Jonathan H. Epstein
EcoHealth Alliance
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jonathan H. Epstein.
Environmental Health Perspectives | 2004
Jonathan A. Patz; Peter Daszak; G. M. Tabor; A. Alonso Aguirre; M. Pearl; Jonathan H. Epstein; N. D. Wolfe; A. M. Kilpatrick; J. Foufopoulos; David H. Molyneux; David J. Bradley
Anthropogenic land use changes drive a range of infectious disease outbreaks and emergence events and modify the transmission of endemic infections. These drivers include agricultural encroachment, deforestation, road construction, dam building, irrigation, wetland modification, mining, the concentration or expansion of urban environments, coastal zone degradation, and other activities. These changes in turn cause a cascade of factors that exacerbate infectious disease emergence, such as forest fragmentation, disease introduction, pollution, poverty, and human migration. The Working Group on Land Use Change and Disease Emergence grew out of a special colloquium that convened international experts in infectious diseases, ecology, and environmental health to assess the current state of knowledge and to develop recommendations for addressing these environmental health challenges. The group established a systems model approach and priority lists of infectious diseases affected by ecologic degradation. Policy-relevant levels of the model include specific health risk factors, landscape or habitat change, and institutional (economic and behavioral) levels. The group recommended creating Centers of Excellence in Ecology and Health Research and Training, based at regional universities and/or research institutes with close links to the surrounding communities. The centers’ objectives would be 3-fold: a) to provide information to local communities about the links between environmental change and public health; b) to facilitate fully interdisciplinary research from a variety of natural, social, and health sciences and train professionals who can conduct interdisciplinary research; and c) to engage in science-based communication and assessment for policy making toward sustainable health and ecosystems.
Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2013
Ziad A. Memish; Nischay Mishra; Kevin J. Olival; Shamsudeen F. Fagbo; Vishal Kapoor; Jonathan H. Epstein; Rafat F. Alhakeem; Abdulkareem Durosinloun; Mushabab Al Asmari; Ariful Islam; Amit Kapoor; Thomas Briese; Peter Daszak; Abdullah A. Al Rabeeah; W. Ian Lipkin
The source of human infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus remains unknown. Molecular investigation indicated that bats in Saudi Arabia are infected with several alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses. Virus from 1 bat showed 100% nucleotide identity to virus from the human index case-patient. Bats might play a role in human infection.
Nature | 2013
Xing Yi Ge; Jia Lu Li; Xing Lou Yang; Aleksei A. Chmura; Guangjian Zhu; Jonathan H. Epstein; Jonna A. K. Mazet; Ben Hu; Wei Zhang; Cheng Peng; Yu Ji Zhang; Chu Ming Luo; Bing Tan; Ning Wang; Yan Zhu; Gary Crameri; Shuyi Zhang; Lin-Fa Wang; Peter Daszak; Zhengli Shi
The 2002–3 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was one of the most significant public health events in recent history. An ongoing outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus suggests that this group of viruses remains a key threat and that their distribution is wider than previously recognized. Although bats have been suggested to be the natural reservoirs of both viruses, attempts to isolate the progenitor virus of SARS-CoV from bats have been unsuccessful. Diverse SARS-like coronaviruses (SL-CoVs) have now been reported from bats in China, Europe and Africa, but none is considered a direct progenitor of SARS-CoV because of their phylogenetic disparity from this virus and the inability of their spike proteins to use the SARS-CoV cellular receptor molecule, the human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2). Here we report whole-genome sequences of two novel bat coronaviruses from Chinese horseshoe bats (family: Rhinolophidae) in Yunnan, China: RsSHC014 and Rs3367. These viruses are far more closely related to SARS-CoV than any previously identified bat coronaviruses, particularly in the receptor binding domain of the spike protein. Most importantly, we report the first recorded isolation of a live SL-CoV (bat SL-CoV-WIV1) from bat faecal samples in Vero E6 cells, which has typical coronavirus morphology, 99.9% sequence identity to Rs3367 and uses ACE2 from humans, civets and Chinese horseshoe bats for cell entry. Preliminary in vitro testing indicates that WIV1 also has a broad species tropism. Our results provide the strongest evidence to date that Chinese horseshoe bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-CoV, and that intermediate hosts may not be necessary for direct human infection by some bat SL-CoVs. They also highlight the importance of pathogen-discovery programs targeting high-risk wildlife groups in emerging disease hotspots as a strategy for pandemic preparedness.
Mbio | 2014
Abdulaziz N. Alagaili; Thomas Briese; Nischay Mishra; Vishal Kapoor; Stephen Sameroff; Peter D. Burbelo; E. de Wit; Vincent J. Munster; Lisa E. Hensley; Iyad S. Zalmout; Amit Kapoor; Jonathan H. Epstein; William B. Karesh; Peter Daszak; Osama B. Mohammed; W. I. Lipkin
ABSTRACT The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is proposed to be a zoonotic disease; however, the reservoir and mechanism for transmission of the causative agent, the MERS coronavirus, are unknown. Dromedary camels have been implicated through reports that some victims have been exposed to camels, camels in areas where the disease has emerged have antibodies to the virus, and viral sequences have been recovered from camels in association with outbreaks of the disease among humans. Nonetheless, whether camels mediate transmission to humans is unresolved. Here we provide evidence from a geographic and temporal survey of camels in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that MERS coronaviruses have been circulating in camels since at least 1992, are distributed countrywide, and can be phylogenetically classified into clades that correlate with outbreaks of the disease among humans. We found no evidence of infection in domestic sheep or domestic goats. IMPORTANCE This study was undertaken to determine the historical and current prevalence of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus infection in dromedary camels and other livestock in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where the index case and the majority of cases of MERS have been reported. This study was undertaken to determine the historical and current prevalence of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus infection in dromedary camels and other livestock in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where the index case and the majority of cases of MERS have been reported.
Mbio | 2013
Simon J. Anthony; Jonathan H. Epstein; Kris A. Murray; Isamara Navarrete-Macias; Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio; Alexander Solovyov; Rafael Ojeda-Flores; Nicole C. Arrigo; Ariful Islam; S. A. Khan; Parviez R. Hosseini; Tiffany L. Bogich; Kevin J. Olival; Maria Sanchez-Leon; William B. Karesh; Tracey Goldstein; Stephen P. Luby; Sanchez-Leon Morse; Jonna A. K. Mazet; Peter Daszak; W. Ian Lipkin
ABSTRACT The majority of emerging zoonoses originate in wildlife, and many are caused by viruses. However, there are no rigorous estimates of total viral diversity (here termed “virodiversity”) for any wildlife species, despite the utility of this to future surveillance and control of emerging zoonoses. In this case study, we repeatedly sampled a mammalian wildlife host known to harbor emerging zoonotic pathogens (the Indian Flying Fox, Pteropus giganteus) and used PCR with degenerate viral family-level primers to discover and analyze the occurrence patterns of 55 viruses from nine viral families. We then adapted statistical techniques used to estimate biodiversity in vertebrates and plants and estimated the total viral richness of these nine families in P. giganteus to be 58 viruses. Our analyses demonstrate proof-of-concept of a strategy for estimating viral richness and provide the first statistically supported estimate of the number of undiscovered viruses in a mammalian host. We used a simple extrapolation to estimate that there are a minimum of 320,000 mammalian viruses awaiting discovery within these nine families, assuming all species harbor a similar number of viruses, with minimal turnover between host species. We estimate the cost of discovering these viruses to be ~
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2011
Kim Halpin; Alex D. Hyatt; Rhys Fogarty; Deborah Middleton; John Bingham; Jonathan H. Epstein; Sohayati Abdul Rahman; Tom Hughes; Craig A. Smith; Hume E. Field; Peter Daszak
6.3 billion (or ~
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013
Phenix-Lan Quan; Cadhla Firth; Juliette M. Conte; Simon H. Williams; Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio; Simon J. Anthony; James A. Ellison; Amy T. Gilbert; Ivan V. Kuzmin; Michael Niezgoda; Modupe Osinubi; Sergio Recuenco; Wanda Markotter; Robert F. Breiman; Lems Kalemba; Jean Malekani; Kim A. Lindblade; Melinda K. Rostal; Rafael Ojeda-Flores; Gerardo Suzán; Lora B. Davis; Dianna M. Blau; Albert B. Ogunkoya; Danilo A. Alvarez Castillo; David Moran; Sali Ngam; Dudu Akaibe; Bernard Agwanda; Thomas Briese; Jonathan H. Epstein
1.4 billion for 85% of the total diversity), which if annualized over a 10-year study time frame would represent a small fraction of the cost of many pandemic zoonoses. IMPORTANCE Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in viral discovery efforts. However, most lack rigorous systematic design, which limits our ability to understand viral diversity and its ecological drivers and reduces their value to public health intervention. Here, we present a new framework for the discovery of novel viruses in wildlife and use it to make the first-ever estimate of the number of viruses that exist in a mammalian host. As pathogens continue to emerge from wildlife, this estimate allows us to put preliminary bounds around the potential size of the total zoonotic pool and facilitates a better understanding of where best to allocate resources for the subsequent discovery of global viral diversity. Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in viral discovery efforts. However, most lack rigorous systematic design, which limits our ability to understand viral diversity and its ecological drivers and reduces their value to public health intervention. Here, we present a new framework for the discovery of novel viruses in wildlife and use it to make the first-ever estimate of the number of viruses that exist in a mammalian host. As pathogens continue to emerge from wildlife, this estimate allows us to put preliminary bounds around the potential size of the total zoonotic pool and facilitates a better understanding of where best to allocate resources for the subsequent discovery of global viral diversity.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2014
Raina K. Plowright; Peggy Eby; Peter J. Hudson; Ina Smith; David A. Westcott; W. L. Bryden; Deborah Middleton; Peter A. Reid; Rosemary McFarlane; Gerardo Martin; Gary Tabor; Lee F. Skerratt; Dale L. Anderson; Gary Crameri; David Quammen; David Jordan; Paul Freeman; Lin-Fa Wang; Jonathan H. Epstein; Glenn A. Marsh; Nina Y. Kung; Hamish McCallum
Bats of the genus Pteropus have been identified as the reservoir hosts for the henipaviruses Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV). The aim of these studies was to assess likely mechanisms for henipaviruses transmission from bats. In a series of experiments, Pteropus bats from Malaysia and Australia were inoculated with NiV and HeV, respectively, by natural routes of infection. Despite an intensive sampling strategy, no NiV was recovered from the Malaysian bats and HeV was reisolated from only one Australian bat; no disease was seen. These experiments suggest that opportunities for henipavirus transmission may be limited; therefore, the probability of a spillover event is low. For spillover to occur, a range of conditions and events must coincide. An alternate assessment framework is required if we are to fully understand how this reservoir host maintains and transmits not only these but all viruses with which it has been associated.
Journal of the Royal Society Interface | 2012
Juliet R. C. Pulliam; Jonathan H. Epstein; Jonathan Dushoff; Sohayati Abdul Rahman; Michel Bunning; Aziz A. Jamaluddin; Alex D. Hyatt; Hume E. Field; Andrew P. Dobson; Peter Daszak
Although there are over 1,150 bat species worldwide, the diversity of viruses harbored by bats has only recently come into focus as a result of expanded wildlife surveillance. Such surveys are of importance in determining the potential for novel viruses to emerge in humans, and for optimal management of bats and their habitats. To enhance our knowledge of the viral diversity present in bats, we initially surveyed 415 sera from African and Central American bats. Unbiased high-throughput sequencing revealed the presence of a highly diverse group of bat-derived viruses related to hepaciviruses and pegiviruses within the family Flaviridae. Subsequent PCR screening of 1,258 bat specimens collected worldwide indicated the presence of these viruses also in North America and Asia. A total of 83 bat-derived viruses were identified, representing an infection rate of nearly 5%. Evolutionary analyses revealed that all known hepaciviruses and pegiviruses, including those previously documented in humans and other primates, fall within the phylogenetic diversity of the bat-derived viruses described here. The prevalence, unprecedented viral biodiversity, phylogenetic divergence, and worldwide distribution of the bat-derived viruses suggest that bats are a major and ancient natural reservoir for both hepaciviruses and pegiviruses and provide insights into the evolutionary history of hepatitis C virus and the human GB viruses.
Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2008
Jonathan H. Epstein; Vibhu Prakash; Craig S. Smith; Peter Daszak; Amanda McLaughlin; Greer Meehan; Hume E. Field; Andrew A. Cunningham
Viruses that originate in bats may be the most notorious emerging zoonoses that spill over from wildlife into domestic animals and humans. Understanding how these infections filter through ecological systems to cause disease in humans is of profound importance to public health. Transmission of viruses from bats to humans requires a hierarchy of enabling conditions that connect the distribution of reservoir hosts, viral infection within these hosts, and exposure and susceptibility of recipient hosts. For many emerging bat viruses, spillover also requires viral shedding from bats, and survival of the virus in the environment. Focusing on Hendra virus, but also addressing Nipah virus, Ebola virus, Marburg virus and coronaviruses, we delineate this cross-species spillover dynamic from the within-host processes that drive virus excretion to land-use changes that increase interaction among species. We describe how land-use changes may affect co-occurrence and contact between bats and recipient hosts. Two hypotheses may explain temporal and spatial pulses of virus shedding in bat populations: episodic shedding from persistently infected bats or transient epidemics that occur as virus is transmitted among bat populations. Management of livestock also may affect the probability of exposure and disease. Interventions to decrease the probability of virus spillover can be implemented at multiple levels from targeting the reservoir host to managing recipient host exposure and susceptibility.