John G. Bass

Infant survival after cesarean section for trauma

HYPOTHESIS Emergency cesarean sections in trauma patients are not justified and should be abandoned. SETTING AND DESIGN A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted of level 1 trauma centers. METHODS Trauma admissions from nine level 1 trauma centers from January 1986 through December 1994 were reviewed. Pregnant women who underwent emergency cesarean sections were identified. Demographic and clinical data were obtained on all patients undergoing a cesarean section. Fetal distress was defined by bradycardia, deceleration, or lack of fetal heart tones (FHTs). Maternal distress was defined by shock (systolic blood pressure < 90) or acute decompensation. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Of the 114,952 consecutive trauma admissions, more than 441 pregnant women required 32 emergency cesarean sections. All were performed for fetal distress, maternal distress, or both. Overall, 15 (45%) of the fetuses and 23 (72%) of the mothers survived. Of 33 fetuses delivered, 13 had no FHTs and none survived. Twenty infants (potential survivors) had FHTs and an estimated gestational age (EGA) of greater than or equal to 26 weeks, and 75% survived. Infant survival was independent of maternal distress or maternal Injury Severity Score. The five infant deaths in the group of potential survivors resulted from delayed recognition of fetal distress, and 60% of these deaths were in mothers with mild to moderate injuries (Injury Severity Score < 16). CONCLUSIONS In pregnant trauma patients, infant viability is defined by the presence of FHTs, estimated gestational age greater than or equal to 26 weeks. In viable infants, survival after emergency cesarean section is acceptable (75%). Infant survival is independent of maternal distress or Injury Severity Score. Sixty percent of infant deaths resulted from delay in recognition of fetal distress and cesarean section. These were potentially preventable. Given the definition of fetal viability, our initial hypothesis is invalid.

Elective bedside surgery in critically injured patients is safe and cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE The success of elective minimally invasive surgery suggested that this concept could be adapted to the intensive care unit. We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery could be done safely and cost-effectively at the bedside in critically injured patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA This case series, conducted between October 1991 and June 1997 at a Level I trauma center, examined bedside dilatational tracheostomy (BDT), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement. All procedures had been performed in the operating room (OR) before initiation of this study. METHODS All BDTs and PEGs were performed with intravenous general anesthesia (fentanyl, diazepam, and pancuronium) administered by the surgical team. IVC filters were placed using local anesthesia and conscious sedation. BDTs were done using a Ciaglia set, PEGs were done using a 20 Fr Flexiflow Inverta-PEG kit, and IVC filters were placed percutaneously under ultrasound guidance. Cost difference (delta cost) was defined as the difference in hospital cost and physician charges incurred in the OR as compared to the bedside. RESULTS Of 16,417 trauma admissions, 379 patients (2%) underwent 472 minimally invasive procedures (272 BDTs, 129 PEGs, 71 IVC filters). There were four major complications (0.8%). Two patients had loss of airway requiring reintubation. Two patients had an intraperitoneal leak from the gastrostomy requiring operative repair. No patient had a major complication after IVC filter placement. Total delta cost was

Cost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients

611,994. When examined independently, the cost was

Needle thoracostomy may not be indicated in the trauma patient

324,224 for BDT,

Hypothermia in critically ill trauma patients

164,088 for PEG, and

Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a complication after systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

123,682 for IVC filter. OR use was reduced by 506 hours. CONCLUSIONS These bedside procedures have minimal complications, eliminate the risk associated with patient transport, reduce cost, improve OR utilization, and should be considered for routine use in the general surgery population.

Traumatic asphyxia syndrome

BACKGROUND The need for patient transport for inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement impacts patient safety, comfort, charges, and nursing care. Bedside, ultrasound-guided IVC filter placement may offer an acceptable, cost-effective alternative. METHODS Prospective cohort study of 55 consecutive trauma patients requiring IVC filter placement. During a 13-month period (August of 1995-September of 1996), patients meeting criteria for IVC filter were evaluated. Complications were recorded, and the potential financial savings were determined. RESULTS Of 3,172 trauma admissions, 55 patients met IVC filter criteria and 49 patients had IVC filters placed under ultrasound guidance. In six patients (10.9%), ultrasound guided filter placement failed. There were four complications in four patients (8.2%). Over 13 months, charges were reduced by

ANTERIOR ISCHEMIC OPTIC NEUROPATHY: A COMPLICATION IN TRAUMA PATIENTS REQUIRING MASSIVE VOLUME RESUSCITATION

69,800 when compared with radiology suite placement and

Management of the pregnant patient with acute spinal cord injury.

118,300 when compared with operative placement. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound guided, bedside placement of IVC filters is a safe, cost-effective method of pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in select trauma patients.

Hypothermia: impact on the trauma victim.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of needle thoracostomy catheter (NTC) placement in trauma. METHODS A consecutive case series was conducted from November 1996 to September 1997. All patients admitted to a level I trauma centre who had NTCs placed prior to arrival in the Emergency Department were included. No patients were excluded or omitted. During the course of the study 2801 patients were admitted to our trauma centre. Nineteen patients (0.68%) had NTCs placed prior to arrival in the emergency department. RESULTS Twenty-five needle thoracostomies were performed in 19 patients. This group represented 0.68% of the trauma admissions. Four patients were found to have evidence of a pneumothorax with an air leak (28%). The NTC failed to decompress the chest in one of two patients who had physiologic evidence of a tension pneumothorax. Eleven patients (58%) were endotracheally intubated prior to NTC. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that field NTC placements are often ineffective and may be over-used. Further study on the usefulness of NTC is required.