Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John W.M. Martens is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John W.M. Martens.


Nature | 2012

The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer

Philip Stephens; Patrick Tarpey; Helen Davies; Peter Van Loo; Christopher Greenman; David C. Wedge; Serena Nik-Zainal; Sancha Martin; Ignacio Varela; Graham R. Bignell; Lucy R. Yates; Elli Papaemmanuil; David Beare; Adam Butler; Angela Cheverton; John Gamble; Jonathan Hinton; Mingming Jia; Alagu Jayakumar; David Jones; Calli Latimer; King Wai Lau; Stuart McLaren; David J. McBride; Andrew Menzies; Laura Mudie; Keiran Raine; Roland Rad; Michael Spencer Chapman; Jon W. Teague

All cancers carry somatic mutations in their genomes. A subset, known as driver mutations, confer clonal selective advantage on cancer cells and are causally implicated in oncogenesis, and the remainder are passenger mutations. The driver mutations and mutational processes operative in breast cancer have not yet been comprehensively explored. Here we examine the genomes of 100 tumours for somatic copy number changes and mutations in the coding exons of protein-coding genes. The number of somatic mutations varied markedly between individual tumours. We found strong correlations between mutation number, age at which cancer was diagnosed and cancer histological grade, and observed multiple mutational signatures, including one present in about ten per cent of tumours characterized by numerous mutations of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides. Driver mutations were identified in several new cancer genes including AKT2, ARID1B, CASP8, CDKN1B, MAP3K1, MAP3K13, NCOR1, SMARCD1 and TBX3. Among the 100 tumours, we found driver mutations in at least 40 cancer genes and 73 different combinations of mutated cancer genes. The results highlight the substantial genetic diversity underlying this common disease.


Cell | 2012

Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers.

Serena Nik-Zainal; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Christopher Greenman; Keiran Raine; David Jones; Jonathan Hinton; John D Marshall; Lucy Stebbings; Andrew Menzies; Sancha Martin; Kenric Leung; Lina Chen; Catherine Leroy; Manasa Ramakrishna; Richard Rance; King Wai Lau; Laura Mudie; Ignacio Varela; David J. McBride; Graham R. Bignell; Susanna L. Cooke; Adam Shlien; John Gamble; Ian Whitmore; Mark Maddison; Patrick Tarpey; Helen Davies; Elli Papaemmanuil

Summary All cancers carry somatic mutations. The patterns of mutation in cancer genomes reflect the DNA damage and repair processes to which cancer cells and their precursors have been exposed. To explore these mechanisms further, we generated catalogs of somatic mutation from 21 breast cancers and applied mathematical methods to extract mutational signatures of the underlying processes. Multiple distinct single- and double-nucleotide substitution signatures were discernible. Cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibited a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions. Complex relationships between somatic mutation prevalence and transcription were detected. A remarkable phenomenon of localized hypermutation, termed “kataegis,” was observed. Regions of kataegis differed between cancers but usually colocalized with somatic rearrangements. Base substitutions in these regions were almost exclusively of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides. The mechanisms underlying most of these mutational signatures are unknown. However, a role for the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases is proposed. PaperClip


Nature | 2009

Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes.

Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Meng-Lay Lin; Ignacio Varela; Erin Pleasance; Jared T. Simpson; Lucy Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Sarah Edkins; Laura Mudie; Christopher Greenman; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; Jon Teague; King Wai Lau; John Burton; Michael A. Quail; Harold Swerdlow; Carol Churcher; Rachael Natrajan; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; John W.M. Martens; Daniel P. Silver; Anita Langerød; Hege G. Russnes; John A. Foekens; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Laura J. van 't Veer; Andrea L. Richardson; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale

Multiple somatic rearrangements are often found in cancer genomes; however, the underlying processes of rearrangement and their contribution to cancer development are poorly characterized. Here we use a paired-end sequencing strategy to identify somatic rearrangements in breast cancer genomes. There are more rearrangements in some breast cancers than previously appreciated. Rearrangements are more frequent over gene footprints and most are intrachromosomal. Multiple rearrangement architectures are present, but tandem duplications are particularly common in some cancers, perhaps reflecting a specific defect in DNA maintenance. Short overlapping sequences at most rearrangement junctions indicate that these have been mediated by non-homologous end-joining DNA repair, although varying sequence patterns indicate that multiple processes of this type are operative. Several expressed in-frame fusion genes were identified but none was recurrent. The study provides a new perspective on cancer genomes, highlighting the diversity of somatic rearrangements and their potential contribution to cancer development.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2009

Anti-Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Antibodies and the Detection of Circulating Normal-Like Breast Tumor Cells

Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Jaco Kraan; Joan Bolt; Petra van der Spoel; Fons Elstrodt; Mieke Schutte; John W.M. Martens; Jan-Willem Gratama; Stefan Sleijfer; John A. Foekens

Identification of specific subtypes of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of cancer patients can provide information about the biology of metastasis and improve patient management. However, to be effective, the method used to identify circulating tumor cells must detect all tumor cell types. We investigated whether the five subtypes of human breast cancer cells that have been defined by global gene expression profiling—normal-like, basal, HER2-positive, and luminal A and B—were identified by CellSearch, a US Food and Drug Administration–approved test that uses antibodies against the cell surface–expressed epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) to isolate circulating tumor cells. We used global gene expression profiling to determine the subtypes of a well-defined panel of 34 human breast cancer cell lines (15 luminal, nine normal-like, five basal-like, and five Her2-positive). We mixed 50-150 cells from 10 of these cell lines with 7.5 mL of blood from a single healthy human donor, and the mixtures were subjected to the CellSearch test to isolate the breast cancer cells. We found that the CellSearch isolation method, which uses EpCAM on the surface of circulating tumor cells for cell isolation, did not recognize, in particular, normal-like breast cancer cells, which in general have aggressive features. New tests that include antibodies that specifically recognize normal-like breast tumor cells but not cells of hematopoietic origin are needed.


Nature | 2016

Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences

Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen Davies; Johan Staaf; Manasa Ramakrishna; Dominik Glodzik; Xueqing Zou; Inigo Martincorena; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Sancha Martin; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Young Seok Ju; Michiel M. Smid; Arie B. Brinkman; Sandro Morganella; Miriam Ragle Aure; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Anita Langerød; Markus Ringnér; Sung-Min Ahn; Sandrine Boyault; Jane E. Brock; Annegien Broeks; Adam Butler; Christine Desmedt; Luc Dirix; Serge Dronov; Aquila Fatima; John A. Foekens; Moritz Gerstung

We analysed whole genome sequences of 560 breast cancers to advance understanding of the driver mutations conferring clonal advantage and the mutational processes generating somatic mutations. 93 protein-coding cancer genes carried likely driver mutations. Some non-coding regions exhibited high mutation frequencies but most have distinctive structural features probably causing elevated mutation rates and do not harbour driver mutations. Mutational signature analysis was extended to genome rearrangements and revealed 12 base substitution and six rearrangement signatures. Three rearrangement signatures, characterised by tandem duplications or deletions, appear associated with defective homologous recombination based DNA repair: one with deficient BRCA1 function; another with deficient BRCA1 or BRCA2 function; the cause of the third is unknown. This analysis of all classes of somatic mutation across exons, introns and intergenic regions highlights the repertoire of cancer genes and mutational processes operative, and progresses towards a comprehensive account of the somatic genetic basis of breast cancer.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2008

Four miRNAs associated with aggressiveness of lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer

John A. Foekens; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Marcel Smid; Maxime P. Look; Vanja de Weerd; Antonius W. M. Boersma; J.G.M. Klijn; Erik A.C. Wiemer; John W.M. Martens

In this study, we quantified 249 mature micro-RNA (miRNA) transcripts in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) primary breast tumors of patients with lymph node-negative (LNN) disease to identify miRNAs associated with metastatic capability. In addition, the prognostic value of the candidate miRNAs was determined in ER−/LNN breast cancer. Unsupervised analysis in a prescreening set of 38 patients identified three subgroups predominantly driven by three miRNA signatures: an ER-driven luminal B-associated miRNA signature, a stromal miRNA signature, and an overexpressed miRNA cluster located on chromosome 19q23, but these intrinsic miRNA signatures were not associated with tumor aggressiveness. Supervised analysis in the initial subset and subsequent analysis in additional tumors significantly linked four miRNAs (miR-7, miR-128a, miR-210, and miR-516–3p) to ER+/LNN breast cancer aggressiveness (n = 147) and one miRNA (miR-210) to metastatic capability in ER−/LNN breast cancer (n = 114) and in the clinically important triple-negative subgroup (n = 69) (all P < 0.05). Bioinformatic analysis coupled miR-210 to hypoxia/VEGF signaling, miR-7 and miR-516–3p to cell cycle progression and chromosomal instability, and miR-128a to cytokine signaling. In conclusion, our work connects four miRNAs to breast cancer progression and to several distinct biological processes involved therein.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

Genes Associated With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone

Marcel Smid; Yixin Wang; J.G.M. Klijn; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Yi Zhang; David Atkins; John W.M. Martens; John A. Foekens

PURPOSE The biology of tumors relapsing to bone is poorly understood. In this study, we initiated a search for genes that are implicated in tumors relapsing to bone in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 107 primary breast tumors in patients who were all lymph node negative at the time of diagnosis and all had experienced relapse. Total RNA isolated from frozen tumor samples was used to gather gene expression data using oligo microarrays. RESULTS A panel of 69 genes was found significantly differentially expressed between patients who experienced relapse to bone versus those who experienced relapse elsewhere in the body. The most differentially expressed gene, TFF1, was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in an independent cohort (n = 122; P = .0015). Our differentially expressed genes, combined with a recently reported gene set relevant to tumors relapsing to bone in an animal model system, pointed to the involvement of the fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling pathway in preference of tumor cells that relapse to bone. Given that patients who experience relapse to bone may benefit from bisphosphonate therapy, we developed a classifier of 31 genes, which in an independent validation set correctly predicts all tumors relapsing to bone with a specificity of 50%. CONCLUSION Our study identifies a panel of genes relevant to bone metastasis in breast cancer. The subsequently developed classifier of tumors relapsing to bone could, after thorough confirmation on an extended number of independent samples, and in combination with our previously developed high-risk profile, provide a diagnostic tool for the recommendation of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy in addition to endocrine therapy or chemotherapy.


Genome Research | 2013

CCAT2, a novel noncoding RNA mapping to 8q24, underlies metastatic progression and chromosomal instability in colon cancer

Hui Ling; Riccardo Spizzo; Yaser Atlasi; Milena S. Nicoloso; Masayoshi Shimizu; Roxana S. Redis; Naohiro Nishida; Roberta Gafà; Jian Song; Zhiyi Guo; Cristina Ivan; Elisa Barbarotto; Ingrid de Vries; Xinna Zhang; Manuela Ferracin; Mike Churchman; Janneke F. van Galen; Berna Beverloo; Maryam Shariati; Franziska Haderk; Marcos R. Estecio; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Gijs A. Patijn; D. C. Gotley; Vikas Bhardwaj; Imad Shureiqi; Subrata Sen; Asha S. Multani; James W. Welsh; Ken Yamamoto

The functional roles of SNPs within the 8q24 gene desert in the cancer phenotype are not yet well understood. Here, we report that CCAT2, a novel long noncoding RNA transcript (lncRNA) encompassing the rs6983267 SNP, is highly overexpressed in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer and promotes tumor growth, metastasis, and chromosomal instability. We demonstrate that MYC, miR-17-5p, and miR-20a are up-regulated by CCAT2 through TCF7L2-mediated transcriptional regulation. We further identify the physical interaction between CCAT2 and TCF7L2 resulting in an enhancement of WNT signaling activity. We show that CCAT2 is itself a WNT downstream target, which suggests the existence of a feedback loop. Finally, we demonstrate that the SNP status affects CCAT2 expression and the risk allele G produces more CCAT2 transcript. Our results support a new mechanism of MYC and WNT regulation by the novel lncRNA CCAT2 in colorectal cancer pathogenesis, and provide an alternative explanation of the SNP-conferred cancer risk.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2011

mRNA and microRNA expression profiles in circulating tumor cells and primary tumors of metastatic breast cancer patients

Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Bianca Mostert; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Dieter Peeters; Felix E. de Jongh; Jacqueline M.L. Stouthard; Luc Dirix; Peter A. van Dam; Anne van Galen; Vanja de Weerd; Jaco Kraan; Petra van der Spoel; Raquel Ramírez-Moreno; Carolien H.M. van Deurzen; Marcel Smid; Jack Yu; John Jiang; Yixin Wang; Jan W. Gratama; Stefan Sleijfer; John A. Foekens; John W.M. Martens

Purpose: Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTC) holds great promise. Unfortunately, routinely isolated CTC fractions currently still contain contaminating leukocytes, which makes CTC-specific molecular characterization extremely challenging. In this study, we determined mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) expression of potentially CTC-specific genes that are considered to be clinically relevant in breast cancer. Experimental Design: CTCs were isolated with the epithelial cell adhesion molecule–based CellSearch Profile Kit. Selected genes were measured by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR in CTCs of 50 metastatic breast cancer patients collected before starting first-line systemic therapy in blood from 53 healthy blood donors (HBD) and in primary tumors of 8 of the patients. The molecular profiles were associated with CTC counts and clinical parameters and compared with the profiles generated from the corresponding primary tumors. Results: We identified 55 mRNAs and 10 miRNAs more abundantly expressed in samples from 32 patients with at least 5 CTCs in 7.5 mL of blood compared with samples from 9 patients without detectable CTCs and HBDs. Clustering analysis resulted in 4 different patient clusters characterized by 5 distinct gene clusters. Twice the number of patients from cluster 2 to 4 had developed both visceral and nonvisceral metastases. Comparing transcript levels in CTCs with those measured in corresponding primary tumors showed clinically relevant discrepancies in estrogen receptor and HER2 levels. Conclusions: Our study shows that molecular profiling of low numbers of CTCs in a high background of leukocytes is feasible and shows promise for further studies on the clinical relevance of molecular characterization of CTCs. Clin Cancer Res; 17(11); 3600–18. ©2011 AACR.


Cancer Research | 2010

FOXC1 Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker with Functional Significance in Basal-like Breast Cancer

Partha Ray; Jinhua Wang; Ying Qu; Myung Shin Sim; Jaime Shamonki; Sanjay P. Bagaria; Xing Ye; Bingya Liu; David Elashoff; Dave S.B. Hoon; Michael A. Walter; John W.M. Martens; Andrea L. Richardson; Armando E. Giuliano; Xiaojiang Cui

Gene expression signatures for a basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) subtype have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, but a molecular basis for this disease remains unclear. Here, we report overexpression of the transcription factor FOXC1 as a consistent feature of BLBC compared with other molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Elevated FOXC1 expression predicted poor overall survival in BLBC (P = 0.0001), independently of other clinicopathologic prognostic factors including lymph node status, along with a higher incidence of brain metastasis (P = 0.02) and a shorter brain metastasis-free survival in lymph node-negative patients (P < 0.0001). Ectopic overexpression of FOXC1 in breast cancer cells increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, whereas shRNA-mediated FOXC1 knockdown yielded opposite effects. Our findings identify FOXC1 as a theranostic biomarker that is specific for BLBC, offering not only a potential prognostic candidate but also a potential molecular therapeutic target in this breast cancer subtype.

Collaboration


Dive into the John W.M. Martens's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Foekens

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anieta M. Sieuwerts

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcel Smid

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Sleijfer

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maxime P. Look

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vanja de Weerd

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul N. Span

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arzu Umar

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bianca Mostert

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge