John H. Peever
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John H. Peever.
Sleep Health | 2015
Max Hirshkowitz; Kaitlyn Whiton; Steven M. Albert; Cathy A. Alessi; Oliviero Bruni; Lydia L. DonCarlos; Nancy Hazen; John H. Herman; Eliot S. Katz; Leila Kheirandish-Gozal; David N. Neubauer; Anne E. O’Donnell; Maurice M. Ohayon; John H. Peever; Robert Rawding; Ramesh Sachdeva; Belinda Setters; Michael V. Vitiello; J. Catesby Ware; Paula J. Adams Hillard
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a scientifically rigorous update to the National Sleep Foundations sleep duration recommendations. METHODS The National Sleep Foundation convened an 18-member multidisciplinary expert panel, representing 12 stakeholder organizations, to evaluate scientific literature concerning sleep duration recommendations. We determined expert recommendations for sufficient sleep durations across the lifespan using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS The panel agreed that, for healthy individuals with normal sleep, the appropriate sleep duration for newborns is between 14 and 17 hours, infants between 12 and 15 hours, toddlers between 11 and 14 hours, preschoolers between 10 and 13 hours, and school-aged children between 9 and 11 hours. For teenagers, 8 to 10 hours was considered appropriate, 7 to 9 hours for young adults and adults, and 7 to 8 hours of sleep for older adults. CONCLUSIONS Sufficient sleep duration requirements vary across the lifespan and from person to person. The recommendations reported here represent guidelines for healthy individuals and those not suffering from a sleep disorder. Sleep durations outside the recommended range may be appropriate, but deviating far from the normal range is rare. Individuals who habitually sleep outside the normal range may be exhibiting signs or symptoms of serious health problems or, if done volitionally, may be compromising their health and well-being.
Sleep Health | 2015
Max Hirshkowitz; Kaitlyn Whiton; Steven M. Albert; Cathy A. Alessi; Oliviero Bruni; Lydia L. DonCarlos; Nancy Hazen; John H. Herman; Paula J. Adams Hillard; Eliot S. Katz; Leila Kheirandish-Gozal; David N. Neubauer; Anne E. O’Donnell; Maurice M. Ohayon; John H. Peever; Robert Rawding; Ramesh Sachdeva; Belinda Setters; Michael V. Vitiello; J. Catesby Ware
OBJECTIVE To make scientifically sound and practical recommendations for daily sleep duration across the life span. METHODS The National Sleep Foundation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel (Panel) with broad representation from leading stakeholder organizations. The Panel evaluated the latest scientific evidence and participated in a formal consensus and voting process. Then, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to formulate sleep duration recommendations. RESULTS The Panel made sleep duration recommendations for 9 age groups. Sleep duration ranges, expressed as hours of sleep per day, were designated as recommended, may be appropriate, or not recommended. Recommended sleep durations are as follows: 14-17 hours for newborns, 12-15 hours for infants, 11-14 hours for toddlers, 10-13 hours for preschoolers, 9-11 hours for school-aged children, and 8-10 hours for teenagers. Seven to 9 hours is recommended for young adults and adults, and 7-8 hours of sleep is recommended for older adults. The self-designated basis for duration selection and critical discussions are also provided. CONCLUSIONS Consensus for sleep duration recommendations was reached for specific age groupings. Consensus using a multidisciplinary expert Panel lends robust credibility to the results. Finally, limitations and caveats of these recommendations are discussed.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2008
Patricia L. Brooks; John H. Peever
A hallmark of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is a potent suppression of postural muscle tone. Motor control in REM sleep is unique because it is characterized by flurries of intermittent muscle twitches that punctuate muscle atonia. Because somatic motoneurons are bombarded by strychnine-sensitive IPSPs during REM sleep, it is assumed that glycinergic inhibition underlies REM atonia. However, it has never been determined whether glycinergic inhibition of motoneurons is indeed responsible for triggering the loss of postural muscle tone during REM sleep. Therefore, we used reverse microdialysis, electrophysiology, and pharmacological and histological methods to determine whether glycinergic and/or GABAA-mediated neurotransmission at the trigeminal motor pool mediates masseter muscle atonia during REM sleep in rats. By antagonizing glycine and GABAA receptors on trigeminal motoneurons, we unmasked a tonic glycinergic/GABAergic drive at the trigeminal motor pool during waking and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Blockade of this drive potently increased masseter muscle tone during both waking and NREM sleep. This glycinergic/GABAergic drive was immediately switched-off and converted into a phasic glycinergic drive during REM sleep. Blockade of this phasic drive potently provoked muscle twitch activity in REM sleep; however, it did not prevent or reverse REM atonia. Muscle atonia in REM even persisted when glycine and GABAA receptors were simultaneously antagonized and trigeminal motoneurons were directly activated by glutamatergic excitation, indicating that a powerful, yet unidentified, inhibitory mechanism overrides motoneuron excitation during REM sleep. Our data refute the prevailing hypothesis that REM atonia is caused by glycinergic inhibition. The inhibitory mechanism mediating REM atonia therefore requires reevaluation.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011
Greer S. Kirshenbaum; Steven J. Clapcote; Steven Duffy; Christian R. Burgess; Janne Petersen; Karolina J. Jarowek; Yeni H. Yücel; Miguel A. Cortez; O. Carter Snead; Bente Vilsen; John H. Peever; Martin R. Ralph; John C. Roder
Bipolar disorder is a debilitating psychopathology with unknown etiology. Accumulating evidence suggests the possible involvement of Na+,K+-ATPase dysfunction in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Here we show that Myshkin mice carrying an inactivating mutation in the neuron-specific Na+,K+-ATPase α3 subunit display a behavioral profile remarkably similar to bipolar patients in the manic state. Myshkin mice show increased Ca2+ signaling in cultured cortical neurons and phospho-activation of extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) and Akt in the hippocampus. The mood-stabilizing drugs lithium and valproic acid, specific ERK inhibitor SL327, rostafuroxin, and transgenic expression of a functional Na+,K+-ATPase α3 protein rescue the mania-like phenotype of Myshkin mice. These findings establish Myshkin mice as a unique model of mania, reveal an important role for Na+,K+-ATPase α3 in the control of mania-like behavior, and identify Na+,K+-ATPase α3, its physiological regulators and downstream signal transduction pathways as putative targets for the design of new antimanic therapies.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2008
Christian R. Burgess; Diane Lai; Jerome M. Siegel; John H. Peever
Skeletal muscle tone is modulated in a stereotypical pattern across the sleep–wake cycle. Abnormalities in this modulation contribute to most of the major sleep disorders; therefore, characterizing the neurochemical substrate responsible for transmitting a sleep–wake drive to somatic motoneurons needs to be determined. Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter that modulates motoneuron excitability; however, its role in regulating motoneuron excitability and muscle tone during natural sleep–wake behaviors is unknown. Therefore, we used reverse-microdialysis, electrophysiology, pharmacological, and histological methods to determine how changes in glutamatergic neurotransmission within the trigeminal motor pool contribute to the sleep–wake pattern of masseter muscle tone in behaving rats. We found that blockade of non-NMDA and NMDA glutamate receptors (via CNQX and d-AP-5) on trigeminal motoneurons reduced waking masseter tone to sleeping levels, indicating that masseter tone is maximal during alert waking because motoneurons are activated by an endogenous glutamatergic drive. This wake-related drive is switched off in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, and this contributes to the suppression of muscle tone during this state. We also show that a functional glutamatergic drive generates the muscle twitches that characterize phasic rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep. However, loss of a waking glutamatergic drive is not sufficient for triggering the motor atonia that characterizes REM sleep because potent activation of either AMPA or NMDA receptors on trigeminal motoneurons was unable to reverse REM atonia. We conclude that an endogenous glutamatergic drive onto somatic motoneurons contributes to the stereotypical pattern of muscle tone during wakefulness, NREM sleep, and phasic REM sleep but not during tonic REM sleep.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2012
Patricia L. Brooks; John H. Peever
During REM sleep the CNS is intensely active, but the skeletal motor system is paradoxically forced into a state of muscle paralysis. The mechanisms that trigger REM sleep paralysis are a matter of intense debate. Two competing theories argue that it is caused by either active inhibition or reduced excitation of somatic motoneuron activity. Here, we identify the transmitter and receptor mechanisms that function to silence skeletal muscles during REM sleep. We used behavioral, electrophysiological, receptor pharmacology and neuroanatomical approaches to determine how trigeminal motoneurons and masseter muscles are switched off during REM sleep in rats. We show that a powerful GABA and glycine drive triggers REM paralysis by switching off motoneuron activity. This drive inhibits motoneurons by targeting both metabotropic GABAB and ionotropic GABAA/glycine receptors. REM paralysis is only reversed when motoneurons are cut off from GABAB, GABAA and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition. Neither metabotropic nor ionotropic receptor mechanisms alone are sufficient for generating REM paralysis. These results demonstrate that multiple receptor mechanisms trigger REM sleep paralysis. Breakdown in normal REM inhibition may underlie common sleep motor pathologies such as REM sleep behavior disorder.
Neuroscience | 2002
John H. Peever; Linlin Shen; James Duffin
The goal of this study was to determine the origin and transmission pathway of respiratory drive to hypoglossal motoneurons. First we recorded intracellularly from 28 antidromically activated inspiratory hypoglossal motoneurons (resting membrane potential, -50+/-3 mV), and found that injection of chloride ions had no discernible effect on the shape of their membrane potential trajectories. We concluded that the membrane potential trajectories of these hypoglossal motoneurons were determined primarily by inspiratory excitation. To determine the origin of this excitation we cross-correlated the extracellular discharge of medullary inspiratory neurons, including those in the hypoglossal motor nucleus, with the hypoglossal nerve discharge. We found 27 inspiratory neurons within the hypoglossal motor nucleus that were not antidromically activated from the ipsilateral hypoglossal nerve; their cross-correlograms featured either central peaks (1.7+/-0.2 ms) alone (n=14; 39%), or central peaks (1.3+/-0.2 ms) followed by troughs (1.3+/-0.1 ms) at short latencies (1.1+/-0.4 ms) (n=13; 36%), and suggest that these neurons are hypoglossal interneurons. We recorded from 238 inspiratory neurons throughout the rest of the medulla; the cross-correlograms of 19 neurons (8%), located mostly in the lateral tegmental field, displayed narrow half-amplitude peaks (1.0+/-0.1 ms) at short latencies (0.9+/-0.1 ms), which we interpreted as evidence for monosynaptic excitation of hypoglossal motoneurons.We conclude that the respiratory control of hypoglossal motoneurons originates from inspiratory premotor neurons scattered throughout the lateral tegmental field and interneurons within the hypoglossal motor nucleus.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2011
Patricia L. Brooks; John H. Peever
Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a neurological disease characterized by loss of normal REM motor inhibition and subsequent dream enactment. RBD is clinically relevant because it predicts neurodegenerative disease onset (e.g., Parkinsons disease) and is clinically problematic because it disrupts sleep and results in patient injuries and hospitalization. Even though the cause of RBD is unknown, multiple lines of evidence indicate that abnormal inhibitory transmission underlies the disorder. Here, we show that transgenic mice with deficient glycine and GABA transmission have a behavioral, motor, and sleep phenotype that recapitulates the cardinal features of RBD. Specifically, we show that mice with impaired glycine and GABAA receptor function exhibit REM motor behaviors, non-REM muscle twitches, sleep disruption, and EEG slowing—the defining disease features. Importantly, the RBD phenotype is rescued by drugs (e.g., clonazepam and melatonin) that are routinely used to treat human disease symptoms. Our findings are the first to identify a potential mechanism for RBD—we show that deficits in glycine- and GABAA-mediated inhibition trigger the full spectrum of RBD symptoms. We propose that these mice are a useful resource for investigating in vivo disease mechanisms and developing potential therapeutics for RBD.
Trends in Neurosciences | 2014
John H. Peever; Pierre-Hervé Luppi; Jacques Montplaisir
During rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, skeletal muscles are almost paralyzed. However, in REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), which is a rare neurological condition, muscle atonia is lost, leaving afflicted individuals free to enact their dreams. Although this may sound innocuous, it is not, given that patients with RBD often injure themselves or their bed-partner. A major concern in RBD is that it precedes, in 80% of cases, development of synucleinopathies, such as Parkinsons disease (PD). This link suggests that neurodegenerative processes initially target the circuits controlling REM sleep. Clinical and basic neuroscience evidence indicates that RBD results from breakdown of the network underlying REM sleep atonia. This finding is important because it opens new avenues for treating RBD and understanding its link to neurodegenerative disorders.
Nature Reviews Neurology | 2014
Yves Dauvilliers; Jerry M. Siegel; Régis Lopez; Zoltan A. Torontali; John H. Peever
Cataplexy is the pathognomonic symptom of narcolepsy, and is the sudden uncontrollable onset of skeletal muscle paralysis or weakness during wakefulness. Cataplexy is incapacitating because it leaves the individual awake but temporarily either fully or partially paralyzed. Occurring spontaneously, cataplexy is typically triggered by strong positive emotions such as laughter and is often underdiagnosed owing to a variable disease course in terms of age of onset, presenting symptoms, triggers, frequency and intensity of attacks. This disorder occurs almost exclusively in patients with depletion of hypothalamic orexin neurons. One pathogenetic mechanism that has been hypothesized for cataplexy is the activation, during wakefulness, of brainstem circuitry that normally induces muscle tone suppression in rapid eye movement sleep. Muscle weakness during cataplexy is caused by decreased excitation of noradrenergic neurons and increased inhibition of skeletal motor neurons by γ-aminobutyric acid-releasing or glycinergic neurons. The amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex contain neural pathways through which positive emotions probably trigger cataplectic attacks. Despite major advances in understanding disease mechanisms in cataplexy, therapeutic management is largely symptomatic, with antidepressants and γ-hydroxybutyrate being the most effective treatments. This Review describes the clinical and pathophysiological aspects of cataplexy, and outlines optimal therapeutic management strategies.