John M. Cox

Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE To define preliminary guidelines for the use of lymphatic mapping techniques in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Lymphatic mapping techniques have the potential of changing the standard of surgical care of patients with breast cancer. METHODS Four hundred sixty-six consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent a prospective trial of intraoperative lymphatic mapping using a combination of vital blue dye and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was defined as a blue node and/or a hot node with a 10:1 ex vivo gamma probe ratio of SLN to non-SLN. All SLNs were bivalved, step-sectioned, and examined with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains and immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin. A cytokeratin-positive SLN was defined as any SLN with a defined cluster of positive-staining cells that could be confirmed histologically on H&E sections. RESULTS Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or stereotactic core biopsy was used to diagnose 195 of the 422 patients (46.2%) with breast cancer; 227 of 422 patients (53.8%) were diagnosed by excisional biopsy. The SLN was successfully identified in 440 of 466 patients (94.4%). Failure to identify an SLN to the axilla intraoperatively occurred in 26 of 466 patients (5.6%). In all patients who failed lymphatic mappings, a complete axillary dissection was performed, and metastatic disease was documented in 4 of 26 (15.4%) of these patients. Of the 26 patients who failed lymphatic mapping, 11 of 227 (4.8%) were diagnosed by excisional biopsy and 15 of 195 (7.7%) were diagnosed by FNA or stereotactic core biopsy. Of interest, there was only one skip metastasis (defined as a negative SLN with higher nodes in the chain being positive) in a patient with prior excisional biopsy. A mean of 1.92 SLNs were harvested per patient. Twenty percent of the SLNs removed were positive for metastatic disease in 105 of 440 (23.8%) of the patients. Descriptive information on 844 SLNs was evaluated: 339 of 844 (40.2%) were hot, 272 of 844 (32.2%) were blue, and 233 of 844 (27.6%) were both hot and blue. At least one positive SLN was found in 4 of 87 patients (4.6%) with noninvasive (ductal carcinoma in situ) tumors. A greater incidence of positive SLNs was found in patients who had invasive tumors of increasing size: 18 of 112 patients (16%) with tumor size between 0.1 mm and 1 cm had positive SLNs. However, a significantly greater percentage of patients (43 of 131 [32.8%] with tumor size between 1 and 2 cm and 31 of 76 [40.8%] with tumor size between 2 and 5 cm) had positive SLNs. The highest incidence of positive SLNs was seen with patients of tumor size greater than 5 cm; in this group, 9 of 12 (75%) had a positive SLN (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that accurate SLN identification was obtained when all blue and hot lymph nodes were harvested as SLNs. Therefore, lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy is most effective when a combination of vital blue dye and radiolabeled sulfur colloid is used. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or small tumors exhibit a low but significant incidence of metastatic disease to the axillary lymph nodes and may benefit most from selective lymphadenectomy, avoiding the unnecessary complications of a complete axillary lymph node dissection.

Significance of Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastases in Human Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND The significance of micrometastatic disease in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) of patients with invasive breast cancer has been questioned. The objective of our study was to review the impact of micrometastatic carcinoma detected by SLN biopsy. STUDY DESIGN Between January 1997 and May 2004, 2,408 patients with invasive breast cancer and an SLN with micrometastatic (N0[i+], N1mi) or no metastatic (N0[i-]) disease were identified through our breast database. Slide review was performed and reclassified by the 6(th) edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. Of these, 27 were excluded from analysis because of evidence of macrometastatic disease on slide review or enrollment in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z10 study. RESULTS Of 2,381 patients, 2,108 were N0(i-), 151 were N0(i+), and 122 were N1mi. Overall and disease-free survivals of patients with an N1mi SLN were substantially worse than those in patients with an N0(i-) SLN (p < 0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). Additional positive non-SLNs were identified in 15.5% (15 of 97) of N1mi patients and 9.3% (10 of 107) of N0(i+) patients undergoing completion axillary lymph node dissection. Overall survival of the N0(i+) SLN patients not undergoing axillary dissection was substantially less than those undergoing axillary dissection (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Detection of micrometastatic carcinoma (N1mi) in the SLNs of invasive breast cancer patients is a major indicator of poorer survival compared with N0(i-) patients. Although survival of patients with an N0(i+) SLN does not statistically differ from that of N0(i-) patients, 9.3% of these patients had additional axillary nodal disease on axillary dissection, and N0(i+) patients had a decreased survival when axillary dissection was omitted.

Sentinel node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for determining axillary status and treatment prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer

BackgroundTreatment of locally advanced breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy assesses an in vivo tumor response while increasing breast conservation. Axillary clearance of nodal disease after treatment defines prognostic stratification. Our study objective was to show that sentinel node staging before treatment can optimize posttreatment prognostic stratification in clinically N0 patients.MethodsEighty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of these, 42 (47%) clinically palpable or image-detected nodes (cN+) were histologically confirmed before treatment (group 1), and 47 (53%) patients without palpable lymph nodes (cN0) had a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy before treatment (group 2). Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsIn groups 1 and 2, 82 (92%) of 89 patients had node-positive disease before treatment. Seven (8%) of 89 had negative SLNs and no completion axillary lymph node dissection, 24 (27%) patients had a complete pathologic axillary response (pCRAX; 11 [26%] of 42 in group 1 and 13 [33%] of 40 in group 2), and 58 (65%) of 89 had residual disease in the axilla. Breast-conserving therapy was applied to 27 (30%) of 89 patients. The seven SLN-negative patients had no axillary recurrence at 25 months, and pCRAX patients had a significantly higher overall survival than patients with residual disease.ConclusionsThis study validates the prognostic stratification of patients with a complete pathologic axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The addition of SLN biopsy to cN0 patients before treatment increased accurate nodal staging by 53%, eliminated completion axillary lymph node dissection in 15%, and demonstrated an improved prognosis in 28% of pCRAX patients. SLN biopsy before treatment provides accurate staging of cN0 patients; allows acquisition of standard treatment markers, prognostic biomarkers, and microarray analysis; and affords prognostic stratification after treatment.

Breast Preservation in Women With Giant Juvenile Fibroadenoma

Introduction Fibroadenomas are defined as benign breast lesions, usually formed during menarche (15-25 years of age), that can exist as a solitary mass or multiple masses in the breasts of women. In develpment, as lobular structures are added to the breast’s ductal system, yperplastic lobules are often present. Although lobules are associted with normal growth, analysis of the cellular components link yperplastic lesions to fibroadenomas. Fibroadenomas that measure 5 cm are commonly classified as giant fibroadenomas. When these nlarged masses are found in young female patients, they are often alled juvenile fibroadenomas. The lesions are rare, accounting for nly 0.5% of the total diagnosed fibroadenomas, and can grow to arge sizes and cause prominent asymmetry of the breasts. Other structural changes include both stretching of the areola complex and distortion of the dermal tissue. Clinicians are confronted with treatment decisions on whether to manage these rare cases by way of continued routine examinations or to surgically remove the fibroadenomas. Cosmesis and lactation preservation are the main concerns in this population because malignancy is rare in this age group. Malignancy is of lesser concern with giant fibroadenomas due to their more cellular and less lobular his-

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer

The term “sentinel node” was first used by Gould et al. in 1960 to describe the first node in the drainage pathway of a malignant tumor (1). In 1977, Cabanas proposed that sentinel lymph nodes could be removed and evaluated to determine the need for complete lymph node dissection in penile carcinoma (2). Landmark studies by Norman et al. in the early 1990’s redefined Sappey’s line physiologically and demonstrated the necessity of lymphoscintigraphy to accurately assess nodal basins in truncal and head and neck melanoma (3),(4). Morton and colleagues then observed that preoperative lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated a single lymph node receiving drainage from the primary melanoma (5),(6). Alex et al. and Krag et al. reported the use of a handheld gamma probe to identify sentinel lymph nodes following lymphoscintigraphy in both melanoma and breast cancer patients (7),(8). Giuliano demonstrated that blue dye accurately identified the sentinel lymph node in 174 breast cancer patients (9),(10). The early sentinel node mapping experience using single agents was associated with 65% to 70% accuracy rates (7)–(9), and in 1996 Albertini et al. described a combination technique that improved the success rate of sentinel node localization to 92% (11).