Jordan P. Feekings
Technical University of Denmark
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jordan P. Feekings.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Jordan P. Feekings; Valerio Bartolino; Niels Madsen; Tom Catchpole
Discards represent one of the most important issues within current commercial fishing. It occurs for a range of reasons and is influenced by an even more complex array of factors. We address this issue by examining the data collected within the Danish discard observer program and describe the factors that influence discarding within the Danish Kattegat demersal fleet over the period 1997 to 2008. Generalised additive models were used to assess how discards of the 3 main target species, Norway lobster, cod and plaice, and their subcomponents (under and over minimum landings size) are influenced by important factors and their potential relevance to management. Our results show that discards are influenced by a range of different factors that are different for each species and portion of discards. We argue that knowledge about the factors influential to discarding and their use in relation to potential mitigation measures are essential for future fisheries management strategies.
Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science | 2016
Bent Herrmann; Ludvig Ahm Krag; Jordan P. Feekings; Thomas Noack
Abstract Danish seining is an important fishing method used to harvest demersal species. Knowledge about the size selectivity of different demersal species with this type of fishing gear is therefore of importance for managing the exploitation of marine resources. However, there are only limited data on size selection in cod ends in this fishery. Sea trials were therefore carried out to collect size selectivity data for Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua, Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus, and Witch Flounder Glyptocephalus cynoglossus for a diamond-mesh cod end. For all three species, the data were best described by a double logistic selection curve, implying that two different size selection processes occur in the cod end. The double selection process could be explained by an additional selection process occurring through slack meshes. The results imply that the escapement of 46% and 34% of the larger Atlantic Cod and Haddock (those above 48 cm), respectively, would be through wide-open or slack meshes. Since these mesh states are only likely to be present in the latest stage of the fishing process (e.g., when the cod end is near the surface), a large fraction of the bigger fish probably escaped near the surface, which might influence their likelihood of survival. Furthermore, based on the models established for explaining the experimental size selection, we were able to predict the effect of changing the mesh size on cod end size selection in the Danish seine fishery.
Ices Journal of Marine Science | 2016
Sara Hornborg; Patrik Jonsson; Mattias Sköld; Mats Ulmestrand; Daniel Valentinsson; Ole Ritzau Eigaard; Jordan P. Feekings; J. Rasmus Nielsen; Francois Bastardie; Johan Lövgren
&NA; The European Common Fisheries Policy has in its 2013 reform increased in complexity, such as a call for coherence with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and a landing obligation, posing new requirements and challenges to managers, scientists and the fishing industry. Therefore, re‐evaluations of current practice are important as a basis for management actions. The Swedish fishery for Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in the Kattegat‐Skagerrak area provides an interesting case study of relevance to emerging policies. Sprung from an unbalance in available fish‐ and Nephrops quotas and an ambition to protect coastal areas, the current fishery has been directed towards three separate fisheries (mixed trawling, directed trawling using a sorting grid and creeling). Studying direct and indirect effects from alternative Swedish quota allocations among gear types is therefore interesting. Accordingly, a screening study was conducted, taking into consideration area‐gear interactions in catch rates, to compare the three different fisheries regarding quantified pressures on the target species, the by‐catch species, and on the seafloor, as well as to qualitatively discuss social and economic dimensions. In the next step, alternative quota allocations were studied. In Swedish fisheries, we show that creeling offers a substantial reduction of fishing mortality of both undersized Nephrops and fish and a reduced seafloor pressure per landed kilo of Nephrops. Given that the fishing areas in many cases may be interchangeable between gears, allocating a larger quota share to creels in the Swedish fishery would therefore contribute to the integration of fisheries‐ and environmental management as called for in the new policies.
African Journal of Marine Science | 2015
Paulus Inekela Kainge; Kai Wieland; Jordan P. Feekings
Diel patterns in survey trawl catches for the Cape hakes Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus off Namibia were studied in order to examine the effect of diel bias on catchability, and its implication for survey abundance estimation and the consistency of the survey time-series. Catch rates (numbers per haul) by species and length from summer demersal biomass surveys conducted during the period 2002–2013 were used, together with a computation of the corresponding light-level data from which the solar zenith angles were obtained. Generalised additive models were fitted to assess the relationship between the catches and a number of explanatory variables. Significant covariates were zenith angle, depth and geographical position. The final models explained 78% and 59% of the variability in catch rates of M. capensis and M. paradoxus, respectively. For M. capensis, the response to zenith angle increased sharply for values above 100°, which represents the time between sunset and sunrise. For M. paradoxus there was a moderate increase in the response to zenith angle during the night. In cases where some fishing took place at night in shallow water, the survey results for M. capensis were more greatly affected than was the case for M. paradoxus, which is related to the different depth preference of the two species. Fishing in depths shallower than 400 m outside daylight hours should therefore be avoided in order to reduce bias and ensure consistency in abundance estimates from surveys.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Tiago Veiga-Malta; Jordan P. Feekings; Bent Herrmann; Ludvig Ahm Krag
There is general pressure throughout the world’s fisheries for the industry to have greater involvement not only in the development of fishing gears but also in the testing and documentation of their effect. In the European Union, the Common Fisheries Policy of 2013, together with the proposed reform of the technical measures regulation, highlights the need for greater flexibility in fisheries through increased stakeholder involvement. To achieve this flexibility, there is a need for additional fishing gears available to the fishermen. A way to facilitate this is to have the industry take part in the development and testing of fishing gears, as well as collect data on their performance. However, to have a successful industry-collected data programme, fishermen have to be able to collect data on the length of a portion of the catch. In this study, we determine how many individuals need to be measured to correctly evaluate the relative selective performance of a new gear compared to a standard gear. The evaluation was carried out by analysing catch ratio curves, their associated uncertainties, and the trade-offs between uncertainties and sampling effort. Results show that with relatively small sample sizes (500 to 1000 individuals) it is possible to correctly evaluate the performance of a gear for a given species. By having the industry develop and test their own gears, as well as being involved in the collection of data, the number of potential gear solutions available to address the different issues emerging in the fisheries is increased.
Archive | 2018
Ewen Bell; Annika Clements; Helen Dobby; Jennifer Doyle; Jordan P. Feekings; Ana Leocádio; Colm Lordan; Adrian Weetman; Kai Wieland
General information State: Published Organisations: National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Section for Ecosystem based Marine Management, Section for Monitoring and Data Contributors: Bell, E., Clements, A., Dobby, H., Doyle, J., Feekings, J. P., Leocádio, A., Lordan, C., Weetman, A., Wieland, K., Leocádio, A. (ed.), Weetman, A. (ed.), Wieland, K. (ed.) Number of pages: 49 Publication date: 2018
Ices Journal of Marine Science | 2014
S.S. Uhlmann; Aloysius T. M. van Helmond; Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir; Sigríður Sigurðardóttir; John Haralabous; Jose M. Bellido; Aina Carbonell; Tom Catchpole; Dimitrios Damalas; Laurence Fauconnet; Jordan P. Feekings; Teresa Ortiz García; Niels Madsen; Sandra Mallold; Sveinn Margeirsson; Andreas Palialexis; Lisa Readdy; Julio Valeiras; Vassiliki Vassilopoulou; Marie-Joëlle Rochet
Ices Journal of Marine Science | 2014
T.L. Catchpole; Jordan P. Feekings; Niels Madsen; Andreas Palialexis; Vassiliki Vassilopoulou; Julio Valeiras; Teresa Ortiz García; Natacha Nikolic; Marie-Joëlle Rochet
Marine Policy | 2015
Sigríður Sigurðardóttir; Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir; Harriet M. Condie; Sveinn Margeirsson; T.L. Catchpole; Jose M. Bellido; Søren Qvist Eliasen; Raquel Goñi; Niels Madsen; Andreas Palialexis; S.S. Uhlmann; Vassiliki Vassilopoulou; Jordan P. Feekings; Marie-Joëlle Rochet
Fisheries Research | 2014
Harald Wienbeck; Bent Herrmann; Jordan P. Feekings; Daniel Stepputtis; Waldemar Moderhak