Nathan Howes

Clinical and genetic characteristics of hereditary pancreatitis in Europe.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Hereditary pancreatitis is an autosomal dominant disease that is mostly caused by cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) gene mutations. The aim was to determine phenotype-genotype correlations of families in Europe. METHODS Analysis of data obtained by the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer was undertaken using multilevel proportional hazards modelling. RESULTS There were 112 families in 14 countries (418 affected individuals): 58 (52%) families carried the R122H, 24 (21%) the N29I, and 5 (4%) the A16V mutation, 2 had rare mutations, and 21 (19%) had no PRSS1 mutation. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to first symptoms for R122H was 10 (8, 12) years of age, 14 (11, 18) years for N29I, and 14.5 (10, 21) years for mutation negative patients (P = 0.032). The cumulative risk (95% CI) at 50 years of age for exocrine failure was 37.2% (28.5%, 45.8%), 47.6% (37.1%, 58.1%) for endocrine failure, and 17.5% (12.2%, 22.7%) for pancreatic resection for pain. Time to resection was significantly reduced for females (P < 0.001) and those with the N29I mutation (P = 0.014). The cumulative risk (95% CI) of pancreatic cancer was 44.0% (8.0%, 80.0%) at 70 years from symptom onset with a standardized incidence ratio of 67% (50%, 82%). CONCLUSIONS Symptoms in hereditary pancreatitis start in younger patients and endpoints take longer to be reached compared with other forms of chronic pancreatitis but the cumulative levels of exocrine and endocrine failure are much higher. There is an increasingly high risk of pancreatic cancer after the age of 50 years unrelated to the genotype.

The N34S mutation of SPINK1 (PSTI) is associated with a familial pattern of idiopathic chronic pancreatitis but does not cause the disease

Background: Mutations in the PRSS1 gene explain most occurrences of hereditary pancreatitis (HP) but many HP families have no PRSS1 mutation. Recently, an association between the mutation N34S in the pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (SPINK1 or PSTI) gene and idiopathic chronic pancreatitis (ICP) was reported. It is unclear whether the N34S mutation is a cause of pancreatitis per se, whether it modifies the disease, or whether it is a marker of the disease. Patients and methods: A total of 327 individuals from 217 families affected by pancreatitis were tested: 152 from families with HP, 108 from families with ICP, and 67 with alcohol related CP (ACP). Seven patients with ICP had a family history of pancreatitis but no evidence of autosomal dominant disease (f-ICP) compared with 87 patients with true ICP (t-ICP). Two hundred controls were also tested for the N34S mutation. The findings were related to clinical outcome. Results: The N34S mutation was carried by five controls (2.5%; allele frequency 1.25%), 11/87 (13%) t-ICP patients (p=0.0013 v controls), and 6/7 (86%) affected (p<0.0001 v controls) and 1/9 (11%) unaffected f-ICP cases. N34S was found in 4/108 affected HP patients (p=0.724 v controls), in 3/27 (11%) with wild-type and in 1/81 (1%) with mutant PRSS1, and 4/67 ACP patients (all p>0.05 v controls). The presence of the N34S mutation was not associated with early disease onset or disease severity. Conclusions: The prevalence of the N34S mutation was increased in patients with ICP and was greatest in f-ICP cases. Segregation of the N34S mutation in families with pancreatitis is unexplained and points to a complex association between N34S and another putative pancreatitis related gene.

Anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer

Background: Previous studies of anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer have been small and subject to ascertainment bias. Our aim was to determine evidence for anticipation in a large number of European families. Patients and methods: A total of 1223 individuals at risk from 106 families (264 affected individuals) were investigated. Generation G3 was defined as the latest generation that included any individual aged over 39 years; preceding generations were then defined as G2 and G1. Results: With 80 affected child-parent pairs, the children died a median (interquartile range) of 10 (7, 14) years earlier. The median (interquartile range) age of death from pancreatic cancer was 70 (59, 77), 64 (57, 69), and 49 (44, 56) years for G1, G2, and G3, respectively. These indications of anticipation could be the result of bias. Truncation of Kaplan-Meier analysis to a 60 year period to correct for follow up time bias and a matched test statistic indicated significant anticipation (p = 0.002 and p<0.001). To minimise bias further, an iterative analysis to predict cancer numbers was developed. No single risk category could be applied that accurately predicted cancer cases in every generation. Using three risk categories (low with no pancreatic cancer in earlier generations, high with a single earlier generation, and very high where two preceding generations were affected), incidence was estimated without significant error. Anticipation was independent of smoking. Conclusion: This study provides the first strong evidence for anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer and must be considered in genetic counselling and the commencement of secondary screening for pancreatic cancer.

Surgery in the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis Minimal Access Pancreatic Necrosectomy

Between 5% and 10% of patients with acute pancreatitis will develop infected pancreatic necrosis. Traditional open surgery for this condition carries a mortality rate of up to 50%, and therefore a number of less invasive techniques have been developed, including radiological drainage and a minimal access retroperitoneal approach. No randomised controlled trials have been published which compare these techniques. Indications for minimal access surgery are the same as for open surgery, i.e. infected pancreatic necrosis or failure to improve with extensive sterile necrosis. Access is obtained to the pancreatic necrosis via the left loin and necrosectomy performed using an operating nephroscope, and this often requires several procedures to remove all necrotic tissue. The cavity is continuously irrigated on the ward in between procedures. The results of this approach are encouraging, with less systemic upset to the patient, a lower incidence of post-operative organ failure when compared with open surgery, and a reduced requirement for ITU support. There is also a trend towards a lower mortality rate, although this does not reach statistical significance on the data published so far. Current evidence suggests that a minimal access approach to pancreatic necrosis is feasible, well tolerated and beneficial for the patient when compared with open surgery.

Molecular Diagnosis of Early Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in High-Risk Patients

The prevalence of pancreatic cancer in the general population is too low – even in high-prevalence areas such as Northern Europe and North America (8–12 per 105 population) – relative to the diagnostic accuracy of present detection methods to permit primary screening in the asymptomatic adult population. The recognition that the lifetime risk of developing pancreatic cancer for patients with hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is extremely high (20% by the age of 60 years and 40% by the age of 70 years) poses considerable challenges and opportunities for secondary screening in those patients without any clinical features of pancreatic cancer. Even for secondary screening, the detection of cancer at a biological stage that would be amenable to cure by surgery (total pancreatectomy) still requires diagnostic modalities with a very high sensitivity and specificity. Conventional radiological imaging methods such as endoluminal ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, which have proved to be valuable in the early detection of early neoplastic lesions in patients with familial pancreatic cancer, may well be applicable to patients with HP but only in those without gross morphological features of chronic pancreatitis (other than parenchymal atrophy). Unfortunately, most cases of HP also have associated gross features of chronic pancreatitis that are likely to seriously undermine the diagnostic value of these conventional imaging modalities. Pre-malignant molecular changes can be detected in the pancreatic juice of patients. Thus, the application of molecular screening in patients with HP is potentially the most powerful method of detection of early pancreatic cancer. Although mutant (mt) K-ras can be detected in the pancreatic juice of most patients with pancreatic cancer, it is also present in patients with non-inherited chronic pancreatitis who do not progress to pancreatic cancer (at least in the short to medium term), as well as increasingly in the older population without pancreatic disease. Nevertheless, the presence of mt-K-ras may identify a genuinely higher-risk group, enabling additional diagnostic imaging and molecular resources to be focussed on such a group. What is clear is that prospective multi-centre studies, such as that being pursued by the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC), are essential for the development of an effective secondary screening programme for these patients.

A new polymorphism for the RI22H mutation in hereditary pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is a rare form of recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis. Mutations in the cationic trypsinogen (protease serine 1, PRSS1) gene have been identified as causing HP. The R122H (previously known as R117H) mutation is the commonest and can be detected by a single and rapid polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR/RFLP) based technique using the AflIII enzyme. This test however may give a false negative result in the presence of a neutral polymorphism within the enzyme recognition site. The frequency of this event was examined by sequencing studies in patients with HP and in healthy controls. METHODS Of 60 families identified by the UK and Ireland consortium of EUROPAC (European Registry for Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer), 51 were screened for R122H, N29I, and A16V mutations using standard techniques, and by sequencing of all five exons of cationic trypsinogen. RESULTS Twelve families had the N29I mutation, one family had A16V and, on standard testing, 15 families had the R122H mutation. An additional family with the R122H mutation was found on direct sequencing. The false negative result was due to a neutral polymorphism C→T at the third base of the codon, not affecting the amino acid coded for, destroying theAflIII restriction site. This polymorphism was not observed in 50 DNA specimens (100 chromosomes) from controls nor from 50 individuals from PRSS1 mutation negative HP families. A novel mutation specific PCR was developed to avoid this pitfall. CONCLUSIONS One of the 16 families with HP and an R122H mutation contained a polymorphism affecting the AflIII restriction site. Adoption of an alternative R122H assay is important for genetic studies in individuals with apparent HP.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Abstract. Pancreatic cancer is a major cause of cancer death; and despite advances in the standards of surgery and supportive care, the median and long-term survival rates have not shown similar dramatic improvements. Techniques such as radical surgery alone cannot guarantee a cure. Previous work with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has indicated a role for adjuvant therapy for patients with resectable tumors. The main modalities that have been assessed are based on the Gastrointestinal Tumour Study Group (GITSG) results using 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or both. Alternative approaches such as neoadjuvant therapy have been used, which may increase the number of patients suitable for resection; and regional therapy techniques have been used to increase the therapeutic potential by concentrating agents to the tumor bed. The results of single or combination therapy do show some improvement in survival but have been limited in most cases to retrospective nonrandomized series of patients. Therefore the results must be assessed as such. There are several large randomized trials that will deliver definitive answers in the near future as to whether conventional adjuvant therapy is effective. New approaches using novel agents for advanced disease are currently being assessed, and they may eventually identify the most appropriate and effective agents to use for pancreatic cancer in the adjuvant setting.

Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Important advances in the understanding of pancreatic diseases have taken place through the application of molecular methods in the study of the inherited form of pancreatitis and pancreas cancer. Mutations of the cationic trypsinogen gene have been found to be causative for hereditary pancreatitis with important implications for the molecular pathogenesis of acute and chronic pancreatitis. A variety of cancer syndromes involving the P16 and BRCA2 genes, for example, also lead to pancreatic cancer, but the gene responsible for familial pancreatic cancer has not been identified so far. The establishment of a European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC) will facilitate future developments.

Molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and clinical implications

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a significant cause of cancer death worldwide. PDAC is also one of the best-studied cancers with regard to molecular pathogenesis. The chief risk factors associated with PDAC are smoking and pancreatitis, in addition genetic predisposition seems to play a major role. This genetic predisposition may in some cases be indirect, for example via the elevated risk of pancreatitis seen in patients with hereditary pancreatitis (HP). The elucidation of the molecular causes of PDAC has enabled the provision of secondary screening for PDAC in conditions such as HP. This review is concerned with the molecular pathogenesis of PDAC and the application of this basic scientific understanding into state-of-the-art clinical practice.

Screening for early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in hereditary pancreatitis

Patients with hereditary pancreatitis have a 40% lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Existing methods of diagnosing pancreatic cancer such as tumor markers, endoscopy, and radiological imaging lack the sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis, particularly in a background of chronic pancreatitis. Molecular based strategies offer new avenues of screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in these high-risk patients, which may allow the development of highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tests for the early detection of cancer.