Jonathan Wynn

QT prolongation and the antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone

Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic agent known to cause prolongation of action potential duration which is reflected in the electrocardiogram as a prolongation of the QT interval. Prolongation of the QT interval in patients dying suddenly was compared with that in patients who remained alive to determine whether a difference existed between these two groups. The electrocardiogram and amiodarone levels were evaluated in 33 patients who presented with cardiac arrest and symptomatic ventricular tachycardia in whom no other antiarrhythmic agent was found effective in preventing induction of ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiologic studies. There were 30 men and 3 women (mean age 52 +/- 10 years). Twenty-three are alive after a mean follow-up period of 12 +/- 7 months. Ten died: six suddenly, three of non-cardiac causes and one of congestive heart failure. Using a two-way analysis of variance, the percent change in QT, QTc, JT and JTc intervals before and after amiodarone therapy was analyzed. Marked prolongation in the QT interval was present in patients who remained alive with amiodarone therapy. A significant difference in percent QT prolongation was seen between the latter patients and those who died suddenly (p less than 0.005). No difference was observed in the percent change in QRS interval between the two groups. The levels of amiodarone (2.5 versus 3.2 micrograms/ml) and its metabolite (desethylamiodarone) were not significantly different between the living patients and those who died suddenly. These findings suggest that a prolongation of the QT interval may be a marker for the therapeutic antiarrhythmic effect of amiodarone.

Prolonged repolarization: A historical perspective

This symposium will more fully discuss QT prolongation--an area of controversy--prolonged QT syndromes, and new groups of agents that prolong repolarization and the QT interval (calcium blockers and antiarrhythmic agents). This is an important evolving field with old biases confronting a new and more thorough understanding of the phenomenon of prolonged repolarization.

The antiarrhythmic effects of d-sotalol

The antiarrhythmic properties of d-sotalol were studied in 38 patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies. Programmed electrical stimulation studies were performed in 28 men and in 10 women with a mean age of 67 years and a mean ejection fraction of 37 +/- 3%. All patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia while they were off all antiarrhythmic therapy. D-sotalol was given as a 2 mg/kg infusion over 15 minutes and did not significantly change the PR, QRS, or QTc intervals from baseline values in the group as a whole. In the group protected by d-sotalol, the percent change in the QTc interval as well as the percent change in refractoriness was significantly increased as compared to the group not protected. D-sotalol also significantly decreased heart rate. D-sotalol prevented the induction of ventricular tachycardia in 18 of the 38 patients, while significantly slowing the rate of the ventricular tachycardia in the group that could still have tachycardia provoked. Seventeen patients were tested on procainamide and only four were protected, while d-sotalol prevented the induction of ventricular tachycardia in 7 of these 17. Eleven patients were discharged on oral d-sotalol doses ranging from 100 to 400 mg twice daily. One patient died 1 month post discharge due to an acute myocardial infarction, and one patient had a cardiac arrest while on d-sotalol and survived and was switched to amiodarone therapy. The remaining nine patients are alive and well at 14 +/- 3 months. D-sotalol appears to be an effective antiarrhythmic drugs and appears to be well tolerated.

Antiarrhythmic efficacy of ethmozine in patients with ventricular tachycardia as determined by programmed electrical stimulation.

The antiarrhythmic properties of ethmozine were studied in 27 patients with a history of a cardiac arrest or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Programmed electrical stimulation studies were performed in 20 men and seven women with a mean age of 62 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 43%. All patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation while off all antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients were then tested on procainamide if their treatment with this drug orally had not previously failed. Procainamide, 1000 and 1500 mg, was administered intravenously, and ventricular tachycardia could be provoked in 14 of 18 patients. Ethmozine was given in an oral loading regimen starting 24 to 36 hours later. After 500 mg oral ethmozine, patients were given 15 mg/kg ethmozine every 8 hours for seven to nine doses prior to drug testing. Ethmozine did not significantly change the baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and QTc interval from the initial drug-free values. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly prolonged. Seven patients were protected on oral ethmozine; 14 patients still had ventricular tachycardia inducible at programmed electrical stimulation testing, and six patients developed ventricular tachycardia spontaneously on ethmozine and were not tested in the programmed electrical stimulation laboratory. One patient had gastrointestinal complaints and was not discharged on the drug. The five patients who tolerated the oral protocol without side effects and who were protected against programmed stimulation induction of ventricular tachycardia were discharged on oral therapy. One patient on long-term therapy appeared to develop an allergic reaction to the agent with unexplained fevers and was switched to amiodarone therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antiarrhythmic drug efficacy at electrophysiology testing: Predictive effectiveness of procainamide and flecainide

In an effort to assess the ability of procainamide to predict effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents at programmed electrical stimulation (PES) testing, we compared the result of procainamide at PES testing with that of all of the other agents studied. One hundred fifty-three patients underwent PES studies because of either sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Procainamide prevented VT induction in 79 of 153 patients. Seventy-four of the remaining 153 were inducible for VT on procainamide, with 55 of these being protected by another antiarrhythmic agent (p less than 0.001). If procainamide failed to prevent VT induction, other conventional and experimental agents were equally as likely to be effective in preventing VT induction. Analysis of flecainide acetate as a predictor of efficacy was also evaluated. Fifty-five patients received flecainide and 29 of these were protected at PES testing; 26 of these patients were also protected with another agent. When VT was inducible in patients who received flecainide, 15 of these 26 patients were protected by another agent, either conventional or experimental (p less than 0.01). Thus, if procainamide or flecainide prevented VT induction they accurately predicted effectiveness of other drugs; however, when they did not prevent VT induction, they served as a poor predictor of the possible effectiveness of other drugs. Serial drug testing at PES studies with multiple conventional and experimental drugs increases the likelihood of finding an effective antiarrhythmic agent.

Electrophysiologic evaluation of the antiarrhythmic effects of N-acetylprocainamide for ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery disease.

Antiarrhythmic properties of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), an active metabolite of procainamide, were studied in 12 patients with coronary artery disease who presented with cardiac arrest or documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies were performed in 10 men and 2 women, aged 52 to 80 years (mean 63), who had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 16 to 69% (mean 33). All patients tested had inducible VT provoked by PES without antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients were then tested with procainamide, 1,000 mg administered intravenously. VT could be provoked after procainamide treatment in 8 of 10 patients. Twenty-four to 36 hours later NAPA was administered, 18 mg/kg body weight intravenously, and PES was performed after 20 minutes. NAPA did not significantly change heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, electrocardiographic intervals and AH or HV conduction times. The QT interval lengthened, but not significantly. The mean serum NAPA levels were 15.7 +/- 4 micrograms/ml in the group protected by NAPA and 16.2 +/- 4 micrograms/ml in the group not protected by NAPA. Five patients were discharged with NAPA therapy, 1.5 g orally every 8 hours. Two patients have been maintained with chronic NAPA therapy (10 +/- 3 months), and 2 patients had breakthrough VT on follow-up Holter monitoring and alternative therapy was given. One patient died while taking oral therapy. NAPA demonstrates antiarrhythmic efficacy in preventing induction of VT by PES in a high-risk group of patients. During chronic oral therapy in some patients, NAPA appears to be well tolerated, with antiarrhythmic efficacy that may be enhanced with further upward dose titration.

Antiarrhythmic action of bethanidine

Studies were performed in 20 patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) to determine the efficacy of bethanidine compared with procainamide in preventing VT induced by programmed electrical stimulation. Before administering bethanidine, 5 to 10 mg/kg, the patients received 15 mg of protriptyline orally 24 and 2 hours before electrophysiologic studies to prevent the orthostatic hypotensive effects of bethanidine. Sustained VT (VT not spontaneously stopping) was induced in 8 and nonsustained VT (10 beats or more, terminating spontaneously) was induced in 4 patients. Bethanidine, 5 mg/kg, protected in 7 patients, and 10 mg/kg protected 1 additional patient. Procainamide, 1,000 and 1,500 mg intravenously, protected 8 of 16 patients. Bethanidine prevented VT induction in 50% of the patients not protected by procainamide. Bethanidine facilitated VT induction in 3 patients, while procainamide facilitated VT induction in 1 patient. Four patients with symptomatic VT have received bethanidine therapy for an average of 11 +/- 1.3 months, without clinical recurrence of their VT. Concomitant administration of protriptyline attenuated the acute hemodynamic changes caused by bethanidine and chronic combined therapy of protriptyline and bethanidine abolished the severe orthostatic changes in blood pressure caused by bethanidine. These studies show that bethanidine is effective in preventing VT induction and, thus, its use may not be restricted only to cases of primary ventricular fibrillation.

Comparative Efficacy of Pirmenol and Procainamide in a Drug‐Resistant Population with Ventricular Tachycardia

The acute antiarrhythmic properties of pirmenol were studied in 12 patients who failed clinical oral drug therapy with a history of a cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Programmed electrical stimulation studies were performed in ten men and two women with a mean age of 63 ±2 years. All patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation when they were off all antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients were then tested on procainamide, 1000 mg, administered intravenously, and ventricular tachycardia could be provoked in nine of twelve patients. Pirmenol was given intravenously, 1.1 mg/kg bolus followed by 40 μg/kg/min over 40 minutes prior to drug testing. Pirmenol did not significantly change the baseline heart rate, blood pressure, or measured electrocardiographic values from control values. Ten of 12 patients were still inducible to ventricular tachycardia on pirmenol. Procainamide protected one of nine patients against VT induction. In patients still inducible on drug therapy, the VT rate was significantly slowed from 221 beats/min to 166 beats/min on pirmenol and to 200 beats/min on procainamide. The effects of this new antiarrhythmic agent were similar to procainamide in this drug‐resistant study population.

Ethmozine Toxicity: Fever of Unknown Origin

The possible role of DLIS in the regulation of extracellular fluid volume prompted us to examine whether DLIS concentration varied with clinical and biochemical features of disordered volume control. Our observation that DLIS levels are higher in association with ascites and edema and also that they correlate with serum albumin concentration is in keeping with the hypothesis that DLIS has a possible role in regulation of body fluids. The exact nature of DLIS is unknown. Recently, Seccombe and colleagues5 have suggested that DLIS may be related to natriuretic factor(s). It Is not possible, however, to elucidate from the present study whether DLIS is actively involved or is a byproduct of other factors involved in body fluid regulation. REFERENCES

Lorcainide therapy in a cardiac arrest population

Thirty-eight patients with prior history of cardiac arrest underwent programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies and serial drug testing. Lorcainide was tested acutely in all 38 patients and prevented ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction in 14 patients and failed in 24 (efficacy rate 37%). Procainamide had failed clinically (cardiac arrest or breakthrough VT) in 16 patients, seven patients had previously severe adverse side effects, and thus only 15 were tested on procainamide at PES testing with seven protected. Following initial studies, 14 patients were started on lorcainide oral therapy and 24 on other therapy determined effective at PES testing (N-acetylprocainamide-two, flecainide-nine, bethanidine-three, slow-release procainamide hydrochloride-three, quinidine-two, cibenzoline-one, amiodarone-four). After 29 +/- 7 months follow-up, three are alive on lorcainide therapy, five discontinued therapy due to side effects; six died--three sudden deaths (33%) and two cardiac deaths (both myocardial infarctions). Twenty out of 24 patients are alive who were started on PES predicted effective therapy other than lorcainide; four died--three sudden deaths (13%) and one cardiac nonsudden death. Antiarrhythmic therapy guided by PES studies gives overall encouraging results in a cardiac arrest group of patients. Lorcainide, however, is not tolerated well and affords less protection against a sudden death recurrence than is noted in a population on other antiarrhythmic therapy predicted effective at PES testing.