Jonathan Thomas

A Comparison of Clozapine and Haloperidol in Hospitalized Patients with Refractory Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND Clozapine, a relatively expensive antipsychotic drug, is widely used to treat patients with refractory schizophrenia. It has a low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects but may cause agranulocytosis. There have been no long-term assessments of its effect on symptoms, social functioning, and the use and cost of health care. METHODS We conducted a randomized, one-year, double-blind comparative study of clozapine (in 205 patients) and haloperidol (in 218 patients) at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers. All participants had refractory schizophrenia and had been hospitalized for the disease for 30 to 364 days in the previous year. All patients received case-management and social-rehabilitation services, as clinically indicated. RESULTS In the clozapine group, 117 patients (57 percent) continued their assigned treatment for the entire year, as compared with 61 (28 percent) of the patients in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). As judged according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia, patients in the clozapine group had 5.4 percent lower symptom levels than those in the haloperidol group at all follow-up evaluations (mean score, 79.1 vs. 83.6; P=0.02). The differences on a quality-of-life scale were not significant in the intention-to-treat analysis, but they were significant among patients who did not cross over to the other treatment (P=0.003). Over a one-year period, patients assigned to clozapine had fewer mean days of hospitalization for psychiatric reasons than patients assigned to haloperidol (143.8 vs. 168.1 days, P=0.03) and used more outpatient services (133.6 vs. 97.9 units of service, P=0.03). The total per capita costs to society were high --

Predictors of differential response to clozapine and haloperidol

58,151 in the clozapine group and

Quality of Life in Schizophrenia: A Comparison of Instruments

60,885 in the haloperidol group (P=0.41). The per capita costs of antipsychotic drugs were

Medication continuation and compliance: a comparison of patients treated with clozapine and haloperidol.

3,199 in the clozapine group and

Cost-effectiveness of Clozapine in Patients With High and Low Levels of Hospital Use

367 in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). Patients assigned to clozapine had less tardive dyskinesia and fewer extrapyramidal side effects. Agranulocytosis developed in three patients in the clozapine group; all recovered fully. CONCLUSIONS For patients with refractory schizophrenia and high levels of hospital use, clozapine was somewhat more effective than haloperidol and had fewer side effects and similar overall costs.

Does Participation in Psychosocial Treatment Augment the Benefit of Clozapine

BACKGROUND We sought to identify baseline predictors of response to clozapine. METHODS Data were from a 15-site randomized clinical trial comparing clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia (n = 423). Three-month outcomes were analyzed with the full sample (n = 368 due to attrition). Because of crossovers, analyses of 12-month outcomes were conducted with crossovers excluded (n = 291). Clinical predictors included age, race, diagnosis (current substance abuse, paranoid subtype of schizophrenia, or depressive syndrome), severity of symptoms, quality of life, age at onset of schizophrenia, extrapyramidal symptoms, and VA compensation payment. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the interaction of treatment condition and each of these variables in predicting outcomes for symptoms, quality of life, side effects, and days hospitalized. RESULTS Patients with higher quality of life at baseline (p = .04) and higher symptoms (p = .02) had relatively smaller declines in hospital days at 6 months. In the 12-month sample patients with higher levels of symptoms had greater symptom reductions at 12 months (p = .03) and greater improvement in quality of life (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS Although high levels of symptoms were associated with greater improvement on clozapine, these findings are not robust enough to suggest that any specific, clinically defined subgroup of refractory patients should be preferentially targeted for clozapine treatment.