Joo Myung Lee

Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

BACKGROUND The prognostic impact of microvascular status in patients with high fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not clear. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to investigate the implications of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients who underwent FFR measurement. METHODS Patients with high FFR (>0.80) were grouped according to CFR (≤2) and IMR (≥23 U) levels: group A, high CFR with low IMR; group B, high CFR with high IMR; group C, low CFR with low IMR; and group D, low CFR with high IMR. Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) of any death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization was assessed. The median follow-up was 658 days (interquartile range: 503.8 to 1,139.3 days). RESULTS A total of 313 patients (663 vessels) were assessed with FFR, CFR, and IMR. Correlation (r = 0.201; p < 0.001) and categorical agreement (kappa value = 0.178; p < 0.001) between FFR and CFR were modest. Low CFR was associated with higher POCO than high CFR (p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics among groups. Patients with high IMR with low CFR had the highest POCO (p = 0.002). Overt microvascular disease (p = 0.008), multivessel disease (p = 0.033), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.033) were independent predictors of POCO. Inclusion of a physiological index significantly improved the discriminant function of a predictive model (relative integrated discrimination improvement 0.467 [p = 0.037]; category-free net reclassification index 0.648 [p = 0.007]). CONCLUSIONS CFR and IMR improved the risk stratification of patients with high FFR. Low CFR with high IMR was associated with poor prognosis. (Clinical, Physiological and Prognostic Implication of Microvascular Status; NCT02186093).

The Efficacy and Safety of Prone Positional Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Updated Study-Level Meta-Analysis of 11 Randomized Controlled Trials*

Objective:The survival benefit of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome has been a matter of debate. Recent multicenter randomized controlled trials have shown a significant reduction of 28-day and 90-day mortality associated with prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis on this topic and elucidated the effect of prone positioning on overall mortality and associated complications. Data Sources:PubMed, EMBASE, BioMed Central, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings through May 2013. Study Selection:Randomized controlled trial comparing overall mortality of prone-versus-supine positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Data Extraction:Data were extracted for populations, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall mortality, using the longest available follow-up in each study. The odds ratio with 95% CI was the effect measure. Data Synthesis:This analysis included 11 randomized controlled trial, 2,246 total adult patients, and 1,142 patients ventilated in the prone position. Prone positioning during ventilation significantly reduced overall mortality in the random-effect model (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59–0.99; p = 0.039; I2 = 33.7%), and the effects were marked in the subgroup in which the duration of prone positioning was more than 10 hr/session, compared with the subgroup with a short-term duration of prone positioning (odds ratio, 0.62; 9% CI, 0.48–0.79; p = 0.039; pinteraction = 0.015). Prone positioning was significantly associated with pressure ulcers (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18–1.89; p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%) and major airway problems (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.10–2.17; p = 0.012; I2 = 32.7%). Conclusions:Ventilation in the prone position significantly reduced overall mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sufficient duration of prone positioning was significantly associated with a reduction in overall mortality. Prone ventilation was also significantly associated with pressure ulcers and major airway problems.

Comparison Among Drug-Eluting Balloon, Drug-Eluting Stent, and Plain Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis : A Network Meta-Analysis of 11 Randomized, Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed comparing the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons (DEB), drug-eluting stents (DES), or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND Optimal treatment options for ISR have not been well established. METHODS Randomized, controlled trials comparing DEB, DES, and POBA for the treatment of ISR after percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent or DES were included. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The pairwise posterior median odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was the effect measure. RESULTS This analysis included 2,059 patients from 11 RCTs. The risk of TLR was markedly lower in patients treated with DEB (OR: 0.22, 95% CrI: 0.10 to 0.42) or DES (OR: 0.24, 95% CrI: 0.11 to 0.47) than in those treated with POBA in a random-effects model. In a comparison of DEB and DES, the risk of TLR (OR: 0.92, 95% CrI: 0.43 to 1.90) was similar. The risk of MI or all-cause mortality was lowest in the DEB group compared with the DES and POBA groups, which did not meet statistical significance. The risk of major adverse cardiac events, which was mainly driven by TLR, was also significantly lower in the DEB or and DES group (OR: 0.28, 95% CrI: 0.14 to 0.53) than in the POBA group, but it was similar between the DEB and DES groups (OR: 0.84, 95% CrI: 0.45 to 1.50). The probability of being ranked as the best treatment was 59.9% (DEB), 40.1% (DES), and 0.1% (POBA) in terms of TLR, whereas it was 63.0% (DEB), 35.3% (POBA), and 1.7% (DES) in terms of MI. CONCLUSIONS Local drug delivery by DEB or DES for ISR lesions was markedly better than POBA in preventing TLR, but not for MI or mortality. Among the 2 different strategies of drug delivery for ISR lesions, treatment with DEB showed a trend of less development of MI than did treatment with DES.

Diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for lung cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated inconsistent associations between diabetes mellitus and the risk of lung cancer. To determine whether diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of observational studies. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for observational studies conducted prior to September 2012. We included prospective cohort studies that reported relative risks and case-control studies that showed odds ratios in the analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated with a random effects model. Sensitivity analysis was performed with studies which controlled for smoking status. Associations were assessed in several subgroups representing different participant and study characteristics. RESULTS A total of 34 studies from 24 manuscripts (10 case-control studies and 24 cohort studies) were included in the analyses. Diabetes was significantly associated with the increased risk of lung cancer compared with non-diabetic controls when limiting the analysis to studies adjusting for smoking status (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20; I(2)=46.1%). By contrast, this association disappeared when the analysis was restricted to studies not adjusting for smoking status (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11; I(2)=96.7%). When stratifying by sex, an increased risk of lung cancer was prominent in diabetic women (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.20; I(2)=0%), while there was no association in diabetic men (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89-1.28; I(2)=96.6%). Among diabetic women, significantly increased risks of lung cancer were found in the following subgroups: cohort studies (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20; I(2)=0%), studies controlling for major confounding variables such as age, smoking and alcohol (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00-1.43; I(2)=23.1%), studies with long-term follow-up (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20; I(2)=0%), and high-quality studies assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20; I(2)=0%). INTERPRETATION Preexisting diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of lung cancer, especially among female diabetic patients. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to test specifically the effect of diabetes mellitus on lung cancer risk.

Comparison of endothelialization and neointimal formation with stents coated with antibodies against CD34 and vascular endothelial-cadherin.

Vascular endothelial-cadherin (VE-cadherin) is exclusively expressed on the late endothelial progenitor cells (EPC). Therefore, VE-cadherin could be an ideal target surface molecule to capture circulating late EPC. In the present study, we evaluated whether anti-VE-cadherin antibody-coated stents (VE-cad stents) might accelerate endothelial recovery and reduce neointimal formation more than anti-CD34 antibody-coated stents (CD34 stents) through the superior ability to capture the late EPC. The stainless steel stents were coated with anti-human VE-cadherin antibodies or anti-human CD34 antibodies under the same condition. In vitro, VE-cad stents showed higher number of adhering EPC (823.6 ± 182.2 versus 379.2 ± 137.2 cells per HPF, p < 0.001). VE-cad stents also demonstrated better specific capturing of cells with endothelial lineage markers than CD34 stents did in flow cytometric analysis. VE-cad stents showed more effective re-endothelialization after 1 h, 24 h, and 3 days in vivo. At 42 days, VE-cad stents demonstrated significantly smaller neointima area (0.92 ± 0.38 versus 1.24 ± 0.41 mm(2), p = 0.002) and significantly lower PCNA positive cells in neointima (1684.8 ± 658.8/mm(2) versus 2681.7 ± 375.1/mm(2), p = 0.008), compared with CD34 stents. In conclusion, VE-cad stents captured EPC and endothelial cells more selectively in vitro, accelerated re-endothelialization over stents, and reduced neointimal formation in vivo, compared with CD34 stents.

Coronary Artery Axial Plaque Stress and its Relationship With Lesion Geometry : Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Coronary CT Angiography

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to characterize the hemodynamic force acting on plaque and to investigate its relationship with lesion geometry. BACKGROUND Coronary plaque rupture occurs when plaque stress exceeds plaque strength. METHODS Computational fluid dynamics was applied to 114 lesions (81 patients) from coronary computed tomography angiography. The axial plaque stress (APS) was computed by extracting the axial component of hemodynamic stress acting on stenotic lesions, and the axial lesion asymmetry was assessed by the luminal radius change over length (radius gradient [RG]). Lesions were divided into upstream-dominant (upstream RG > downstream RG) and downstream-dominant lesions (upstream RG < downstream RG) according to the RG. RESULTS Thirty-three lesions (28.9%) showed net retrograde axial plaque force. Upstream APS linearly increased as lesion severity increased, whereas downstream APS exhibited a concave function for lesion severity. There was a negative correlation (r = -0.274, p = 0.003) between APS and lesion length. The pressure gradient, computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), and wall shear stress were consistently higher in upstream segments, regardless of the lesion asymmetry. However, APS was higher in the upstream segment of upstream-dominant lesions (11,371.96 ± 5,575.14 dyne/cm(2) vs. 6,878.14 ± 4,319.51 dyne/cm(2), p < 0.001), and in the downstream segment of downstream-dominant lesions (7,681.12 ± 4,556.99 dyne/cm(2) vs. 11,990.55 ± 5,556.64 dyne/cm(2), p < 0.001). Although there were no differences in FFRCT, % diameter stenosis, and wall shear stress pattern, the distribution of APS was different between upstream- and downstream-dominant lesions. CONCLUSIONS APS uniquely characterizes the stenotic segment and has a strong relationship with lesion geometry. Clinical application of these hemodynamic and geometric indices may be helpful to assess the future risk of plaque rupture and to determine treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. (Evaluation of FFR, WSS, and TPF Using CCTA; NCT01857687).

Integrated Physiologic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease in Real-World Practice Using Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve Insights From the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry

Background—The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is a quantitative and specific index for coronary microcirculation. However, the distribution and determinants of IMR have not been fully investigated in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods and Results—Consecutive patients who underwent elective measurement of both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and IMR were enrolled from 8 centers in 5 countries. Patients with acute myocardial infarction were excluded. To adjust for the influence of collateral flow, IMR values were corrected with Yong’s formula (IMRcorr). High IMR was defined as greater than the 75th percentile in each of the major coronary arteries. FFR⩽0.80 was defined as an ischemic value. 1096 patients with 1452 coronary arteries were analyzed (mean age 61.1, male 71.2%). Mean FFR was 0.84 and median IMRcorr was 16.6 U (Q1, Q3 12.4 U, 23.0 U). There was no correlation between IMRcorr and FFR values (r=0.01, P=0.62), and the categorical agreement of FFR and IMRcorr was low (kappa value=−0.04, P=0.10). There was no correlation between IMRcorr and angiographic % diameter stenosis (r=−0.03, P=0.25). Determinants of high IMR were previous myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24–3.74, P=0.01), right coronary artery (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.54–2.84, P<0.01), female (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.18–2.38, P<0.01), and obesity (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31–2.49, P<0.01). Determinants of FFR ⩽0.80 were left anterior descending coronary artery (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.92–6.36, P<0.01), angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% (OR 5.16, 95% CI 3.66–7.28, P<0.01), male (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.38–3.35, P<0.01), and age (per 10 years, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.46, P=0.04). Conclusions—IMR showed no correlation with FFR and angiographic lesion severity, and the predictors of high IMR value were different from those for ischemic FFR value. Therefore, integration of IMR into FFR measurement may provide additional insights regarding the relative contribution of macro- and microvascular disease in patients with ischemic heart disease. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02186093.

Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography

Background—Recent evidence suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging is improved by quantifying stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) in absolute terms. We evaluated a comprehensive quantitative 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (13NH3-PET) diagnostic panel, including stress MBF, coronary flow reserve (CFR), and relative flow reserve (RFR) in conjunction with relative perfusion defect (PD) assessments to better detect functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Methods and Results—A total of 130 patients (307 vessels) with coronary artery disease underwent both 13NH3-PET and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Diagnostic accuracy, optimal cut points, and discrimination indices of respective 13NH3-PET quantitative measures were compared, with FFR as standard reference. The capacity to discern disease with stepwise addition of stress MBF, CFR, and RFR to qualitatively assessed relative PD was also gauged, using the category-free net reclassification index. All quantitative measures showed significant correlation with FFR (PET-derived CFR, r=0.388; stress MBF, r=0.496; and RFR, r=0.780; all P<0.001). Optimal respective cut points for FFR ⩽0.8 and ⩽0.75 were 1.99 and 1.84 mL/min per g for stress MBF and 2.12 and 2.00 for PET-derived CFR. Discrimination indices of quantitative measures that correlated with FFR ⩽0.8 were all significantly higher than that of relative PD (area under the curve: 0.626, 0.730, 0.806, and 0.897 for relative PD, CFR, stress MBF, and RFR, respectively; overall comparison P<0.001). The capacity for functionally significant coronary stenosis was incrementally improved by the successive addition of CFR (net reclassification index=0.629), stress MBF (net reclassification index=0.950), and RFR (net reclassification index=1.253; all P<0.001) to relative PD. Conclusions—Integrating quantitative 13NH3-PET measures with qualitative myocardial perfusion assessment provides superior diagnostic accuracy and improves the capacity to detect functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01621438 and NCT01366404.

Efficacy of Short-Term High-Dose Statin Pretreatment in Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Updated Study-Level Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Controlled Trials

Background There have been conflicting results across the trials that evaluated prophylactic efficacy of short-term high-dose statin pre-treatment for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG). The aim of the study was to perform an up-to-date meta-analysis regarding the efficacy of high-dose statin pre-treatment in preventing CIAKI. Methods and Results Randomized-controlled trials comparing high-dose statin versus low-dose statin or placebo pre-treatment for prevention of CIAKI in patients undergoing CAG were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CIAKI within 2–5days after CAG. The relative risk (RR) with 95% CI was the effect measure. This analysis included 13 RCTs with 5,825 total patients; about half of them (n = 2,889) were pre-treated with high-dose statin (at least 40 mg of atorvastatin) before CAG, and the remainders (n = 2,936) pretreated with low-dose statin or placebo. In random-effects model, high-dose statin pre-treatment significantly reduced the incidence of CIAKI (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35–0.57, p<0.001, I2 = 8.2%, NNT 16), compared with low-dose statin or placebo. The benefit of high-dose statin was consistent in both comparisons with low-dose statin (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34–0.65, p<0.001, I2 = 28.4%, NNT 19) or placebo (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21–0.58, p<0.001, I2 = 0.0%, NNT 16). In addition, high-dose statin showed significant reduction of CIAKI across various subgroups of chronic kidney disease, acute coronary syndrome, and old age (≥60years), regardless of osmolality of contrast or administration of N-acetylcystein. Conclusions High-dose statin pre-treatment significantly reduced overall incidence of CIAKI in patients undergoing CAG, and emerges as an effective prophylactic measure to prevent CIAKI.

Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease

Aims There are limited data on the clinical implications of total physiologic atherosclerotic burden assessed by invasive physiologic studies in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the prognostic implications of total physiologic atherosclerotic burden assessed by total sum of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in three vessels (3V-FFR). Methods and results A total of 1136 patients underwent FFR measurement in three vessels (3V FFR-FRIENDS study, NCT01621438). The patients were classified into high and low 3V-FFR groups according to the median value of 3V-FFR (2.72). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven revascularization) at 2 years. Mean angiographic percent diameter stenosis and FFR were 43.7 ± 19.3% and 0.90 ± 0.08, respectively. There was a negative correlation between 3V-FFR and estimated 2-year MACE rate (P < 0.001). The patients in low 3V-FFR group showed a higher risk of 2-year MACE than those in the high 3V-FFR group [(7.1% vs. 3.8%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.205, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.201-4.048, P = 0.011]. The higher 2-year MACE rate was mainly driven by the higher rate of ischaemia-driven revascularization in the low 3V-FFR group (6.2% vs. 2.7%, HR 2.568, 95% CI 1.283-5.140, P = 0.008). In a multivariable adjusted model, low 3V-FFR was an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.031, 95% CI 1.078-3.830, P = 0.029). Conclusion Patients with high total physiologic atherosclerotic burden assessed by 3V-FFR showed higher risk of 2-year clinical events than those with low total physiologic atherosclerotic burden. The difference was mainly driven by ischaemia-driven revascularization for both functionally significant and insignificant lesions at baseline. Three-vessel FFR might be used as a prognostic indicator in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinical trial registration 3V FFR-FRIENDS study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01621438, NCT01621438).