Jon R. Lorsch

The Mechanism of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation: New Insights and Challenges

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is a highly regulated and complex stage of gene expression. It requires the action of at least 12 initiation factors, many of which are known to be the targets of regulatory pathways. Here we review our current understanding of the molecular mechanics of eukaryotic translation initiation, focusing on recent breakthroughs from in vitro and in vivo studies. We also identify important unanswered questions that will require new ideas and techniques to solve.

A mechanistic overview of translation initiation in eukaryotes

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is a complex and highly regulated process requiring the action of at least 12 protein factors. The pathway is distinguished by the formation of a pre-initiation complex that recruits the 5′ end of the mRNA and scans along it to locate the start codon. During the past decade, a combination of genetics, biochemistry and structural studies has begun to illuminate key molecular events in this critical phase of gene expression. Here, we outline our current understanding of eukaryotic translation initiation and discuss important outstanding challenges.

RNA Chaperones Exist and DEAD Box Proteins Get a Life

The RNA chaperone hypothesis suggests the existence of proteins that resolve misfolded RNA structures in vivo. A recent study has found an RNA-dependent ATPase that functions in this manner.

Development and characterization of a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system.

To provide a bridge between in vivo and in vitro studies of eukaryotic translation initiation, we have developed a reconstituted translation initiation system using components from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have purified a minimal set of initiation factors (elFs) that, together with yeast 80S ribosomes, GTP, and initiator methionyl-tRNA, are sufficient to assemble active initiation complexes on a minimal mRNA template. The kinetics of various steps in the pathway of initiation complex assembly and the formation of the first peptide bond in vitro have been explored. The formation of active initiation complexes in this system is dependent on ribosomes, mRNA, Met-tRNAi, GTP hydrolysis, elF1, elF1A, elF2, elF5, and elF5B. Our data indicate that elF1 and elF1A both facilitate the binding of the elF2 x GTP x Met-tRNAi complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit to form the 43S complex. elF5 stimulates a step after 43S complex formation, consistent with its proposed role in activating GTP hydrolysis by elF2 upon initiation codon recognition. The presence of elF5B is required for the joining of the 40S and 60S subunits to form the 80S initiation complex. The step at which each of these factors acts in this reconstituted system is in agreement with previous data from in vivo studies and work using reconstituted mammalian systems, indicating that the system recapitulates fundamental events in translation initiation in eukaryotic cells. This system should allow us to couple powerful yeast genetic and molecular biological experiments with in vitro kinetic and biophysical experiments, yielding a better understanding of the molecular mechanics of this central, complex process.

Ribozyme catalysis: not different, just worse

Evolution has resoundingly favored protein enzymes over RNA-based catalysts, yet ribozymes occupy important niches in modern cell biology that include the starring role in catalysis of protein synthesis on the ribosome. Recent results from structural and biochemical studies show that natural ribozymes use an impressive range of catalytic mechanisms, beyond metalloenzyme chemistry and analogous to more chemically diverse protein enzymes. These findings make it increasingly possible to compare details of RNA- and protein-based catalysis.

RECONSTITUTION OF YEAST TRANSLATION INITIATION

To facilitate the mechanistic dissection of eukaryotic translation initiation we have reconstituted the steps of this process using purified Saccharomyces cerevisiae components. This system provides a bridge between biochemical studies in vitro and powerful yeast genetic techniques, and complements existing reconstituted mammalian translation systems (Benne and Hershey, 1978; Pestova and Hellen, 2000; Pestova et al., 1998; Trachsel et al., 1977). The following describes methods for synthesizing and purifying the components of the yeast initiation system and assays useful for its characterization.

N- and C-terminal residues of eIF1A have opposing effects on the fidelity of start codon selection

Translation initiation factor eIF1A stimulates preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly and scanning, but the molecular mechanisms of its functions are not understood. We show that the F131A,F133A mutation in the C‐terminal tail (CTT) of eIF1A impairs recruitment of the eIF2‐GTP‐Met‐tRNAiMet ternary complex to 40S subunits, eliminating functional coupling with eIF1. Mutating residues 17–21 in the N‐terminal tail (NTT) of eIF1A also reduces PIC assembly, but in a manner rescued by eIF1. Interestingly, the 131,133 CTT mutation enhances initiation at UUG codons (Sui− phenotype) and decreases leaky scanning at AUG, while the NTT mutation 17–21 suppresses the Sui− phenotypes of eIF5 and eIF2β mutations and increases leaky scanning. These findings and the opposite effects of the mutations on eIF1A binding to reconstituted PICs suggest that the NTT mutations promote an open, scanning‐conducive conformation of the PIC, whereas the CTT mutations 131,133 have the reverse effect. We conclude that tight binding of eIF1A to the PIC is an important determinant of AUG selection and is modulated in opposite directions by residues in the NTT and CTT of eIF1A.

Uncoupling of Initiation Factor eIF5B/IF2 GTPase and Translational Activities by Mutations that Lower Ribosome Affinity

Translation initiation factor eIF5B/IF2 is a GTPase that promotes ribosomal subunit joining. We show that eIF5B mutations in Switch I, an element conserved in all GTP binding domains, impair GTP hydrolysis and general translation but not eIF5B subunit joining function. Intragenic suppressors of the Switch I mutation restore general translation, but not eIF5B GTPase activity. These suppressor mutations reduce the ribosome affinity of eIF5B and increase AUG skipping/leaky scanning. The uncoupling of translation and eIF5B GTPase activity suggests a regulatory rather than mechanical function for eIF5B GTP hydrolysis in translation initiation. The translational defect suggests eIF5B stabilizes Met-tRNA(i)(Met) binding and that GTP hydrolysis by eIF5B is a checkpoint monitoring 80S ribosome assembly in the final step of translation initiation.

Communication between eukaryotic translation initiation factors 1 and 1A on the yeast small ribosomal subunit.

We have used expressed protein ligation to site-specifically label eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) 1 and 1A at their C termini with tetramethyl rhodamine. These fluorescent proteins were used in steady-state anisotropy-based binding experiments to measure the dissociation constants of the factors and the yeast small (40S) ribosomal subunit for the first time. These studies demonstrate that both eIF1 and eIF1A are capable of binding to the 40S subunit in the absence of any other initiation factors or mRNA, arguing against previous suggestions that eIF3 is required for recruitment of eIF1 to the small ribosomal subunit. Strikingly, the data also demonstrate that there is approximately ninefold thermodynamic coupling in the binding of the two factors to the 40S subunit. This indicates that eIF1 and eIF1A communicate with one another when bound to the 40S subunit. Communication between these two factors is likely to be important for coordinating their functions during the initiation process. The data presented here provide a foundation on which to build a quantitative understanding of the network of interactions between these essential factors and the rest of the initiation machinery.

Molecular Architecture of a Eukaryotic Translational Initiation Complex

Introduction Initiation of protein synthesis is a key step in the control of gene expression. In eukaryotes, initiation is a highly complex process that requires almost a dozen protein factors. The last step involves joining of the large and small subunits of the ribosome to form the 80S initiation complex with the transfer RNA (tRNA) in the P-site base paired to the start codon. This step is catalyzed by the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) factor eIF5B. In addition, eIF5B is thought to play a role in ensuring that translation initiation takes place only on mature ribosomes. The complex of the ribosome with eIF5B and initiator tRNA determined by cryo-EM, showing conformational changes in all three components. (A) The structure of the initiation complex of the ribosome with initiation factor eIF5B, initiator tRNA, and mRNA start codon. (B) Comparison with the canonical ribosome (gray) reveals a rotation of the two subunits relative to each other