Jonathan Piper
Wake Forest University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jonathan Piper.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012
Maria Werner-Wasik; Arden Nelson; Walter Choi; Yoshio Arai; Peter Faulhaber; P. Kang; Fabio Almeida; Ying Xiao; Nitin Ohri; Kristin D. Brockway; Jonathan Piper; Aaron Nelson
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy and consistency of a gradient-based positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation method, GRADIENT, compared with manual (MANUAL) and constant threshold (THRESHOLD) methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Contouring accuracy was evaluated with sphere phantoms and clinically realistic Monte Carlo PET phantoms of the thorax. The sphere phantoms were 10-37 mm in diameter and were acquired at five institutions emulating clinical conditions. One institution also acquired a sphere phantom with multiple source-to-background ratios of 2:1, 5:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 70:1. One observer segmented (contoured) each sphere with GRADIENT and THRESHOLD from 25% to 50% at 5% increments. Subsequently, seven physicians segmented 31 lesions (7-264 mL) from 25 digital thorax phantoms using GRADIENT, THRESHOLD, and MANUAL. RESULTS For spheres <20 mm in diameter, GRADIENT was the most accurate with a mean absolute % error in diameter of 8.15% (10.2% SD) compared with 49.2% (51.1% SD) for 45% THRESHOLD (p < 0.005). For larger spheres, the methods were statistically equivalent. For varying source-to-background ratios, GRADIENT was the most accurate for spheres >20 mm (p < 0.065) and <20 mm (p < 0.015). For digital thorax phantoms, GRADIENT was the most accurate (p < 0.01), with a mean absolute % error in volume of 10.99% (11.9% SD), followed by 25% THRESHOLD at 17.5% (29.4% SD), and MANUAL at 19.5% (17.2% SD). GRADIENT had the least systematic bias, with a mean % error in volume of -0.05% (16.2% SD) compared with 25% THRESHOLD at -2.1% (34.2% SD) and MANUAL at -16.3% (20.2% SD; p value <0.01). Interobserver variability was reduced using GRADIENT compared with both 25% THRESHOLD and MANUAL (p value <0.01, Levenes test). CONCLUSION GRADIENT was the most accurate and consistent technique for target volume contouring. GRADIENT was also the most robust for varying imaging conditions. GRADIENT has the potential to play an important role for tumor delineation in radiation therapy planning and response assessment.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009
Arden Nelson; Maria Werner-Wasik; Walter Choi; Yoshio Arai; Peter Faulhaber; Nitin Ohri; Jonathan Piper; Kristin D. Brockway; Aaron Nelson
Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts | 2009
Arden Nelson; Kristin D. Brockway; Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012
Sara Pirozzi; Marri Horvat; Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper
Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts | 2007
Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper; Robert P. Friedland; Barbara Freeman
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
Sara Pirozzi; Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009
G. Kubicek; S. Fogh; Jonathan Piper; Ying Xiao; Mitchell Machtay
Society of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts | 2013
Aaron Nelson; Jonathan Piper; Sara Pirozzi; Zhilei Shen
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013
Maria Werner-Wasik; P. Kang; Walter Choi; Nitin Ohri; Peter Faulhaber; D. Nelson; Arden Nelson; Jonathan Piper; Z. Shen; Sara Pirozzi
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013
Sara Pirozzi; Jonathan Piper; Aaron Nelson; Z. Shen; S. Gardner