John Nieland
MediGene
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John Nieland.
International Journal of Cancer | 2007
Andreas M. Kaufmann; John Nieland; Ingrid Jochmus; Siegfried Baur; Klaus Friese; Joseph Gabelsberger; Friederike Gieseking; Lutz Gissmann; Birgit Glasschröder; Thomas Grubert; Peter Hillemanns; Reinhard Höpfl; Hans Ikenberg; Jörg Schwarz; Matthias Karrasch; Anette Knoll; Volkmar Küppers; Martin Lechmann; Ralph J. Lellé; Harald Meissner; Rainer T. Müller; Michael Pawlita; Karl Ulrich Petry; Henryk Pilch; Elke Walek; Achim Schneider
Persistent infection with human papillomaviruses (HPV) is a prerequisite for the development of cervical cancer. Vaccination with virus‐like particles (VLP) has demonstrated efficacy in prophylaxis but lacks therapeutic potential. HPV16 L1E7 chimeric virus‐like particles (CVLP) consist of a carboxy‐terminally truncated HPV16L1 protein fused to the amino‐terminal part of the HPV16 E7 protein and self‐assemble by recombinant expression of the fusion protein. The CVLP are able to induce L1‐ and E7‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. We have performed a first clinical trial to gain information about the safety and to generate preliminary data on the therapeutic potential of the CVLP in humans. A randomized, double blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial has been conducted in 39 HPV16 mono‐infected high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) patients (CIN 2/3). Two doses (75 μg or 250 μg) of CVLP were applied. The duration of the study was 24 weeks with 2 optional visits after another 12 and 24 weeks. The vaccine showed a very good safety profile with only minor adverse events attributable to the immunization. Antibodies with high titers against HPV16 L1 and low titers against HPV16 E7 as well as cellular immune responses against both proteins were induced. Responses were equivalent for both vaccine concentrations. A trend for histological improvement to CIN 1 or normal was seen in 39% of the patients receiving the vaccine and only 25% of the placebo recipients. Fifty‐six percent of the responders were also HPV16 DNA‐negative by the end of the study. Therefore, we demonstrated evidence for safety and a nonsignificant trend for the clinical efficacy of the HPV16 L1E7 CVLP vaccine.
International Journal of Cancer | 2003
Angela Kather; Alfonso Ferrara; Marion Nonn; Manuela Schinz; John Nieland; Achim Schneider; Matthias Dürst; Andreas M. Kaufmann
Immunotherapy of HPV‐associated disease such as cervical cancer is moving from preclinical investigation to clinical trials. The viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 are ideal target antigens because their expression is mandatory in HPV‐transformed tumor cells. T cells are the most important effector cells for therapeutic vaccination strategies. Therefore, the identification and characterization of HPV E6 and E7 T cell epitopes is necessary. Methods to date rely on screening for immunogenicity of peptides predicted by algorithms. Presentation of the identified peptides on tumor cells, however, needs to be confirmed. In our study, we have improved the method to identify peptide epitopes of HPV18 E7 that are actually presented by tumor cells. We induced allogeneic T‐cell lines by stimulation with HPV18‐positive, CD80 and HLA‐A*0201 transfected cervical cancer cells. Sensitized T cells were probed against an array of a HPV18 E7 20mer peptide‐library. We found specific reactivity to one of the 20mer peptides. This sequence was then screened via algorithms for putative epitopes. One putative HLA‐A2 restricted epitope was confirmed to bind to HLA‐A2, to be immunogenic and to induce IFNγ‐release in ELISpot assays. Epitope‐specific T cells were cytolytic toward autologous peptide pulsed targets and HPV18 transformed tumor cells. The identification of epitope‐specific T cells in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes of a HPV18‐positive HLA‐matched cervical cancer patient suggests an in vivo relevance of the identified epitope. We suggest that our approach is advantageous over conventional methods, because it yields candidate peptides that are relevant CTL epitopes that are expressed, processed and presented by tumor cells.
Clinical Chemistry | 2005
Tim Waterboer; Peter Sehr; Kristina M. Michael; Silvia Franceschi; John Nieland; Thomas O. Joos; Markus F. Templin; Michael Pawlita
Archive | 2002
John Nieland; Christoph Rehfuess
Archive | 2008
Kerstin Lux; Hildegard Büning; Luca Perabo; John Nieland; Jorge Boucas; Mirko Ritter; Markus Hörer
Archive | 2001
Rainer T. Müller; John Nieland; Josef Gabelsberger; Ruth Herbst
Archive | 2003
John Nieland; Andreas M. Kaufmann; Angela Kather; Manuela Schinz
Archive | 2000
Ingrid Jochmus; John Nieland
Archive | 2011
John Nieland; Markus Hörer; Mirko Ritter; Florian Sonntag; Jürgen A. Kleinschmidt; Kerstin Lux
Archive | 2004
Ingrid Jochmus; John Nieland