John Kadzielski

Self-Reported Upper Extremity Health Status Correlates with Depression

BACKGROUND The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is the most widely used upper extremity-specific health-status measure. The DASH score often demonstrates greater variability than would be expected on the basis of objective pathology. This variability may be related to psychosocial factors. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the DASH score and psychological factors for specific diagnoses with relatively limited variation in objective pathology. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-five patients with a single, common, discrete hand problem known to have limited variations in objective pathology completed the DASH questionnaire, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) to assess neuroticism, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale to quantify depressive symptoms, and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS). Forty-five patients had carpal tunnel syndrome, forty-four had de Quervain tenosynovitis, forty-eight had lateral elbow pain, and seventy-one had a single trigger finger. In addition, twenty-seven patients were evaluated six weeks after a nonoperatively treated fracture of the distal part of the radius. Relationships between psychosocial factors and the DASH score were determined. RESULTS A significant positive correlation between the DASH score and depression was noted for all diagnoses (r = 0.38 to 0.52; p < 0.01 for all). The DASH score also correlated with pain anxiety for four of the five diagnoses (carpal tunnel syndrome, r = 0.40; de Quervain tendinitis, r = 0.46; lateral elbow pain, r = 0.42; and trigger finger, r = 0.24) (p < 0.05 for all). The DASH score was not correlated with neuroticism for any diagnosis. There was a highly significant effect of depression (as measured with the CES-D score) on the DASH score for all diagnoses. Both the CES-D score (F = 62.68, p < 0.0001) and gender (F = 11.36, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of the DASH score. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported upper extremity-specific health status as measured with the DASH score correlates with depression and pain anxiety but not neuroticism. These data support the contention that psychosocial factors have a strong influence on health-status measures.

Psychological Factors Associated with Idiopathic Arm Pain

BACKGROUND Psychological and personality factors may be as important as, or more important than, pathological processes in the experience of pain, particularly in patients whose pain has a vague or uncertain source. METHODS Validated measures of psychological factors were used to prospectively evaluate fifty-six patients with a single, discrete pain complaint and fifty-one patients with vague, diffuse idiopathic arm pain. Pain was assessed with use of 10-point Likert scales, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Wahler Physical Symptom Inventory, the Body Consciousness Questionnaire, and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale. RESULTS Patients with idiopathic arm pain reported more severe pain at rest (p = 0.02) and with repeated movements (p = 0.01); exhibited higher levels of cognitive anxiety (p = 0.008); demonstrated greater helplessness (p = 0.002), pain magnification (p = 0.007), and overall catastrophic coping mechanisms for dealing with pain (p = 0.005); and showed a tendency for increased somatic complaining (p = 0.07). A multiple logistic regression model identified the total score on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale as the sole predictor of idiopathic pain complaints. CONCLUSIONS Pain complaints without a clear physical cause are common and are frustrating for both patients and physicians. Awareness of the psychological factors associated with idiopathic arm pain may lead to more effective interventions designed to improve coping mechanisms while at the same time limiting the use of meddlesome and potentially harmful diagnoses and treatments.

Evaluation of Preoperative Expectations and Patient Satisfaction After Carpal Tunnel Release

PURPOSE We tested the hypothesis that preoperative expectations affect postoperative satisfaction and arm-specific, self-reported health status after elective carpal tunnel release. METHODS Forty-nine patients having elective carpal tunnel release completed questionnaires evaluating self-rated upper extremity-specific disability using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, expectations regarding surgery (Preop Expectations Score), personal importance of upper-extremity function, measures of general optimism, the Life Orientation Test (LOT), as well as health-specific optimism, and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale. Six months after surgery, patients completed a 10-point Likert scale to assess satisfaction, the DASH, and measures determining (1) fulfillment of expectations (Postop Met Expectations Score) and (2) relief of specific systems (Postop Help Score). RESULTS The DASH scores decreased significantly from an average of 37 points before surgery to an average of 15 points 6 months after carpal tunnel release (p<.001), and patients rated their satisfaction (mean +/- standard deviation) as 8 +/- 3. Preoperative expectations did not correlate with patient satisfaction or postoperative DASH scores. Multivariable analyses determined that patient satisfaction was best predicted by fulfillment of expectations (Postop Help Score alone, accounting for 41% of the variance in scores) and postoperative DASH scores were predicted by a combination of Postop Met Expectations Score and the LOT score (accounting for 31% of the variance in scores). CONCLUSIONS As measured in this study, the strongest predictor of satisfaction after carpal tunnel release was relief of symptoms, and the strongest predictors of postoperative disability were met expectations and optimism; however, the majority of the variance in postoperative satisfaction remains unexplained. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic III.

Surgeons' attitudes are associated with reoperation and readmission rates.

BackgroundAttitudes influence how people make decisions. In an effort to decrease pilot judgment-related accidents, the Federal Aviation Administration teaches new pilots about hazardous attitudes that are believed to be incompatible with safe flight: macho, impulsive, worry, resignation, self-confidence, and antiauthority. If these attitudes are hazardous for pilots and their passengers, they may also be incompatible with the reliable and safe delivery of surgical care.Questions/purposesThe purposes of this study were (1) to ascertain to what extent surgeons harbor hazardous attitudes; and (2) to determine their relationship, if any, to reoperation and readmission rates.MethodsWe selected validated aviation psychology tools that are used to measure these attitudes in pilots. We converted the aviation scenarios to analogous situations for surgeons and invited all surgeons from one academic program to participate in this study. A total of 41 surgeons were eligible to participate; 37 (90%) completed the attitude prevalence protocol and 31 (76%) had complete reoperation and readmission data for the correlation and regression analysis. Attending orthopaedic surgeons completed the Modified Surgeon Hazardous Attitude Scale as well as a series of additional instruments.ResultsLevels of macho thought to be hazardous in pilots were present in nine (24%) surgeons. Similar, elevated levels of self-confidence were found in three (8%) surgeons. High levels of impulsivity were found in 5% (two surgeons) and high levels of antiauthority were found in 3% (one surgeon). Only one (3%) surgeon reported elevated levels of worry and no surgeon reported hazardous levels of resignation. Thirty percent (11 surgeons) of surgeons harbored at least one elevated attitude level. In a regression model, macho attitude levels predicted 19% of the variation in surgeons’ rate of readmissions and reoperations.ConclusionsHigh levels of hazardous attitudes may not be consistent with the routine delivery of safe surgical care in a teamwork setting where human factors and safe systems are the key to success. Further research is needed to determine if abnormally high levels of these hazardous attitudes impact patient care.Level of EvidenceLevel II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient Safety Climate Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Patient safety has attained a higher profile since the Institute of Medicines report, To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System , was distributed in 20001. This report suggested that many hospital errors were related to flaws within the health-care delivery system. Many organizations—aviation, nuclear power, the military, and some industries—have realized that safe systems are essential for creating a barrier between human errors and adverse events2. Organizations with systems designed to minimize errors, prevent adverse events, and produce reliable outcomes despite intrinsic risks have been termed highly reliable organizations 2,3. Health-care institutions are now being challenged by both internal and external forces to become highly reliable organizations by applying systems-based approaches to address patient safety. One of the key factors in the transformation of health-care institutions into patient-safety-focused, highly reliable organizations is the development and maintenance of a positive patient safety climate within the institution. In a systematic review of the literature, safety climate has been defined as “the surface features of the safety culture discerned from the workforces attitudes and perceptions at a given point in time. … It is a snapshot of the state of safety providing an indicator of the underlying safety culture of a work group, plant or organization.”4 As extrinsic pressures build and government and public scrutiny increase, delivery of dependable and safe patient care with consistent outcomes will be demanded from health-care organizations. Training new members of the health-care delivery system to adopt and maintain a safety climate will be a critical component of the transformation of health-care delivery into a highly reliable organization. The purpose of this study was to identify the baseline safety climate in orthopaedic surgical residents and track its trends in trainees over time. ### Measures Safety climate was measured by a modified …

Fatigue Optimization Scheduling in Graduate Medical Education: Reducing Fatigue and Improving Patient Safety

BACKGROUND Medical error is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Resident fatigue is likely to be a significant contributor. OBJECTIVES We calculated and compared predicted fatigue impairment in surgical residents on varying schedules by using the validated Sleep, Activity, Fatigue, and Task Effectiveness model and Fatigue Avoidance Scheduling Tool; we identified specific times of day and rotations during which residents were most affected, instituted countermeasures, and measured the predicted response. METHODS We compared 4 scheduling patterns: day shift, trauma shift, night shift, and prework hour restriction Q3 call (or every-third-night call). The dependent variables were mean daily effectiveness while at work and the percentage of time residents worked with critical fatigue impairment (defined as an effectiveness score of less than 70 correlated with an increased risk for error and a blood alcohol content of 0.08). Fatigue countermeasures (ie, a 30-minute nap, eliminating 24-hour shifts) were applied to rotations with significant impairment to determine impairment plasticity. RESULTS CALCULATED MEAN EFFECTIVENESS SCORES AND PERCENTAGE OF TIME SPENT IMPAIRED AT WORK WERE AS FOLLOWS: day shift, 90.3, 0%; trauma shift, 82.0, 7.5%; prework hour restriction Q3 call shift, 80.7, 23%; and night shift, 68.0, 50% (P < .001). Fatigue optimization countermeasures for night shift rotation improved mean daily effectiveness to 87.1 with only 1.9% of time working while impaired (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS There is a significant potential for fatigue impairment in residents, with work schedule a significant factor. Once targeted, fatigue impairment may be minimized with specific countermeasures. Fatigue optimization tools provide data for targeted scheduling interventions, which reduce fatigue and may mitigate medical error.

A Patient-Specific Version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire

PURPOSE We modified the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire to be weighted according to a patients priorities (patient-specific [PS-DASH]) and compared it with the DASH in terms of its mean and variance and its relationship with coping styles (pain avoidance, pain catastrophizing, anxiety sensitivity, and hypochondriasis), depression, and overall stress. METHODS Ninety-eight patients with carpal tunnel syndrome completed questionnaires measuring depression, pain catastrophizing, avoidance, hypochondriasis, anxiety sensitivity, and ordinal measures of self-reported stress and disability. They also completed the DASH and a modification of the DASH that weighted each item according to personal priorities. RESULTS The DASH scores had a significantly higher mean and greater standard deviation than the PS-DASH (mean +/- standard deviation, 54.1 +/- 16.8 vs 32.7 +/- 11.0). Health anxiety (r = 0.355), anxiety sensitivity (r = 0.258), and pain catastrophizing (r = 0.421) were significantly related to PS-DASH; health anxiety (r = 0.298), depression (r = 0.225), and pain catastrophizing (r = .350) were significantly related to DASH. Multivariable regression analyses were statistically significant, but accounted for only 35% of the variance in PS-DASH and 17% of the variance in DASH. Pain catastrophizing and gender were the sole significant predictors for PS-DASH (B = 0.290, B = 0.384), whereas only pain catastrophizing predicted DASH (B = 0.251). CONCLUSIONS A version of the DASH weighted according to patient priorities narrowed the variability in DASH scores but did not appear to have sufficient advantage over DASH to warrant this much more cumbersome questionnaire.

Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Crew Administration of Antibiotics for Open Fractures

This study had 3 major aims: (1) to ascertain the degree to which helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) administration of antibiotics (Abx) can streamline the time to Abx in open fracture patients, (2) to determine whether any clinical outcome improvements were associated with HEMS Abx therapy, and (3) to calculate the cost-effectiveness of prehospital HEMS Abx. The design of the study was a prospective, nonrandomized, nonintervention, natural study of timing and clinical outcomes for patients with suspected open extremity fracture. There were 138 scene trauma cases transported by 8 participating HEMS programs from July 2009 to June 2010. The participating HEMS programs were both urban and rural. The diagnosis of an open fracture by the HEMS crews had an accuracy rate of 97.8% (95% confidence interval, 90.8%-98.4%). The time from the incident to Abx was 30 minutes shorter (P = .0001) when Abx were administered by HEMS crews. There was no statistical significance (P = 1.0) regarding the endpoint of infection or nonunion development in HEMS- versus hospital-administered Abx. In conclusion, the administration of Abx by HEMS crews to patients diagnosed with open extremity fractures is feasible, it may decrease the time to Abx by 30 minutes, and the effect magnitude (40.3% relative risk reduction) was promising.