Stanley J. Rogers

Laparoscopic thermal ablation of hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases

BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumor metastases to the liver are generally slow growing, but patients suffer from hormone hypersecretion despite aggressive multimodality therapy. A minimally invasive method of tumor ablation affords symptomatic improvement with minimal morbidity. METHODS Radiofrequency electrical energy is delivered to tissues via a 4-prong catheter resulting in tissue heating to 60 to 70 degrees C and cell death. Porcine studies were conducted to define appropriate parameters for energy delivery and then applied to patients using laparoscopic techniques. RESULTS In the porcine model 3.5 to 4 cm lesions were reproducibly created in 15 minutes using 30 to 50 W of power. The ablation process was monitored via temperature feedback from thermocouples in the catheter tips and by a hyperechoic blush noted on ultrasonography. Laparoscopic thermal ablation of 13 tumors in six patients with carcinoid (two patients), gastrinoma, insulinoma, nonsecreting islet cell cancer, or medullary thyroid cancer was performed. There were no intraoperative complications, and all patients were discharged the next day. Successful ablation was confirmed by spiral-computed tomography and by symptomatic improvement in patients with secreting tumors. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic thermal ablation of hepatic tumors is a novel, minimally invasive method of providing effective cytoreduction of neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver.

Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation of Hepatic Tumors

AbstractBackground: Since we first described laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) of liver tumors, several reports have documented technical and safety aspects of this procedure. Little is known, however, about the long-term follow-up of such patients. Methods: From January 1996 to February 1999, we performed LRFA on 250 liver tumors in 66 patients. Triphasic spiral computed tomographic scanning was obtained preoperatively and at 1 week, and every 3 months postoperatively. Lesion diameter was measured in the x- and y-axes and the volume estimated; 181 lesions in 43 patients for whom computed tomographic scans available were included in the study. The tumor types were as follows: 64 metastatic adenocarcinomas, 79 neuroendocrine metastases, 27 other metastases, and 11 primary liver tumors. Results: One week postoperatively, the ablated zone was larger than the original tumor in 178 of 181 lesions, which suggests ablation of the tumor and a margin of normal liver tissue. A progressive decline in lesion size was seen in 156 (88%) of 178 lesions, followed for at least 3 months (mean, 13.9 months; range, 4.9–37.8 months), which suggests resorption of the ablated tissue. Fourteen definite local treatment failures were apparent by increase in size and change in computed tomographic scan appearance, and eight lesions were scored as failures because of multifocal recurrence that encroached on ablated foci (22 total recurrences). Predictors of failure include lack of increased lesion size at 1 week (2 of 3 such lesions failed), adenocarcinoma or sarcoma (18 of 22 failures; P < .05), larger tumors (failures, M < 18cm3 vs. successes, M < 7cm3; P < .005) and vascular invasion on laparoscopic ultrasonography. By size criteria, 17 of 22 failures were apparent by 6 months. Energy delivered per gram of tissue was not significantly different (P < .45). Conclusions: LRFA has a 12% local failure rate, with larger adenocarcinomas and sarcomas at greatest risk. Failures occur early in follow-up, with most occurring by 6 months. LRFA seems to be a safe and effective treatment technique for patients with primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Prospective Randomized Trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for Common Bile Duct Stone Disease

OBJECTIVE To compare outcome parameters for good-risk patients with classic signs, symptoms, and laboratory and abdominal imaging features of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+LCBDE) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/S+LC). DESIGN Our study was a prospective trial conducted following written informed consent, with randomization by the serially numbered, opaque envelope technique. SETTING Our institution is an academic teaching hospital and the central receiving and trauma center for the City and County of San Francisco, California. PATIENTS We randomized 122 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 or 2) meeting entry criteria. Ten of these patients, excluded from outcome analysis, were protocol violators having signed out of the hospital against medical advice before 1 or both procedures were completed. INTERVENTIONS Treatment was preoperative ERCP/S followed by LC, or LC+LCBDE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was efficacy of stone clearance from the common bile duct. Secondary end points were length of hospital stay, cost of index hospitalization, professional fees, hospital charges, morbidity and mortality, and patient acceptance and quality of life scores. RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the 2 randomized groups were similar. Efficacy of stone clearance was likewise equivalent for both groups. The time from first procedure to discharge was significantly shorter for LC+LCBDE (mean [SD], 55 [45] hours vs 98 [83] hours; P < .001). Hospital service and total charges for index hospitalization were likewise lower for LC+LCBDE, but the differences were not statistically significant. The professional fee charges for LC+LCBDE were significantly lower than those for ERCP/S+LC (median [SD],

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastaticliver tumors

4820 [1637] vs

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery improves candidacy in morbidly obese patients awaiting transplantation

6139 [1583]; P < .001). Patient acceptance and quality of life scores were equivalent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS Both ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE were highly effective in detecting and removing common bile duct stones and were equivalent in overall cost and patient acceptance. However, the overall duration of hospitalization was shorter and physician fees lower for LC+LCBDE. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00807729.

Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass.

AbstractBackground: Radiofrequency thermal ablation is a new technology for the local destruction of liver tumors. Since we first described laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) for the treatment of liver tumors, much has been learned about patient selection, laparoscopic ultrasound (LU) guided placement of the ablation catheter, monitoring of the ablation process, and patient follow-up. Methods: Since January 1996 we have performed LRFA of 250 tumors in 67 patients including 85 adenocarcinomas, 107 neuroendocrine tumors, 34 sarcomas, 1 melanoma, and 11 hepatomas. We used LU to guide placement of the ablation catheter and to monitor the ablation process. Most of the patients had two trocars (camera and laparoscopic ultrasound) with the 15-gauge ablation catheter (RITA Medical Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) placed percutaneously. Results: The LRFA procedure was completed successfully in all patients, with 1 to 14 lesions per patient, ranging in size from 0.5 to 10 cm in diameter. The entire liver could be examined by LU via right subcostal ports. Criteria for successful ablation were 5-min ablation times at 100°C with 1-min cool-down temperatures of 60° to 70°C. Outgassing of dissolved nitrogen, monitored by ultrasound, was useful in confirming the zone of ablation. Intralesional color-flow Doppler, seen before ablation, was eliminated after ablation. Placement of the grounding pad closer to the lesion on the back rather than the thigh resulted in more efficient energy delivery to the tumor. Lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter required overlapping ablations to achieve a 1-cm margin of normal liver. Most patients required overnight hospitalization, with no coagulopathy or electrolyte disturbances noted. Conclusions: The LRFA procedure is a novel, minimally invasive technique for treatment of liver tumors that have failed conventional therapy. This study documents the technical aspects of targeting lesions and performing reproducible zones of ablation. Familiarity with these techniques should lead to more widespread application.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe and efficacious for pretransplant candidates

BACKGROUND To evaluate, at a university tertiary referral center, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with cirrhosis or end-stage lung disease (ESLD); and to determine whether these procedures help patients become better candidates for transplantation. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of selected patients with end-stage organ failure who were not eligible for transplantation because of morbid obesity who underwent LRYGB or LSG. The prospectively collected data included demographics, operative details, complications, percentage of excess weight loss, postoperative laboratory data, and status of transplant candidacy. RESULTS Of the 15 patients, 7 with ESRD underwent LRYGB and 6 with cirrhosis and 2 with ESLD underwent LSG. Complications developed in 2 patients (both with cirrhosis); no patient died. The mean follow-up was 12.4 months, and the mean percentage of excess weight loss at > or =9 months was 61% (ESRD), 33% (cirrhosis), and 61.5% (ESLD). Obesity-associated co-morbidities improved or resolved in all patients. Serum albumin and other nutritional parameters at > or =9 months after surgery were similar to the preoperative levels in all 3 groups. At the most recent follow-up visit, 14 (93%) of 15 patients had reached our institutions body mass index limit for transplantation and were awaiting transplantation; 1 patient with ESLD underwent successful lung transplant. CONCLUSION The results of this pilot study have provided preliminary evidence that LRYGB in patients with ESRD and LSG in patients with cirrhosis or ESLD is safe, well-tolerated, and improves their candidacy for transplantation.

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND Gastric bypass (GBP) is the most common operation performed in the United States for morbid obesity. However, weight loss is poor in 10% to 15% of patients. We sought to determine the independent factors associated with poor weight loss after GBP. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. We examined demographic, operative, and follow-up data by means of multivariate analysis. Variables investigated were age, sex, race, marital and insurance status, initial weight and body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, joint disease, sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, and psychiatric disease), laparoscopic vs open surgery, gastric pouch area, gastrojejunostomy technique, and alimentary limb length. SETTING University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS All patients at our institution who underwent GBP from January 1, 2003, through July 30, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Weight loss at 12 months defined as poor (< or =40% excess weight loss) or good (>40% excess weight loss). RESULTS Follow-up data at 12 months were available for 310 of the 361 patients (85.9%) undergoing GBP during the study period. Mean preoperative BMI was 52 (range, 36-108). Mean BMI and excess weight loss at follow-up were 34 (range, 17-74) and 60% (range, 8%-117%), respectively. Thirty-eight patients (12.3%) had poor weight loss. Of the 4 variables associated with poor weight loss in the univariate analysis (greater initial weight, diabetes, open approach, and larger pouch size), only diabetes (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-7.09 [P = .007]) and larger pouch size (odds ratio, 2.77;95% confidence interval, 1.81-4.22 [P <.001]) remained after the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Gastric bypass results in substantial weight loss in most patients. Diabetes and larger pouch size are independently associated with poor weight loss after GBP.

Cost-Effective Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Possible Common Bile Duct Stones

BACKGROUND Morbid obesity is a relative contraindication for organ transplant because it is associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a weight loss method for patients awaiting transplant has not been examined. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on morbidly obese patients awaiting liver or kidney transplant who underwent LSG from 2006 to 2012. Data included patient demographic characteristics, operative details, 30-day complications, percentage of excess weight loss, postoperative laboratory data, and status of transplant candidacy. RESULTS Twenty-six pretransplant patients underwent LSG. The mean age was 57 years, and 17 (65%) were women. Six patients had end-stage renal disease, and 20 patients had end-stage liver disease. The preoperative mean body mass index was 48.3 kg/m(2) (range 38-60.4 kg/m(2)). There were no deaths, and there were 6 postoperative complications: 2 superficial wound infections, 1 staple line leak, 1 postoperative bleed requiring blood transfusion, 1 transient encephalopathy, and 1 temporary renal insufficiency. The mean percentage of excess weight loss at 1, 3, and 12 months was 17% (n = 24/26), 26% (n = 23/26), and 50% (n = 18/20), respectively. All patients met our institutions body mass index cutoffs for transplantation by 12 months after the procedure. One patients renal function stabilized, and he was taken off the transplant list. Eight patients eventually underwent solid organ transplant. Six received liver transplants, 1 patient received a combined liver and kidney transplant, and 1 received a kidney transplant. The mean time between LSG and transplant was 16.6 months. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest case series involving LSG in patients awaiting solid organ transplantation. LSG is well tolerated, is technically feasible, and improves candidacy for transplantation.

Intestinal Calcium Absorption Decreases Dramatically After Gastric Bypass Surgery Despite Optimization of Vitamin D Status

BACKGROUND Proponents of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) claim patients have less pain, faster recovery, and better long-term cosmetic results than patients who undergo multiport laparoscopy. However, randomized comparisons are lacking. This study presents the results of a prospective randomized trial of SILS or 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy. STUDY DESIGN Adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis were randomized 1:1 to either SILS or 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy. The primary end point was early postoperative pain (measured by opiate usage and pain score in the first 12 hours). Secondary end points were operative time, complication rate (including conversions), and recovery time (days of oral opiate usage and return to work). After 6 months, body image and cosmetic appearance were assessed using a validated survey. RESULTS The trial was planned for 150 patients, but was halted after 75 patients when planned interim analysis showed that SILS patients had more postoperative pain (pain score: 4.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.5 ± 1.5; p = 0.01) and higher inpatient opiate usage (hydromorphone use: 3.9 ± 1.9 mg vs 2.8 ± 1.7 mg; p = 0.01) than 3-port laparoscopy. Operative time for SILS averaged 40% longer (54 ± 17 minutes vs 38 ± 11 minutes; p < 0.01). Only 1 SILS case was converted to 3-port. There were no significant differences in length of stay, complications, oral pain medication usage after discharge, or return to work. After 6 months, body image and cosmetic appearance were excellent for both groups and indistinguishable by most measures. However, 3-port patients reported better physical attractiveness (4.0 ± 0.4 vs 3.8 ± 0.4; p = 0.04) and SILS patients reported better scars (score 18.4 ± 2.7 vs 16.4 ± 3.0; p < 0.01). Results are reported as mean ± SD. CONCLUSIONS Single-incision laparoscopic surgery appendectomy resulted in more pain and longer operative times without improving short-term recovery or complications. Long-term body image and cosmetic appearance were excellent in both groups.