John C. Blasko

10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) control of prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy

PURPOSE To report 10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) outcomes for patients treated with 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred and twenty-five consecutively treated patients, with clinical Stage T1-T2b prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy, and followed with PSA determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PSA progression-free survival (PFS), on the basis of a two consecutive elevations of PSA, were calculated. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed. Comparisons were made to an earlier-treated cohort. RESULTS The overall PSA PFS rate achieved at 10 years was 87% for low-risk patients (PSA < 10, Gleason Sum 2-6, T1-T2b). Of 59 patients (47%) followed beyond 7 years, 51 (86%) had serum PSAs less than 0.5 ng/mL; 48 (81%) had serum PSAs less than 0.2 ng/mL. Failures were local, 3.0%; distant, 3.0%. No patients have died of prostate carcinoma. The proportion of patients with a PSA < or =0.2 ng/mL continued to increase until at least 7-8 years posttherapy. A plot of PSA PFS against the proportion of patients achieving serum PSA of less than 0.2 ng/mL suggests a convergence of these two endpoints at 10 years. Patients treated in the era of this study (1988-1990) experienced a statistically improved PFS compared with an earlier era (1986-1987). This difference appears independent of patient selection, suggesting that the maturation of the technique resulted in improved biochemical control. CONCLUSION With modern technique, monotherapy with 125I achieves a high rate (87%) of biochemical and clinical control in patients with low-risk disease at 10 years. The decline of PSA following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes can be protracted. Absolute PSA and PFS curves merge, and are comparable at 10 years.

PALLADIUM-103 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CARCINOMA

PURPOSE A report of biochemical outcomes for patients treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103) brachytherapy over a fixed time interval. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two hundred thirty patients with clinical stage T1-T2 prostate cancer were treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy and followed with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical failure on the basis of two consecutive elevations of PSA were utilized. Multivariate risk groups were constructed. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed. RESULTS The overall biochemical control rate achieved at 9 years was 83.5%. Failures were local 3.0%; distant 6.1%; PSA progression only 4.3%. Significant risk factors contributing to failure were serum PSA greater than 10 ng/ml and Gleason sum of 7 or greater. Five-year biochemical control for those exhibiting neither risk factor was 94%; one risk factor, 82%; both risk factors, 65%. When all 1354 PSA determinations obtained for this cohort were considered, the patients with a proportion of PSAs < or = 0.5 ng/ml continued to increase until at least 48 months post-therapy. These data conformed to a median PSA half-life of 96.2 days. CONCLUSIONS Prostate brachytherapy with Pd-103 achieves a high rate of biochemical and clinical control in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. PSA response following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes is protracted.

Pretreatment nomogram for predicting freedom from recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy in prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES To develop a prognostic nomogram to predict the freedom from recurrence for patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 920 patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy between 1992 and 2000. The clinical parameters included clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and administration of external beam radiation. Patients who received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. Failure was defined as any post-treatment administration of androgen deprivation, clinical relapse, or biochemical failure, defined as three PSA rises. Patients with fewer than three PSA rises were censored at the time of the first PSA rise. Data from two outside institutions served as validation. RESULTS A nomogram that predicts the probability of remaining free from biochemical recurrence for 5 years after brachytherapy without adjuvant hormonal therapy was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. External validation revealed a concordance index of 0.61 to 0.64, and calibration of the nomogram suggested confidence limits of +5% to -30%. CONCLUSIONS The pretreatment nomogram we developed may be useful to physicians and patients in estimating the probability of successful treatment 5 years after brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Brachytherapy and organ preservation in the management of carcinoma of the prostate

The treatment of organ-confined carcinoma of the prostate with permanent radioisotopes by the retropubic method has generated variable and controversial results. In this article, the technical flaws of the retropubic approach are discussed. Issues of radiobiological factors, dose inhomogeneity, and case selection are addressed relative to the reported results. Recent advances in radioisotope development, computer based dosimetry, and transrectal ultrasound and computed tomographic imaging have fostered techniques of closed transperineal implantation that produce a more homogeneous, reproducible, and larger volume implant with a higher peripheral dose rate than was possible in the past. With a median follow-up of 37 months (range 12 to 78 months), 93% of 291 early stage A-B patients treated with (125)I or (130)Pd alone showed a normal posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (median value 0.4). In 160 more advanced stage A-C patients treated with external beam irradiation and implant boost, 85% showed a normal PSA (median value 0.3). The elimination of surgery with these techniques permits outpatient treatment resulting in high patient acceptance. If longer follow-up substantiates the favorable early results, these methods may potentially offer the least morbid and least expensive method of treatment for early stage carcinoma of the prostate.

The role of external beam radiotherapy with I-125/Pd-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To compare the biochemical outcomes of patients treated with Pd-103/I-125 brachytherapy alone vs. brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for early stage prostate carcinoma. METHODS Brachytherapy monotherapy was used in 403 patients. Brachytherapy was combined with 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 231 patients. Median follow-up was 58 months. To compare the biochemical outcomes of these two treatment approaches, patients were stratified into three relative risk groups: low risk, T(1)-T(2), Gleason 2-6/10, PSA< or =10.0; intermediate risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (one factor); high risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (two factors). RESULTS The actuarial biochemical progression-free rate (bNED) for the entire 634 patients was 85% at 10 years. The bNED outcomes by risk group for monotherapy vs. combined therapy respectively were: low risk, 94 vs. 87%; intermediate risk, 84 vs. 85%; high risk, 54 vs. 62%. These differences did not reach statistical significance for any risk group. Rectal morbidity was slightly greater in the combined treatment patients. CONCLUSION Although the addition of external beam irradiation to brachytherapy is conceptually appealing for patients with higher risk prostate carcinoma, we were unable to demonstrate a benefit. Whether this is because of patient selection biases within the risk groupings, an artefact of retrospective review, or because external radiotherapy does not offer additional benefit is uncertain.

RISK FACTORS FOR ACUTE URINARY RETENTION REQUIRING TEMPORARY INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION AFTER PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

PURPOSE We prospectively investigated prognostic factors for men undergoing transperineal radioactive seed implantation for prostate cancer at the University of Washington. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between February and April, 1998, 62 consecutive unselected patients were prospectively followed after brachytherapy for early-stage prostate adenocarcinoma. Pretreatment variables included age, American Urological Association (AUA) score, uroflowimetry, and prostate volume by ultrasound. Nonrandomized variables included hormonal therapy, seed type, and use of pelvic radiotherapy. Patients were contacted by phone at one week postoperatively and at one-month intervals thereafter. Follow-up continued until all patients provided the date of last catheterization. RESULTS Urinary retention rate at one week was 34% (21 of 63 patients). At one month, 29%; at three months, 18%; and at six months, 10%. Preoperative flow rate and post-void residual did not predict for retention (p =.48 and p =.58). Use of alpha blockers, hormonal therapy, type of seed (103Pd or 1251), or external beam radiotherapy had no impact on risk of retention at any followup point. Preimplant volume and AUA score predicted for retention on univariate analysis, but on multivariate analysis only postimplant volume remained significant (p =.02) for predicting retention risk and duration. CONCLUSION Patients with large prostate size (>36 g) and higher AUA score (>10) appear to be at greater risk of risk of retention as well as duration of retention as defined in our study. Further investigation will be needed to clarify the risk of urinary retention for men undergoing brachytherapy.

SHOULD BRACHYTHERAPY BE CONSIDERED A THERAPEUTIC OPTION IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER

Contemporary prostate brachytherapy incorporates advances in computer analysis, imaging technology, and delivery apparatus, allowing exacting and reproducible results compared with historical approaches. The advances permit brachytherapy to be performed on a cost-effective, outpatient basis with low morbidity in the appropriately selected patient. Although unsettled questions remain regarding dosimetric issues, long-term outcomes, and morbidity, the weight of evidence to date appears to support the use of brachytherapy in selected patients. Brachytherapy may be considered a therapeutic option: as monotherapy for early-stage disease and also a boost following moderate doses of external beam irradiation for locally advanced disease.

Centralized Multiinstitutional Postimplant Analysis for Interstitial Prostate Brachytherapy

PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility and utility of performing centralized postimplant analysis for transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) by conducting a pilot study that compares the results obtained from 125I implants conducted at five different institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis was performed on 10 postimplant CT scans from each of five institutions. This analysis included the total implanted activity of 125I, ultrasound, and CT volumes of the prostate, target-volume ratios, dose homogeneity quantifiers, prostate dose coverage indices, and rectal doses. As a result of the uncertainty associated with the delineation of the prostatic boundaries on a CT scan, the contours were redrawn by a single, study center physician, and a repeat DVH analysis was performed. This provided the basis for comparison between institutions in terms of implant technique and quality. RESULTS By comparing total activity to preimplant ultrasound volume we clearly demonstrated that differences exist in implant technique among these five institutions. The difficulty associated with determining glandular boundaries on CT scans was apparent, based upon the variability in prostate volumes drawn by the various investigators compared to those drawn by the study center physician. This made no difference, of course, in the TVR or homogeneity quantifiers that are independent of target location. Furthermore, this variability made surprisingly little difference in terms of dose coverage of the prostate gland. Rectal doses varied between institutions according to the various implant techniques. CONCLUSIONS Centralized, outcome-based evaluation of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy is viable and appropriate. Such an approach could be reasonably used in the conduct of multiinstitutional trials used to study the efficacy of the procedure.

Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: results at 7- and 8-year follow-up.

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in interstitial radiation as a cost-effective and efficient method of treating organ-confined prostate cancer. We describe our 7- and 8-year results with transperineal Iodine-125 and Palladium-103 implantation. A total of 551 consecutive patients were treated. Of these, 320/551 (58%) received implant alone (Group I), and 231/551 (42%)--considered higher risk patients--were also treated with a modest dose (45 Gy) of external beam irradiation (Group II). The median follow-up for Group I was 55 months, and for Group II, 60 months. At 7 years, the actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 1.0 ng/mL) was 80% in Group I patients, and, at 8 years, 65% in Group II patients. Morbidity was minimal if patients had not undergone prior transurethral prostate resections. The results indicate that interstitial radiation is a valid treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Posttreatment biopsy results following interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage prostate cancer☆

PURPOSE To assess pathologic control rates for prostatic carcinoma as determined by postimplant prostate biopsy in a large series of consecutive patients who have received permanent interstitial brachytherapy using a contemporary transrectal ultrasound-directed, transperineal, computer generated, volume technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS Four hundred and two patients received permanent 125I or 103Pd interstitial brachytherapy as primary treatment for early stage prostatic carcinoma at the Northwest Tumor Institute between January 1988 and January 1994. Of these, 201 have consented to biopsy 12 or more months postimplant with a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 12-83 months). None had received hormonal manipulation. A total of 361 biopsies was performed on 201 patients with a range of one to six annual biopsies per patient (91 received multiple, serial biopsies). Of the 161 patients more than 12 months postimplant who have not been biopsied, most have been unwilling or unable to submit to biopsy. Only six patients with biochemical progression have not been biopsied. There was no difference in the presenting characteristics or implant parameters between those patients biopsied and those that were not. One hundred and forty-three received 125I (71%) prescribed to a MPD of 160 Gy with a median activity of 35.5 mCi, and 58 (29%) received 103Pd prescribed to a MPD of 115 Gy with a median activity of 123 mCi. Multiple biopsies were performed under transrectal ultrasound guidance, and all specimens were classified as either negative, indeterminate, or positive. RESULTS At the time of last biopsy, 161 (80%) have achieved negative pathology, 34 (17%) remain indeterminate, and 6 (3%) have been positive. Only 2 of the 186 patients with a PSA < 4.0 ng/ml at the time of biopsy were positive. Among those 33 indeterminate patients with a subsequent biopsy, 28 have converted to negative, 2 to positive, and 3 remain unchanged to date. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate at least an 80% pathologically confirmed local control rate following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer. A higher local control rate is expected with further follow-up as the majority of indeterminate biopsies convert to negative over time. The indeterminate category of postirradiation biopsy described here includes specimens that have probably been interpreted as positive in other series, but correlate clinically and biochemically with negative biopsies. These results support the use of modern interstitial brachytherapy techniques for selected patients with early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate.