Johanna Mård
Uppsala University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Johanna Mård.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Arvid Bring; I. Fedorova; Yonas B. Dibike; Larry D. Hinzman; Johanna Mård; Sebastian H. Mernild; Terry D. Prowse; O. Semenova; S. L. Stuefer; M‐k. Woo
Terrestrial hydrology is central to the Arctic system and its freshwater circulation. Water transport and water constituents vary, however, across a very diverse geography. In this paper, which is ...
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Frederick J. Wrona; Margareta Johansson; Joseph M. Culp; Alan Jenkins; Johanna Mård; Isla H. Myers-Smith; Terry D. Prowse; Warwick F. Vincent; Philip A. Wookey
Numerous international scientific assessments and related articles have, during the last decade, described the observed and potential impacts of climate change as well as other related environmental stressors on Arctic ecosystems. There is increasing recognition that observed and projected changes in freshwater sources, fluxes, and storage will have profound implications for the physical, biogeochemical, biological, and ecological processes and properties of Arctic terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. However, a significant level of uncertainty remains in relation to forecasting the impacts of an intensified hydrological regime and related cryospheric change on ecosystem structure and function. As the terrestrial and freshwater ecology component of the Arctic Freshwater Synthesis, we review these uncertainties and recommend enhanced coordinated circumpolar research and monitoring efforts to improve quantification and prediction of how an altered hydrological regime influences local, regional, and circumpolar-level responses in terrestrial and freshwater systems. Specifically, we evaluate (i) changes in ecosystem productivity; (ii) alterations in ecosystem-level biogeochemical cycling and chemical transport; (iii) altered landscapes, successional trajectories, and creation of new habitats; (iv) altered seasonality and phenological mismatches; and (v) gains or losses of species and associated trophic interactions. We emphasize the need for developing a process-based understanding of interecosystem interactions, along with improved predictive models. We recommend enhanced use of the catchment scale as an integrated unit of study, thereby more explicitly considering the physical, chemical, and ecological processes and fluxes across a full freshwater continuum in a geographic region and spatial range of hydroecological units (e.g., stream-pond-lake-river-near shore marine environments).
Earth’s Future | 2017
Heidi Kreibich; Giuliano Di Baldassarre; Sergiy Vorogushyn; J.C.J.H. Aerts; Heiko Apel; Giuseppe T. Aronica; Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen; Laurens M. Bouwer; P. Bubeck; Tommaso Caloiero; Do Thi Chinh; Maria Cortès; Animesh K. Gain; Vincenzo Giampá; Christian Kuhlicke; Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz; M. C. Llasat; Johanna Mård; Piotr Matczak; Maurizio Mazzoleni; Daniela Molinari; Nguyen Viet Dung; Olga Petrucci; Kai Schröter; Kymo Slager; Annegret H. Thieken; Philip J. Ward; Bruno Merz
As flood impacts are increasing in large parts of the world, understanding the primary drivers of changes in risk is essential for effective adaptation. To gain more knowledge on the basis of empirical case studies, we analyze eight paired floods, that is, consecutive flood events that occurred in the same region, with the second flood causing significantly lower damage. These success stories of risk reduction were selected across different socioeconomic and hydro-climatic contexts. The potential of societies to adapt is uncovered by describing triggered societal changes, as well as formal measures and spontaneous processes that reduced flood risk. This novel approach has the potential to build the basis for an international data collection and analysis effort to better understand and attribute changes in risk due to hydrological extremes in the framework of the IAHSs Panta Rhei initiative. Across all case studies, we find that lower damage caused by the second event was mainly due to significant reductions in vulnerability, for example, via raised risk awareness, preparedness, and improvements of organizational emergency management. Thus, vulnerability reduction plays an essential role for successful adaptation. Our work shows that there is a high potential to adapt, but there remains the challenge to stimulate measures that reduce vulnerability and risk in periods in which extreme events do not occur.
Earth’s Future | 2018
Giuliano Di Baldassarre; Daniel Nohrstedt; Johanna Mård; Steffi Burchardt; Cecilia Albin; Sara Bondesson; Korbinian Breinl; Frances Deegan; Diana Fuentes; Marc Girons Lopez; Mikael Granberg; Lars Nyberg; Monika Rydstedt Nyman; Emma Rhodes; Valentin R. Troll; Stephanie Young; Colin Walch; Charles F. Parker
Climate change, globalization, urbanization, social isolation, and increased interconnectednessbetween physical, human, and technological systems pose major challenges to disaster risk reduction(DR ...
Science Advances | 2018
Johanna Mård; Giuliano Di Baldassarre; Maurizio Mazzoleni
Catastrophic flood events can trigger human resettlement away from rivers. To understand the spatiotemporal changes of flood risk, we need to determine the way in which humans adapt and respond to flood events. One adaptation option consists of resettling away from flood-prone areas to prevent or reduce future losses. We use satellite nighttime light data to discern the relationship between long-term changes in human proximity to rivers and the occurrence of catastrophic flood events. Moreover, we explore how these relationships are influenced by different levels of structural flood protection. We found that societies with low protection levels tend to resettle further away from the river after damaging flood events. Conversely, societies with high protection levels show no significant changes in human proximity to rivers. Instead, such societies continue to rely heavily on structural measures, reinforcing flood protection and quickly resettling in flood-prone areas after a flooding event. Our work reveals interesting aspects of human adaptation to flood risk and offers key insights for comparing different risk reduction strategies. In addition, this study provides a framework that can be used to further investigate human response to floods, which is relevant as urbanization of floodplains continues and puts more people and economic assets at risk.
Ecological Engineering | 2017
Josefin Thorslund; Jerker Jarsjö; Fernando Jaramillo; James W. Jawitz; Stefano Manzoni; Nandita B. Basu; Sergey Chalov; Matthew J. Cohen; Irena F. Creed; Romain Goldenberg; Anna Hylin; Zahra Kalantari; Antonis D. Koussis; Steve W. Lyon; Katerina Mazi; Johanna Mård; Klas Persson; Jan Pietro; Carmen Prieto; Andrew Quin; Kimberly J. Van Meter; Georgia Destouni
Land Degradation & Development | 2018
Elisabeth Groß; Johanna Mård; Zahra Kalantari; Arvid Bring
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions | 2018
Giuliano Di Baldassarre; Heidi Kreibich; Sergiy Vorogushyn; J.C.J.H. Aerts; Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen; Marlies Holkje Barendrecht; Paul D. Bates; Marco Borga; W.J.W. Botzen; P. Bubeck; Bruna De Marchi; Carmen Llasat; Maurizio Mazzoleni; Daniela Molinari; Elena Mondino; Johanna Mård; Olga Petrucci; Anna Scolobig; Alberto Viglione; Philip J. Ward
Earth’s Future | 2017
Heidi Kreibich; Giuliano Di Baldassarre; Sergiy Vorogushyn; J.C.J.H. Aerts; Heiko Apel; Giuseppe T. Aronica; Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen; Laurens M. Bouwer; P. Bubeck; Tommaso Caloiero; Do Thi Chinh; Maria Cortès; Animesh K. Gain; Vincenzo Giampá; Christian Kuhlicke; Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz; M. C. Llasat; Johanna Mård; Piotr Matczak; Maurizio Mazzoleni; Daniela Molinari; Nguyen Viet Dung; Olga Petrucci; Kai Schröter; Kymo Slager; Annegret H. Thieken; Philip J. Ward; Bruno Merz
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Arvid Bring; I. Fedorova; Yonas B. Dibike; Larry D. Hinzman; Johanna Mård; Sebastian H. Mernild; Terry D. Prowse; O. Semenova; S. L. Stuefer; M‐k. Woo