John G. Hanly
Dalhousie University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John G. Hanly.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2012
Michelle Petri; Ana Maria Orbai; Graciela S. Alarcón; Caroline Gordon; Joan T. Merrill; Paul R. Fortin; Ian N. Bruce; David A. Isenberg; Daniel J. Wallace; Ola Nived; Gunnar Sturfelt; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Sang-Cheol Bae; John G. Hanly; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Ann E. Clarke; Cynthia Aranow; Susan Manzi; Murray B. Urowitz; Dafna D. Gladman; Kenneth C. Kalunian; Melissa Costner; Victoria P. Werth; Asad Zoma; Sasha Bernatsky; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Munther A. Khamashta; Søren Jacobsen; Jill P. Buyon; Peter Maddison
OBJECTIVE The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge regarding the immunology of SLE. METHODS The classification criteria were derived from a set of 702 expert-rated patient scenarios. Recursive partitioning was used to derive an initial rule that was simplified and refined based on SLICC physician consensus. The SLICC group validated the classification criteria in a new validation sample of 690 new expert-rated patient scenarios. RESULTS Seventeen criteria were identified. In the derivation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (49 versus 70; P = 0.0082) and had greater sensitivity (94% versus 86%; P < 0.0001) and equal specificity (92% versus 93%; P = 0.39). In the validation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (62 versus 74; P = 0.24) and had greater sensitivity (97% versus 83%; P < 0.0001) but lower specificity (84% versus 96%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The new SLICC classification criteria performed well in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts. According to the SLICC rule for the classification of SLE, the patient must satisfy at least 4 criteria, including at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion OR the patient must have biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in the presence of antinuclear antibodies or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 1999
Matthew H. Liang; Michael Corzillius; Sang-Cheol Bae; Robert A. Lew; Paul R. Fortin; Caroline Gordon; David A. Isenberg; Graciela S. Alarcón; Karin V. Straaton; Judah A. Denburg; Susan D. Denburg; John M. Esdaile; Bonnie I. Glanz; Elizabeth W. Karlson; Shahram Khoshbin; Malcolm P. Rogers; Peter H. Schur; John G. Hanly; Elizabeth Kozora; Sterling G. West; Robert G. Lahita; Michael D. Lockshin; Joseph McCune; Patricia M. Moore; Michelle Petri; W. Neal Roberts; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Martin Veilleux; Robin L. Brey; Wayne D. Cornblath
OBJECTIVE To develop a standardized nomenclature system for the neuropsychiatric syndromes of systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). METHODS An international, multidisciplinary committee representing rheumatology, neurology, psychiatry, neuropsychology, and hematology developed case definitions, reporting standards, and diagnostic testing recommendations. Before and after the meeting, clinician committee members assigned diagnoses to sets of vignettes randomly generated from a pool of 108 NPSLE patients. To assess whether the nomenclature system improved diagnostic agreement, a consensus index was developed and pre- and postmeeting scores were compared by t-tests. RESULTS Case definitions including diagnostic criteria, important exclusions, and methods of ascertainment were developed for 19 NPSLE syndromes. Recommendations for standard reporting requirements, minimum laboratory evaluation, and imaging techniques were formulated. A short neuropsychological test battery for the diagnosis of cognitive deficits was proposed. In the postmeeting exercise, a statistically significant improvement in diagnostic agreement was observed. CONCLUSION The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Nomenclature for NPSLE provides case definitions for 19 neuropsychiatric syndromes seen in SLE, with reporting standards and recommendations for laboratory and imaging tests. It is intended to facilitate and enhance clinical research, particularly multicenter studies, and reporting. In clinical settings, consultation with other specialists may be required. It should be useful for didactic purposes but should not be used uncritically or as a substitute for a clinical diagnosis. The complete case definitions are available on the ACR World Wide Web site: http://www.rheumatology .org/ar/ar.html.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1997
Jonathan D. Adachi; W. Bensen; Jacques P. Brown; David A. Hanley; Anthony B. Hodsman; Robert G. Josse; David L. Kendler; Brian Lentle; Wojciech P. Olszynski; Louis-George Ste.-Marie; Alan Tenenhouse; Arkadi A. Chines; A. Jovaisas; William C. Sturtridge; Tassos Anastassiades; John G. Hanly; Janet E. Pope; Reginald Dias; Zebulun D. Horowitz; Simon Pack
BACKGROUND AND METHODS Osteoporosis is a recognized complication of corticosteroid therapy. Whether it can be prevented is not known. We conducted a 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study of intermittent etidronate (400 mg per day for 14 days) followed by calcium (500 mg per day for 76 days), given for four cycles, in 141 men and women (age, 19 to 87 years) who had recently begun high-dose corticosteroid therapy. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the change in the bone density of the lumbar spine between the groups from base line to week 52. Secondary measures included changes in the bone density of the femoral neck, trochanter, and radius and the rate of new vertebral fractures. RESULTS The mean (+/-SE) bone density of the lumbar spine and trochanter in the etidronate group increased 0.61 +/- 0.54 and 1.46 +/- 0.67 percent, respectively, as compared with decreases of 3.23 +/- 0.60 and 2.74 +/- 0.66 percent, respectively, in the placebo group. The mean differences between the groups after one year were 3.72 +/- 0.88 percentage points for the lumbar spine (P = 0.02) and 4.14 +/- 0.94 percentage points for the trochanter (P = 0.02). The changes in the femoral neck and the radius were not significantly different between the groups. There was an 85 percent reduction in the proportion of postmenopausal woman with new vertebral fractures in the etidronate group as compared with the placebo group (1 of 31 patients vs. 7 of 32 patients, P = 0.05), and the etidronate-treated postmenopausal women also had significantly fewer vertebral fractures per patient (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Intermittent etidronate therapy prevents the loss of vertebral and trochanteric bone in corticosteroid-treated patients.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2010
G Bertsias; John P. A. Ioannidis; Martin Aringer; Edward L.E.M. Bollen; Stefano Bombardieri; Ian N. Bruce; Ricard Cervera; Marinos C. Dalakas; Andrea Doria; John G. Hanly; T. W. J. Huizinga; David A. Isenberg; Cornelis Kallenberg; J.-C. Piette; M. Schneider; N Scolding; Josef S Smolen; A Stara; Ioannis Tassiulas; Maria G. Tektonidou; Angela Tincani; M.A. van Buchem; R. van Vollenhoven; M. Ward; Caroline Gordon; Dimitrios T. Boumpas
Objectives To develop recommendations for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) manifestations. Methods The authors compiled questions on prevalence and risk factors, diagnosis and monitoring, therapy and prognosis of NPSLE. A systematic literature search was performed and evidence was categorised based on sample size and study design. Results Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are at increased risk of several neuropsychiatric manifestations. Common (cumulative incidence >5%) manifestations include cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and seizures; relatively uncommon (1–5%) are severe cognitive dysfunction, major depression, acute confusional state (ACS), peripheral nervous disorders psychosis. Strong risk factors (at least fivefold increased risk) are previous or concurrent severe NPSLE (for cognitive dysfunction, seizures) and antiphospholipid antibodies (for CVD, seizures, chorea). The diagnostic work-up of suspected NPSLE is comparable to that in patients without SLE who present with the same manifestations, and aims to exclude causes unrelated to SLE. Investigations include cerebrospinal fluid analysis (to exclude central nervous system infection), EEG (to diagnose seizure disorder), neuropsychological tests (to assess cognitive dysfunction), nerve conduction studies (for peripheral neuropathy) and MRI (T1/T2, fluid-attenuating inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging, enhanced T1 sequence). Glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive therapy are indicated when NPSLE is thought to reflect an inflammatory process (optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, peripheral neuropathy, refractory seizures, psychosis, ACS) and in the presence of generalised lupus activity. Antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy is indicated when manifestations are related to antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly thrombotic CVD. Conclusions Neuropsychiatric manifestations in SLE patients should be first evaluated and treated as in patients without SLE, and secondarily attributed to SLE and treated accordingly.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 1999
John G. Hanly; Connie Hong; Stephanie Smith; John D. Fisk
OBJECTIVE To prospectively analyze the association between changes in cognitive function and circulating anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) over a period of 5 years in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Cognitive function was assessed in 51 unselected female SLE patients at baseline and after a mean followup of 64.5 months (range 52-71 months), using standardized tests of cognitive function, i.e., the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, and the California Verbal Learning Test. Circulating IgG, IgA, and IgM aCL and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on 4-7 occasions over the same time period. Persistent antibody reactivity was defined as levels more than 2 standard deviations (moderately positive) and more than 5 standard deviations (highly positive) above the mean for normal controls over the duration of the study. Changes in overall cognitive performance and in raw scores on individual cognitive tests were compared in patients who were persistently positive or negative for aCL. RESULTS At baseline 11 patients (22%) were cognitively impaired, compared with 7 (14%) at followup. Between 16% and 37% of patients had persistently elevated aCL levels of different isotypes. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of overall cognitive impairment in patients who were persistently positive for aCL compared with those who were not. In contrast, over the period of study, patients who had persistent IgG aCL positivity had a reduction in psychomotor speed, and patients who had persistent IgA aCL positivity had a reduction in conceptual reasoning and executive ability. Similar associations with anti-dsDNA antibodies were not found. CONCLUSION These results suggest that IgG and IgA aCL may be responsible for long-term subtle deterioration in cognitive function in patients with SLE.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2008
John G. Hanly; Murray B. Urowitz; F. Siannis; Vernon T. Farewell; Caroline Gordon; Sang-Cheol Bae; David A. Isenberg; Mary Anne Dooley; Ann E. Clarke; Sasha Bernatsky; Dafna D. Gladman; Paul R. Fortin; Susan Manzi; Kristjan Steinsson; Ian N. Bruce; Ellen M. Ginzler; Cynthia Aranow; Daniel J. Wallace; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; R. van Vollenhoven; Gunnar Sturfelt; Ola Nived; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Graciela S. Alarcón; Michelle Petri; Munther A. Khamashta; Asad Zoma; J. Font; Kenneth C. Kalunian; J. Douglas
OBJECTIVE To examine, in an inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, the association between neuropsychiatric (NP) events and anti-ribosomal P (anti-P), antiphospholipid (lupus anticoagulant [LAC], anticardiolipin), anti-beta2-glycoprotein I, and anti-NR2 glutamate receptor antibodies. METHODS NP events were identified using the American College of Rheumatology case definitions and clustered into central/peripheral and diffuse/focal events. Attribution of NP events to SLE was determined using decision rules of differing stringency. Autoantibodies were measured without knowledge of NP events or their attribution. RESULTS Four hundred twelve patients were studied (87.4% female; mean +/- SD age 34.9 +/- 13.5 years, mean +/- SD disease duration 5.0 +/- 4.2 months). There were 214 NP events in 133 patients (32.3%). The proportion of NP events attributed to SLE varied from 15% to 36%. There was no association between autoantibodies and NP events overall. However, the frequency of anti-P antibodies in patients with central NP events attributed to SLE was 4 of 20 (20%), versus 3 of 107 (2.8%) in patients with other NP events and 24 of 279 (8.6%) in those with no NP events (P = 0.04). Among patients with diffuse NP events, 3 of 11 had anti-P antibodies (27%), compared with 4 of 111 patients with other NP events (3.6%) and 24 of 279 of those with no NP events (8.6%) (P = 0.02). Specific clinical-serologic associations were found between anti-P and psychosis attributed to SLE (P = 0.02) and between LAC and cerebrovascular disease attributed to SLE (P = 0.038). There was no significant association between other autoantibodies and NP events. CONCLUSION Clinically distinct NP events attributed to SLE and occurring around the time of diagnosis were found to be associated with anti-P antibodies and LAC. This suggests that there are different autoimmune pathogenetic mechanisms, although low sensitivity limits the clinical application of testing for these antibodies.
Journal of Autoimmunity | 2013
Sasha Bernatsky; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Jeremy Labrecque; Lawrence Joseph; Jean François Boivin; Michelle Petri; Asad Zoma; Susan Manzi; Murray B. Urowitz; Dafna D. Gladman; Paul R. Fortin; Ellen M. Ginzler; Edward H. Yelin; Sang-Cheol Bae; Daniel J. Wallace; Steven M. Edworthy; Søren Jacobsen; Caroline Gordon; Mary Anne Dooley; Christine A. Peschken; John G. Hanly; Graciela S. Alarcón; Ola Nived; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; David A. Isenberg; Anisur Rahman; Torsten Witte; Cynthia Aranow; Diane L. Kamen; Kristjan Steinsson
OBJECTIVE To update estimates of cancer risk in SLE relative to the general population. METHODS A multisite international SLE cohort was linked with regional tumor registries. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as the ratio of observed to expected cancers. RESULTS Across 30 centres, 16,409 patients were observed for 121,283 (average 7.4) person-years. In total, 644 cancers occurred. Some cancers, notably hematologic malignancies, were substantially increased (SIR 3.02, 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.48, 3.63), particularly non-Hodgkins lymphoma, NHL (SIR 4.39, 95% CI 3.46, 5.49) and leukemia. In addition, increased risks of cancer of the vulva (SIR 3.78, 95% CI 1.52, 7.78), lung (SIR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04, 1.60), thyroid (SIR 1.76, 95% CI 1.13, 2.61) and possibly liver (SIR 1.87, 95% CI 0.97, 3.27) were suggested. However, a decreased risk was estimated for breast (SIR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88), endometrial (SIR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.77), and possibly ovarian cancers (0.64, 95% CI 0.34-1.10). The variability of comparative rates across different cancers meant that only a small increased risk was estimated across all cancers (SIR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05, 1.23). CONCLUSION These data estimate only a small increased risk in SLE (versus the general population) for cancer over-all. However, there is clearly an increased risk of NHL, and cancers of the vulva, lung, thyroid, and possibly liver. It remains unclear to what extent the association with NHL is mediated by innate versus exogenous factors. Similarly, the etiology of the decreased breast, endometrial, and possibly ovarian cancer risk is uncertain, though investigations are ongoing.
Arthritis Care and Research | 2010
Murray B. Urowitz; Dafna D. Gladman; Dominique Ibañez; S.-C. Bae; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Caroline Gordon; Ann E. Clarke; Sasha Bernatsky; Paul R. Fortin; John G. Hanly; Daniel J. Wallace; David A. Isenberg; Anisur Rahman; Graciela S. Alarcón; Joan T. Merrill; Ellen M. Ginzler; Munther A. Khamashta; Ola Nived; Gunnar Sturfelt; Ian N. Bruce; Kristjan Steinsson; Susan Manzi; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Mary Anne Dooley; Asad Zoma; Kenneth C. Kalunian; M. Ramos; R. van Vollenhoven; Cynthia Aranow; Thomas Stoll
To describe vascular events during an 8‐year followup in a multicenter systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) inception cohort and their attribution to atherosclerosis.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2015
Ian N. Bruce; Aidan G. O'Keeffe; Vernon T. Farewell; John G. Hanly; Susan Manzi; Li Su; Dafna D. Gladman; Sang-Cheol Bae; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Juanita Romero-Diaz; Caroline Gordon; Daniel J. Wallace; Ann E. Clarke; Sasha Bernatsky; Ellen M. Ginzler; David A. Isenberg; Anisur Rahman; Joan T. Merrill; Graciela S. Alarcón; Barri J. Fessler; Paul R. Fortin; Michelle Petri; Kristjan Steinsson; Mary Anne Dooley; Munther A. Khamashta; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Asad Zoma; Gunnar Sturfelt; Ola Nived; Cynthia Aranow
Background and aims We studied damage accrual and factors determining development and progression of damage in an international cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Methods The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort recruited patients within 15 months of developing four or more 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for SLE; the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) was measured annually. We assessed relative rates of transition using maximum likelihood estimation in a multistate model. The Kaplan–Meier method estimated the probabilities for time to first increase in SDI score and Cox regression analysis was used to assess mortality. Results We recruited 1722 patients; mean (SD) age 35.0 (13.4) years at cohort entry. Patients with damage at enrolment were more likely to have further worsening of SDI (SDI 0 vs ≥1; p<0.001). Age, USA African race/ethnicity, SLEDAI-2K score, steroid use and hypertension were associated with transition from no damage to damage, and increase(s) in pre-existing damage. Male gender (relative transition rates (95% CI) 1.48 (1.06 to 2.08)) and USA Caucasian race/ethnicity (1.63 (1.08 to 2.47)) were associated with SDI 0 to ≥1 transitions; Asian race/ethnicity patients had lower rates of new damage (0.60 (0.39 to 0.93)). Antimalarial use was associated with lower rates of increases in pre-existing damage (0.63 (0.44 to 0.89)). Damage was associated with future mortality (HR (95% CI) 1.46 (1.18 to 1.81) per SDI point). Conclusions Damage in SLE predicts future damage accrual and mortality. We identified several potentially modifiable risk factors for damage accrual; an integrated strategy to address these may improve long-term outcomes.
Nature Reviews Rheumatology | 2014
John G. Hanly
Nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can manifest as a range of neurological and psychiatric features, which are classified using the ACR case definitions for 19 neuropsychiatric syndromes. Approximately one-third of all neuropsychiatric syndromes in patients with SLE are primary manifestations of SLE-related autoimmunity, with seizure disorders, cerebrovascular disease, acute confusional state and neuropathy being the most common. Such primary neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) events are a consequence either of microvasculopathy and thrombosis, or of autoantibodies and inflammatory mediators. Diagnosis of NPSLE requires the exclusion of other causes, and clinical assessment directs the selection of appropriate investigations. These investigations include measurement of autoantibodies, analysis of cerebrospinal fluid, electrophysiological studies, neuropsychological assessment and neuroimaging to evaluate brain structure and function. Treatment involves the management of comorbidities contributing to the neuropsychiatric event, use of symptomatic therapies, and more specific interventions with either anticoagulation or immunosuppressive agents, depending upon the primary immunopathogenetic mechanism. Although the prognosis is variable, studies suggest a more favourable outcome for primary NPSLE manifestations compared with neuropsychiatric events attributable to non-SLE causes.