Johan Pinto

Clinical Features, Management, and Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Related Cardiotoxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a major advance in the treatment of cancer. Although clinical trials reported a low incidence of immune-related cardiovascular adverse events,1 the number of published life-threatening cases of cardiotoxicity is increasing.2 In this descriptive observational analysis, we aimed to describe the clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes of patients who developed ICI-related cardiotoxicity. The medical records of patients with a clinical suspicion of ICI-related cardiotoxicity were reviewed from the databases of 2 cardio-oncology units between March 2015 and April 2017. The patients are managed according to similar protocols. Because no specific follow-up had previously been established for patients receiving ICIs during the study period, the oncologists referred patients receiving ICIs only on the basis of their clinical suspicion of cardiovascular events. These patients had a standardized evaluation including clinical consultation, ECG, transthoracic echocardiography, and measurement of brain natriuretic peptide and troponin I serum levels. The management of cardiotoxicity was left to the physician’s discretion. The study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent has been obtained from the subjects. To create a pooled analysis, we also searched PubMed for English articles reporting cases of ICI-related cardiotoxicity until April 2017. We selected …

Practices in management of cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity: A cardio-oncology survey

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular toxicity has become a challenging issue during cancer therapy. Nonetheless, there is a lack of consensual guidelines for their management. We aimed to determine the current practices of oncologists regarding cardiovascular toxicity related to anthracyclines, trastuzumab and angiogenic inhibitors and to gather their opinions on the development of cardio-oncology programs. METHODS A cross-sectional declarative study was submitted to French oncologists in the form of an individual, structured questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 303 oncologists responded to the survey. Ninety-nine percent of oncologists prescribed cardiotoxic therapies, including anthracyclines (83%), trastuzumab (51%) and other angiogenic inhibitors (64%). The method adopted for managing cardiovascular toxicity was based on guidelines from expert oncology societies for only 35% of oncologists. None was aware of recommendations from expert cardiology societies. Prescription of pre-, peri- and post-therapy cardiovascular assessment was inconsistent and significantly less frequent for all classes of angiogenic inhibitors than for anthracyclines and trastuzumab (P<0.0001). Relative to pre-therapy assessment, post-therapy assessment was prescribed significantly less often for all cancer therapies (P<0.0001). Attitudes regarding the onset of left ventricular dysfunction were much more inconsistent when angiogenic inhibitors were involved. Additionally, the management of hypertension and QT prolongation was also inconsistent. Finally, 88% of oncologists supported projects of cardio-oncology programs development. CONCLUSIONS Practices of oncologists are disparate in the field of cardiovascular toxicity. This finding underlines the complexity of managing many different situations and the need for distribution of formal guidelines from oncology and cardiology expert societies. The development of personalized cardio-oncology programs seems essential.

Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in selected patients with heart disease known to be at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Nevertheless, this invasive and definitive therapy is not indicated in patients with potentially transient or reversible causes of sudden death, or in patients with temporary contra-indication for ICD placement. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is increasingly used for SCD prevention both in patients awaiting ICD implantation or with an estimated high risk of ventricular arrhythmia though to be transient. We conducted a review of current clinical uses and benefits of the WCD, and described its technical aspects, limitations and perspectives.

Ventricular Arrhythmia Occurrence and Compliance in Patients Treated With the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with high risk of arrhythmic death. We aimed to evaluate ventricular arrhythmia (VA) occurrence rate and compliance with the WCD during the first 90 days following myocardial revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. METHODS From September 2015 to November 2016, clinical characteristics, WCD recordings and compliance data of the aforementioned subset of patients were prospectively collected. RESULTS Twenty-four patients (men=20, 80%) were included in this analysis. Mean age was 56±10 years and mean LVEF at enrolment was 26.6±4.3%. During a mean wearing period of 3.0±1.3 months, two episodes of VA occurred in two patients (8.3%): one successfully treated with WCD shock and one with spontaneous termination. The mean and median daily use of the WCD was 21.5hours and 23.5hours a day, respectively. Eighteen patients (75%) wore the WCD more than 22hours a day. CONCLUSIONS The rate of VA, during the WCD period use after myocardial revascularisation with PCI, was high in our study. Otherwise it underlined that patient compliance is critical during the WCD period use. Remote monitoring and patient education are keys to achieve good compliance.

Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery disease in heart failure with preserved and mid-range ejection fractions: A systematic angiography approach

BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend careful screening and treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in heart failure with preserved or mid-range ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmEF). AIM We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of CAD using a prospective systematic coronary angiography approach. METHODS A systematic coronary angiography protocol was applied in consecutive patients admitted for HFpEF/HFmEF during a 6-month period in a single centre. History of CAD and results of angiography, including revascularization, were reported. RESULTS Of the 164 patients with HFpEF/HFmEF who were included, an angiography assessment was applied in 108 (66%) (median age: 79 years [interquartile range: 70-85 years]; 54% were women). In our analysis, 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55-73%) of patients had a significant coronary stenosis corresponding to a global CAD prevalence of 80% (95% CI 73-88%). The prevalence of CAD was similar for HFpEF and HFmEF. The left main coronary artery presented a significant stenosis in 6.5% of cases and 39% of patients had a two- or three-vessel disease. The rate of significant coronary stenosis was non-significantly higher in patients with a history of CAD. Patients with HFpEF/HFmEF with and without CAD did not differ in clinically meaningful ways, in terms of symptoms or laboratory and echocardiography results. This strategy led to complete revascularization in 36% of patients with significant stenosis and in 23% of all patients with HFpEF/HFmEF. CONCLUSIONS Our study differs from others in that we used a systematic angiography approach. The results suggest a much higher prevalence of CAD in HFpEF/HFmEF than previously reported and should encourage clinicians to aggressively identify this co-morbidity.

Doppler echocardiography for assessment of systemic vascular resistances in cardiogenic shock patients

Objective: Impaired vascular tone plays an important role in cardiogenic shock. Doppler echocardiography provides a non-invasive estimation of systemic vascular resistance. The aim of the present study was to compare Doppler echocardiography with the transpulmonary thermodilution method for the assessment of systemic vascular resistance in patients with cardiogenic shock. Methods: This prospective monocentric comparison study was conducted in a single cardiology intensive care unit (Hopital Nord, Marseille, France). We assessed the systemic vascular resistance index by both echocardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in 28 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock, on admission and after the introduction of an inotrope or vasopressor treatment. Results: A total of 35 paired echocardiographic and transpulmonary thermodilution estimations of the systemic vascular resistance index were compared. Echocardiography values ranged from 1309 to 3526 dynes.s.m2/cm5 and transpulmonary thermodilution values ranged from 1320 to 3901 dynes.s.m2/cm5. A statistically significant correlation was found between echocardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution (r=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.93; P<0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% CI 0.72, 0.92). The mean bias was −111.95 dynes.s.m2/cm5 (95% CI −230.06, 6.16). Limits of agreement were −785.86, 561.96. Conclusions: Doppler echocardiography constitutes an accurate non-invasive alternative to transpulmonary thermodilution to provide an estimation of systemic vascular resistance in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Impact of the time-to-treatment concept on the outcome of acute heart failure: A pilot study

BACKGROUND An optimal maximum time of 60minutes has been recommended in recent guidelines for the first evaluation and treatment of patients with acute heart failure (AHF); however, this has not been tested prospectively. AIM To analyze the impact of a time-to-treatment (TTT) strategy of <60minutes on the in-hospital outcome of patients with AHF. METHODS During a single 1-month period, we consecutively enrolled all patients hospitalized with AHF in a prospective cohort. In this pilot study, TTT was defined as the time between the first medical contact to the onset of the first medical intervention. The primary outcome was a composite including in-hospital death or worsening AHF. RESULTS Of the 74 patients included, 23 (31%) had a TTT of <60minutes. Although these patients were more likely to have a more severe episode of AHF, the primary outcome occurred only in patients with a TTT of ≥60minutes. The primary outcome was significantly associated with a TTT of ≥60minutes (P=0.036), low systolic blood pressure (P<0.01), rales more than halfway up the lung fields (P=0.02), infectious precipitating factor (P=0.04) and high serum concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide (P<0.01) and urea (P=0.03). No significant differences were observed in the rate of treatment-induced acute renal insufficiency or in the long-term rates of death or rehospitalization for heart failure according to TTT. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the recently recommended TTT strategy of <60minutes in the setting of AHF might be associated with a better prognosis during hospitalization. Further large prospective works are needed to confirm these preliminary results, and to define more precisely which types of AHF could benefit from this strategy.

Clopidogrel Response Variability: Etiology and Clinical Relevance

Antiplatelet therapy is key to the care of coronary artery disease. Continuous improvement in the understanding of athero-thrombosis and the pathways of platelet activation has led to tremendous enhancement in the care of patients. The addition of a P2Y12-ADP receptor blocker in particular was a great leap forward in the care of acute coronary syndrome patients and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the development of platelet assays has demonstrated that the one fits it all dosing of clopidogrel resulted in various levels of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition which translated into varying clinical outcomes. Clopidogrel resistance or high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (high on-treatment platelet reactivity, HTPR) was identified and correlated with poor clinical outcome. In addition further to this early finding, researchers have also demonstrated that low on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was associated with bleedings. In the present review, we aimed to summarize the mechanism and etiologies of HTPR in clopidogrel-treated patients and its clinical importance.