Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jonathan Piper is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jonathan Piper.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom.

Maria Werner-Wasik; Arden Nelson; Walter Choi; Yoshio Arai; Peter Faulhaber; P. Kang; Fabio Almeida; Ying Xiao; Nitin Ohri; Kristin D. Brockway; Jonathan Piper; Aaron Nelson

PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy and consistency of a gradient-based positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation method, GRADIENT, compared with manual (MANUAL) and constant threshold (THRESHOLD) methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Contouring accuracy was evaluated with sphere phantoms and clinically realistic Monte Carlo PET phantoms of the thorax. The sphere phantoms were 10-37 mm in diameter and were acquired at five institutions emulating clinical conditions. One institution also acquired a sphere phantom with multiple source-to-background ratios of 2:1, 5:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 70:1. One observer segmented (contoured) each sphere with GRADIENT and THRESHOLD from 25% to 50% at 5% increments. Subsequently, seven physicians segmented 31 lesions (7-264 mL) from 25 digital thorax phantoms using GRADIENT, THRESHOLD, and MANUAL. RESULTS For spheres <20 mm in diameter, GRADIENT was the most accurate with a mean absolute % error in diameter of 8.15% (10.2% SD) compared with 49.2% (51.1% SD) for 45% THRESHOLD (p < 0.005). For larger spheres, the methods were statistically equivalent. For varying source-to-background ratios, GRADIENT was the most accurate for spheres >20 mm (p < 0.065) and <20 mm (p < 0.015). For digital thorax phantoms, GRADIENT was the most accurate (p < 0.01), with a mean absolute % error in volume of 10.99% (11.9% SD), followed by 25% THRESHOLD at 17.5% (29.4% SD), and MANUAL at 19.5% (17.2% SD). GRADIENT had the least systematic bias, with a mean % error in volume of -0.05% (16.2% SD) compared with 25% THRESHOLD at -2.1% (34.2% SD) and MANUAL at -16.3% (20.2% SD; p value <0.01). Interobserver variability was reduced using GRADIENT compared with both 25% THRESHOLD and MANUAL (p value <0.01, Levenes test). CONCLUSION GRADIENT was the most accurate and consistent technique for target volume contouring. GRADIENT was also the most robust for varying imaging conditions. GRADIENT has the potential to play an important role for tumor delineation in radiation therapy planning and response assessment.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009

PET Tumor Segmentation: Multi-observer Validation of a Gradient-Based Method using a NSCLC PET Phantom

Arden Nelson; Maria Werner-Wasik; Walter Choi; Yoshio Arai; Peter Faulhaber; Nitin Ohri; Jonathan Piper; Kristin D. Brockway; Aaron Nelson


Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts | 2009

PET tumor segmentation: Validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC PET phantom

Arden Nelson; Kristin D. Brockway; Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Atlas-based Segmentation: Evaluation of a Multi-atlas Approach for Prostate Cancer

Sara Pirozzi; Marri Horvat; Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper


Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts | 2007

PROBABILISTIC HUMAN BRAIN ATLAS FOR FUNCTIONAL IMAGING: COMPARISON TO SINGLE BRAIN ATLASES

Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper; Robert P. Friedland; Barbara Freeman


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011

Atlas-based Segmentation: Comparison of Multiple Segmentation Approaches for Lymph Level Targets and Normal Structures in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC)

Sara Pirozzi; Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009

PET Registration Methods and Dosimetric Consequences

G. Kubicek; S. Fogh; Jonathan Piper; Ying Xiao; Mitchell Machtay


Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts | 2013

Evaluation of an automated atlas-based method for DaTscan™ analysis

Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper; Sara Pirozzi; Zhilei Shen


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013

Comparison of PET Contouring Methods in Patients With Early-Stage Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Pathologic–Imaging Correlation

Maria Werner-Wasik; P. Kang; Walter Choi; Nitin Ohri; Peter Faulhaber; D. Nelson; Arden Nelson; Jonathan Piper; Z. Shen; Sara Pirozzi


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013

Evaluation of Deformable Prostate Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Contouring Methods for Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Sara Pirozzi; Jonathan Piper; Aaron Nelson; Z. Shen; S. Gardner

Collaboration


Dive into the Jonathan Piper's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Faulhaber

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria Werner-Wasik

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nitin Ohri

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Walter Choi

Beth Israel Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yoshio Arai

Beth Israel Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis Nelson

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Kang

Beth Israel Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ying Xiao

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bryan Traughber

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge