John P. Cello

Evaluation of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Patients with Iron-Deficiency Anemia

BACKGROUND Idiopathic iron-deficiency anemia in adults is assumed to be the result of occult chronic blood loss from the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine an effective clinical strategy for managing this common clinical problem. BACKGROUND We prospectively studied 100 consecutive patients with iron-deficiency anemia, using colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy and, in patients with negative endoscopic studies, enteroclysis (radio-graphic examination of the small intestine). RESULTS Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed at least one lesion potentially responsible for blood loss in 62 of the 100 patients. Endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract showed a bleeding source in 36 patients, and colonoscopy showed a lesion in 25; 1 patient had lesions in both the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. The most common abnormality in the upper gastrointestinal tract was peptic ulceration (duodenal ulcer in 11 patients, gastric ulcer in 5, and anastomotic ulcer in 3). Cancers, detected in 11 patients, were the most common colonic lesions. Enteroclysis was performed in 26 of the 38 patients with negative endoscopic studies, and the results were normal in all instances. Symptoms at a specific site in the gastrointestinal tract were predictive of disease in the corresponding portion of the bowel. In addition, the combination of positive tests for fecal occult blood and symptoms in the lower gastrointestinal tract had a positive predictive value of 86 percent for detecting a lesion in the lower gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal lesions (in both the upper gastrointestinal tract and the colon) are frequently found in patients with iron-deficiency anemia. Since site-specific symptoms are predictive of abnormalities in the corresponding portion of the bowel, the initial evaluation should be directed by the location of the symptoms. Concomitant lesions of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract are rare; thus, detection of a likely source of blood loss during the initial examination may obviate the need for further procedures.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy versus portacaval shunt in patients with severe cirrhosis and acute variceal hemorrhage. Long-term follow-up

In a continuation of a trial for which preliminary results were reported in the Journal two years ago, a total of 64 patients with Child Class C cirrhosis and variceal hemorrhage requiring six or more units of blood were randomly assigned to receive either a portacaval shunt (32 patients) or endoscopic sclerotherapy (32 patients). The duration of initial hospitalization and the total amount of blood transfused during hospitalization were significantly less in the patients receiving sclerotherapy (P less than 0.001). There was no difference in short-term survival (50 percent of the sclerotherapy group were discharged alive, as compared with 44 percent of the shunt-surgery group). Both groups were followed for a mean of 530 days after randomization. Rebleeding from varices, the duration of rehospitalization for hemorrhage, and transfusions received after discharge were all significantly greater in the sclerotherapy group (P less than 0.001). Forty percent of the sclerotherapy-treated patients discharged alive (7 of 16 patients) ultimately required surgical treatment for bleeding varices, despite a mean of 6.1 treatment sessions. Health care costs and long-term survival did not differ significantly between the groups (P greater than 0.05). We conclude that although endoscopic sclerotherapy is as good as surgical shunting for the acute management of variceal hemorrhage in poor-risk patients with massive bleeding, sclerotherapy-treated patients in whom varices are not obliterated and bleeding continues should be considered for elective shunt surgery.

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome cholangiopathy: Spectrum of disease☆

PURPOSE Reports of biliary tract abnormalities in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) are infrequent. Nine patients with features of papillary stenosis and sclerosing cholangitis and one patient with primary bile duct lymphoma were previously described. Since those reports, an additional 16 AIDS patients with clinical and laboratory features suggestive of biliary tract disease have been evaluated. The findings in these 26 patients form the basis of this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS The patients, 25 men and one woman, with right upper quadrant abdominal pain, fevers, or elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels, or any combination of the three symptoms, underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and ampullary biopsy. RESULTS Twenty of these 26 (77%) patients were found to have markedly abnormal cholangiograms. Four patterns of cholangiographic abnormalities were identified: sclerosing cholangitis and papillary stenosis (10 patients), papillary stenosis alone (three patients), sclerosing cholangitis alone (four patients), and long extrahepatic bile duct strictures (three patients). An AIDS-associated pathogen or malignancy was identified in 11 patients (55%), with cytomegalovirus being the most common (five patients). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory features were not significantly different between AIDS patients with cholangiopathy and those without cholangiopathy. However, 15 of 20 patients with cholangiographic abnormalities (versus only one of six patients without such abnormalities) had ductal dilation on ultrasound or computed tomography, or both. CONCLUSION Clinicians should be aware that profound biliary tract abnormalities may develop in a large number of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Confirmation of the anatomic abnormalities, determination of correct etiology, and effective therapy may depend upon early endoscopic cholangiography.

Endoscopic Sclerotherapy Compared with Percutaneous Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt after Initial Sclerotherapy in Patients with Acute Variceal Hemorrhage: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

During the past 15 years, endoscopic sclerotherapy and, more recently, band ligation and such pharmacologic agents as octreotide have eclipsed surgical shunting as the preferred method for controlling acute variceal hemorrhage. The status of sclerotherapy for the long-term management of patients with bleeding varices, however, remains controversial. In a previous controlled clinical trial comparing endoscopic sclerotherapy with surgical portacaval shunting [1], we enrolled 64 adult patients with Child class C cirrhosis and active hemorrhage from esophageal varices. At the index hospitalization, patients randomly assigned to sclerotherapy required less blood transfusion and fewer days of hospitalization than did those randomly assigned to shunt surgery. During the initial follow-up period, which extended for a mean of 530 days after randomization, 75% of the patients treated with sclerotherapy were hospitalized for recurrent variceal hemorrhage but none of the patients who had had shunt surgery were rehospitalized [1]. Although patients treated with sclerotherapy had longer hospital stays and received more blood transfusions during short-term follow-up, a longer follow-up study [2] showed no difference in survival or overall health care costs between patients treated with sclerotherapy and those treated with surgical shunt. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure is a nonsurgical procedure in which an expandable metal prosthesis is used to connect an intrahepatic portal vein with an adjacent hepatic vein [3, 4]. In our initial report on 100 patients having this procedure [3], TIPS stent placement was technically successful in 96 patients and variceal hemorrhage was controlled in 88 of 94 patients [3]. Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was only 13% in patients treated with TIPS. These data, as well as those of other researchers who used radiographically placed portosystemic stents, suggest that TIPS might be more cost-effective than sclerotherapy; however, data comparing the two procedures are limited [5-10]. Therefore, we did a randomized, controlled trial in patients with massive acute variceal hemorrhage in an effort to compare the two therapies for the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Methods From November 1991 through December 1995, we enrolled 49 adults who had cirrhosis and endoscopically documented bleeding from esophageal varices. We excluded an estimated additional 250 patients with bleeding varices whom we had seen during the study period (vide infra). Our study protocol was approved by the Committee on Human Research of the University of California, San Francisco. Patients who were admitted to San Francisco General Hospital, University of California Medical Center, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center (all located in San Francisco, California) with massive or submassive acute gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage from large esophageal varices were approached for consent and randomization within 24 hours of admission. Massive hemorrhage was defined as bleeding associated with shock (systolic blood pressure < 80 mm Hg). Submassive hemorrhage was defined as hemorrhage associated with postural vital sign changes (upright pulse rate increased by 20 beats per minute compared with supine pulse rate; upright systolic blood pressure decreased by 20 mm Hg compared with supine blood pressure). The 250 excluded patients were excluded for the following reasons: They were prisoners; they were younger than 18 or older than 75 years of age; they had had a cerebrovascular accident within 3 months before the onset of bleeding; they refused to accept blood products; or they had gastric variceal hemorrhage, electrocardiographic changes compatible with acute myocardial infarction, a Po 2 less than 70 mm Hg or an arterial pH of 7.20 or less on room air at the time of evaluation for eligibility, a serum creatinine level of 221 mol/L or more, a prothrombin time at least 5 seconds longer than control (despite the use of fresh frozen plasma), a platelet count less than 50 109/L, stage IV hepatic encephalopathy, cancer other than skin cancer, the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or advanced AIDS-related complex, sepsis, pneumonia, peritonitis, clinical evidence of alcoholic hepatitis, a serum bilirubin concentration of 7 mg/dL or more, thrombosis of the portal vein, thrombosis of the hepatic veins, or thrombosis of the inferior vena cava as determined by Doppler ultrasonography. All patients received endoscopic sclerotherapy at the time of the initial endoscopic procedure that established the source of hemorrhage as esophageal varices. Patients were deemed eligible for participation if they presented with hemodynamically submassive or massive hemorrhage and were found to have large (>1 cm across) distal esophageal varices with cherry red spots, hematocystic spots, or red wale signs. Before randomization, all patients had patency of the portal venous system (main, right, and left portal veins and the splenic vein) and hepatic veins determined by real-time color and pulse-wave Doppler ultrasonography. After we obtained informed consent, we used serially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes to randomly assign patients either to repeated sclerotherapy or to TIPS. If neither the patient nor the patients next of kin was able to give informed consent, a patient advocate was designated to consider the invitation to participate. Patients randomly assigned to sclerotherapy received treatment every 2 to 7 days during the initial hospitalization; treatment consisted of 0.5- to 2.0-mL injections of ethanolamine oleate solution per varix. Repeated endoscopy and sclerotherapy treatments were done weekly after discharge from the initial hospitalization. As much as 30 mL of ethanolamine oleate solution was used per treatment session. All visible varices were injected within the distal 7 to 10 cm of the esophagus. In patients who developed sclerotherapy-associated ulcers, repeated endoscopy was scheduled to be done 2 to 7 days after the notation of ulcers to assess interval healing. Patients assigned to the TIPS group had the procedure within 48 hours of randomization; the procedure was performed by one of six radiologists skilled in this procedure, as described elsewhere [3]. Catheterization of the hepatic vein was done through the right internal jugular vein. A tract between a suitable hepatic vein and a suitable portal vein was established by needle set (Ring TIPS set, Cook, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana), dilated with a balloon over a guidewire, and then maintained by one or more expandable metal mesh stents (Wallstent, Schneider, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The adequacy of the portosystemic shunt was documented by contrast injection and manometric measurement at the time of the initial procedure. A target portal vein-to-hepatic vein pressure gradient of 12 mm Hg or less was achieved in all cases. Persistent varices opacified at portal venography after adequate stenting were occluded by using embolization coils. Preprocedural data recorded prospectively included sex, age, vital signs at admission, physical examination findings at admission (including presence of encephalopathy and ascites), nutritional status, results of laboratory tests, and Child-Pugh score [11]. Prospectively identified outcome variables after randomization included death, rebleeding, liver transplantation, total transfusion requirements, onset and presence of encephalopathy, cost of managing variceal hemorrhage after randomization, total duration of hospitalization for variceal hemorrhage and any related encephalopathy, and complications of therapy. Nutritional status was defined as malnourished if the patient had gross muscle wasting, had cachexia, or had lost at least 10% of body weight during the previous 6 months. Bleeding after randomization was defined as bloody or coffee grounds emesis (hemetemesis, melenemesis) or liquid black stools (melena) with a decrease in hematocrit sufficient to warrant transfusion. Hepatic encephalopathy was defined clinically by the presence of asterixis, gross disorientation or agitation, or frank somnolence or coma in the absence of another identifiable cause. Presence of ascites was determined by both ultrasonography and clinical assessment (shifting dullness, fluid wave, gross distention) for all patients initially and for patients in the TIPS group having follow-up Doppler ultrasonography. For patients assigned to sclerotherapy, presence of ascites was subsequently determined by clinical criteria alone. Follow-up information was obtained through face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, or chart reviews and was obtained from the patient, family, physician, or all three sources. The total cost of health care per patient was calculated as the sum of all real costs for inpatient and outpatient hospital care, including hospital expenditures and costs for professional services from the day of randomization until death or the last follow-up visit. In addition, all outpatient costs for endoscopic sclerotherapy, Doppler ultrasonography, and stent revision during the follow-up period were included. We used the actual cost to the hospital or medical staff, or both, of providing a service or procedure (rather than billing charges or collections). For example, the cost of an endoscopic sclerotherapy session was determined by summating the following: 1 hour of a gastroenterologists time plus benefits (derived from personnel pay records); 2 hours of a registered nurses time plus benefits; the invoice cost of disposable sclerotherapy catheters, bite blocks, and intravenous tubing; the pharmacy costs of all drugs, including the sclerosant agent; the estimated depreciation of an Olympus GIT-IT100 videoendoscope (Lake Success, New York); endoscopic processing costs; 1 hour of recovery room personnel time; and costs of recovery supplies. Outcome variables were compared, using the intention-to-tre

Management of foreign body ingestion.

Management of ingested foreign bodies (FB) is a common clinical problem. A 10-year experience of 101 foreign body ingestions is reported. The experience suggests that endoscopic removal of foreign bodies is curative for objects located in the crico-pharynx or upper esophagus. Foreign bodies which pa

Prospective Randomized Trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for Common Bile Duct Stone Disease

OBJECTIVE To compare outcome parameters for good-risk patients with classic signs, symptoms, and laboratory and abdominal imaging features of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+LCBDE) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/S+LC). DESIGN Our study was a prospective trial conducted following written informed consent, with randomization by the serially numbered, opaque envelope technique. SETTING Our institution is an academic teaching hospital and the central receiving and trauma center for the City and County of San Francisco, California. PATIENTS We randomized 122 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 or 2) meeting entry criteria. Ten of these patients, excluded from outcome analysis, were protocol violators having signed out of the hospital against medical advice before 1 or both procedures were completed. INTERVENTIONS Treatment was preoperative ERCP/S followed by LC, or LC+LCBDE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was efficacy of stone clearance from the common bile duct. Secondary end points were length of hospital stay, cost of index hospitalization, professional fees, hospital charges, morbidity and mortality, and patient acceptance and quality of life scores. RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the 2 randomized groups were similar. Efficacy of stone clearance was likewise equivalent for both groups. The time from first procedure to discharge was significantly shorter for LC+LCBDE (mean [SD], 55 [45] hours vs 98 [83] hours; P < .001). Hospital service and total charges for index hospitalization were likewise lower for LC+LCBDE, but the differences were not statistically significant. The professional fee charges for LC+LCBDE were significantly lower than those for ERCP/S+LC (median [SD],

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis—A complex disease entity

4820 [1637] vs

Relative Frequency of Upper Gastrointestinal and Colonic Lesions in Patients with Positive Fecal Occult-Blood Tests

6139 [1583]; P < .001). Patient acceptance and quality of life scores were equivalent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS Both ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE were highly effective in detecting and removing common bile duct stones and were equivalent in overall cost and patient acceptance. However, the overall duration of hospitalization was shorter and physician fees lower for LC+LCBDE. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00807729.

Endoscopic Sclerotherapy versus Portacaval Shunt in Patients with Severe Cirrhosis and Variceal Hemorrhage

Although usually regarded as merely a manifestation of a simple food allergy, eosinophilic gastroenteritis remains a poorly understood disorder. Characterized by peripheral eosinophilia, eosinophilic infiltration of the bowel wall to a variable depth and gastrointestinal complaints, the disease responds inconsistently to simple food withdrawal programs. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to specific food substances have been found in a few patients leading to a postulated pathophysiologic mechanism involving tissue mast cells, release of slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A) and chemotaxis of eosinophils. Oral steroids appear, in uncontrolled trials, to ameliorate the disease.

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery improves candidacy in morbidly obese patients awaiting transplantation

Background Although bleeding lesions anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract can cause a positive reaction on guaiac-based fecal occult-blood tests, the relative frequency of upper gastrointestinal and colonic lesions is unknown. Methods During a period of 30 months, we prospectively studied all patients with at least one stool specimen containing fecal occult blood who were referred for further evaluation. Fecal occult blood was detected by standard guaiac-based tests of stool specimens obtained as part of routine screening or of stool obtained by digital rectal examination. Patients with documented iron-deficiency anemia or active gastrointestinal bleeding were excluded from the study. All participants had a detailed history taken and underwent colonoscopy, followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Results Of the 409 patients with fecal occult blood who were referred, 310 were potentially eligible to participate, and 248 (mean age, 61 years; range, 40 to 89) were studied; 40 percent were women. We identifi...