recorded mining the stem of L. major. Two leaf-feeding and shoot boring weevils, cf. Bagous sp. (Curculionidae) were recorded damaging the shoot tips and stunting the growth of the stem. Several leaf-feeding lepidopteran species (Nymphulinae) were frequently recorded, but are expected to feed on a wide range of plant species and are not considered for importation before other candidates are assessed. The discovery of several natural enemies in the country of origin improves the biological control prospects of L. major in Europe.
Journal of Fish Biology | 2014
Brian Hayden; Alexia Massa-Gallucci; Chris Harrod; Martin O'Grady; Joe Caffrey; Mary Kelly-Quinn
Stable isotope and gut content analyses, in conjunction with backcalculated length-at-age estimates of growth, were employed to examine the relationship between trophic ecology and growth rate of a successful invader, Rutilus rutilus, in eight lakes in Ireland. The data revealed that R. rutilus was a trophic generalist in Irish lakes. It utilized a greater proportion of pelagic resources in mesotrophic lakes than in eutrophic lakes, potentially due to a greater density of benthic macroinvertebrates in eutrophic systems. The species was characterized by a large dietary and isotopic niche width and high temporal and spatial variations in diet. Growth rates were typical of those found in the native range of the species and were unrelated to either lake productivity or fishs diet. A generalist trophic ecology confers significant advantages on an invasive species, allowing it to exploit a variety of novel resources and fluctuations in prey availability.
Journal of Biogeography | 2014
Debbi Pedreschi; Mary Kelly-Quinn; Joe Caffrey; Martin O'Grady; Stefano Mariani; Albert B. Phillimore
Aim We investigated genetic variation of Irish pike populations and their relationship with European outgroups, in order to elucidate the origin of this species to the island, which is largely assumed to have occurred as a human-mediated introduction over the past few hundred years. We aimed thereby to provide new insights into population structure to improve fisheries and biodiversity management in Irish freshwaters. Location Ireland, Britain and continental Europe. Methods A total of 752 pike (Esox lucius) were sampled from 15 locations around Ireland, and 9 continental European sites, and genotyped at six polymorphic microsatellite loci. Patterns and mechanisms of population genetic structure were assessed through a diverse array of methods, including Bayesian clustering, hierarchical analysis of molecular variance, and approximate Bayesian computation. Results Varying levels of genetic diversity and a high degree of population genetic differentiation were detected. Clear substructure within Ireland was identified, with two main groups being evident. One of the Irish populations showed high similarity with British populations. The other, more widespread, Irish strain did not group with any European population examined. Approximate Bayesian computation suggested that this widespread Irish strain is older, and may have colonized Ireland independently of humans. Main conclusions Population genetic substructure in Irish pike is high and comparable to the levels observed elsewhere in Europe. A comparison of evolutionary scenarios upholds the possibility that pike may have colonized Ireland in two ‘waves’, the first of which, being independent of human colonization, would represent the first evidence for natural colonization of a non-anadromous freshwater fish to the island of Ireland. Although further investigations using comprehensive genomic techniques will be necessary to confirm this, the present results warrant a reappraisal of current management strategies for this species.
Biological Invasions | 2017
Ciaran Laverty; Kyle D. Green; Jaimie T. A. Dick; Daniel Barrios-O’Neill; Paul J. Mensink; Vincent Médoc; Thierry Spataro; Joe Caffrey; Frances E. Lucy; Pieter Boets; J. Robert Britton; Josephine Pegg; Cathal Gallagher
Invasive species management requires allocation of limited resources towards the proactive mitigation of those species that could elicit the highest ecological impacts. However, we lack predictive capacity with respect to the identities and degree of ecological impacts of invasive species. Here, we combine the relative per capita effects and relative field abundances of invader as compared to native species into a new metric, “Relative Impact Potential” (RIP), and test whether this metric can reliably predict high impact invaders. This metric tests the impact of invaders relative to the baseline impacts of natives on the broader ecological community. We first derived the functional responses (i.e. per capita effects) of two ecologically damaging invasive fish species in Europe, the Ponto-Caspian round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) and Asian topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva), and their native trophic analogues, the bullhead (Cottus gobio; also C. bairdi) and bitterling (Rhodeus amarus), towards several prey species. This establishes the existence and relative strengths of the predator–prey relationships. Then, we derived ecologically comparable field abundance estimates of the invader and native fish from surveys and literature. This establishes the multipliers for the above per capita effects. Despite both predators having known severe detrimental field impacts, their functional responses alone were of modest predictive power in this regard; however, incorporation of their abundances relative to natives into the RIP metric gave high predictive power. We present invader/native RIP biplots that provide an intuitive visualisation of comparisons among the invasive and native species, reflecting the known broad ecological impacts of the invaders. Thus, we provide a mechanistic understanding of invasive species impacts and a predictive tool for use by practitioners, for example, in risk assessments.
Journal of Fish Biology | 2015
Debbi Pedreschi; Stefano Mariani; J. Coughlan; C. C. Voigt; Martin O'Grady; Joe Caffrey; Mary Kelly-Quinn
The first comprehensive investigation of pike Esox lucius trophic ecology in a region (Ireland) where they have long been thought to be a non-native species is presented. Diet was investigated across habitat types (lake, river and canal) through the combined methods of stable-isotope and stomach content analyses. Variations in niche size, specialization and the timing of the ontogenetic dietary switch were examined, revealing pronounced opportunism and feeding plasticity in E. lucius, along with a high occurrence of invertivory (up to 60 cm fork length, LF ) and a concomitant delayed switch to piscivory. Furthermore, E. lucius were found to primarily prey upon the highly available non-native roach Rutilus rutilus, which may alleviate predation pressure on brown trout Salmo trutta, highlighting the complexity of dynamic systems and the essential role of research in informing effective management.
Management of Biological Invasions | 2014
Joe Caffrey; Jan-Robert Baars; Jenny H. Barbour; Pieter Boets; Philip Boon; Keith Davenport; Jaimie T. A. Dick; John Early; Lennart Edsman; Cathal Gallagher; Jackson A. Gross; Petri Heinimaa; Chris Horrill; Stéphanie Hudin; Philip E. Hulme; Stephen Hynes; Hugh J. MacIsaac; Paul McLoone; Michael Millane; Toril L. Moen; Niall Moore; Jonathan Newman; Ruairi O’Conchuir; Martin O’Farrell; Colette O’Flynn; Birgit Oidtmann; Trevor Renals; Anthony Ricciardi; Helen E. Roy; Richard Shaw
Aquatic Invasions | 2008
Joe Caffrey; Silvana Acevedo; Kevin Gallagher; Robert Britton
Management of Biological Invasions | 2016
Frances E. Lucy; Helen E. Roy; Annie Simpson; James T. Carlton; J. M. Hanson; Kit Magellan; Marnie L. Campbell; Mark J. Costello; Shyama Pagad; Chad L. Hewitt; Justin I. McDonald; Phillip Cassey; Sidinei Magela Thomaz; Stelios Katsanevakis; Argyro Zenetos; Elena Tricarico; Angela Boggero; Quentin Groom; Tim Adriaens; Sonia Vanderhoeven; Mark E. Torchin; Ruth A. Hufbauer; Pam L. Fuller; Mary R. Carman; David Bruce Conn; Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule; João Canning-Clode; Bella S. Galil; Henn Ojaveer; Sarah A. Bailey