Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John R. Metcalfe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John R. Metcalfe.


Water Resources Research | 1999

Quantification of precipitation measurement discontinuity induced by wind shields on national gauges

Daqing Yang; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe; Paul Louie; George H. Leavesley; Douglas G. Emerson; Clayton L. Hanson; Valentin S. Golubev; Esko Elomaa; Thilo Gunther; Timothy Pangburn; Ersi Kang; Janja Milkovic

Various combinations of wind shields and national precipitation gauges commonly used in countries of the northern hemisphere have been studied in this paper, using the combined intercomparison data collected at 14 sites during the World Meteorological Organizations (WMO) Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison Project. The results show that wind shields improve gauge catch of precipitation, particularly for snow. Shielded gauges, on average, measure 20–70% more snow than unshielded gauges. Without a doubt, the use of wind shields on precipitation gauges has introduced a significant discontinuity into precipitation records, particularly in cold and windy regions. This discontinuity is not constant and it varies with wind speed, temperature, and precipitation type. Adjustment for this discontinuity is necessary to obtain homogenous precipitation data for climate change and hydrological studies. The relation of the relative catch ratio (RCR, ratio of measurements of shielded gauge to unshielded gauge) versus wind speed and temperature has been developed for Alter and Tretyakov wind shields. Strong linear relations between measurements of shielded gauge and unshielded gauge have also been found for different precipitation types. The linear relation does not fully take into account the varying effect of wind and temperature on gauge catch. Overadjustment by the linear relation may occur at those sites with lower wind speeds, and underadjustment may occur at those stations with higher wind speeds. The RCR technique is anticipated to be more applicable in a wide range of climate conditions. The RCR technique and the linear relation have been tested at selected WMO intercomparison stations, and reasonable agreement between the adjusted amounts and the shielded gauge measurements was obtained at most of the sites. Test application of the developed methodologies to a regional or national network is therefore recommended to further evaluate their applicability in different climate conditions. Significant increase of precipitation is expected due to the adjustment particularly in high latitudes and other cold regions. This will have a meaningful impact on climate variation and change analyses.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2001

Compatibility evaluation of national precipitation gage measurements

Daqing Yang; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe; Paul Louie; Esko Elomaa; Clayton L. Hanson; Valentin S. Golubev; Thilo Gunther; Janja Milkovic; Milan Lapin

Compatibility of precipitation measurements of various national gages commonly used in the Northern Hemisphere countries has been evaluated, based on the gage intercomparison data collected at 10 stations during the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison Project. Little difference (less than 5%) is found between national rainfall data, but a significant discrepancy (up to 110%) exists between national snowfall records. This difference is not constant and it varies with wind speed and temperature. It is certain that use of different precipitation gages in neighboring countries has introduced a significant discontinuity into precipitation records, particularly in cold and windy regions. Strong linear relations among daily national gage measurements have been defined for several national gages commonly used in the Northern Hemisphere. These linear relations provide a useful technique to adjust gage records when wind speed and temperature data are not available. The linear relations have been tested at selected WMO intercomparison stations, and good agreements of the adjusted amounts to other gage measurements are obtained at most of the test sites, indicating that the linear relations perform reasonably well at the selected WMO sites. Use of the proposed adjustment procedure will reduce inconsistency between precipitation measurements of national gages.


Water Resources Research | 2000

An evaluation of the Wyoming Gauge System for snowfall measurement

Daqing Yang; Douglas L. Kane; Larry D. Hinzman; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe; Paul Louie; George H. Leavesley; Douglas G. Emerson; Clayton L. Hanson

The Wyoming snow fence (shield) has been widely used with precipitation gauges for snowfall measurement at more than 25 locations in Alaska since the late 1970s. This gauges measurements have been taken as the reference for correcting wind-induced gauge undercatch of snowfall in Alaska. Recently, this fence (shield) was tested in the World Meteorological Organization Solid Precipitation Measurement Intercomparison Project at four locations in the United States of America and Canada for six winter seasons. At the Intercomparison sites an octagonal vertical Double Fence with a Russian Tretyakov gauge or a Universal Belfort recording gauge was installed and used as the Intercomparison Reference (DFIR) to provide true snowfall amounts for this Intercomparison experiment. The Intercomparison data collected were compiled at the four sites that represent a variety of climate, terrain, and exposure. On the basis of these data sets the performance of the Wyoming gauge system for snowfall observations was carefully evaluated against the DFIR and snow cover data. The results show that (1) the mean snow catch efficiency of the Wyoming gauge compared with the DFIR is about 80–90%, (2) there exists a close linear relation between the measurements of the two gauge systems and this relation may serve as a transfer function to adjust the Wyoming gauge records to obtain an estimate of the true snowfall amount, (3) catch efficiency of the Wyoming gauge does not change with wind speed and temperature, and (4) Wyoming gauge measurements are generally compatible to the snowpack water equivalent at selected locations in northern Alaska. These results are important to our effort of determining true snowfall amounts in the high latitudes, and they are also useful for regional hydrologic and climatic analyses.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1997

Variability of soil moisture near flux towers in the BOREAS southern study area

Eugene L. Peck; Thomas R. Carroll; Robert Maxson; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe

Soil moisture measurements, using an airborne gamma radiation system, were collected over the southern BOREAS study area in Saskatchewan, Canada, during 1993 and 1994. Results of microscale analyses of the soil moisture measurements near four flux towers established in different boreal forest areas (old aspen, old black spruce, old jack pine, and young aspen) are presented. Included is information on the spatial and temporal variability of soil moisture of the mineral soil in the vicinity of each tower site and estimates of the water content in overlaying moss/humus layers. For the old black spruce site, estimates are presented of the change in the amount of standing water from September 1993, when there was considerable standing water, to September 1994, when the area had completely dried out and no standing water was observed.


Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 1998

Accuracy of NWS 8" Standard Nonrecording Precipitation Gauge: Results and Application of WMO Intercomparison

Daqing Yang; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe; Valentin S. Golubev; Roy Bates; Timothy Pangburn; Clayton L. Hanson


Hydrological Processes | 1995

Accuracy of tretyakov precipitation gauge: Result of wmo intercomparison

Daqing Yang; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe; Valentin S. Golubev; Esko Elomaa; Thilo Gunther; Roy Bates; Timothy Pangburn; Clayton L. Hanson; Douglas G. Emerson; Voilete Copaciu; Janja Milkovic


Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 1998

Accuracy of NWS 8

Daqing Yang; Barry Goodison; John R. Metcalfe; Valentin S. Golubev; Roy Bates; Timothy Pangburn; Clayton L. Hanson


Advances in Water Resources | 2008

Calibration of an integrated land surface process and radiobrightness (LSP/R) model during summertime

Jasmeet Judge; Anthony W. England; John R. Metcalfe; David McNichol; Barry Goodison


Radio Science | 2003

Microwave remote sensing of soil moisture in southern Ontario: Aircraft and satellite measurements at 19 and 37 GHz

June Morland; John R. Metcalfe; Anne Walker


Radio Science | 2003

Microwave remote sensing of soil moisture in southern Ontario: Aircraft and satellite measurements at 19 and 37 GHz: MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING OF SOIL MOISTURE

June Morland; John R. Metcalfe; Anne Walker

Collaboration


Dive into the John R. Metcalfe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barry Goodison

Meteorological Service of Canada

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clayton L. Hanson

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Valentin S. Golubev

State Hydrological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Walker

Meteorological Service of Canada

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas G. Emerson

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Esko Elomaa

Finnish Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Forrest G. Hall

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David E. Knapp

Carnegie Institution for Science

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge