John Sylvester

10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) control of prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy

PURPOSE To report 10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) outcomes for patients treated with 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred and twenty-five consecutively treated patients, with clinical Stage T1-T2b prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy, and followed with PSA determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PSA progression-free survival (PFS), on the basis of a two consecutive elevations of PSA, were calculated. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed. Comparisons were made to an earlier-treated cohort. RESULTS The overall PSA PFS rate achieved at 10 years was 87% for low-risk patients (PSA < 10, Gleason Sum 2-6, T1-T2b). Of 59 patients (47%) followed beyond 7 years, 51 (86%) had serum PSAs less than 0.5 ng/mL; 48 (81%) had serum PSAs less than 0.2 ng/mL. Failures were local, 3.0%; distant, 3.0%. No patients have died of prostate carcinoma. The proportion of patients with a PSA < or =0.2 ng/mL continued to increase until at least 7-8 years posttherapy. A plot of PSA PFS against the proportion of patients achieving serum PSA of less than 0.2 ng/mL suggests a convergence of these two endpoints at 10 years. Patients treated in the era of this study (1988-1990) experienced a statistically improved PFS compared with an earlier era (1986-1987). This difference appears independent of patient selection, suggesting that the maturation of the technique resulted in improved biochemical control. CONCLUSION With modern technique, monotherapy with 125I achieves a high rate (87%) of biochemical and clinical control in patients with low-risk disease at 10 years. The decline of PSA following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes can be protracted. Absolute PSA and PFS curves merge, and are comparable at 10 years.

PALLADIUM-103 BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CARCINOMA

PURPOSE A report of biochemical outcomes for patients treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103) brachytherapy over a fixed time interval. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two hundred thirty patients with clinical stage T1-T2 prostate cancer were treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy and followed with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical failure on the basis of two consecutive elevations of PSA were utilized. Multivariate risk groups were constructed. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed. RESULTS The overall biochemical control rate achieved at 9 years was 83.5%. Failures were local 3.0%; distant 6.1%; PSA progression only 4.3%. Significant risk factors contributing to failure were serum PSA greater than 10 ng/ml and Gleason sum of 7 or greater. Five-year biochemical control for those exhibiting neither risk factor was 94%; one risk factor, 82%; both risk factors, 65%. When all 1354 PSA determinations obtained for this cohort were considered, the patients with a proportion of PSAs < or = 0.5 ng/ml continued to increase until at least 48 months post-therapy. These data conformed to a median PSA half-life of 96.2 days. CONCLUSIONS Prostate brachytherapy with Pd-103 achieves a high rate of biochemical and clinical control in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. PSA response following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes is protracted.

SHOULD BRACHYTHERAPY BE CONSIDERED A THERAPEUTIC OPTION IN LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER

Contemporary prostate brachytherapy incorporates advances in computer analysis, imaging technology, and delivery apparatus, allowing exacting and reproducible results compared with historical approaches. The advances permit brachytherapy to be performed on a cost-effective, outpatient basis with low morbidity in the appropriately selected patient. Although unsettled questions remain regarding dosimetric issues, long-term outcomes, and morbidity, the weight of evidence to date appears to support the use of brachytherapy in selected patients. Brachytherapy may be considered a therapeutic option: as monotherapy for early-stage disease and also a boost following moderate doses of external beam irradiation for locally advanced disease.

Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: results at 7- and 8-year follow-up.

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in interstitial radiation as a cost-effective and efficient method of treating organ-confined prostate cancer. We describe our 7- and 8-year results with transperineal Iodine-125 and Palladium-103 implantation. A total of 551 consecutive patients were treated. Of these, 320/551 (58%) received implant alone (Group I), and 231/551 (42%)--considered higher risk patients--were also treated with a modest dose (45 Gy) of external beam irradiation (Group II). The median follow-up for Group I was 55 months, and for Group II, 60 months. At 7 years, the actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 1.0 ng/mL) was 80% in Group I patients, and, at 8 years, 65% in Group II patients. Morbidity was minimal if patients had not undergone prior transurethral prostate resections. The results indicate that interstitial radiation is a valid treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Interstitial implantation techniques in prostate cancer

Brachytherapy is a radiotherapeutic technique that allows the physician to implant radioactive isotopes into a body cavity or directly into tissue. Different radioisotopes have unique characteristics that the brachytherapist may utilize for a particular situation. The use of brachytherapy is part of standard radiation oncology practice in gynecological and head and neck cancer management. The prostate is approachable for interstitial implantation due to its close proximity to the perineum. Over 20 years ago, primitive methods of brachytherapy were utilized in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, poor results due to inconsistency in achieving adequate coverage of the entire prostate and poor patient selection caused this treatment modality to fall out of favor. Technological advances over the last decade have restored attention to brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Particularly important has been the development of transrectal ultrasound, new radioisotopes such as palladium‐103, computer tomography, computerized dosimetry systems, and earlier diagnosis. Modern interstitial implantation utilizing transperineal template and transrectal ultrasound guidance has resulted in improved consistency in radiation dose delivery to the entire prostate. Early results are encouraging in terms of the relatively low morbidity of the procedure, improved local control rates, and biochemical progression free survival. This has resulted in an outpatient treatment that has high patient acceptance. J. Surg. Oncol. 1997;66:65–75.

The use of postoperative irradiation for the prevention of heterotopic bone formation after total hip replacement

Formation of heterotopic bone (HTB) following total hip replacement may partially or completely ankylose the joint space, causing pain and/or limiting the range of motion. Patients at high risk for formation of HTB postoperatively include those with previous HTB formation, heterotopic osteoarthritis, and active rheumatoid spondylitis. Patients in these high risk groups have a 63-69% incidence of post-operative HTB formation, usually seen radiographically by 2 months post-operation. From 1980-1986 twenty-nine hips in 28 consecutively treated patients were irradiated post-operatively at the UCLA Center for the Health Sciences. The indication for irradiation was documented HTB formation previously in 26 of the 27 hips presented below. From 1980-1982 patients received 20 Gray (Gy) in 2 Gy fractions; from 1982-1986 the dose was reduced to 10 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Twenty-seven hips in 26 patients completed therapy and were available for evaluation, with a minimum of 2 month follow-up, and a median follow-up of 12 months. Three of 27 hips developed significant HTB (Brooker grade III or IV) post-operatively, whereas 5 of 27 hips developed minor, nonsymptomatic HTB (Brooker grade I). When irradiation was begun by postoperative day 4, 0 of 17 hips formed significant HTB. If irradiation began after post-operative day 4, 3 of 10 hips formed significant HTB (Brooker grade III or IV). These 3 hips received doses of 10 Gy in one hip and 20 Gy in the other 2 hips. There were no differences in the incidence or severity of side effects in the 10 Gy vs. the 20 Gy treatment groups. Eighteen hips received 10 Gy, 8 hips 20 Gy and, 1 hip 12 Gy. In conclusion, 10 Gy in 5 fractions appears as effective as 20 Gy in 10 fractions at preventing post-operative formation of HTB. For optimal results, treatment should begin as early as possible prior to post-operative day 4.

Postoperative irradiation for the prevention of heterotopic bone: Analysis of different dose schedules and shielding considerations

Ninety-seven high risk hips were irradiated postoperatively for prevention of heterotopic bone (HTB) in the UCLA Department of Radiation Oncology from 1980 to 1988. Ninety-two hips in 82 patients were eligible for analysis with a minimum follow-up of 2 months and a median follow-up of 10 months. Forty-nine of the hips had porous coated ingrowth prostheses. From 1980 to 1986, 2 Gy fractions were used to deliver 20 Gy (8 hips), 12 Gy (1 hip), and 10 Gy (27 hips). Since December of 1986, 38 hips received 8 Gy in two increments and 18 hips received a single 7 Gy fraction. All porous ingrowth components were shielded with custom blocks. Six out of 92 hips developed clinically significant (Brooker grade 3 or 4 heterotopic bone). There was one clinically significant failure in 78 hips (1.3%) when irradiation was initiated before post-operative day (POD) #6 and shielding was properly placed. One clinical failure occurred in 38 hips which received 8 Gy in two increments. One clinical failure occurred out of the 18 hips treated with 7 Gy in one fraction. This failure could be related to block malposition. There were four clinical failures in the 36 hips treated with 2 Gy fractions to total doses of 10 Gy, 12 Gy, or 20 Gy. Three of these failures were associated with initiation of treatment after POD #5, and the fourth was related to block malposition. Unshielded trochanteric osteotomies resulted in five migrations and seven fibrous unions for a total non-osseous union rate of 12/36 (33%). Shielding of the remaining 28 trochanteric osteotomies resulted in a non-osseous union rate of 7% (0 migrations and 2 fibrous unions). There were no failures of union of components, and the only side effects noted in the series were the five trochanteric migrations. In conclusion, the use of 8 Gy in two increments or 7 Gy in one fraction was found to be as efficacious as conventional 2 Gy fractionation schemes with no increase in side effects. For optimal results, treatment should be implemented prior to POD #5 with shielding of the trochanteric osteotomy. Postoperative irradiation to prevent HTB can be used in hips with porous components using properly placed blocks to shield the porous region.

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer

The goal of radiation therapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumor while preserving normal surrounding tissue. For early-stage prostate cancer, the ultimate conformal irradiation is to place radioactive sources directly into the gland either as permanent or temporary seeds. Permanent seed implantation is capable of delivering two times the radiobiologically equivalent dose of external beam irradiation to the prostate and tumor. In the past, the results of prostate brachytherapy were likely poor owing to the technical difficulty in accurately placing the radioactive seeds uniformly throughout the prostate. The use of low-dose-rate I-125 to treat high-grade cancers probably also contributed to the poorer results as compared with external beam irradiation. Over the last 10 years, however, technologic advances in transrectal ultrasonography, computer dosimetry, and template-based transperineal techniques have dramatically improved the accuracy and consistency of the brachytherapist to place radioactive sources directly into the prostate gland. Transperineal ultrasound or CT directed seed implantation has replaced the older retropubic method. Brachytherapists are now able to accurately map out the gland prior to the implant and carefully evaluate preoperatively seed placement. The availability of such radioactive sources as iodine-125, palladium-103, and iridium-192 has also given the brachytherapist isotopes that can be more carefully matched to the biology and stage of the tumor. More sensitive definitions of failure have prompted radiation oncologists and urologists to carefully evaluate the efficacy of external beam irradiation and surgery. Accurate comparison of the efficacy of brachytherapy to surgery and to external beam radiation requires a randomized study. Comparisons of retrospective studies are fraught with the problems of the heterogeneous nature of early-stage prostate cancer. Imbalances in stage, grade, initial PSA extraprostatic disease, and nodal status of patient groups make comparisons difficult. Most of the long-term data for permanent seed implantation are the result of work at a single institution. These results will need to be repeated at other institutions treating patients in a similar manner. Because techniques vary from institution to institution, permanent implant results will need to be carefully evaluated for technique as well as stratified for pretreatment variables. Pretreatment PSA and grade appear to be more sensitive variables than stage in predicting failure after radiation. As more patients are diagnosed with very early and nonpalpable disease, future studies will need to stratify patients based on these pretreatment factors. Patients with early-stage disease but identified as high risk for extraprostatic disease will require more intensive regimens. The treatment outcomes based on biopsy results are inconclusive. A lack of consensus on the definition of a truly positive biopsy remains forthcoming. The value of a positive prostate biopsy as an outcome predictor for clinical failure is still unclear. The use of prostate nuclear cell antigen staining may help clarify the issue. Comparison of treatment outcome based on absolute PSA is also difficult. The Seattle series suggest that brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation is as efficacious as external beam irradiation for early-stage disease in patients with a low PSA (< 10 ng/mL). As the PSA value rises above 10 ng/mL, the probability of failure after external beam rises substantially. Results from the Seattle series suggest an advantage to seed implant alone or the judicious application of seed implant boost to external beam radiation for these patients with more advanced cancer. The most sensitive measurement of therapeutic outcome is progression-free survival. Few studies to date have evaluated progression-free survival.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy preplanned technique: The modern Seattle method step-by-step and dosimetric outcomes

PURPOSE To describe, step-by-step, the current Seattle preplan technique, and report the dosimetric outcomes on 1,131 consecutively such treated prostate brachytherapy patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS One thousand one hundred thirty one patients with prostate cancer were treated with iodine-125 ((125)I), palladium-103 ((103)Pd), or cesium-131 ((131)Cs) using a preplanned template-guided transrectal ultrasound-guided approach between January 2005 and August 2007. Day one computed tomography (CT) scans were taken for postimplantation dose-volume histogram evaluations. Postoperative prostate contours were drawn by one author (DN) on CT images taken on postoperative day one. RESULTS The volume of prostate receiving 100% of prescription dose (V(100)) and percent dose to 90% of the prostate (%D(90)) were 95% and 106% for 558 monotherapy (125)I implants, 91% and 102% for 327 (103)Pd implants, and 97% and 111.5% for 13 (131)Cs implants, respectively. The median V(100) and percent D(90) were 91% and 101% for five boost (125)I implants, 92% and 104% for 228 boost (103)Pd implants. The median rectal volume receiving 100% of prescription dose (RV(100)) for (125)I, (103)Pd, and (131)Cs monotherapy implants were 0.3, 0.13, and 0.38cc, and for (125)I and (103)Pd boost implants were 0.16 and 0.13cc, respectively. No patient received an RV(100) of >0.92cc. CONCLUSIONS Modern preplanned template and ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy can consistently result in excellent prostate dosimetry and rectal sparing.

Prostate tumor alignment and continuous, real-time adaptive radiation therapy using electromagnetic fiducials: clinical and cost-utility analyses.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy, utility, and cost effectiveness of a new electromagnetic patient positioning and continuous, real-time monitoring system, which uses permanently implanted resonant transponders in the target (Calypso 4D Localization System and Beacon transponders, Seattle, WA) to continuously monitor tumor location and movement during external beam radiation therapy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS This clinical trial studied 43 patients at 5 sites. All patients were implanted with 3 transponders each. In 41 patients, the system was used for initial alignment at each therapy session. Thirty-five patients had continuous monitoring during their radiation treatment. Over 1,000 alignment comparisons were made to a commercially available kV X-ray positioning system (BrainLAB ExacTrac, Munich, Germany). Using decision analysis and Markov processes, the outcomes of patients were simulated over a 5-year period and measured in terms of costs from a payers perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS All patients had satisfactory transponder implantations for monitoring purposes. In over 75% of the treatment sessions, the correction to conventional positioning (laser and tattoos) directed by an electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system was greater than 5 mm. Ninety-seven percent (34/35) of the patients who underwent continuous monitoring had target motion that exceeded preset limits at some point during the course of their radiation therapy. Exceeding preset thresholds resulted in user intervention at least once during the therapy in 80% of the patients (28/35). Compared with localization using ultrasound, electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), or computed tomography (CT), localization with the electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system yielded superior gains in QALYs at comparable costs. CONCLUSIONS Most patients positioned with conventional tattoos and lasers for prostate radiation therapy were found by use of the electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system to have alignment errors exceeding 5 mm. Almost all patients undergoing external beam radiation of the prostate have been shown to have target organ movement exceeding 3 mm during radiation therapy delivery. The ability of the electromagnetic technology to monitor tumor target location during the same time as radiation therapy is being delivered allows clinicians to provide real time adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. This permits clinicians to intervene when the prostate moves outside the radiation isocenter, which should decrease adverse events and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, a cost-utility analysis has demonstrated that the electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system offers patient outcome benefits at a cost that falls well within the payers customary willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of