Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John V. Foster is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John V. Foster.


25th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference | 2006

AirSTAR: A UAV Platform for Flight Dynamics and Control System Testing

Thomas L. Jordan; John V. Foster; Roger M. Bailey; Christine M. Belcastro

As part of the NASA Aviation Safety Program at Langley Research Center, a dynamically scaled unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and associated ground based control system are being developed to investigate dynamics modeling and control of large transport vehicles in upset conditions. The UAV is a 5.5% (seven foot wingspan), twin turbine, generic transport aircraft with a sophisticated instrumentation and telemetry package. A ground based, real-time control system is located inside an operations vehicle for the research pilot and associated support personnel. The telemetry system supports over 70 channels of data plus video for the downlink and 30 channels for the control uplink. Data rates are in excess of 200 Hz. Dynamic scaling of the UAV, which includes dimensional, weight, inertial, actuation, and control system scaling, is required so that the sub-scale vehicle will realistically simulate the flight characteristics of the full-scale aircraft. This testbed will be utilized to validate modeling methods, flight dynamics characteristics, and control system designs for large transport aircraft, with the end goal being the development of technologies to reduce the fatal accident rate due to loss-of-control.


AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference | 2010

Aircraft Loss-of-Control Accident Analysis

Christine M. Belcastro; John V. Foster

Loss of control remains one of the largest contributors to fatal aircraft accidents worldwide. Aircraft loss-of-control accidents are complex in that they can result from numerous causal and contributing factors acting alone or (more often) in combination. Hence, there is no single intervention strategy to prevent these accidents. To gain a better understanding into aircraft loss-of-control events and possible intervention strategies, this paper presents a detailed analysis of loss-of-control accident data (predominantly from Part 121), including worst case combinations of causal and contributing factors and their sequencing. Future potential risks are also considered.


AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit | 2005

Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Large Transport Airplanes in Upset Conditions

John V. Foster; Kevin Cunningham; Charles M. Fremaux; Gautam H. Shah; Eric C. Stewart; Robert A. Rivers; James E. Wilborn; William Gato

As part of NASAs Aviation Safety and Security Program, research has been in progress to develop aerodynamic modeling methods for simulations that accurately predict the flight dynamics characteristics of large transport airplanes in upset conditions. The motivation for this research stems from the recognition that simulation is a vital tool for addressing loss-of-control accidents, including applications to pilot training, accident reconstruction, and advanced control system analysis. The ultimate goal of this effort is to contribute to the reduction of the fatal accident rate due to loss-of-control. Research activities have involved accident analyses, wind tunnel testing, and piloted simulation. Results have shown that significant improvements in simulation fidelity for upset conditions, compared to current training simulations, can be achieved using state-of-the-art wind tunnel testing and aerodynamic modeling methods. This paper provides a summary of research completed to date and includes discussion on key technical results, lessons learned, and future research needs.


AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit | 2004

Defining Commercial Transport Loss-of-Control: A Quantitative Approach

James E. Wilborn; John V. Foster

Loss-of-control (LOC) has contributed to more fatal commercial airliner accidents and related loss of life than any other factor during the last ten years of worldwide operations. In 1997, the Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) designated LOC as one of three major areas of concern in commercial aviation safety, and launched an industry-wide effort to define its causes and develop interventions to reduce its occurrence. But what constitutes “loss-of-control”? The question is not merely academic – the statistical nature of accident analysis requires that investigators group accidents by category. In some cases, the distinction between LOC and other categories, such as Controlled Flight into Terrain or Approach and Landing Operations, is unclear. In others, LOC is undoubtedly a factor, but its specific characteristics are so complex that they make analysis difficult. Consequently, investigators have called for the development of quantitative LOC measurements and criteria. In 2000, the Boeing Company and the NASA Langley Research Center jointly developed a quantitative set of metrics for defining LOC through a NASA-funded partnership under the Aviation Safety and Security Program. These metrics take the form of five envelopes relating to airplane flight dynamics, aerodynamics, structural integrity, and flight control use. These envelopes have been employed successfully in ongoing NASABoeing LOC research to indicate in a measurable sense whether LOC was a factor in an event, and to determine its onset and severity. When these criteria are used in conjunction with data from LOC events and aggressive flight test maneuvers, it becomes evident that the excursion of three or more envelopes is a reliable, quantitative indication of LOC. Furthermore, this numerical methodology can reveal new insight into the circumstances involved in LOC events, providing a valuable tool for investigators seeking viable safety interventions to reduce their occurrence.


AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit | 2008

Practical Application of a Subscale Transport Aircraft for Flight Research in Control Upset and Failure Conditions

Kevin Cunningham; John V. Foster; Eugene A. Morelli; Austin M. Murch

Over the past decade, the goal of reducing the fatal accident rate of large transport aircraft has resulted in research aimed at the problem of aircraft loss-of-control. Starting in 1999, the NASA Aviation Safety Program initiated research that included vehicle dynamics modeling, system health monitoring, and reconfigurable control systems focused on flight regimes beyond the normal flight envelope. In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on adaptive control technologies for recovery from control upsets or failures including damage scenarios. As part of these efforts, NASA has developed the Airborne Subscale Transport Aircraft Research (AirSTAR) flight facility to allow flight research and validation, and system testing for flight regimes that are considered too risky for full-scale manned transport airplane testing. The AirSTAR facility utilizes dynamically-scaled vehicles that enable the application of subscale flight test results to full scale vehicles. This paper describes the modeling and simulation approach used for AirSTAR vehicles that supports the goals of efficient, low-cost and safe flight research in abnormal flight conditions. Modeling of aerodynamics, controls, and propulsion will be discussed as well as the application of simulation to flight control system development, test planning, risk mitigation, and flight research.


AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference | 2014

Preliminary Analysis of Aircraft Loss of Control Accidents: Worst Case Precursor Combinations and Temporal Sequencing

Christine M. Belcastro; Loren Groff; Richard L. Newman; John V. Foster; Dennis H. Crider; David H. Klyde; A. McCall Huston

Aircraft loss of control (LOC) is a leading cause of fatal accidents across all transport airplane and operational classes, and can result from a wide spectrum of hazards, often occurring in combination. Technologies developed for LOC prevention and recovery must therefore be effective under a wide variety of conditions and uncertainties, including multiple hazards, and their validation must provide a means of assessing system effectiveness and coverage of these hazards. This requires the definition of a comprehensive set of LOC test scenarios based on accident and incident data as well as future risks. This paper defines a comprehensive set of accidents and incidents over a recent 15 year period, and presents preliminary analysis results to identify worst-case combinations of causal and contributing factors (i.e., accident precursors) and how they sequence in time. Such analyses can provide insight in developing effective solutions for LOC, and form the basis for developing test scenarios that can be used in evaluating them. Preliminary findings based on the results of this paper indicate that system failures or malfunctions, crew actions or inactions, vehicle impairment conditions, and vehicle upsets contributed the most to accidents and fatalities, followed by inclement weather or atmospheric disturbances and poor visibility. Follow-on research will include finalizing the analysis through a team consensus process, defining future risks, and developing a comprehensive set of test scenarios with correlation to the accidents, incidents, and future risks. Since enhanced engineering simulations are required for batch and piloted evaluations under realistic LOC precursor conditions, these test scenarios can also serve as a high-level requirement for defining the engineering simulation enhancements needed for generating them.


AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit | 2005

Simulation Study of Flap Effects on a Commercial Transport Airplane in Upset Conditions

Kevin Cunningham; John V. Foster; Gautam H. Shah; Eric C. Stewart; Robin N. Ventura; Robert A. Rivers; James E. Wilborn; William Gato

‡§ As part of NASA’s Aviation Safety and Security Program, a simulation study of a twinjet transport airplane crew training simulation was conducted to address fidelity for upset or loss of control conditions and to study the effect of flap configuration in those regimes. Piloted and desktop simulations were used to compare the baseline crew training simulation model with an enhanced aerodynamic model that was developed for high-angle-of-attack conditions. These studies were conducted with various flap configurations and addressed the approach-to-stall, stall, and post-stall flight regimes. The enhanced simulation model showed that flap configuration had a significant effect on the character of departures that occurred during post-stall flight. Preliminary comparisons with flight test data indicate that the enhanced model is a significant improvement over the baseline. Some of the unrepresentative characteristics that are predicted by the baseline crew training simulation for flight in the post-stall regime have been identified. This paper presents preliminary results of this simulation study and discusses key issues regarding predicted flight dynamics characteristics during extreme upset and loss-of-control flight conditions with different flap configurations.


SAE transactions | 2004

Simulation Study of a Commercial Transport Airplane During Stall and Post-Stall Flight

Kevin Cunningham; John V. Foster; Gautam H. Shah; Eric C. Stewart; Robert A. Rivers; James E. Wilborn; William Gato

As part of NASAs Aviation Safety and Security Program, a simulation study of a twin-jet transport aircraft crew training simulation was conducted to address fidelity for upset or loss-of-control flight conditions. Piloted simulation studies were conducted to compare the baseline crew training simulation model with an enhanced aerodynamic model that was developed for high-angle-of-attack conditions. These studies were conducted in a flaps-up configuration and covered the approach-to-stall, stall and post-stall flight regimes. Qualitative pilot comments and preliminary comparison with flight test data indicate that the enhanced model is a significant improvement over the baseline. Some of the significant unrepresentative characteristics that are predicted by the baseline crew training simulation for flight in the post-stall regime have been identified. This paper presents preliminary results of this simulation study and discusses key issues regarding predicted flight dynamics characteristics during loss-of-control flight conditions.


AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit | 2004

Comparison of Rolling Moment Characteristics During Roll Oscillations for a Low and a High Aspect Ratio Configuration

Jay M. Brandon; John V. Foster; Gautam H. Shah; William Gato; James E. Wilborn

Improvements in testing and modeling of nonlinear and unsteady aerodynamic effects for flight dynamics predictions of vehicle performance is critical to enable the design and implementation of new, innovative vehicle concepts. Any configuration which exhibits significant flow separation, nonlinear aerodynamics, control interactions or attempts maneuvering through one or more conditions such as these is, at present, a challenge to test, model or pre dict flight dynamic responses prior to flight. Even in flight test experiments, adequate models are not available to study and characterize the complex nonlinear and time-dependent flow effects occurring during portions of the maneuvering envelope. Traditionally, airplane designs have been conducted to avoid these areas of the flight envelope. Better understanding and characterization of these flight regimes may not only reduce risk and cost of flight test development programs, but also may pave the way for exploitation of those characteristics that increase airplane capabilities. One of the hurdles is that the nonlinear/unsteady effects appear to be configuration dependent. This paper compares some of the dynamic aerodynamic stability characteristics of two very different configurations - representative of a fighter and a transport airplane - during dynamic body- axis roll wind tunnel tests. The fighter model shows significant effects of oscillation frequency which are not as apparent for the transport configuration.


Flight Simulation and Technologies | 1993

Status of the Validation of High-Angle-Of-Attack Nose-Down Pitch Control Margin Design Guidelines

Marilyn E. Ogburn; John V. Foster; Joseph W. Pahle; R. J. Wilson; James B. Lackey

This paper presents a summary of results obtained to date in an ongoing cooperative research program between NASA and the U.S. Navy to develop design criteria for high-angle-of-attack nose- down pitch control for combat aircraft. A fundamental design consideration for aircraft incorporating relaxed static stability in pitch is the level of stability which achieves a proper balance between high- speed performance considerations and low-speed requirements for maneuvering at high angles of attack. A comprehensive data base of piloted simulation results was generated for parametric variations of critical parameters affecting nose-down control capability. The results showed a strong correlation of pilot rating to the short-term pitch response for nose-down commands applied at high- angle-of-attack conditions. Using these data, candidate design guidelines and flight demonstration requirements were defined. Full- scale flight testing to validate the research methodology and proposed guidelines is in progress, some preliminary results of which are reviewed.

Collaboration


Dive into the John V. Foster's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ersin Ancel

Old Dominion University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David E. Cox

Langley Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge