John L. O’Donnell

Gout in solid organ transplantation: a challenging clinical problem.

Hyperuricaemia occurs in 5–84% and gout in 1.7–28% of recipients of solid organ transplants. Gout may be severe and crippling, and may hinder the improved quality of life gained through organ transplantation. Risk factors for gout in the general population include hyperuricaemia, obesity, weight gain, hypertension and diuretic use. In transplant recipients, therapy with ciclosporin (cyclosporin) is an additional risk factor.Hyperuricaemia is recognised as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, whether anti-hyperuricaemic therapy reduces cardiovascular events remains to be determined.Dietary advice is important in the management of gout and patients should be educated to partake in a low-calorie diet with moderate carbohydrate restriction and increased proportional intake of protein and unsaturated fat. While gout is curable, its pharmacological management in transplant recipients is complicated by the risk of adverse effects and potentially severe interactions between immunosuppressive and hypouricaemic drugs. NSAIDs, colchicine and corticosteroids may be used to treat acute gouty attacks. NSAIDs have effects on renal haemodynamics, and must be used with caution and with close monitoring of renal function. Colchicine myotoxicty is of particular concern in transplant recipients with renal impairment or when used in combination with ciclosporin. Long-term urate-lowering therapy is required to promote dissolution of uric acid crystals, thereby preventing recurrent attacks of gout. Allopurinol should be used with caution because of its interaction with azathioprine, which results in bone marrow suppression. Substitution of mycophenylate mofetil for azathioprine avoids this interaction. Uricosuric agents, such as probenecid, are ineffective in patients with renal impairment. The exception is benzbromarone, which is effective in those with a creatinine clearance >25 mL/min. Benzbromarone is indicated in allopurinol-intolerant patients with renal failure, solid organ transplant or tophaceous/ polyarticular gout. Monitoring for hepatotoxicty is essential for patients taking benzbromarone.Physicians should carefully consider therapeutic options for the management of hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, which are common in transplant recipients. While loop and thiazide diuretics increase serum urate, amlodipine and losartan have the same antihypertensive effect with the additional benefit of lowering serum urate. Atorvastatin, but not simvastatin, may lower uric acid, and while fenofibrate may reduce serum urate it has been associated with a decline in renal function.Gout in solid organ transplantation is an increasing and challenging clinical problem; it impacts adversely on patients’ quality of life. Recognition and, if possible, alleviation of risk factors, prompt treatment of acute attacks and early introduction of hypouricaemic therapy with careful monitoring are the keys to successful management.

Wegener’s granulomatosis in New Zealand: evidence for a latitude-dependent incidence gradient

Background: The aim of the study was to determine whether there was evidence for a geographic gradient in the incidence of Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG) and WG‐like disease in New Zealand (NZ).

Emerging therapies in the long‐term management of hyperuricaemia and gout

Gout is a common chronic arthritis that can lead to significant disability. Gout is one of the few rheumatological conditions that can be diagnosed with certainty, has a known cause and can be cured with appropriate therapy. Hypouricaemic agents reduce uric acid concentrations through inhibiting uric acid production (allopurinol) or enhancing uric acid excretion (probenecid, benzbromarone). Allopurinol is the most commonly used hypouricaemic agent but at recommended doses often fails to reduce adequately uric acid concentrations and prevent acute attacks of gout. The use of probenecid is limited by lack of efficacy in renal impairment. In the last few years, new agents in the management of hyperuricaemia and gout have become available. Febuxostat, a new xanthine oxidase inhibitor, is an effective hypouricaemic agent although further data are required for patients with renal impairment and other significant medical conditions. Rasburicase, a recombinant uricase (which catalyses the conversion of uric acid to the more readily excreted allantoin) is available for prevention of tumour lysis syndrome. However, its repeated use, as would be required in chronic gout, is limited by antigenicity. A less antigenic PEGylated uricase can rapidly reduce serum uric acid concentrations and promote resorption of tophi. However, further information with regard to the long‐term risks and benefits of these agents is required. These agents may ultimately be used in the short term to rapidly deplete urate stores (induction therapy) followed by long‐term therapy with an alternative hypouricaemic agent to prevent subsequent accumulation of uric acid (maintenance therapy).

Furosemide increases plasma oxypurinol without lowering serum urate—a complex drug interaction: implications for clinical practice

OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of furosemide on serum urate (SU), plasma oxypurinol and urinary urate. METHODS Twenty-three cases with gout receiving furosemide and allopurinol were recruited. Twenty-three controls with gout receiving allopurinol but no diuretics were matched on age, gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate and allopurinol dose. SU, plasma oxypurinol and urinary urate were assessed on a single occasion. The effects of a single dose of furosemide 40 mg were examined in a separate group of 10 patients receiving allopurinol but not diuretic. RESULTS Cases had significantly higher SU and plasma oxypurinol compared with controls despite receiving similar doses of allopurinol. There was no difference in urinary urate excretion. There was a significant increase in area under the curve (AUC)(0-24) for oxypurinol after administration of furosemide 40 mg. CONCLUSION The interaction between allopurinol and furosemide results in increased SU and plasma oxypurinol. The exact mechanisms remain unclear but complex interactions that result in attenuation of the hypouricaemic effects of oxypurinol are likely. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, www.anzctr.org.au, 12609000529246.

Audit of pneumocystis pneumonia in patients seen by the Christchurch Hospital rheumatology service over a 5-year period

Aim: The aim of the study was to review all cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients seen by the Christchurch Hospital Rheumatology service over a 5‐year period and to determine the annual incidence of PCP.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody measurement: advantages and disadvantages of a capture PR3 ELISA and a direct PR3 ELISA

Aim: To compare the performance of a capture proteinase 3 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (PR3 ELISA) with a direct PR3 ELISA in the measurement of PR3 antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). Method: The performance of both assays systems was compared using two sets of sera. Sera from patients (n = 49) suffering from Wegeners granulomatosis (WG) and fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria (or a modification of those criteria that allowed for ANCA positivity) were used along with sera from a group of patients (n = 48) considered to have a clinically false positive PR3 ANCA result when measured by routine direct ELISA. Results: Using the assay specific cut‐offs, the direct ELISA gave a positive result in 92% on repeat testing and the capture ELISA a positive result in 84% of sera from patients with WG. The capture ELISA was negative in 75% of patients considered to have a false positive PR3 ANCA on initial testing by direct ELISA (27% were negative on repeat testing by direct ELISA). The mean concentration of PR3 ANCA in WG patient sera measured by the capture ELISA was significantly higher than that measured by the direct ELISA. The capture PR3 ELISA had a broader analytical range which was also reflected in PR3 ANCA concentrations measured in serial serum samples from WG patients. Conclusion: In this study the direct PR3 ELISA performed better as a screening test for PR3 ANCA compared with the capture PR3 ELISA, mainly because the cut‐off for the capture ELISA needed to be set higher to avoid non‐specific binding. In contrast, the improved analytical range of the capture ELISA made it a potentially more useful method for monitoring serial PR3 ANCA concentrations. In specific serum samples the capture ELISA was better able to discriminate ‘false positive’ PR3 ANCA.

Rates of Joint Replacement Surgery in New Zealand, 1999–2015: A Comparison of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis

Objective. To determine rates of joint replacement for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) and to examine the characteristics of those receiving elbow replacements. Methods. Data were extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry from 1999 to 2015 and annual rates calculated. Results. Rates of joint replacement increased over time for OA but not RA. Elbow replacement was the only procedure performed more commonly in RA. Conclusion. There has been a substantial increase in joint replacement for OA in New Zealand. For RA, where access to biologics has been limited to those with erosions, joint replacement rates have not declined, with the exception of elbow replacements.

Management of Gout in a Hospital Setting: A Lost Opportunity

Objective. Management of gout is frequently suboptimal. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients presenting to Christchurch Hospital for a gout flare and to determine whether management for both acute flares and urate lowering was in accordance with international recommendations. Methods. A retrospective audit was undertaken of all admissions to Christchurch Hospital from June 1, 2013, to May 31, 2014, in which gout was coded as a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis. Information including demographics, comorbidities, concomitant medications, treatment of acute gout, and urate lowering was collected. Results. A total of 235 acute admissions for gout in 216 individuals were identified. Eleven individuals had 2 admissions and 4 individuals had 3 admissions. In 95/235 admissions (40.4%), gout was the primary diagnosis. Gout accounted for 95/77,321 (0.12%) of acute admissions. The treatment of acute gout was prednisone monotherapy in 170/235 (72.3%) of admissions. Serum urate was measured at some point during 123/235 (52.3%) of admissions, with only 19/123 (15.4%) at target urate level (< 0.36 mmol/l). At 60 of the 235 admissions, urate-lowering therapy was already being prescribed. Nine out of 175 patients (5.1%) not treated with urate-lowering therapy at admission commenced allopurinol and 32/174 (18.4%) had commencement of urate-lowering therapy recommended in the discharge plan. Conclusion. Rates of admission for gout are similar to that observed in other studies. Failure to initiate, change, or recommend alterations in urate-lowering therapy to achieve target urate in people with gout admitted to hospital represents a significant lost opportunity to improve longterm gout management.

Comparison of two plasma urate assays in patients receiving vitamin C supplementation

Summary The aim of this study was to compare plasma urate (PU) concentrations using two different assays in patients receiving vitamin C supplementation. PU was measured using two routinely available enzymatic uricase methods: (1) uric acid plus method (ascorbate oxidase assay), and (2) uric acid method (non-ascorbate oxidase assay). Twenty patients receiving allopurinol were randomised to an increase in allopurinol dose or commence vitamin C 500 mg/d on a 1:1 ratio. Twenty patients not receiving allopurinol were randomised to start allopurinol or vitamin C 500 mg/d on a 1:1 ratio. Trough fasting samples for plasma ascorbate and urate were measured weekly until week 8. There was no significant difference in the mean PU measured by the two assays. In patients not receiving supplemental vitamin C the mean PU concentrations were identical for both assays. For patients receiving supplemental vitamin C the mean PU concentrations for the ascorbate oxidase assay was 0.525 mmol/L (SE 0.034) and for the non-ascorbate oxidase assay 0.510 mmol/L (SE 0.033), p = 0.079. There is a small non-significant difference in measured PU in patients receiving supplemental vitamin C between the two assays. The assay which does not include ascorbate oxidase results in consistently lower PU concentrations compared to the assay which includes ascorbate oxidase.