Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John P. Neoptolemos is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John P. Neoptolemos.


Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2004

Clinical and genetic characteristics of hereditary pancreatitis in Europe.

Nathan Howes; Markus M. Lerch; William Greenhalf; Deborah D. Stocken; Ian Ellis; Peter Simon; Kaspar Truninger; Rudi Ammann; G. Cavallini; Richard Charnley; G. Uomo; Miriam Delhaye; Julius Spicak; Brendan Drumm; Jan B.M.J. Jansen; Roger Mountford; David C. Whitcomb; John P. Neoptolemos

BACKGROUND & AIMSnHereditary pancreatitis is an autosomal dominant disease that is mostly caused by cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) gene mutations. The aim was to determine phenotype-genotype correlations of families in Europe.nnnMETHODSnAnalysis of data obtained by the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer was undertaken using multilevel proportional hazards modelling.nnnRESULTSnThere were 112 families in 14 countries (418 affected individuals): 58 (52%) families carried the R122H, 24 (21%) the N29I, and 5 (4%) the A16V mutation, 2 had rare mutations, and 21 (19%) had no PRSS1 mutation. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to first symptoms for R122H was 10 (8, 12) years of age, 14 (11, 18) years for N29I, and 14.5 (10, 21) years for mutation negative patients (P = 0.032). The cumulative risk (95% CI) at 50 years of age for exocrine failure was 37.2% (28.5%, 45.8%), 47.6% (37.1%, 58.1%) for endocrine failure, and 17.5% (12.2%, 22.7%) for pancreatic resection for pain. Time to resection was significantly reduced for females (P < 0.001) and those with the N29I mutation (P = 0.014). The cumulative risk (95% CI) of pancreatic cancer was 44.0% (8.0%, 80.0%) at 70 years from symptom onset with a standardized incidence ratio of 67% (50%, 82%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnSymptoms in hereditary pancreatitis start in younger patients and endpoints take longer to be reached compared with other forms of chronic pancreatitis but the cumulative levels of exocrine and endocrine failure are much higher. There is an increasingly high risk of pancreatic cancer after the age of 50 years unrelated to the genotype.


Gut | 2002

The N34S mutation of SPINK1 (PSTI) is associated with a familial pattern of idiopathic chronic pancreatitis but does not cause the disease

Jayne Threadgold; William Greenhalf; Ian Ellis; Nathan Howes; Markus M. Lerch; Peter Simon; Jan B.M.J. Jansen; Richard Charnley; R Laugier; L Frulloni; Attila Oláh; Myriam Delhaye; Ingemar Ihse; O. B. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell; Åke Andren-Sandberg; Clem W. Imrie; J Martinek; Thomas M. Gress; Roger Mountford; David C. Whitcomb; John P. Neoptolemos

Background: Mutations in the PRSS1 gene explain most occurrences of hereditary pancreatitis (HP) but many HP families have no PRSS1 mutation. Recently, an association between the mutation N34S in the pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (SPINK1 or PSTI) gene and idiopathic chronic pancreatitis (ICP) was reported. It is unclear whether the N34S mutation is a cause of pancreatitis per se, whether it modifies the disease, or whether it is a marker of the disease. Patients and methods: A total of 327 individuals from 217 families affected by pancreatitis were tested: 152 from families with HP, 108 from families with ICP, and 67 with alcohol related CP (ACP). Seven patients with ICP had a family history of pancreatitis but no evidence of autosomal dominant disease (f-ICP) compared with 87 patients with true ICP (t-ICP). Two hundred controls were also tested for the N34S mutation. The findings were related to clinical outcome. Results: The N34S mutation was carried by five controls (2.5%; allele frequency 1.25%), 11/87 (13%) t-ICP patients (p=0.0013 v controls), and 6/7 (86%) affected (p<0.0001 v controls) and 1/9 (11%) unaffected f-ICP cases. N34S was found in 4/108 affected HP patients (p=0.724 v controls), in 3/27 (11%) with wild-type and in 1/81 (1%) with mutant PRSS1, and 4/67 ACP patients (all p>0.05 v controls). The presence of the N34S mutation was not associated with early disease onset or disease severity. Conclusions: The prevalence of the N34S mutation was increased in patients with ICP and was greatest in f-ICP cases. Segregation of the N34S mutation in families with pancreatitis is unexplained and points to a complex association between N34S and another putative pancreatitis related gene.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2006

Evaluation of the 4q32-34 Locus in European Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Julie Earl; Li Yan; Louis Vitone; Janet M. Risk; Steve J. Kemp; Chris McFaul; John P. Neoptolemos; William Greenhalf; Ralf Kress; Mercedes Sina-Frey; Stephan A. Hahn; Harald Rieder; Detlef K. Bartsch

Background: Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) describes a group of families where the inheritance of pancreatic cancer is consistent with an autosomal-dominant mode of inheritance. The 4q32-34 region has been previously identified as a potential locus for FPC in a large American family. Methods: The region was allelotyped in 231 individuals from 77 European families using nine microsatellite markers, and haplotyping was possible in 191 individuals from 41 families. Families were selected based on at least two affected first-degree relatives with no other cancer syndromes. Results: Linkage to most of the locus was excluded based on LOD scores less than −2.0. Eight families were excluded from linkage to 4q32-34 based on haplotypes not segregating with the disease compared with a predicted six to seven families. Two groups of families were identified, which seem to share common alleles within the minimal disease-associated region of 4q32-34, one group with an apparently earlier age of cancer death than the other pancreatic cancer families. Four genes were identified with potential tumor suppressor roles within the locus in regions that could not be excluded based on the LOD score. These were HMGB2, PPID, MORF4, and SPOCK3. DNA sequence analysis of exons of these genes in affected individuals and in pancreatic cancer cell lines did not reveal any mutations. Conclusion: This locus is unlikely to harbor a FPC gene in the majority of our European families. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(10):1948–55)


Journal of Proteome Research | 2009

Confounding effect of obstructive jaundice in the interpretation of proteomic plasma profiling data for pancreatic cancer.

Li Yan; Sarah Tonack; Richard D. Smith; Susanna Dodd; Rosalind E. Jenkins; Neil R. Kitteringham; William Greenhalf; Paula Ghaneh; John P. Neoptolemos; Eithne Costello

It is well established that variation in sampling, processing and storage protocols can alter the levels of potential biomarkers in serum and plasma. Here, using pancreatic cancer as an example, we demonstrate that consideration of clinical parameters related to the patients illness is equally important when seeking cancer-specific biomarkers. Bile duct-obstruction is a feature of pancreatic disease that can cause jaundice. Comparing patients with pancreatic cancer, chronic pancreatitis or biliary duct obstruction, we observed that the plasma levels of apolipoprotein A1, transthyretin, and apolipoprotein E, when examined in isolation, were each associated with pancreatic cancer. However, when the effect of bile duct obstruction was considered, only transthyretin levels were independently associated with cancer likelihood. Our results demonstrate the importance of accounting for disease-related confounding factors when analyzing data for the detection of cancer biomarkers.


Digestion | 1997

Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Margaret D. Finch; Nathan Howes; Ian Ellis; Roger Mountford; Robert Sutton; Michael Raraty; John P. Neoptolemos

Important advances in the understanding of pancreatic diseases have taken place through the application of molecular methods in the study of the inherited form of pancreatitis and pancreas cancer. Mutations of the cationic trypsinogen gene have been found to be causative for hereditary pancreatitis with important implications for the molecular pathogenesis of acute and chronic pancreatitis. A variety of cancer syndromes involving the P16 and BRCA2 genes, for example, also lead to pancreatic cancer, but the gene responsible for familial pancreatic cancer has not been identified so far. The establishment of a European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC) will facilitate future developments.


Gut | 2010

The variable phenotype of the p.A16V mutation of cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) in pancreatitis families

C. Grocock; Vinciane Rebours; Myriam Delhaye; Åke Andren-Sandberg; Frank Ulrich Weiss; Roger Mountford; Matthew Harcus; Edyta Niemczyck; Louis Vitone; Susanna Dodd; Maiken Thyregod Joergensen; Rudolf W. Ammann; Ove B. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell; J. Butler; Philip Burgess; Bronwyn Kerr; Richard Charnley; Robert Sutton; Michael Raraty; Jacques Devière; David C. Whitcomb; John P. Neoptolemos; Philippe Lévy; Markus M. Lerch; William Greenhalf

Objective To characterise the phenotypes associated with the p.A16V mutation of PRSS1. Design Clinical and epidemiological data were collected for any family in which a p.A16V mutation was identified, either referred directly to the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer or via a collaborator. DNA samples were tested for mutations in PRSS1, SPINK1, CFTR and CTRC. Patients Participants were recruited on the basis of either family history of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) or the results of genetic testing. Families were categorised as having hereditary pancreatitis (HP), idiopathic disease or pancreatitis in a single generation. HP was defined as ≥2 cases in ≥2 generations. Main outcome measures Onset of painful episodes of pancreatitis, death from pancreatic cancer, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic failure. Results Ten families with p.A16V mutations were identified (22 affected individuals): six HP families, three with idiopathic disease and one with only a single generation affected. The median age of onset, ignoring non-penetrants, was 10u2005years (95% CI 5 to 25). There were eight confirmed cases of exocrine failure, four of whom also had diabetes mellitus. There were three pancreatic cancer cases. Two of these were confirmed as p.A16V carriers, only one of whom was affected by pancreatitis. Those with p.A16V pancreatitis were compared to affected individuals with p.R122H, p.N29I and no PRSS1 mutation. No significant differences were proven using logrank or Mann–Whitney U tests. Conclusions Penetrance of p.A16V is highly variable and family dependent, suggesting it contributes to multigenic inheritance of a predisposition to pancreatitis.


Pancreatology | 2017

Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis

Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Stefan A.W. Bouwense; C. Campbell; Güralp O. Ceyhan; Myriam Delhaye; Ihsan Ekin Demir; Pramod Kumar Garg; Harry van Goor; Christopher Halloran; Shuiji Isaji; John P. Neoptolemos; Søren Schou Olesen; Tonya Palermo; Pankaj J. Pasricha; Andrea Sheel; Tooru Shimosegawa; Eva Szigethy; David C. Whitcomb; Dhiraj Yadav

Abdominal pain is the foremost complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP). Pain can be related to recurrent or chronic inflammation, local complications or neurogenic mechanisms with corresponding changes in the nervous systems. Both pain intensity and the frequency of pain attacks have been shown to reduce quality of life in patients with CP. Assessment of pain follows the guidelines for other types of chronic pain, where the multidimensional nature of symptom presentation is taken into consideration. Quantitative sensory testing may be used to characterize pain, but is currently used in a research setting in advanced laboratories. For pain relief, current guidelines recommend a simple stepwise escalation of analgesic drugs with increasing potency until pain relief is obtained. Abstinence from alcohol and smoking should be strongly advised. Pancreatic enzyme therapy and antioxidants may be helpful as initial treatment. Endoscopic treatment can be used in patients with evidence of ductal obstruction and may be combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithothripsy. The best candidates are those with distal obstruction of the main pancreatic duct and in early stage of disease. Behavioral interventions should be part of the multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management particularly when psychological impact is experienced. Surgery should be considered early and after a maximum of five endoscopic interventions. The type of surgery depends on morphological changes of the pancreas. Long-term effects are variable, but high success rates have been reported in open studies and when compared with endoscopic treatment. Finally, neurolytical interventions and neuromodulation can be considered in difficult patients.


Lancet Oncology | 2018

Consensus statement on mandatory measurements in pancreatic cancer trials (COMM-PACT) for systemic treatment of unresectable disease

Emil ter Veer; L. Bengt van Rijssen; Marc G. Besselink; Rosa M A Mali; Jordan Berlin; Stefan Boeck; Franck Bonnetain; Ian Chau; Thierry Conroy; Eric Van Cutsem; Gael Deplanque; Helmut Friess; Bengt Glimelius; David Goldstein; Richard Herrmann; Roberto Labianca; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Teresa Macarulla; Jonathan H M van der Meer; John P. Neoptolemos; Takuji Okusaka; Eileen Mary O'Reilly; Uwe Pelzer; Philip A. Philip; Marcel J. van der Poel; Michele Reni; Werner Scheithauer; Jens T. Siveke; Chris Verslype; Olivier R. Busch

Variations in the reporting of potentially confounding variables in studies investigating systemic treatments for unresectable pancreatic cancer pose challenges in drawing accurate comparisons between findings. In this Review, we establish the first international consensus on mandatory baseline and prognostic characteristics in future trials for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer. We did a systematic literature search to find phase 3 trials investigating first-line systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer to identify baseline characteristics and prognostic variables. We created a structured overview showing the reporting frequencies of baseline characteristics and the prognostic relevance of identified variables. We used a modified Delphi panel of two rounds involving an international panel of 23 leading medical oncologists in the field of pancreatic cancer to develop a consensus on the various variables identified. In total, 39 randomised controlled trials that had data on 15u2008863 patients were included, of which 32 baseline characteristics and 26 prognostic characteristics were identified. After two consensus rounds, 23 baseline characteristics and 12 prognostic characteristics were designated as mandatory for future pancreatic cancer trials. The COnsensus statement on Mandatory Measurements in unresectable PAncreatic Cancer Trials (COMM-PACT) identifies a mandatory set of baseline and prognostic characteristics to allow adequate comparison of outcomes between pancreatic cancer studies.


Pancreatology | 2008

Contents Vol. 8, 2008

Jens Werner; Hein G. Gooszen; J. Sadic; A. Borgström; Steen Larsen; Thomas P. Conrads; Nils Habbe; David B. Krizman; Jan Mollenhauer; Georg Feldmann; Anirban Maitra; S. Regnér; J. Manjer; S. Appelros; C. Hjalmarsson; Wang Cheung; Marlene Darfler; Hector Alvarez; Brian L. Hood; Nanna M. Jensen; Supot Pongprasobchai; Rahul Pannala; Thomas C. Smyrk; William R. Bamlet; Suresh Pitchumoni; Andrei V. Ougolkov; Mariza de Andrade; Gloria M. Petersen; Suresh T. Chari; Hjalmar C. van Santvoort

71 32nd Annual Meeting of the Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland November 8–9, 2007, London, UK Guest Editor: Pereira, S. (London) (available online only) 86 IAP Society News 87 EPC Society News 88 HBPD Int: Table of


Gastroenterology | 2005

Molecular Analysis to Detect Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in High-Risk Groups

Li Yan; Christopher McFaul; Nathan Howes; Jane Leslie; Gillian Lancaster; Theresa Wong; Jane Threadgold; Jonathan Evans; Ian Gilmore; Howard Smart; Martin Lombard; John P. Neoptolemos; William Greenhalf

Collaboration


Dive into the John P. Neoptolemos's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nathan Howes

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Li Yan

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Louis Vitone

University of Liverpool

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Raraty

Royal Liverpool University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Ellis

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge