John Lloyd

MUTATIONS IN A SUBGROUP OF PATIENTS WITH MILD HAEMOPHILIA A AND A FAMILIAL DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ONE‐STAGE AND TWO‐STAGE FACTOR VIII:C METHODS

A subgroup of patients with haemophilia A who have a familial discrepancy between the one‐stage and two‐stage factor VIII:C results has previously been described. These patients show factor VIII:C levels by one‐stage assay that are 2–7‐fold higher than their two‐stage results. We have studied 10 such families and identified six different mutations in the factor VIII gene in this group. The chemical cleavage method and DNA sequencing was used to identify mutations in factor VIII gene fragments generated by reverse transcription and PCR. All available family members were tested to confirm the presence of the mutation in affected individuals. These patients were found to have one of six single point substitutions causing a missense mutation and alteration to one codon in exons 7, 11, 14 or 18. The mutations comprise three that have not previously been described (Ala284Glu, Arg698Leu, Leu1932Phe) and three that have been previously described (Ser289Leu, Arg531His, Arg698Trp). Alterations to the amino acid composition of the A1, A2 and A3 domains of factor VIII are predicted by these molecular studies. In contrast, a control group of 23 mild haemophilia families with equivalent factor VIII:C results by one‐stage and two‐stage assays did not have any of the above mutations. Detailed studies in seven of these latter families identified four mutations affecting the A3, C1 and C2 domains of factor VIII. These findings suggest a genetic basis to the unusual factor VIII phenotype but do not explain the mechanism of the discrepant factor VIII activity.

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand's disorder: quality and diagnostic improvements driven by peer review in a multilaboratory test process.

Summary.  Regular multilaboratory surveys of laboratories derived primarily from Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia have been conducted over the past 7 years to evaluate testing proficiency in the diagnosis of von Willebrands disorder (VWD) and to assess changes to test practice. Participating laboratories (currently 45) are asked to perform their usual panel of tests for VWD, and then to self‐interpret test results as to the likelihood (or not) of VWD, as well as to the potential subtype identified. Samples provided in the past two survey distributions (both conducted in 2003) were as follows. Survey part A/distribution 1: Normal donor plasma, plasma with borderline normal/reduced levels of VWF (×2) and plasma from an individual with type 2 A VWD. Survey part B/distribution 2 (family VWD study): Plasma from a father, mother and son with borderline normal/reduced von Willebrand factor (VWF), and a daughter with type 3 VWD. In line with previously published survey results, the interassay and within method coefficients of variation (CV) were similar for all assays (around 15–25%), although tending to be slightly higher for VWF:RCo and VWF:CB than VWF:Ag and FVIII:C. Most laboratories reported test values consistent with expected findings, and made correct interpretations or predictions regarding the nature of the samples, although discrepant assay results or interpretations are still seen in approximately 5–10% of responses (typically from laboratories using a more limited test panel or not performing the VWF:CB). Overall, problems with the non‐identification of functional VWF discordance in type 2 VWD, the misidentification of functional VWF discordance in type 1 VWD, and difficulties in discriminating types 1 and 3 VWD appear to predominate. In comparison with previous surveys, performance of electro‐immuno diffusion (EID) (or Laurel gel) procedures has now ceased, and a reduction in VWF:RCo and VWF:Multimer testing and an increase in latex immunoassay (LIA) testing is sustained. We conclude that laboratories are generally proficient in tests for VWD, and that diagnostic error rates are reduced when test panels are more comprehensive and include the VWF:CB.

Acquired isolated factor VII deficiency associated with severe bleeding and successful treatment with recombinant FVIIa (NovoSeven).

Acquired isolated FVII deficiency not due to vitamin K deficiency or liver disease is rare and often associated with severe bleeding. We present a case of transient acquired factor VII deficiency associated with major bleeding, successfully treated with twice daily intermittent intravenous recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) (NovoSeven; Novo Nordisk). The severe transient reduction in factor VII coagulant activity (FVII:C) levels, unresponsive to fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K administration, raise the possibility of an acquired inhibitor to factor VII. However, no inhibitor to factor VII could be demonstrated using protein G sepharose adsorption, or a Bethesda assay using IgG purified from patient plasma. There are few reports of the use of rFVIIa in this setting and this case suggests that rFVIIa is effective therapy, and should be considered early when acquired factor VII deficiency is associated with severe bleeding.

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder. Current practice in the southern hemisphere.

A survey of 44 laboratories was conducted to evaluate current testing proficiency in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder (vWD) and to assess recent changes in test practices. Laboratories performed their usual panel of tests for vWD and interpreted results for the likelihood of vWD and potential subtype. Samples were as follows: normal plasma; borderline normal or abnormal levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and factor VIII; type 3 vWD; type 2A vWD; and 2 samples from a healthy person, processed after handling at 22°C and 4°C, respectively. Interassay and within-method coefficients of variation were similar for all assays (approximately 15%–25%). Most laboratories reported test values consistent with expected findings and made correct interpretations, although discrepant results for 5% to 10% of responses are of concern. For the sample stored at 4°C, all laboratories detected low or borderline levels of vWF and factor VIII coagulant, and no laboratory identified this sample as from a healthy person. In contrast, for the sample stored at 22°C, most laboratories reported normal results. Compared with previous results, performance of some assays has declined while that of others has increased. Laboratories generally are proficient in tests for vWD, and transport of samples at 4°C before processing may lead to false identification of vWD, suggesting that NCCLS guidelines should be reviewed.

Experience with Recombinant Factor VIla in Australia and New Zealand

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeventrademark) was availablefor compassionate use in Australia and New Zealand from 1991 to 1994. Over this period there were 18 treatment episodes in 9 patients, age 8-66 years, with haemophilia A and high titre inhibitors cross-reacting with porcine factor VIII. There were no significant adverse effects. Treatment with rFVIIa resulted in a successful outcome in 8 potentially life-threatening (retroperitoneal, subdural, gastro-intestinal) bleeds. Elective cystoscopy, repair of a cranial flap, yttrium synovectomy and inguinal herniotomy were performed successfully, as was surgical decompression of a flexor pollicis longus bleed. Treatment of a patient with an infected haematoma had limited success, attributed to intermittent suboptimal doses. In 2 patients, satisfactory haemostasis was achieved for multiple dental extractions; subsequent oozing was attributed to suboptimal rFVIIa and/or antifibrinolytic therapy.