Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John A. Hamley.
33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | 1997
James S. Sovey; John A. Hamley; Thomas W. Haag; Michael J. Patterson; Eric J. Pencil; Todd Peterson; Luis R. Pinero; John L. Power; Vincent K. Rawlin; Charles J. Sarmiento; John Anderson; Thomas Bond; G. I. Cardwell; Jon Christensen
James S. Sovey, John A. Hamley, Thomas W. Haag, Michael J. Patterson, Eric J. Pencil,Todd T. Peterson, Luis R. Pinero, John L. Power, Vincent K. Rawlin, and Charles J. SarmientoNASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OhioJohn R. Anderson, Raymond A. Becker, John R. Brophy, and James E. PolkJet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CaliforniaGerald Benson, Thomas A. Bond, G. I. Cardwell, Jon A. Christensen, Kenneth J. Freick,David J. Hamel, Stephen L. Hart, John McDowell, Kirk A. Norenberg, T. Keith Phelps,Ezequiel Solis, and Harold YostHughes Electron Dynamics Division, Torrance, CaliforniaMichael MatrangaSpectrum Astro Incorporated, Gilbert, ArizonaPrepared for the33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibitcosponsored by AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEESeattle, Washington, July 6-9, 1997National Aeronautics andSpace AdministrationLewis Research Center
27th Joint Propulsion Conference | 1991
John A. Hamley; Gerald M. Hill
In anticipation of the needs of future light-weight, low-power spacecraft, arcjet power electronics in the 100 to 400 W operating range were developed. Limited spacecraft power and thermal control capacity of these small spacecraft emphasized the need for high efficiency. Power topologies similar to those in the higher 2 kW and 5 to 30 kW power range were implemented, including a four transistor bridge switching circuit, current mode pulse-width modulated control, and an output current averaging inductor with an integral pulse generation winding. Reduction of switching transients was accomplished using a low inductance power distribution network, and no passive snubber circuits were necessary for power switch protection. Phase shift control of the power bridge was accomplished using an improved pulse width modulation to phase shift converter circuit. These features, along with conservative magnetics designs allowed power conversion efficiencies of greater than 92.5 percent to be achieved into resistive loads over the entire operating range of the converter. Electromagnetic compatibility requirements were not considered in this work, and control power for the converter was derived from AC mains. Addition of input filters and control power converters would result in an efficiency of on the order of 90 percent for a flight unit. Due to the developmental nature of arcjet systems at this power level, the exact nature of the thruster/power processor interface was not quantified. Output regulation and current ripple requirements of 1 and 20 percent respectively, as well as starting techniques, were derived from the characteristics of the 2 kW system but an open circuit voltage in excess of 175 V was specified. Arcjet integration tests were performed, resulting in successful starts and stable arcjet operation at power levels as low as 240 W with simulated hydrazine propellants.
31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | 1995
John A. Hamley; Luis R. Pinero; Vincent K. Rawlin; John R. Miller; Kevin C. Cartier; Glen E. Bowers
A 0.5-2.3 kW xenon ion propulsion system is presently being developed under the NASA Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) program. This propulsion system includes a 30 cm diameter xenon ion thruster, a Digital Control Interface Unit, a xenon feed system, and a power processing unit (PPU). The PPU consists of the power supply assemblies which operate the thruster neutralizer, main discharge chamber, and ion optics. Also included are recycle logic and a digital microcontroller. The neutralizer and discharge power supplies employ a dual use configuration which combines the functions of two power supplies into one, significantly simplifying the PPU. Further simplification was realized by implementing a single thruster control loop which regulates the beam current via the discharge current. Continuous throttling is possible over a 0.5-2.3 kW output power range. All three power supplies have been fabricated and tested with resistive loads, and have been combined into a single breadboard unit with the recycle logic and microcontroller. All line and load regulation test results show the power supplies to be within the NSTAR flight PPU specified power output of 1.98 kW. The overall efficiency of the PPU, calculated as the combined efficiencies of the power supplies and controller, at 2.3 kW delivered to resistive loads was 0.90. The component was 6.16 kg. Integration testing of the neutralizer and discharge power supplies with a functional model thruster revealed no issues with discharge ignition or steady state operation.
AIP Conference Proceedings (American Institute of Physics); (United States) | 2008
James S. Sovey; John A. Hamley; Michael J. Patterson; Vincent K. Rawlin; Timothy R. Sarver-Verhey
Recent ion propulsion technology efforts at NASA’s Lewis Research Center including development of kW‐class xenon ion thrusters, high power xenon and krypton ion thrusters, and power processors are reviewed. Thruster physical characteristics, performance data, life projections, and power processor component technology are summarized. The ion propulsion technology program is structured to address a broad set of mission applications from satellite stationkeeping and repositioning to primary propulsion using solar or nuclear power systems.
40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | 2004
John W. Dunning; John A. Hamley; Robert S. Jankovsky; Steven R. Oleson
This paper provides an overview of NASA s activities in the area of electric propulsion with an emphasis on project directions, recent progress, and a view of future project directions. The goals of the electric propulsion programs are to develop key technologies to enable new and ambitious science missions and to transfer these technologies to industry. Activities include the development of gridded ion thruster technology, Hall thruster technology, pulsed plasma thruster technology, and very high power electric propulsion technology, as well as systems technology that supports practical implementation of these advanced concepts. The performance of clusters of ion and Hall thrusters is being revisited. Mission analyses, based on science requirements and preliminary mission specifications, guide the technology projects and introduce mission planners to new capabilities. Significant in-house activity, with strong industrial/academia participation via contracts and grants, is maintained to address these development efforts. NASA has initiated a program covering nuclear powered spacecraft that includes both reactor and radioisotope power sources. This has provided an impetus to investigate higher power and higher specific impulse thruster systems. NASA continues to work closely with both supplier and user communities to maximize the understanding and acceptance of new technology in a timely and cost-effective manner. NASA s electric propulsion efforts are closely coordinated with Department of Defense and other national programs to assure the most effective use of available resources. Several NASA Centers are actively involved in these electric propulsion activities, including, the Glenn Research Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Johnson Space Center, and Marshall Space Flight Center.
30th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | 1994
Michael J. Patterson; John A. Hamley; Timothy R. Sarver-Verhey; George C. Soulas
A plasma contactor system has been baselined for the International Space Station Alpha (ISSA) to control the electrical potentials of surfaces to eliminate/mitigate damaging interactions with the space environment. The system represents a dual-use technology which is a direct outgrowth of the NASA electric propulsion program and, in particular, the technology development effort on ion thruster systems. The plasma contactor subsystems include a hollow cathode assembly, a power electronics unit, and an expellant management unit. Under a pre-flight development program these subsystems are being developed to the level of maturity appropriate for transfer to U.S. industry for final development. Development efforts for the hollow cathode assembly include design selection and refinement, validating its required lifetime, and quantifying the cathode performance and interface specifications. To date, cathode components have demonstrated over 10,000 hours lifetime, and a hollow cathode assembly has demonstrated over 3,000 ignitions. Additionally, preliminary integration testing of a hollow cathode assembly with a breadboard power electronics unit has been completed. This paper discusses test results and the development status of the plasma contactor subsystems for ISSA, and in particular, the hollow cathode assembly.
32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | 1996
John A. Hamley; Luis R. Pinero; Vincent K. Rawlin; John R. Miller; Roger M. Myers; Glen E. Bowers
A 2.3 kW Breadboard Power Processing Unit (BBPPU) was developed as part of the NASA Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) Program. The NSTAR program will deliver an electric propulsion system based on a 30 cm xenon ion thruster to the New Millennium (NM) program for use as the primary propulsion system for the initial NM flight. The final development test for the BBPPU, the Functional Integration Test, was carried out to demonstrate all aspects of BBPPU operation with an Engineering Model Thruster. Test objectives included: (1) demonstration and validation of automated thruster start procedures, (2) demonstration of stable closed loop control of the thruster beam current, (3) successful response and recovery to thruster faults, and (4) successful safing of the system during simulated spacecraft faults. These objectives were met over the specified 80-120 VDC input voltage range and 0.5-2.3 output power capability of the BBPPU. Two minor anomalies were noted in discharge and neutralizer keeper current. These anomalies did not affect the stability of the system and were successfully corrected.
Archive | 1994
John M. Sankovic; John A. Hamley; Thomas W. Haag
33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | 1997
John A. Hamley; John M. Sankovic; Peter Lynn; Mark O'Neill; Steven R. Oleson
Space Technology Conference and Exposition | 1999
Vincent K. Rawlin; James S. Sovey; John A. Hamley; Thomas Bond; Michael Matranga; John Stocky