John E. van Hamont
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John E. van Hamont.
Vaccine | 2003
David E. Katz; Arthur J DeLorimier; Marcia K. Wolf; Eric R. Hall; Frederick J. Cassels; John E. van Hamont; Rhonda Newcomer; Mitra A Davachi; David N. Taylor; Charles E. McQueen
As a step in the development of an oral vaccine against ETEC, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of CS6, a polymeric protein commonly found on the surface of ETEC. Formulations included 1 and 5mg doses of CS6, either encapsulated in biodegradable polymer poly(D, L)-lactide-co-glycolide (PLG), or as free protein, administered orally in a solution of either normal saline or a rice-based buffer. Three doses of CS6 were given at 2-week intervals. Blood was collected immediately before and 7 days after each dose. All formulations were well tolerated. Four of five volunteers who received 1mg CS6 in PLG microspheres with buffer had significant IgA ASC responses (median=30 ASC per 10(6) PBMC) and significant serum IgG responses (median=3.5-fold increase). Oral administration of these prototype ETEC vaccine formulations are safe and can elicit immune responses. The ASC, serum IgA, and serum IgG responses to CS6 are similar in magnitude to the responses after challenge with wild-type ETEC [Coster et al., unpublished data]. Further studies are underway to determine whether these immune responses are sufficient for protection.
Current Medicinal Chemistry | 2005
Rickey P. Hicks; Mark G. Hartell; Daniel A. Nichols; Apurba K. Bhattacharjee; John E. van Hamont; Donald R. Skillman
The potential use of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, biological or chemical) by terrorist organizations represents a major threat to world peace and safety. Only a limited number of vaccines are available to protect the general population from the medical consequences of these weapons. In addition there are major health concerns associated with a pre-exposure mass vaccination of the general population. To reduce or eliminate the impact of these terrible threats, new drugs must be developed to safely treat individuals exposed to these agents. A review of all therapeutic agents under development for the treatment of the illnesses and injuries that result from exposure to nuclear, biological or chemical warfare agents is beyond the scope of any single article. The intent here is to provide a focused review for medicinal and organic chemists of three widely discussed and easily deployed biological warfare agents, botulinum neurotoxin and ricin toxins and the bacteria Bacillus anthracis. Anthrax will be addressed because of its similarity in both structure and mechanism of catalytic activity with botulinum toxin. The common feature of these three agents is that they exhibit their biological activity via toxin enzymatic hydrolysis of a specific bond in their respective substrate molecules. A brief introduction to the history of each of the biological warfare agents is presented followed by a discussion on the mechanisms of action of each at the molecular level, and a review of current potential inhibitors under investigation.
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology | 2008
Joyce Lapa; Stephanie A. Sincock; Madhumita Ananthakrishnan; Chad K. Porter; Frederick J. Cassels; Carl Brinkley; Eric R. Hall; John E. van Hamont; Joseph D. Gramling; Colleen M. Carpenter; Shahida Baqar; David R. Tribble
ABSTRACT An oral, microencapsulated anti-colonization factor 6 antigen (meCS6) vaccine, with or without heat-labile enterotoxin with mutation R192G (LTR192G) (mucosal adjuvant), against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) was evaluated for regimen and adjuvant effects on safety and immunogenicity. Sixty subjects were enrolled into a three-dose, 2-week interval or four-dose, 2-day interval regimen. Each regimen was randomized into two equal groups of meCS6 alone (1 mg) or meCS6 with adjuvant (2 μg of LTR192G). The vaccine was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. Serologic response to CS6 was low in all regimens (0 to 27%). CS6-immunogloublin A (IgA) antibody-secreting cell (ASC) responses ranged from 36 to 86%, with the highest level in the three-dose adjuvanted regimen; however, the magnitude was low. As expected, serologic and ASC LT responses were limited to adjuvanted regimens, with the exception of fecal IgA, which appeared to be nonspecific to LT administration. Further modifications to the delivery strategy and CS6 and adjuvant dose optimization will be needed before conducting further clinical trials with this epidemiologically important class of ETEC.
international conference on computational science | 2006
Apurba K. Bhattacharjee; Mark G. Hartell; Daniel A. Nichols; Rickey P. Hicks; John E. van Hamont; Wilbur K. Milhous
Malaria is one of the most dangerous diseases affecting primarily poor people of tropical and subtropical regions. The search for novel drugs against specific parasites is an important goal for antimalarial drug discovery. This study describes how 3D pharmacophores for antimalarial activity could be developed from known antimalarials and be used as screening tools for virtual compound libraries to identify new antimalarial candidates with examples of indolo[2,1-b]quinazoline-6,12-diones (tryptanthrins) that exhibited in vitro activity below 100 ng/mL. These models mapped on the potent analogues and also onto other well-known antimalarial drugs of different chemical classes including quinolines, chalcones, rhodamine dyes, Pfmrk CDK inhibitors, malarial KASIII inhibitors, and plasmepsin inhibitors. The pharmacophores allowed search and identification of new antimalarials from in-house multi-conformer 3D CIS database and enabled custom designed synthesis of new potent analogues that are found to be potent against in vitro W2, D6, and TM91C235 strains of P. falciparum.
Archive | 1998
Jean A. Setterstrom; John E. van Hamont; Robert H. Reid; Elliot Jacob; Ramasubbu Jeyanthi; Edgar C. Boedeker; Charles E. McQueen; Daniel L. Jarboe; Frederick J. Cassels; William R. Brown; Curt Thies; Thomas R. Tice; F. Donald Roberts; Phil Friden
Archive | 2002
Noelle Christine Vook; Elliott Jacob; Jean A. Setterstrom; John E. van Hamont; William Vaughan; Ha Duong
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry | 2004
Apurba K. Bhattacharjee; Mark G. Hartell; Daniel A. Nichols; Rickey P. Hicks; Benjamin Stanton; John E. van Hamont; Wilbur K. Milhous
Archive | 2000
Paul R. Burnett; John E. van Hamont; Robert H. Reid; Jean A. Setterstrom; Thomas C. Van Cott; Deborah L. Birx
Archive | 1999
Ramasubbu Jevanthi; John E. van Hamont; Phil Friden; Robert H. Reid; F. Donald Roberts; Charles E. McQueen; Jean A. Setterstrom
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2004
Mark G. Hartell; Rickey P. Hicks; Apurba K. Bhattacharjee; Brandon W. Koser; Keith A. Carvalho; John E. van Hamont