John Palka

Neural projection patterns from homeotic tissue of Drosophila studied in bithorax mutants and mosaics

The central projection patterns of sensory cells from the wing and haltere of Drosophila, as revealed by filling their axons with cobalt, consist of dorsal components arising from small campaniform sensilla and ventral components arising from large campaniform sensilla and from bristles. All of the bristles of the wing are innervated, some singly and some multiply. All three classes of sensilla are strongly represented on the wing, but the haltere carries primarily small campaniform sensilla and has a correspondingly minute ventral projection. In bithorax mutants in which the haltere is transformed into wing, ventral components are added to the projection pattern, while the dorsal components appear as if haltere tissue were still present. Thus, the three classes of receptors not only produce different projection patterns when they develop in their native mesothoracic segment, but also behave differently in the homeotic situation. Consequently, different developmental programs are inferred for each class. When somatic recombination clones of bithorax tissue are generated in phenotypically wild-type flies, they also produce ventral projections. However, these projections of mutant fibers into wild-type ganglia differ in certain details from the projections of mutant fibers into mutant ganglia. Thus, homeotic changes are inferred to occur in the CNS of mutant flies, but these are not required for the execution of those developmental instructions carried in the genome of large campaniform and bristle sensory cells which specify that their axons should grow ventrad in the CNS.

Changing spatial patterns of DNA replication in the developing wing of Drosophila.

Using an antibody against bromodeoxyuridine we have analyzed the distribution of S-phase nuclei in the wing disc of Drosophila as the larval disc transforms into the adult wing during metamorphosis. On the basis of the timing of replication three cell populations can be distinguished: the cells of the presumptive wing margin, the precursor cells of the longitudinal veins, and those of the intervein regions. In each of these populations the cell cycle is first arrested and later resumes at a specific time, so that at each developmental time point a characteristic spatial pattern of S-phase nuclei is seen. An interpretation of these changing patterns in terms of vein formation, compartments, and neural development is offered.

Neuron differentiation and axon growth in the developing wing of Drosophila melanogaster

Sensory neurons in the wing of Drosophila originate locally from epithelial cells and send their axons toward the base of the wing in two major bundles, the L1 and L3 nerves. We have estimated the birth times of a number of identified wing sensory neurons using an X-irradiation technique and have followed the appearance of their somata and axons by means of an immunohistochemical stain. These cells become immunoreactive and begin axon growth in a sequence which mirrors the sequence of their birth times. The earliest ones are born before pupariation and begin axonogenesis within 1 to 2 hr after the onset of metamorphosis; the last are born and differentiate some 12 to 14 hr later. The L1 and L3 nerves are formed in sections, with specific neurons pioneering defined stretches of the pathways during the period between 0 and 4 hr after pupariation (AP), and finally joining together around 12 hr AP. By 16 hr AP the adult complement of neurons is present and the adult peripheral nerve pattern has been established. Pathway establishment appears to be specified by multiple cues. In places where neurons differentiate in close proximity to one another, random filopodial exploration followed by axon growth to a neighboring neuron soma might be the major factor leading to pathway construction. In other locations, filopodial contact between neighboring somata does not appear to occur, and axon pathways joining neural neighbors by the most direct route are not established. We propose that in these cases additional factors, including veins which are already present at the time of axonogenesis, influence the growth of axons through non-neural tissues.

A mutation of the drosophila sodium pump α subunit gene results in bang-sensitive paralysis

Abstract A bang-sensitive enhancer trap line was isolated in a behavioral screen. The flies show a weak bang-sensitive paralysis, recovering after about 7 s. The P element insert is localized at 93131-2 on the salivary chromosomes, the site of the (Na + ,K + )ATPase a subunit gene. Molecular characterization demonstrates that the transposon is inserted into the first intron of this gene. This insertion leads to normal-sized transcripts, but reduced levels of expression. This change is also reflected in lower amounts of a normal-sized a subunit protein. Mutant flies show a much greater sensitivity to ouabain, likewise indicating, on a functional level, a reduction in Na + pump activity. Furthermore, the bang-sensitive behavior can also be mimicked by injecting sublethal doses of ouabain into wild-type flies. The molecular and functional evidence indicates that the insertion has produced a hypomorphic mutation of the (Na + ,K + )ATPase α subunit gene, opening the way to future studies of the regulation of the Na + pump.

Projection of sensory neurons from a homeotic mutant appendage, Antennapedia, in Drosophila melanogaster

Central projections of sensory neurons from homeotic mutant appendages (Antennapedia) of Drosophila melanogaster were compared with those of wild-type antennae and wild-type legs by means of degeneration and cobalt backfilling methods. Sensory axons originating from wild-type thoracic legs terminate within the ventral ipsilateral half of the corresponding neuropile segment and do not project to the brain. Sensory fibers from the third antennal segment (AIII) of wild-type animals project into the ipsilateral antennal glomerulus (AG) and to a lesser extent into the contralateral AG, whereas those from the second antennal segment terminate principally within the ipsilateral posterior antennal center. The sensory terminals of femur, tibia, and tarsi of the homeotic leg show a distribution very similar to that of the homologous wild-type antennal segment AIII, differing to a minor degree only in the size and precise localization of terminals within the antennal glomeruli. No degenerating axons were evident in ultrastructural examination of neck connectives after removal of homeotic legs. It is thus very improbable that any sensory fibers of the homeotic leg project to normal leg projection areas in the thoracico-abdominal ganglion. Several alternative explanations are offered for the apparent retention of antennal specificity by axons from the transformed appendage.

Neural Regeneration: Delayed Formation of Central Contacts by Insect Sensory Cells

Correlated anatomical and electrophysiological results demonstrate that sensory neurons, which differentiate de novo within the epidermis of regenerate abdominal cerci of crickets, enter the terminal ganglion and form functional central connections even when regeneration of the cerci is delayed through the greater part of postembryonic development. Stimulation of regenerate cerci evokes activity in giant interneurons which is normal by several physiological criteria.

The polarity of axon growth in the wings of Drosophila melanogaster.

We have analyzed the growth of axons in the wings of the mutants Hairy wing and hairy of Drosophila melanogaster. These mutants produce many supernumerary bristle organs and sensilla campaniformia, whose axons grow between the two wing epithelia and can be visualized in both pupal and adult stages. The sensory axons of wild-type animals follow two paths in the wing, within longitudinal veins L1 and L3, and always grow with a distal to proximal polarity. In the mutants, all axons following these two paths likewise grow with correct polarity. Axons elsewhere in the wing, however, are found to grow in many different directions, including from proximal to distal and hence directly away from the central nervous system. A variety of patterns of axon growth and fasciculation are seen in different individuals. Only if the supernumerary axons encounter the two normal paths do they reliably grow toward the base of the wing. We conclude that these two paths provide polarity information for axon growth, information which is either not used or not available elsewhere in the wing in spite of the obvious morphological polarization of every epithelial cell. The time course of neural differentiation suggests that the normal sensory cells of mutant wings, which grow axons relatively early, may be the source of polarity information for the later-differentiating supernumerary cells.

Genetic suppression of putative guidepost cells: Effect on establishment of nerve pathways in Drosophila wings

In the developing wing of Drosophila a set of early differentiating neurons pioneer the axon courses observed in the adult. The possibility that these first cells are indispensable for establishing the normal neural pathways has been tested. The differentiation of particular neurons was suppressed by inducing cell clones homozygous for two scute deficiencies, mutations that inhibit the differentiation of sensilla and their associated neurons. From the analysis of the nerve patterns in wings lacking specific sensilla, it has been demonstrated that none of the identified neurons are essential for guiding other axons along the correct path. However, the possibility remains that the presence of certain cells may increase the probability of establishing the normal pattern of peripheral nerves.

Segments, compartments and axon paths in Drosophila

Abstract What factors determine the course of axons through non-neural tissues and within the CNS? We describe some recent studies on this question in Drosophila where ideas and techniques of developmental genetics can be added to those of developmental neurobiology.

Theories of Pattern Formation in Insect Neural Development

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the efforts of a neurobiologist to understand theories formulated by developmental biologists for explaining the formation of patterns and to evaluate their application to the analysis of neural development. It states a number of theories as clearly as possible, together with a few of the observations that led to their formulation. The chapter also reviews some of the empirical findings concerning the development of various parts of the insect nervous system, with special emphasis on sensory systems and only an appreciative nod to motor neurons. It describes the development of each neural subsystem and highlights the possible applications of the theories of pattern formation to that particular tissue. The chapter presents some speculations on how the various ideas and findings scattered throughout its many pages might be interrelated.