Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jordan Riley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jordan Riley.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2013

DE-STAR: Phased-array laser technology for planetary defense and other scientific purposes

Gary B. Hughes; Philip Lubin; Johanna Bible; Jesse Bublitz; Josh Arriola; Caio Motta; Jon Suen; Isabella Johansson; Jordan Riley; Nilou Sarvian; Jane Wu; Andrew Milich; Mitch Oleson; Mark Pryor

Current strategies for diverting threatening asteroids require dedicated operations for every individual object. We propose a stand-off, Earth-orbiting system capable of vaporizing the surface of asteroids as a futuristic but feasible approach to impact risk mitigation. We call the system DE-STAR (Directed Energy System for Targeting of Asteroids and exploRation). DE-STAR is a modular phased array of laser amplifiers, powered by solar photovoltaic panels. Lowcost development of test systems is possible with existing technology. Larger arrays could be tested in sub-orbital demonstrations, leading eventually to an orbiting system. Design requirements are established by seeking to vaporize the surface of an asteroid, with ejected material creating a reaction force to alter the asteroid’s orbit. A proposed system goal would be to raise the surface spot temperature to <3,000K, evaporating all known substances. Engagement distance required for successful diversion depends on the asteroid’s mass, composition and approach velocity. Distance to focus and desired surface spot temperature then determine laser array size. Volatile-laden objects (such as comets) ~100m wide and approaching at 5km/s could be diverted by initiating engagement at ~0.05AU, requiring a laser array of ~100m side length. Phased array configuration allows multiple beams, so a single DE-STAR of sufficient size would be capable of targeting several threats simultaneously. An orbiting DE-STAR could serve diverse scientific objectives, such as propulsion of kinetic asteroid interceptors or other interplanetary spacecraft. Vaporization of debris in Earth orbit could be accomplished with a ~10m array. Beyond the primary task of Earth defense, numerous functions are envisioned.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

Directed Energy Active Illumination for Near-Earth Object Detection

Jordan Riley; Philip Lubin; Gary B. Hughes; Hugh O'Neill; P. R. Meinhold; Jonathan Y. Suen; Johanna Bible; Isabella Johansson; Janelle Griswold; Brianna Cook

On 15 February 2013, a previously unknown ~20 m asteroid struck Earth near Chelyabinsk, Russia, releasing kinetic energy equivalent to ~570 kt TNT. Detecting objects like the Chelyabinsk impactor that are orbiting near Earth is a difficult task, in part because such objects spend much of their own orbits in the direction of the Sun when viewed from Earth. Efforts aimed at protecting Earth from future impacts will rely heavily on continued discovery. Ground-based optical observatory networks and Earth-orbiting spacecraft with infrared sensors have dramatically increased the pace of discovery. Still, less than 5% of near-Earth objects (NEOs) ≥100 m/~100 Mt TNT have been identified, and the proportion of known objects decreases rapidly for smaller sizes. Low emissivity of some objects also makes detection by passive sensors difficult. A proposed orbiting laser phased array directed energy system could be used for active illumination of NEOs, enhancing discovery particularly for smaller and lower emissivity objects. Laser fiber amplifiers emit very narrow-band energy, simplifying detection. Results of simulated illumination scenarios are presented based on an orbiting emitter array with specified characteristics. Simulations indicate that return signals from small and low emissivity objects is strong enough to detect. The possibility for both directed and full sky blind surveys is discussed, and the resulting diameter and mass limits for objects in different observational scenarios. The ability to determine both position and speed of detected objects is also discussed.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

Effects of asteroid rotation on directed energy deflection

Isabella Johansson; Tatiana Tsareva; Janelle Griswold; Philip Lubin; Gary B. Hughes; Hugh O'Neill; P. R. Meinhold; Jonathan Y. Suen; Qicheng Zhang; Jordan Riley; Carl Melis; Kevin J. Walsh; Travis Brashears; Justin Bollag; Shana Mathew; Johanna Bible

Asteroids that threaten Earth could be deflected from their orbits using laser directed energy or concentrated solar energy to vaporize the surface; the ejected plume would create a reaction thrust that pushes the object away from its collision course with Earth. One concern regarding directed energy deflection approaches is that asteroids rotate as they orbit the Sun. Asteroid rotation reduces the average thrust and changes the thrust vector imparting a time profile to the thrust. A directed energy system must deliver sufficient flux to evaporate surface material even when the asteroid is rotating. Required flux levels depend on surface material composition and albedo, thermal and bulk mechanical properties of the asteroid, and asteroid rotation rate. In the present work we present results of simulations for directed energy ejecta-plume asteroid threat mitigation. We use the observed distribution of asteroid rotational rates, along with a range of material and mechanical properties, as input to a thermal-physical model of plume generation. We calculate the expected thrust profile for rotating objects. Standoff directed energy schemes that deliver at least 10 MW/m2 generate significant thrust for all but the highest conceivable rotation rates.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2015

Stand-off molecular composition analysis

Gary B. Hughes; Philip Lubin; P. R. Meinhold; Hugh O'Neill; Travis Brashears; Qicheng Zhang; Janelle Griswold; Jordan Riley; Caio Motta

Molecular composition of distant stars is explored by observing absorption spectra. The star produces blackbody radiation that passes through the molecular cloud of vaporized material surrounding the star. Characteristic absorption lines are discernible with a spectrometer, and molecular composition is investigated by comparing spectral observations with known material profiles. Most objects in the solar system—asteroids, comets, planets, moons—are too cold to be interrogated in this manner. Molecular clouds around cold objects consist primarily of volatiles, so bulk composition cannot be probed. Additionally, low volatile density does not produce discernible absorption lines in the faint signal generated by low blackbody temperatures. This paper describes a system for probing the molecular composition of cold solar system targets from a distant vantage. The concept utilizes a directed energy beam to melt and vaporize a spot on a distant target, such as from a spacecraft orbiting the object. With sufficient flux (~10 MW/m2), the spot temperature rises rapidly (to ~2 500 K), and evaporation of all materials on the target surface occurs. The melted spot creates a high-temperature blackbody source, and ejected material creates a molecular plume in front of the spot. Bulk composition is investigated by using a spectrometer to view the heated spot through the ejected material. Spatial composition maps could be created by scanning the surface. Applying the beam to a single spot continuously produces a borehole, and shallow sub-surface composition profiling is also possible. Initial simulations of absorption profiles with laser heating show great promise for molecular composition analysis.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

Optical modeling for a laser phased-array directed energy system

Gary B. Hughes; Philip Lubin; Janelle Griswold; Brianna Cook; Durante Bozzini; Hugh O'Neill; P. R. Meinhold; Jonathan Y. Suen; Johanna Bible; Jordan Riley; Isabella Johansson; Mark Pryor; Miikka Kangas

We present results of optical simulations for a laser phased array directed energy system. The laser array consists of individual optical elements in a square or hexagonal array. In a multi-element array, the far-field beam pattern depends on both mechanical pointing stability and on phase relationships between individual elements. The simulation incorporates realistic pointing and phase errors. Pointing error components include systematic offsets to simulate manufacturing and assembly variations. Pointing also includes time-varying errors that simulate structural vibrations, informed from random vibration analysis of the mechanical design. Phase errors include systematic offsets, and time-varying errors due to both mechanical vibration and temperature variation in the fibers. The optical simulation is used to determine beam pattern and pointing jitter over a range of composite error inputs. Results are also presented for a 1 m aperture array with 10 kW total power, designed as a stand-off system on a dedicated asteroid diversion/capture mission that seeks to evaporate the surface of the target at a distance of beyond 10 km. Phase stability across the array of λ/10 is shown to provide beam control that is sufficient to vaporize the surface of a target at 10 km. The model is also a useful tool for characterizing performance for phase controller design in relation to beam formation and pointing.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2013

Directed energy planetary defense

Philip Lubin; Gary B. Hughes; Johanna Bible; Jesse Bublitz; Josh Arriola; Caio Motta; Jon Suen; Isabella Johansson; Jordan Riley; Nilou Sarvian; Deborah Clayton-Warwick; Jane Wu; Andrew Milich; Mitch Oleson; Mark Pryor; Peter Krogen; Miikka Kangas

Asteroids and comets that cross Earth’s orbit pose a credible risk of impact, with potentially severe disturbances to Earth and society. Numerous risk mitigation strategies have been described, most involving dedicated missions to a threatening object. We propose an orbital planetary defense system capable of heating the surface of potentially hazardous objects to the vaporization point as a feasible approach to impact risk mitigation. We call the system DE-STAR for Directed Energy System for Targeting of Asteroids and exploRation. DE-STAR is a modular phased array of kilowatt class lasers powered by photovoltaics. Modular design allows for incremental development, test, and initial deployment, lowering cost, minimizing risk, and allowing for technological co-development, leading eventually to an orbiting structure that would be developed in stages with both technological and target milestones. The main objective of DE-STAR is to use the focused directed energy to raise the surface spot temperature to ~3,000K, allowing direct vaporization of all known substances. In the process of heating the surface ejecting evaporated material a large reaction force would alter the asteroid’s orbit. The baseline system is a DE-STAR 3 or 4 (1-10km array) depending on the degree of protection desired. A DE-STAR 4 allows for asteroid engagement starting beyond 1AU with a spot temperature sufficient to completely evaporate up to 500-m diameter asteroids in one year. Small asteroids and comets can be diverted/evaporated with a DESTAR 2 (100m) while space debris is vaporized with a DE-STAR 1 (10m).


Proceedings of SPIE | 2015

Local phase control for a planar array of fiber laser amplifiers

Patrick Steffanic; Benjamin T. Johannes; Claudia A. Sison; Gary B. Hughes; Philip Lubin; P. R. Meinhold; Johnathan Suen; Hugh O'Neill; Miikka Kangas; Travis Brashears; Qicheng Zhang; Janelle Griswold; Jordan Riley; Caio Motta

Arrays of phase-locked lasers have been developed for numerous directed-energy applications. Phased-array designs are capable of producing higher beam intensity than similar sized multi-beam emitters, and also allow beam steering and beam profile manipulation. In phased-array designs, individual emitter phases must be controllable, based on suitable feedback. Most current control schemes sample individual emitter phases, such as with an array-wide beam splitter, and compare to a master phase reference. Reliance on a global beam splitter limits scalability to larger array sizes due to lack of design modularity. This paper describes a conceptual design and control scheme that relies only on feedback from the array structure itself. A modular and scalable geometry is based on individual hexagonal frames for each emitter; each frame cell consists of a conventional lens mounted in front of the fiber tip. A rigid phase tap structure physically connects two adjacent emitter frame cells. A target sensor is mounted on top of the phase tap, representing the local alignment datum. Optical sensors measure the relative position of the phase tap and target sensor. The tap senses the exit phase of both emitters relative to the target normal plane, providing information to the phase controller for each emitter. As elements are added to the array, relative local position data between adjacent phase taps allows accurate prediction of the relative global position of emitters across the array, providing additional constraints to the phase controllers. The approach is scalable for target distance and number of emitters without loss of control.


Advances in Space Research | 2016

Directed energy missions for planetary defense

Philip Lubin; Gary B. Hughes; Mike Eskenazi; Kelly Kosmo; Isabella Johansson; Janelle Griswold; Mark Pryor; Hugh O’Neill; P. R. Meinhold; Jonathan Y. Suen; Jordan Riley; Qicheng Zhang; Kevin J. Walsh; Carl Melis; Miikka Kangas; Caio Motta; Travis Brashears


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

DE-STARLITE: A directed energy planetary defense mission

Kelly Kosmo; Mark Pryor; Philip Lubin; Gary B. Hughes; Hugh O'Neill; P. R. Meinhold; Jonathan Y. Suen; Jordan Riley; Janelle Griswold; Brianna Cook; Isabella Johansson; Qicheng Zhang; Kevin J. Walsh; Carl Melis; Miikka Kangas; Johanna Bible; Caio Motta; Travis Brashears; Shana Mathew; Justin Bollag


SPIE | 2014

Toward directed energy planetary defense

Philip Lubin; Gary B. Hughes; Johanna Bible; Jesse Bublitz; Josh Arriola; Caio Motta; Jon Suen; Isabella Johansson; Jordan Riley; Nilou Sarvian; Deborah Clayton-Warwick; Jane Wu; Andrew Milich; Mitch Oleson; Mark Pryor; Peter Krogen; Miikka Kangas; Hugh O’Neill

Collaboration


Dive into the Jordan Riley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary B. Hughes

California Polytechnic State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip Lubin

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caio Motta

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johanna Bible

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. R. Meinhold

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugh O'Neill

California Polytechnic State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miikka Kangas

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge