John P. Hanrahan

Effects of arformoterol twice daily, tiotropium once daily, and their combination in patients with COPD

PURPOSE Current guidelines support using in combination more than one class of long-acting bronchodilator for COPD patients whose symptoms are not controlled by mono-therapy. This 2-week, multi-center (34 sites), randomized, modified-blind, parallel group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concomitant treatment with nebulized arformoterol (the formoterol(R,R)-isomer) BID and tiotropium DPI QD. METHODS COPD patients (mean FEV(1) 1.37L, 45.4% predicted) were randomized to receive mono-therapy (either arformoterol 15microg BID [n=76] or tiotropium 18microg QD [n=80]), or combined therapy (sequential dosing of arformoterol 15microg BID and tiotropium 18microg QD [n=78]). Changes in pulmonary function, dyspnea, and rescue levalbuterol use were evaluated, as were safety outcomes. RESULTS Mean FEV(1)AUC(0-24) (the primary endpoint) improved similarly from baseline for arformoterol (0.10L) and tiotropium (0.08L) treatment groups and greater for the combined therapy group (0.22L; all p-values <0.005). Peak FEV(1), peak FVC, 24-h trough FEV(1), and inspiratory capacity also improved similarly for the mono-therapies and greatest for the combined therapy. Dyspnea (mean transition dyspnea index) improved similarly for arformoterol (+2.3) and tiotropium (+1.8) and greatest with combined therapy (+3.1; p-values <0.05). Levalbuterol use decreased for all treatment groups (range -1.8 to -2.5 actuations/day). All treatments had similar frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSION In this study, the combination of nebulized arformoterol 15microg BID plus tiotropium 18microg DPI QD was the most effective in improving pulmonary function and disease symptoms. Mono-therapy improvement with arformoterol or tiotropium was similar. All three treatments were well tolerated.

Effect of nebulized arformoterol on airway function in COPD: Results from two randomized trials

Rationale: Arformoterol, a single isomer long-acting β2-agonist, was developed as an inhalation solution for the maintenance treatment of bronchoconstriction in COPD. Methods: The pulmonary function efficacy of nebulized arformoterol (15 μ g BID, 25 μ g BID, 50 μ g QD) and salmeterol MDI (42 μ g BID) versus placebo was assessed in 1456 subjects (mean FEV1 1.2L, mean predicted 41%). Data were pooled from 2 identical, 12-week, double-blind, randomized trials. The percent change in trough FEV1, percent change in FEV1 average AUC(0 - 12 hrs) and peak percent change FEV1 from predose were analyzed. Results: Improvement in trough FEV1 averaged over 12 weeks was greater for arformoterol and salmeterol versus placebo (mean differences from placebo [95% CI] arformoterol–15 μ g BID: 11.4% [8.4, 14.3]; 25 μ g BID: 15.4% [12.2, 18.6]; 50 μ g QD: 10.9% [7.9, 13.9]); salmeterol: (11.6% [8.8, 14.4]). Greater improvements versus placebo occurred after the first dose (mean differences between arformoterol and placebo for trough FEV1: 13–19%; FEV1 AUC(0 - 12 hrs): 19–24%; peak percent change: 20–25%) and at week 12 (trough FEV1: 10–13%; FEV1 AUC(0 - 12 hrs): 6–13%; peak percent change: 7–14%); all 95% CIs excluded zero. Increases in FEV1 AUC(0 - 12 hrs) and peak percent change were greater for arformoterol than for salmeterol (95% CIs excluded zero). After 12 weeks, 78–87% of arformoterol subjects had ≥ 10% increases in FEV1 from pre-dose (56% salmeterol, 44% placebo); the median time to response was 3–13 minutes (142 minutes salmeterol). Conclusions: In these trials, COPD subjects administered nebulized arformoterol demonstrated significant and sustained improvement in lung function over 12 weeks.

A Comparison of 5-Day Courses of Dirithromycin and Azithromycin in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND Short-term use of antibiotics has become a common component of the management of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), particularly in complex cases with productive cough or purulent phlegm. The macrolide antibiotics, particularly second-generation agents such as dirithromycin and azithromycin, are among the antibiotic classes frequently recommended and used to treat upper and lower respiratory infections, including AECB. OBJECTIVE This study compared the clinical efficacy and tolerability of 5-day courses of dirithromycin and azithromycin given once daily for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS This randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted at 5 centers in the United States. Eligible patients were adult (age >35 years) smokers or ex-smokers (smoking history of at least 10 pack-years) with chronic bronchitis and an acute exacerbation, defined by the occurrence of increased dyspnea and/or productive cough and feverishness within 48 hours of enrollment. Before randomization, an attempt was made to obtain a sputum specimen from each patient for Grams staining and culture. Patients were randomized to receive dirithromycin 500 mg QD for 5 days or azithromycin 500 mg QD on day 1 and 250 mg QD on days 2 to 5. Clinical efficacy was assessed separately by patients and physicians at early (days 7-10) and late (days 25-35) posttreatment visits. RESULTS Eighty-six patients (48 women, 38 men; mean age, 55 years) with a mean smoking history of 31 pack-years were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Forty-six (54%) patients were randomized to dirithromycin and 40 (47%) patients to azithromycin. Clinical efficacy was reported in a high proportion of patients in both treatment groups, both at the early posttreatment visit (84.8% dirithromycin, 75.7% azithromycin; difference dirithromycin - azithromycin, 9.1%; 95% CI, -8.2 to 26.4) and the late posttreatment visit (95.5% and 86.5%, respectively; difference dirithromycin - azithromycin, 9.0%; 95% CI, -3.7 to 21.6). A similar proportion of patients required a second course of antibiotics over the study period (20.5% dirithromycin, 27.0% azithromycin; difference dirithromycin - azithromycin, -6.6%; 95% CI, -25.2 to 12.1). Only 42 (48.8%) patients were able to produce a sputum sample before receiving study treatment, and of these, only 20 (47.6%) demonstrated a preponderance of neutrophils on Grams staining. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest comparable clinical efficacy between 5-day courses of once-daily dirithromycin and azithromycin in acute exacerbations of COPD. There were insufficient data to permit meaningful comparison of the bacteriologic efficacy of these macrolide antibiotics.

The Safety and Efficacy of Arformoterol and Formoterol in COPD

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of arformoterol and formoterol over 6-months in subjects with COPD. In a multi-center, 6-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects with COPD (mean FEV1 1.21 L, ∼41.0%% predicted) were randomized to receive either nebulized arformoterol (15μg BID [[n == 149]][[ARF 15]], 25μg BID [[n == 147]][[ARF 25]]), or racemic formoterol (12μg BID [[n == 147]][[FORM]]) delivered by DPI. The proportion of subjects with any post-treatment adverse event for ARF 15, ARF 25 μg, and FORM was 67.8%%, 76.2%% and 66.7%%, respectively, and those with at least one COPD exacerbation was 32.2%%, 30.6%%, and 22.4%%, respectively. Pulmonary function improved for all treatment groups and was maintained throughout the study. Mean change from baseline at 6-months for ARF 15, ARF 25 and FORM in peak FEV1 was 0.30L, and 0.34L, and 0.26L, respectively, in 24-hour trough FEV1 was, 0.10L, 0.14L, and 0.09L, and in inspiratory capacity was, 0.20L, 0.37L, and 0.23L. Dyspnea, (mean Transition Dypsnea Index (TDI) focal score) improved in all treatment arms (ARF 15: 1.4, ARF 25: 1.5, and FORM: 1.4) at 6 months, as did rescue short-acting β2-agonists use (mean range: −1.1 to −1.3 actuations/day) and ipratropium bromide (mean range: −0.3 to −0.8 actuations/day). Health status, measured by St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, improved from baseline at 6-months in all treatment groups (mean change: −3.7 to −6.8). In this 6-month study, arformoterol and formoterol were well-tolerated, and their use was associated with improvement in pulmonary function and health status in subjects with COPD with no apparent development of tolerance.

A cumulative dose study of levalbuterol and racemic albuterol administered by hydrofluoroalkane-134a metered-dose inhaler in asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND The short-acting beta(2)-agonists levalbuterol and racemic albuterol are available for administration through a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). OBJECTIVE This study compared the short-term safety and efficacy of cumulative doses of levalbuterol HFA MDI and racemic albuterol HFA MDI in asthmatic subjects. METHODS This was a randomized, modified-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, 2-way crossover study. Subjects (n = 49) were randomized to 16 cumulative doses (1x, 2x, 4x, 8x, and 16x) of levalbuterol (45 microg per dose) or racemic albuterol (90 microg per dose) administered over a 2-hour period. After a 7-day washout period, subjects were crossed over to the other treatment. After each dose, safety outcomes and pulmonary function were assessed. RESULTS Heart rate and (R)-albuterol exposure increased for both racemic albuterol HFA and levalbuterol HFA. For cumulative doses of 8x or greater, racemic albuterol HFA treatment had greater increases in mean heart rate than levalbuterol HFA (least-squares mean [+/- SD] difference at the 8x dose was 2.8 beats/min [95% CI, 0.3-5.3] and at the 16x dose was 3.5 beats/min [95% CI, 0.6-6.4]). (R)-albuterol plasma levels ranged from 10% to 18% higher after racemic albuterol HFA MDI dosing versus after levalbuterol HFA MDI. FEV(1) improvements were similar for both treatments. The relative potencies of the 2 therapies, based on FEV(1), were similar (ratio, 1.1 [90% CI, 0.9-1.2]; Finney method). CONCLUSION In this study single-day cumulative dosing of asthmatic subjects with levalbuterol HFA MDI or racemic albuterol HFA MDI resulted in similar improvements in FEV(1) and tolerability. Plasma (R)-albuterol levels and mean heart rate were less with levalbuterol HFA MDI.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study comparing arformoterol tartrate inhalation solution and racemic formoterol dry powder inhaler in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND Arformoterol is a single-isomer (R,R-formoterol) nebulized long-acting beta(2)-agonist approved for use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Exposure (plasma concentrations of (R,R)-formoterol) and forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) were compared for 15 microg nebulized arformoterol and 12 and 24 microg racemic formoterol (containing 6 and 12 microg (R,R)-formoterol, respectively) delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI). METHODS An open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study in 39 subjects with COPD (FEV(1) 1.4L, 44.4% predicted). Twice-daily treatments included nebulized arformoterol (15 microg) and racemic formoterol DPI (12 and 24 microg) for 14 days. Plasma concentrations of (R,R)- and (S,S)-formoterol were determined on days 1 and 14 of each treatment period. Airway function efficacy endpoints included the percent change in trough FEV(1) from baseline on day 14 of each treatment period. RESULTS At steady state, exposure to (R,R)-formoterol was similar following nebulized 15 microg arformoterol (C(max): 6.5 pg/mL; AUC(0-tau): 56.5 pgh/mL) and 12 microg racemic formoterol DPI (C(max): 6.2 pg/mL; AUC((0-)(tau)()): 46.3 pgh/mL). The geometric mean ratios between these two treatments (90% confidence intervals) for C(max) and AUC((0-)(tau)()) were 0.91 (0.76, 1.09) and 1.16 (1.00, 1.35), respectively. Treatment with 24 microg racemic formoterol DPI resulted in dose proportionally higher (R,R)-formoterol: C(max) (10.8 pg/mL) and AUC((0-)(tau)()) (83.6 pgh/mL). Detectable (S,S)-formoterol was consistently measured only after treatment with racemic formoterol. The mean percent increase in trough FEV(1) was 19.1% in the arformoterol group, and 16.0% and 18.2% in the 12 and 24 microg racemic formoterol groups, respectively. Changes in (R,R)-formoterol concentrations over time paralleled changes in FEV(1). CONCLUSIONS In this study, plasma exposure to (R,R)-formoterol was similar for nebulized 15 microg arformoterol and 12 microg racemic formoterol DPI, and 40% lower than 24 microg racemic formoterol DPI. There was no evidence of chiral interconversion following treatment with arformoterol. Finally, temporal changes in airway function in all treatment groups corresponded to changes in (R,R)-formoterol plasma concentrations.

A cumulative dose, safety and tolerability study of arformoterol in pediatric subjects with stable asthma†‡

Short‐acting β2‐agonists (SABAs) are recommended for treating acute pediatric asthma. The long‐acting β2‐agonist (LABA) arformoterol is approved for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Arformoterol acts rapidly, is delivered via nebulization, and, as such, raises concerns from the FDA over possible off‐label use in acute asthma in children. As a step to investigate this issue, this study evaluated the safety and tolerability of three consecutive doses of arformoterol administered over 1 hr in children with stable asthma.